Functional analysis of ESRP1/2 gene variants and CTNND1 isoforms in orofacial cleft pathogenesis.

Orofacial cleft (OFC) is a common human congenital anomaly. Epithelial-specific RNA splicing regulators ESRP1 and ESRP2 regulate craniofacial morphogenesis and their disruption result in OFC in zebrafish, mouse and humans. Using esrp1/2 mutant zebrafish and murine Py2T cell line models, we functionally tested the pathogenicity of human ESRP1/2 gene variants. We found that many variants predicted by in silico methods to be pathogenic were functionally benign. Esrp1 also regulates the alternative splicing of Ctnnd1 and these genes are co-expressed in the embryonic and oral epithelium. In fact, over-expression of ctnnd1 is sufficient to rescue morphogenesis of epithelial-derived structures in esrp1/2 zebrafish mutants. Additionally, we identified 13 CTNND1 variants from genome sequencing of OFC cohorts, confirming CTNND1 as a key gene in human OFC. This work highlights the importance of functional assessment of human gene variants and demonstrates the critical requirement of Esrp-Ctnnd1 acting in the embryonic epithelium to regulate palatogenesis.

Unique Epigenetic Programming Distinguishes Regenerative Spermatogonial Stem Cells in the Developing Mouse Testis.

Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) both self-renew and give rise to progenitors that initiate spermatogenic differentiation in the mammalian testis. Questions remain regarding the extent to which the SSC and progenitor states are functionally distinct. Here we provide the first multiparametric integrative analysis of mammalian germ cell epigenomes comparable with that done for >100 somatic cell types by the ENCODE Project. Differentially expressed genes distinguishing SSC- and progenitor-enriched spermatogonia showed distinct histone modification patterns, particularly for H3K27ac and H3K27me3. Motif analysis predicted transcription factors that may regulate spermatogonial subtype-specific fate, and immunohistochemistry and gene-specific chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses confirmed subtype-specific differences in target gene binding of a subset of these factors. Taken together, these results show that SSCs and progenitors display distinct epigenetic profiling consistent with these spermatogonial subtypes being differentially programmed to either self-renew and maintain regenerative capacity as SSCs or lose regenerative capacity and initiate lineage commitment as progenitors.