Implementation of pharmacists' monitoring for intravenous drug compatibility.

BACKGROUND: Injectable medication errors primarily occur during preparation and administration. Currently, South Korea is experiencing chronic pharmacist shortages. Moreover, pharmacists have not routinely conducted prescription monitoring for intravenous compatibility. In the present study, we analysed the implementation of a pre-issue monitoring program using recently released cloud-based software to provide information on intravenous compatibility in the pharmacy at a general hospital in South Korea. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine whether adding an intravenous drug prescription review to pharmacists' actual work scope could promote patient safety, and to assess the impact of this new task on pharmacists' workload. METHODS: Data on intravenous drugs prescribed in the intensive care unit and haematology-oncology ward were prospectively collected during January 2020. Four quantitative items were evaluated: the run-time, intervention ratio, acceptance ratio, and the information completeness ratio with regard to the compatibility of intravenous drugs. RESULTS: The mean run-time of two pharmacists was 18.1 min in the intensive care unit and 8.7 min in the haematology-oncology ward (p<0.001). Significant differences were also found between the intensive care unit and the haematology-oncology wards in terms of the mean intervention ratio (25.3% vs 5.3%, respectively; p<0.001) and the information completeness ratio (38.3% vs 34.0%, respectively; p=0.007). However, the mean acceptance ratio was comparable (90.4% in the intensive care unit and 100% in the haematology-oncology ward; p=0.239). The intravenous pairs that most frequently triggered interventions were tazobactam/piperacillin and famotidine in the intensive care unit, and vincristine and sodium bicarbonate in the haematology-oncology ward. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that despite a shortage of pharmacists, intravenous compatibility can be monitored before issuing injectable products in all wards. Because the prescribing pattern of injections varies across wards, pharmacists' tasks should be established accordingly. To improve the completeness of information, efforts to generate more evidence should continue.

Guidelines for the management of extravasation.

The purpose of these practice guidelines is to offer and share strategies for preventing extravasation and measures for handling drugs known to cause tissue necrosis, which may occur even with the most skilled experts at intravenous (IV) injection. Herein, general knowledge about extravasation is first described, including its definition, incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and extravasation injuries. Management of extravasation includes nursing intervention and thermal application. At the first sign of extravasation, nursing intervention with following steps is recommended: stop administration of IV fluids immediately, disconnect the IV tube from the cannula, aspirate any remaining drug from the cannula, administer drug-specific antidote, and notify the physician. Local thermal treatments are used to decrease the site reaction and absorption of the infiltrate. Local cooling (ice packs) aids in vasoconstriction, theoretically limiting the drug dispersion. Although clear benefit has not been demonstrated with thermal applications, it remains a standard supportive care. The recommended application schedule for both warm and cold applications is 15 to 20 minutes, every 4 hours, for 24 to 48 hours. For prevention of extravasation, health professionals should be familiar with the extravasation management standard guidelines. They should regularly check the extravasation kit, assess patients' sensory changes, tingling or burning, and always pay attention to patients' words. The medical team's continuous education on extravasation is essential. With the practical use of these guidelines, it is expected to reduce the occurrence rate of extravasation and contribute to patient care improvement.