ABSTRACT
Background: Primary cardiac tumours are rare, accounting for only 0.002-0.03% at autopsy. Cardiac haemangiomas are benign vascular tumours and constitute for 0.28% of all primary cardiac tumours. Cavernous haemangiomas, capillary haemangiomas, and arteriovenous haemangiomas are three distinct types. Cardiac haemangiomas are often misdiagnosed as myxomas and must be differentiated from malignant angiosarcomas. Case summary: We present a 44-year-old Mediterranean male patient with a cavernous haemangioma in the inferior vena cava and right atrium, detected on transthoracic echocardiography. The patient experienced palpitations and dyspnoea on exertion. Computed tomography (CT) angiography revealed a 7.5 × 6 × 5â cm mass suspected to be perfused by the distal right coronary artery. A watch-and-wait approach was suggested, leading to a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast 6 months later. T1 mapping exhibited a prolonged relaxation time and isointensity to the myocardium. T2 mapping revealed a homogenous hyperintense mass with heterogenous late enhancement. Surgical excision was performed using a bicaval cannulation technique on cardiopulmonary bypass. Intraoperatively, no connection to the coronaries was noted. At 1 year follow-up, the patient reported restored physical resilience, with no evidence of tumour recurrence. Discussion: Clinical symptoms of cardiac cavernous haemangiomas are unspecific and become evident once the tumour grows. To investigate the nature and vascular involvement of the tumour, a contrast-enhanced CT angiography or MRI can be performed. Cardiac haemangiomas are often misdiagnosed and must be differentiated from malignant angiosarcomas. Clear guidelines for the treatment of cardiac haemangiomas in adult patients are lacking. Primary cardiac tumours require thorough investigation, and surgical intervention should be tailored to the individual's case.
ABSTRACT
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in COVID-19-related pulmonary failure and the number of patients recovering from COVID-19 is growing. Here, we assess survival and recovery 6 months after ECMO for COVID-19. From April 2020 to September 2021, n = 60 (60.5 [51.0-65.0] years, 23.3% female) were treated with venovenous/venoarterial ECMO for COVID-19. 41.7% were weaned off ECMO, survival-to-discharge was 40.0% (n = 24). Age (63.0 [60.0-66.8] vs. 55.0 [43.8-60.0] years, p < 0.001), vasoactive support (97.2% vs . 75.0%, p = 0.013), and pre-ECMO SOFA scores (13.0 [12.0-14.8] vs. 12.0 [10.0-13.8] p = 0.036) correlated with nonsurvival. All patients aged >65 years, with histories of neoplasia, immunocompromise, chronic renal failure, or frailty died. After 6 months, 20 were alive (6-month survival 33.3%, survival conditioned on survival-to-discharge 83.3%), with follow-up in 19. 57.9% showed no relevant, 26.3% moderate, 15.8% severe deficits. Cardiopulmonary status was satisfactory (mMRC level: 84.2% ≤2). 73.7% were independent in daily life. Cognitive impairments were frequent (52.6%). 26.3% showed moderate depression, 15.8% posttraumatic stress disorder. Social and work life were considerably affected. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation thus can serve as salvage therapy in COVID-19, but advanced age, immunocompromise, histories of neoplasia, and frailty must be considered as relative contraindications. Age, vasoactive support, and SOFA scores assist discriminating in daily practice. Deficits after 6 months are substantial, and efforts need to focus on long-term recovery.
