Frailty among older surgical patients and risk of hospital acquired adverse events: The South-Western Sydney frailty and nurse sensitive indicators study.

BACKGROUND: While advances in healthcare mean people are living longer, increasing frailty is a potential consequence of this. The relationship between frailty among older surgical patients and hospital acquired adverse events has not been extensively explored. We sought to describe the relationship between increasing frailty among older surgical patients and the risk of hospital acquired adverse events. METHODS: We included consecutive surgical admissions among patients aged 70 years or more across the SWSLHD between January 2010 and December 2020. This study used routinely collected ICD-10-AM data, obtained from the government maintained Admitted Patient Data Collection. The relationships between cumulative frailty deficit items and risk of hospital acquired adverse events were assessed using Poisson regression modelling. This study followed the RECORD/STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: During the study period, 44,721 (57% women) older adults were admitted, and 41% (25,306) were planned surgical admissions. The risk of all adverse events increased with increasing number of frailty deficit items, the highest deficit items group (4-12 deficit items) compared with the lowest deficit items group (0 or 1 deficit item): falls adjusted rate ratio (adj RR) = 15.3, (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.1, 19.42); pressure injury adj RR = 21.3 (95% CI 12.53, 36.16); delirium adj RR = 40.9 (95% CI 31.21, 53.55); pneumonia adj RR = 16.5 (95% CI 12.74, 21.27); thromboembolism adj RR = 17.3 (95% CI 4.4, 11.92); and hospital mortality adj RR = 6.2 (95% CI 5.18, 7.37). CONCLUSION: The increase in number of cumulative frailty deficit items among older surgical patients was associated with a higher risk of adverse hospital events. The link offers an opportunity to clinical nursing professionals in the surgical setting, to develop and implement targeted models of care and ensure the best outcomes for frail older adults and their families.

Perioperative diabetes management of adult patients with diabetes: a best practice implementation project.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this project were to conduct a retrospective healthcare records audit to determine the current compliance with evidence-based criteria regarding perioperative management of patients with diabetes; to identify barriers and facilitators to achieve compliance and develop strategies to address areas of non-compliance, and to implement evidence-based best practice recommendations for perioperative diabetic management and to assess the effectiveness of these strategies in improving compliance of perioperative diabetic management across five participating clinical areas in a large tertiary referral hospital. INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes is a frequent co-morbidity among inpatients. It affects up to 20% of the general surgical population. Patients with diabetes undergoing surgery have a greater complication rate and length of hospital stay. Optimization of diabetes management of hospitalized patients will improve quality of care delivery, prevent postoperative complications and reduce length of stay and costs. However, there is limited knowledge and understanding of whether the current nursing practices concerning perioperative diabetic management meet the best practice recommendations outlined by JBI best practice criteria. METHODS: A pre-post intervention healthcare record audit was conducted to examine compliance with nine best practice recommendations for perioperative diabetic management across five clinical areas. Following pre-intervention data analysis along with two focus group discussions, barriers to compliance with best practice criteria were identified and targeted strategies were used to address the issues. This project used the JBI Practice Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) tools. RESULTS: Face to face education sessions and educational resources relating to perioperative diabetic management were delivered to nursing staff, which resulted in improved compliance for most of the audit criteria, with significant improvement in the areas of regular blood glucose level monitoring and nursing staff receiving education and training in the post-implementation analysis.

Nutritional screening, assessment and implementation strategies for adults in an Australian acute tertiary hospital: a best practice implementation report.

OBJECTIVE: The project aimed to improve the effectiveness of nutritional screening and assessment practices through clinical audits and the implementation of evidence-based practice recommendations. INTRODUCTION: In the absence of optimal nutrition, health may decline and potentially manifest as adverse health outcomes. In a hospitalized person, poor nutrition may adversely impact on the person's outcome. If the nutritional status can be ascertained, nutritional needs can be addressed and potential risks minimized.The overall purpose of this project was to review and monitor staff compliance with nutritional screening and assessment best practice recommendations ensuring there is timely, relevant and structured nutritional therapeutic practices that support safe, compassionate and person-centered care in adults in a tertiary hospital in South Western Sydney, Australia, in the acute care setting. METHODS: A baseline retrospective chart audit was conducted and measured against 10 best practice criteria in relation to nutritional screening and assessment practices. This was followed by a facilitated multidisciplinary focus group to identify targeted strategies, implementation of targeted strategies, and a post strategy implementation chart audit.The project utilized the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (JBI PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRIP) tool, including evidence from other available supporting literature, for promoting change in healthcare practice. RESULTS: The baseline audit revealed deficits between current practice and best practice across the 10 criteria. Barriers for implementation of nutritional screening and assessment best practice criteria were identified by the focus group and an education strategy was implemented. There were improved outcomes across all best practice criteria in the follow-up audit. CONCLUSIONS: The baseline audit revealed gaps between current practice and best practice. Through the implementation of a targeted education program and resource package, outcomes improved in the follow up audit. The findings indicated that engagement from multidisciplinary team members and consumers was effective in developing tailored education that improved knowledge of best practice. This was demonstrated by an increase in the percentage of compliance across the 10 criteria, although leaving room for more improvement. A policy has been developed for implementation and future audits are planned to measure whether improved practices have been sustained.

Carotid endarterectomy: What difference does a clinical protocol make?

BACKGROUND: The initial eight hours after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are crucial to patient outcome as many potential complications can occur during this period. Hypotension is one of the most common issues observed after patients have returned to the surgical ward. Postoperative management of patients undergoing CEA varies between facilities, with reported direct intensive care unit or surgical high dependence unit admission. Patients that underwent a CEA procedure at the study hospital were monitored in the Recovery Unit for a minimum of four hours before being transferred to the surgical ward. Episodes of hypotension, on return to the surgical ward, were one of the main issues identified. This observation resulted in revision of the CEA management policy with collaboration from all specialties involved in the care of patients undergoing a CEA. The aim of this study was to compare whether there was any difference in short-term clinical outcomes between preupdate and postupdate of the carotid management policy in a tertiary referral hospital in New South Wales. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective review of health care records was undertaken for the following two time intervals: prepolicy change from July 2008 to June 2009; postpolicy change from June 2011 to May 2012. Hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg. State SE 12.1 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: After assessing for potential confounding factors-such as postoperative heart rate, risk factors, gender, and age-patients from the postpolicy change group were less likely to receive vasoactive medications to manage blood pressure deviation (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12-0.91; P = 0.026), the odds of receiving vasoactive medications was 0.33 times lower than that of the pre-policy change group patients, and is 95% confident that the true association lies between 0.12 and 0.91 in the underlying population. Over 90% of intensive care unit admission was avoided in patients from the postpolicy change group with estimated cost saving of $807 Australian dollars per patient. CONCLUSIONS: The study hospital postoperative carotid surgery management policy has driven practice change with an extended Recovery Unit observation. This is a cost effective and safer management method. The Clinical Nurse Consultant was essential for clinical policy development, implementation, and evaluation.

Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic pathologies: postoperative nursing implications.

Endovascular stent grafting is increasingly used to manage descending thoracic aortic pathologies. The procedure was introduced at the study hospital in 2001. We sought to examine the short-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent this endovascular stent grafting, with the aim of using the result as baseline for development of an in-center clinical management protocol. We undertook a single-center, retrospective review of health care records of patients managed with thoracic stent grafts from 2001 to 2009. Patient characteristics, in-hospital data, and procedural data were obtained. SPSS was used to analyze the data. A total of 30 patients were treated with thoracic stent; 23 were male, 7 were female, and the mean age was 55.0. Aortic pathologies treated were traumatic aortic dissection/transection (n = 15), acute/chronic aortic dissection (n = 9), and degenerative aneurysms (n = 6). Endoleak occurred in 3 patients, with 1 requiring further endograft repair. Two patients underwent combined open and endovascular repair of acute thoracic aortic dissection; 1 died 4 days after the procedure, and the other developed stroke and acute renal failure not requiring dialysis. Of the 28 patients who underwent endovascular repair, paraplegia and paraparesis occurred in 2 patients but resolved with cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Stroke occurred in 1 patient. Patients who underwent combined procedure of open and endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissection had a greater risk of developing major adverse events than patients who underwent endovascular repair alone (Fisher's exact test P = .023). There was no association between the risk of stroke and the coverage of left subclavian artery in this series (P = .483). Graft stenting treatment for descending thoracic aortic pathologies has been shown to result in high in-hospital survival rates. It is essential for nurses who work in acute care settings to have knowledge of this procedure and potential complications associated with the procedure to enable postoperative assessment and immediate action if any deviation is observed.

Engaging clinicians in evidence based policy development: the case of nursing documentation.

A lack of consistent policy direction, revealed by a review of nursing and midwifery documentation, presented researchers with an opportunity to engage clinicians in the process of evidence based policy development. By utilising the framework informed by both practice development and the principles of evidence based practice, clinicians were taken through an education program and a series of activities to develop their skills in discerning how research evidence and other literature can inform policy development. The clinicians' involvement maximised their investment in the final policy. Clinicians synthesised all the evidence associated with nursing and midwifery documentation and produced a set of seven guiding principles that formed the basis of an area wide policy for nursing and midwifery documentation. The strength of this approach to policy development was that the clinician's experience ensured that the concerns of the clinicians were included in the policy. Difficulties in completing tasks outside meeting times were highlighted.

[Comparison of the effectiveness of 131-I and antithyroid drugs in the treatment of Graves' disease in children].

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate the treatment of Graves' disease in children with (131)I and antithyroid drugs (ATD) and to quantitatively assess the advantages and disadvantages of them. METHODS: The authors examined the outcome of (131)I and ATD treatment in children with Graves' disease at the Hospital of Dongshan District in Guangzhou during the period 1997 to 2002. Each of the 2 groups of patients consisted of 40 patients ranging in age from 8 to 14 years (mean 10.7 +/- 2.2). The groups were similar in age, gender, length of disease, goiter size, and initial serum thyroid hormone levels. Thyroid status was assessed > 2 year after the therapies started. The efficacy of the therapeutic methods were scored as follows: the children whose disease was cured were marked 0, and those who had improvement but were not cured were marked 1, and those who remained unchanged were marked 2. After treatment the patients who were demonstrated to have ophthalmopathy or more severe ophthalmopathy, hyperthyroid heart disease, liver function damage and leukopenia were marked 2 respectively, and those who showed temporary hypothyroidism and permanent hypothyroidism were marked 1 and 2, respectively. Those who had a relapse of the disease after being cured were marked 2. The effects of two groups and total scores were compared. RESULTS: The total score of the group treated with (131)I was 34; and the median score was 1; the total score of the group treated with ATD was 69, and the median score was 1.5; the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.01). When these two groups were compared, the advantage of (131)I in the treatment of this disease was clear. The incidences of ophthalmopathy and improvement of ophthalmopathy of the two groups were not significantly different (P > 0.05). No significant difference was found in incidence of hypothyroidism between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant worsening or new development of ophthalmopathy or hypothyroidism after (131)I and ATD treatment. The rate of relapse of hyperthyroidism among patients cured with (131)I was significantly lower than that among patients cured with ATD (P < 0.05). In the patients treated with (131)I the incidences of hyperthyroid heart disease, liver function damage, leukopenia and so on were significantly lower than those of patients treated with ATD (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: (131)I therapy was superior to the ATD in treatment of the children with Graves' disease. Observations for more than 2 years after treatment with (131)I showed that there were no harmful side effects or complications. (131)I can be recognized as the safer, more convenient and effective treatment than ATD for Graves' disease in children.