Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal stability after surgery-first bimaxillary surgery for class III asymmetry in 70 consecutive patients.

Background/purpose: Skeletal stability after orthognathic surgery is essential for positive treatment outcome. This study evaluated the stability of osteotomy segments after surgery-first bimaxillary surgery for class III asymmetry. Materials and methods: Seventy adults with class III asymmetry consecutively corrected through surgery-first Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies were investigated. Cone-beam computed tomography before treatment (T0), 1-week after surgery (T1), and after all treatment (T2, ≥1-year after surgery) was used to assess surgical movement (T0 to T1) and skeletal stability (T1 to T2) regarding the translation and rotation of the maxillary, mandibular distal, and proximal segments. Results: At T1, the maxillary segment had moved forward and upward, turned to the deviated side, and rotated downward (all P < 0.01). The distal segment of mandible had moved forward and upward and rotated upward (all P < 0.001). The deviated proximal segment had moved upward, tilted to the opposite side, and rotated upward (all P < 0.001). The opposite proximal segment had moved upward and tilted to the deviated side (both P < 0.01). At T2, significant relapse occurred in the mandible. The distal segment moved forward and upward and rotated upward (all P < 0.001). The deviated proximal segment moved upward, tilted to the opposite side, and rotated upward (all P < 0.001). The opposite proximal segment moved upward and tilted to the deviated side (both P < 0.01). Conclusion: Clinically significant relapse of class III asymmetry was discovered on the mandibular distal and opposite proximal segments.

Three-dimensional positioning of the maxilla using novel intermediate splints in maxilla-first orthognathic surgery for correction of skeletal class III deformity.

OBJECTIVES: Successful orthognathic surgery requires accurate transfer of the intraoperative surgical plan. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the surgical error of a novel intermediate splint in positioning the maxilla during maxilla-first orthognathic surgery and (2) determine factors influencing surgical error. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study examined 83 patients who consecutively underwent Le Fort I osteotomy for correction of skeletal class III deformity using a novel intermediate splint and a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Surgical error was the outcome variable, measured as the difference in postoperative translational and rotational maxillary position from the virtual plan. Measures included asymmetry, need and amount for mandibular opening during fabrication of intermediate splints, and planned and achieved skeletal movement. RESULTS: Mean errors in translation for vertical, sagittal, and transversal dimensions were 1.0 ± 0.7 mm, 1.0 ± 0.6 mm, and 0.7 ± 0.6 mm, respectively; degrees in rotation for yaw, roll, and pitch were 0.8 ± 0.6, 0.6 ± 0.4, and 1.6 ± 1.1, respectively. The transverse error was smaller than sagittal and vertical errors; error for pitch was larger than roll and yaw (both p < 0.001). Error for sagittal, transverse, and roll positioning was affected by the achieved skeletal movement (roll, p < 0.05; pitch and yaw, p < 0.001). Surgical error of pitch positioning was affected by planned and achieved skeletal movement (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using the novel intermediate splint when performing Le Fort I osteotomy allowed for accurate positioning of the maxilla. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The novel intermediate splint for maxillary positioning can be reliably used in clinical routines.

Chang Gung Forum: An Exemplary Strategy for Implementing a Multidisciplinary Network of Experts in Craniofacial Anomalies.

INTRODUCTION: The Chang Gung Forum has been dedicated to the care of craniofacial anomalies since 2000. This annual continuing medical education program focuses on orofacial cleft and surgery-first orthognathic surgery by providing up-to-date information and management guidelines. This study explored how the Chang Gung Forum has influenced medical perspectives, decisions, and practices in a multidisciplinary craniofacial team. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2022, 20 Chang Gung Forums have been held. A questionnaire was distributed among 170 attendees who had participated in the forum more than once. The questionnaire collected information on the participants' experiences and levels of satisfaction with the educational program and whether or how it had influenced their clinical practice. RESULTS: Valid responses from 86 attendees (response rate, 50.6%) who had participated more than once were collected and analyzed. The overall satisfaction rate of the Chang Gung Forum based on the respondents' most recent visits was 4.28 ± 0.63 out of 5. Of the respondents, 90.9% acknowledged changes in their clinical practice, with modifications in surgery plans and decisions being the most notable (48.5%). In addition, comprehension increased throughout years of attending the annual forum (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Chang Gung Forum has contributed markedly to the community of congenital craniofacial anomalies. The program will continue providing updated information and influencing the clinical decision-making of health care professionals.

Facial Palsy after Orthognathic Surgery: Incidence, Causative Mechanism, Management, and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Facial palsy after orthognathic surgery is an uncommon but serious complication causing dissatisfaction and affecting quality of life. The occurrence could be underreported. Surgeons need to recognize this issue regarding the incidence, causative mechanism, managements, and outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review of orthognathic surgery records between January of 1981 and May of 2022 was conducted in the authors' craniofacial center. Patients who developed facial palsy after the surgery were identified, and demographics, surgical methods, radiologic images, and photographs were collected. RESULTS: A total of 20,953 sagittal split ramus osteotomies (SSROs) were performed in 10,478 patients. Twenty-seven patients developed facial palsy, resulting in an incidence of 0.13% per SSRO. In a comparison of SSRO technique, the Obwegeser-Dal Pont technique using osteotome for splitting had higher risk of facial palsy than the Hunsuck technique using the manual twist splitting ( P < 0.05). The severity of facial palsy was complete in 55.6% of patients and incomplete in 44.4%. All patients were treated conservatively, and 88.9% attained full recovery in a median duration of 3 months [interquartile range (IQR), 2.75 to 6 months] after surgery, whereas 11.1% attained partial recovery. Initial severity of facial palsy predicted the timing of recovery, with incomplete palsy patients having faster median recovery (3 months; IQR, 2 to 3 months) than the complete palsy patients (6 months; IQR, 4 to 6.25 months) ( P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of facial palsy after orthognathic surgery was 0.13%. Intraoperative nerve compression was the most likely causative mechanism. Conservative treatment is the mainstay of therapeutic strategy, and full functional recovery was anticipated. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, IV.

Enhancing Philtrum Morphology Using Fat Grafting Combined with Percutaneous Rigottomy in Repaired Unilateral Cleft Lip.

BACKGROUND: Improving the philtrum morphology of patients with a secondary cleft lip deformity has been a challenge in cleft care. Combining fat grafting with percutaneous rigottomy has been advocated for treatment of volumetric deficiency associated with a scarred recipient site. This study assessed the outcome of synchronous fat grafting and rigottomy for improvement of cleft philtrum morphology. METHODS: Consecutive young adult patients ( n = 13) with a repaired unilateral cleft lip who underwent fat grafting combined with rigottomy expansion technique for enhancement of philtrum morphology were included. Preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional facial models were used for three-dimensional morphometric analyses including philtrum height, projection, and volume parameters. Lip scar was qualitatively judged by a panel composed by two blinded external plastic surgeons using a 10-point visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Three-dimensional morphometric analysis revealed a significant (all P < 0.05) postoperative increase of the lip height-related measurements for cleft philtrum height, noncleft philtrum height, and central lip length parameters, with no difference ( P > 0.05) between cleft and noncleft sides. The postoperative three-dimensional projection of the philtral ridges was significantly ( P < 0.001) larger in cleft (1.01 ± 0.43 mm) than in noncleft sides (0.51 ± 0.42 mm). The average philtrum volume change was 1.01 ± 0.68 cm 3 , with an average percentage fat graft retention of 43.36% ± 11.35%. The panel assessment revealed significant ( P < 0.001) postoperative scar enhancement for the qualitative rating scale, with mean preoperative and postoperative scores of 6.69 ± 0.93 and 7.88 ± 1.14, respectively. CONCLUSION: Synchronous fat grafting and rigottomy improved philtrum length, projection, and volume and lip scar in patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach for Correction of Dentofacial Deformity in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have reported the advantages of the surgery-first approach for orthognathic correction of class III deformity, there is no report of the success of this approach for patients with cleft lip and palate. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability and outcome of bimaxillary surgery for cleft-related dentofacial deformity using a surgery-first approach. METHODS: Forty-one patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who consecutively underwent Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for skeletal class III deformity were included. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and after orthodontic treatment were used to measure the surgical and postsurgical changes in jaw position by landmarks, and outcomes of jaw protrusion and relation, incisor angle and occlusion, and menton deviation after treatment. Self-report questionnaires regarding satisfaction with overall appearance of the face and seven facial regions were administered after treatment. RESULTS: A clinically insignificant relapse was found in the maxilla (<1 mm) and mandible (<2 mm). There was a significant improvement in the jaw protrusion and relation, incisor angle and occlusion, and menton deviation. Responses from the self-report questionnaires completed after treatment indicated that patient satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate surgical-orthodontic treatment with a surgery-first approach can successfully improve cleft-related dentofacial deformity in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Surgical occlusion setup and skeletal stability of correcting cleft-associated class III deformity using surgery-first bimaxillary surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the three-dimensional (3D) quantitative characteristics of the surgical occlusion setup in surgery-first cleft orthognathic surgery, and to evaluate its influence on post-surgical skeletal stability. METHODS: This prospective study was comprised of 35 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and class III deformity who consecutively underwent two-jaw surgery with surgery-first approach. Digitized dental models were analyzed to quantify the 3D characteristics of the final surgical occlusion setup. Cone-beam computed tomography was used to measure the 3D surgical skeletal movement and post-surgical skeletal stability. The correlation between skeletal stability and surgical occlusal contact or surgical skeletal movement was also evaluated. RESULTS: The surgical occlusion setup had a large incisor overjet and positive overbite, and buccal cross bite and open bite on second molars. Occlusal contact on three segments was present in 51.4% of the patients, and the average number for tooth contact was 4.3 teeth. No correlation was found between maxillary or mandibular stability and surgical occlusal contact. However, a significant correlation was found between maxillary and mandibular stability and the surgical skeletal movement. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical occlusion for correction of cleft-associated class III deformity using the surgery-first approach was characterized with large overjet and positive overbite, and posterior cross bite and open bite. On average, there was occlusal contact on four to five teeth; half of surgical occlusion setups had contact on three segments. The post-surgical skeletal stability was not related to the surgical occlusal contact but to the surgical skeletal movement.

The Rise of Online Medical Education in Craniofacial Surgery.

BACKGROUND: International travel had been radically disrupted by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), leaving traditional medical conferences on a 2-year hiatus. The International Craniofacial Chang Gung Group (ICC) was thus created to disseminate knowledge related to craniofacial surgery. This study aimed to reveal how webinars fundamentally transformed the traditional format of medical conferences. MATERIALS AND METHOD: In total, 64 ICC webinars held between December 13, 2020, and May 21, 2023, were documented and reviewed. A questionnaire was designed and sent to ICC members. The questionnaire collected information on attitudes and habits relating to videoconferencing in general before and after the start of COVID-19 and on the ICC webinars specifically. Responses were analyzed to inform our understanding of respondents' experience and satisfaction with the webinars. RESULTS: The webinars covered a variety of topics related to craniofacial surgery. In total, 64 webinars were included for analysis. The mean number of attendees at each webinar was 86.7. In total, 111 respondents were more satisfied (4.25 ± 0.72 out of 5) with ICC webinars than with other media of online meetings ( P < 0.001). In total, 89.2% of respondents were willing to continue attending ICC webinars after COVID-19 restrictions have been lifted. CONCLUSIONS: Webinars are an effective format for imparting knowledge, especially in the ICC, and will become key in continuing medical education.

Does Clockwise Rotation of Maxillomandibular Complex Using Surgery-First Approach to Correct Mandibular Prognathism Improve Facial Appearance?

BACKGROUND: Facial aesthetics may be optimized based on a deeper understanding of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to delineate facial soft tissue changes after clockwise rotation (CWR) of the maxillomandibular complex (MMC) to correct mandibular prognathism using the surgery-first approach. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients over 18 years of age with skeletal Class III malocclusion in the craniofacial center. The patients were excluded with previous history of craniofacial syndrome, orthognathic surgery trauma, infection at surgical sites, chin deviation (menton deviation ≥4 mm), 2 or more missing data points after surgery, or without informed consent. This study compared significant facial changes before (T0) and after orthodontic debonding (T1) in the CWR and control groups. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The patients were divided in accordance with maxillary occlusal plane change (OPC) after surgery into CWR (OPC >4°) and control (OPC ≤4°) groups. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was frontal lip curvature (FLC: Right Cheilion-Stomion-Left Cheilion, degree) with or without upper lip curving upward at T1, where upper lip curving upward was considered more favorable. COVARIATES: The covariates included age, sex, and various cephalometric measurements. ANALYSES: The Mann-Whitney U test, paired, and independent t-test were implemented to compare the intragroup and intergroup differences. Statistical significance was indicated by P value <.05. RESULTS: The study comprised 34 patients (21 women) in the control group and 37 (29 women) in the CWR group; their mean ages were 23.64 ± 4.38 and 24.21 ± 3.84 years, respectively (P value = .562). At T1, the CWR group had significant increased FLC (P value = .001), alar width (P value = .034), and lower vermilion height (P value = .018), and decreased lower lip length (P value = .004). The high FLC group had significant decreased upper lip projection (P value = .002) and increased nasolabial angle (P value = .013). The significant relationship between CWR and high FLC was supported by the χ2 test (P value = .018) and multiple logistic regression (P value = .017). CONCLUSION: Greater CWR of the MMC increased FLC and lower vermilion height and reduced lower lip length. High FLC resulting from the CWR of the MMC improved facial appearance by moving the upper lip curve upward.

Comparative assessment of orthodontic and aesthetic outcomes after orthognathic surgery with clear aligner or fixed appliance therapy.

BACKGROUND: Clear aligner therapy has an aesthetic advantage over fixed appliance therapy. However, to our knowledge, no study has objectively compared patient orthodontic and aesthetic outcomes between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies administered after orthognathic surgery (OGS). METHODS: This study included patients with no history of congenital craniofacial deformities who underwent surgery-first OGS and received clear aligner or fixed appliance therapy. The patients' grades on the Dental Health Component (DHC) and Aesthetic Component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and scores on the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index were calculated before OGS (T0), after OGS (T1), and after orthodontic therapy (T2). RESULTS: This study included 33 patients (clear aligner therapy, 19; fixed appliance therapy, 14). No considerable between-group differences were noted in the DHC and AC grades at T0, T1, or T2. Furthermore, %reduction in the PAR index score was more significant in the clear aligner group (74.4%) than in the fixed appliance group (63.2%) from T0 to T1 (p = .035); however, no between-group differences were noted from T1 to T2 or from T0 to T2. Both groups exhibited substantially improved DHC grades, AC grades, and PAR index scores at T1 and T2. CONCLUSIONS: Patient outcomes were similar between the clear aligner and fixed appliance groups after orthodontic therapy. However, the former group exhibited more favorable immediate results after OGS than did the latter group. Thus, as an adjunct therapy for patients with malocclusion, clear aligner therapy may be more effective than fixed appliance therapy.

Computer-assisted Simulation-based Modification of Sagittal Split Osteotomy in Class II Asymmetry: Optimizing Bone Contact Between Proximal and Distal Segments.

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted surgical simulation (CASS) allows more precise orthognathic surgery. However, few studies have evaluated associations between CASS-designed bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and bone contact surface in class II mandibular asymmetry. This study aims to evaluate the effects of using computer-assisted simulation and design modification of sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) to improve bony contact in skeletal class II asymmetry. METHODS: This retrospective analysis reviewed 28 patients with class II asymmetry who underwent orthognathic surgery, including 15 with modified SSO (group CS) and 13 with conventional SSO (group C). Modified SSO was designed under CASS. Operative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and complications were collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Bony contact was found at the distal end of the proximal segment in all group CS patients, while bone gap was noted in all group C patients (p<0.05). Moreover, bone graft was used in four group C patients but was not used in all cases group CS patients (p<0.05). A trend toward lower operative time or perioperative bleeding was noted in group CS, but without statistical significance. After 1-year follow-up, inferior alveolar nerve disturbances were noted in two group CS patients and one group C patient. Palpable bone gap with uneven jaw line was noted in two group C patients one year after surgery and one patient received fat graft treatment. CONCLUSION: The simulation-based sagittal split osteotomy modification provides appropriate contact surface and eliminates the bone gap between proximal and distal segments in class II asymmetry.

Long-term treatment outcome of patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cleft lip and palate have functional and esthetic impairment and typically require multiple interventions in their life. Long-term evaluation following a treatment protocol, especially for patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), is important but was rarely reported in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with complete BCLP born between 1995 and 2002 and treated at our center. Inclusion criteria were having adequate medical records and receiving continuous multidisciplinary team care at least until 20 years of age. Exclusion criteria were lack of regular follow-up and congenital syndromic abnormalities. The medical records and photos were reviewed, and facial bone development was evaluated using cephalometric analysis. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included, with a mean age of 22.1 years at the final evaluation in this study. Primary one-stage cheiloplasty was performed in 91.0% of the patients, and 9.0% underwent two-stage repair with an initial adhesion cheiloplasty. All patients underwent two-flap palatoplasty at an average of 12.3 months. Surgical intervention for velopharyngeal insufficiency was required in 59.0% of patients. Revisional lip/nose surgery was performed in 31.1% during growing age and in 64.8% after skeletal maturity. Orthognathic surgery was applied in 60.7% of patients with retruded midface, of which 97.3% underwent two-jaw surgery. The average number of operations to complete the treatment was 5.9 per patient. CONCLUSION: Patients with complete BCLP remain the most challenging group to treat among the cleft. This review revealed certain suboptimal results, and modifications have been made to the treatment protocol. Longitudinal follow-up and periodic assessment help to establish an ideal therapeutic strategy and improve overall cleft care.

Orthognathic Surgery to Enhance the Smile.

An esthetic smile is an integral feature of beauty. Improvement of the smile can be achieved by a combination of orthognathic surgery, orthodontics, and cosmetic dentistry. Preoperative evaluation serves to address a patient's surgical goals; it allows a surgeon to perform a detailed facial analysis and identify patients who are contraindicated for surgery. LeFort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy are performed to minimize the risk of complications. Injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve are the most common complication after orthognathic surgery, in which 90% of patients experience transient sensory disturbance of the lower lip in the postoperative period.

Does Clockwise Rotation of Maxillomandibular Complex Using Surgery-First Approach to Correct Mandibular Prognathism Affect Surgical Movement and Stability?

PURPOSE: Orthognathic surgery (OGS) using the surgery-first approach (SFA) can decrease treatment time and increase patient satisfaction. Clockwise rotation (CWR) of the maxillomandibular complex to correct mandibular prognathism leads to optimized functional, aesthetic, and stable outcomes. This study examined the combined effect of SFA and CWR of the maxillomandibular complex to correct mandibular prognathism by comparing the surgical movement before (T0) and immediately after OGS (T1) and the stability between T1 and 12 months after OGS (T2). METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent SFA involving Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, with or without genioplasty. Based on the occlusal plane (OP) change at T0-T1, the patients were divided into CWR (OP > 4°) and control (C) groups (OP ≤ 4°). The predictor variable was OP change at T0-T1. The primary outcome variable was the stability of pogonion (Pog) at T1-T2. The covariates included demographic factors, cephalometric measurements (anterior facial height, posterior facial height, OP, mandibular plane angle, incisor mandibular plane angle, overjet, and overbite), and 3-dimensional landmark displacement (anterior nasal spine, A-point, upper central incisor, upper first molar, lower central incisor, lower first molar, Pog, gonion, and condylion). An independent t-test was used to compare between these 2 groups when appropriate. The level of significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The sample included 28 patients (17 females) in the C group and 36 (24 females) in the CWR group; the mean ages were 23.89 ± 3.35 and 24.08 ± 4.02 years, respectively. For the surgical movement at T0-T1, the CWR group showed an association with vertical movement of the maxilla at posterior nasal spine (P = .005), anterior nasal spine (P < .001), and A-point (P < .001) and horizontal backward movement of the mandible at B-point (P < .001), Pog (P < .001), and gonion (P = .042). At T1-T2, all landmarks remained stable without clinically significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Surgical movement in the CWR group could vertically displace the maxilla and setback mandible more than that in the C group. Postoperative skeletal stability remained the same between the 2 groups at 1 year after OGS.

Comparison of regional soft tissue changes after bimaxillary rotational surgery between class III deformity with overbite and open bite: A 3D imaging analysis.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study aimed to compare regional soft tissue changes between patients with class III overbite and open bite deformities treated with bimaxillary surgery involving clockwise and counter-clockwise mandibular setback, respectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Class III deformity adults receiving Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies were grouped according to the incisal occlusion: overbite (n = 30) and open bite (n = 30). Combined cone-beam CT scans and 3D facial photographs preoperative and at least 1-year postoperative were taken to assess the soft tissue changes. RESULTS: Postoperative changes for the overbite and open bite groups included anterior repositioning of nose (-0.8 ± 1.2 mm and -1.1 ± 1.1 mm, respectively) and cheek (-1.9 ± 1.3 mm and -1.7 ± 2.6 mm, respectively), posterior repositioning of chin (5.2 ± 4.0 mm and 4.9 ± 3.2 mm, respectively), and medial (-1.7 ± 2.0 mm and -1.9 ± 2.1 mm, respectively) and posterior (2.7 ± 1.4 mm and 2.8 ± 2.3 mm, respectively) repositioning of bilateral angles. Posterior (1.2 ± 2.0 mm and 5.1 ± 3.3 mm) and inferior (-1.4 ± 2.2 mm and -2.4 ± 2.7 mm) repositioning of upper lip and lower lip occurred in overbite group. Inferior (-2.3 ± 2.4 mm) and superior (3.7 ± 3.4 mm) repositioning of chin occurred in the overbite and open bite groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of class III overbite and open bite deformities with bimaxillary rotational surgery resulted in comparable regional soft tissue changes, except for upper lip, lower lip and chin.

The Number of Surgical Interventions and Specialists Involved in the Management of Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type I: A 25-Year Analysis.

Objective: In this study, we aim to present a single institution's 25-year experience of employing a comprehensive multidisciplinary team-based surgical approach for treating patients with NF-1. Summary Background Data: All patients (n = 106) with a confirmed diagnosis of NF-1 who were treated using a multidisciplinary surgical treatment algorithm at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between 1994 and 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were categorized into groups according to the anatomy involved (craniofacial and noncraniofacial groups) and the type of clinical presentation (plexiform and cutaneous neurofibromas groups) for comparative analysis. Methods: The number of surgical interventions and number of specialists involved in surgical care were assessed. Results: Most of the patients exhibited craniofacial involvement (69.8%) and a plexiform type of NF-1 (58.5%), as confirmed through histology. A total of 332 surgical interventions (3.1 ± 3.1 procedures per patient) were performed. The number of specialists involved in surgical care of the included patients was 11 (1.6 ± 0.8 specialists per patient). Most of the patients (62.3%) underwent two or more surgical interventions, and 40.6% of the patients received treatment from two or more specialists. No significant differences were observed between the craniofacial and noncraniofacial groups in terms of the average number of surgical interventions (3.3 ± 3.2 vs. 2.7 ± 2.7, respectively) and number of specialists involved (1.7 ± 0.9 vs. 1.4 ± 0.6). Patients with plexiform craniofacial involvement underwent a significantly higher average number of surgical interventions (4.3 ± 3.6 vs. 1.6 ± 1.1; p < 0.001) and received treatment by more specialists (1.9 ± 0.9 vs. 1.2 ± 0.5; p < 0.001) compared with those having cutaneous craniofacial involvement. Conclusions: In light of the potential benefits of employing the multidisciplinary team-based surgical approach demonstrated in this study, such an approach should be adopted to provide comprehensive individualized care to patients with NF-1.

Skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgery with surgery-first approach for class III asymmetry is not related to virtual surgical occlusal contact.

OBJECTIVES: Surgery-first orthognathic surgery is rarely used in class III asymmetry due to concerns of reduced skeletal stability from unstable surgical occlusion. This study aimed to evaluate if skeletal stability after surgery-first orthognathic surgery is related to virtual surgical occlusal contact or surgical change. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 58 adults with class III asymmetry, consecutively corrected by Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy using a surgery-first approach. Dental casts were manually set to measure virtual surgical occlusal contact including contact distribution, contact number, and contact area. Cone-beam computed tomography taken before treatment, 1-week post-surgery, and after treatment was used to measure surgical change and post-surgical stability of the maxilla and mandible in translation (left/right, posterior/anterior, superior/inferior) and rotation (pitch, roll, yaw). The relationship between skeletal stability and surgical occlusal contact or surgical change was evaluated with correlation analysis. RESULTS: Significant instability was found in the mandible but not in the maxilla. No correlation was found between the maxillary or mandibular stability and surgical occlusal contact (all p > 0.01). However, a significant correlation was found between the maxillary (roll and yaw) or mandibular (shift, roll and pitch) stability and its surgical change (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In correction of class III asymmetry with surgery-first bimaxillary surgery, the skeletal stability is not related to the virtual surgical occlusal contact, but surgical skeletal change. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Planned over-correction is a reasonable option for correction of severe shift or roll mandibular asymmetry in bimaxillary surgery for class III deformity.

Comparison of stability and outcomes of surgery-first bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III deformity between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVES: Some adults with cleft lip and palate (CLP) require orthognathic surgery due to skeletal deformity. This prospective study aimed to (1) compare skeletal stability following bimaxillary surgery for correction of class III deformity between patients with unilateral CLP (UCLP) and bilateral CLP (BCLP), and (2) identify risk factors of stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with CLP and skeletal class III deformities who underwent surgery-first bimaxillary surgery were divided into two groups according to cleft type: UCLP (n = 30) and BCLP (n = 30). Skeletal stability was assessed with measures from cone beam computed tomography images of the maxilla and mandible taken before treatment, 1-week and ≥ 1 year postsurgery for translation (left/right, posterior/anterior, superior/inferior) and rotation (yaw, roll, pitch); multiple regression analysis examined risk factors. RESULTS: At follow-up, the maxilla moved upwards in both groups, and backwards in the UCLP group. The mandible moved forward and upward, shifted to the cleft (deviated) side, and rotated upward in both groups. The amount of surgical advancement was a risk factor for sagittal stability in the maxilla (ß = -0.14, p < 0.05). The mandible had three risk factors for sagittal stability: age (ß = -0.23, p < 0.05), surgical team (ß = -1.83, p < 0.05), and amount of surgical setback (ß = -0.32, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Two years after bimaxillary surgery, patients with UCLP had a higher sagittal relapse of the maxilla compared with patients with BCLP, which was due to a greater surgical advancement in the patients with UCLP. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgery-first bimaxillary surgery results in favorable treatment outcomes for correction of cleft-related class III deformity. Severity of jaw discrepancy and surgeons should be considered in the surgical design of overcorrection.