A Clinician's Roadmap to the Research and Data Acquisition Process Within the Veterans Health System.

Objective Identify and address potential obstacles to initiation of older population-related research within the NF/SG VHS through the provision of a concise flowchart. Setting North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System (NF/SG VHS). Practice Description The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Research Service with connection to the University of Florida facilitates research that contributes to improving the delivery of inpatient/outpatient care to veterans and their families. Practice Innovation A compendium of a senior care pharmacist's experiences will be compiled and reviewed by other specialists within the field while attempting to submit research protocols for publication within the VHS through the use of data platforms such as VINCI (VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure) and the Corporate Data Warehouse. Main Outcome Measurements Impact of navigating research websites affiliated with and directly pertaining to the NF/SG VHS upon clinicians attempting to begin research processes within the institution. Results It was determined that for the most expeditious publication experience to result the following six steps had to be pursued sequentially: VA Institutional Review Board (IRB) Net documentation/ submission, local myIRB submission, Data Access Request Tracker/VINCI access request, setup of VINCI workspace, drafting of VINCI cohort specification, data analysis and tracking, statistical methods, abstract, and manuscript production. Conclusion This study outlines a consistent/clear method from first-hand experiences on how to navigate, more efficiently, complex research processes to produce successful future impacts on patient care.

American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry-Strategic Thinking.

Never has there been a more pressing time for the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry (AAGP) to articulate a unified strategy to meet the challenges of our aging world. To this end, this report summarizes an AAGP leadership meeting that reviewed the results from a recent membership survey and launched a strategic planning process on behalf of AAGP members and stakeholders. This meeting was the first step in drafting a blueprint for the future that may serve as our guide in the context of finite resources to meet the infinitely complex and growing need for education, research, public advocacy, and clinical practice support. The following report serves to invite our valued colleagues to provide feedback and actively participate in defining our mission. Among the outcomes of the planning session, the following aspirations were identified by the participants 1) assert the AAGP as the "go to" organization for all things related to geriatric mental health, 2) prioritize activities that enhance the inclusivity/diversity of membership, and 3) collaborate across disciplines focused on geriatric mental health. From this initial framework, the group developed four general themes to guide AAGP's strategic future: 1) collaboration, 2) advocacy, 3) inclusivity, 4) high purpose. Inclusivity was further defined as encompassing growth, return on investment, and workforce development. Higher purpose was further defined as encompassing engagement, purpose, branding, communication, and expertise. The AAGP affirmed its commitment to serving the needs of its members and widening its scope of impact in view of staggering demands for better access to geriatric mental healthcare.

The Road Ahead in Education: Milestones for Geriatric Psychiatry Subspecialty Training.

OBJECTIVE: The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestone Project is the next step in a series of changes revamping the system of graduate medical education. In 2013 the ACGME completed the general psychiatry milestones. The ACGME then pursued creation of milestones for accredited psychiatric subspecialty fellowships. This article documents the work of the geriatric psychiatry subspecialty milestones work group. It reports the history and rationale supporting the milestones, the milestone development process, and the implications for geriatric psychiatry fellowship training. METHODS: In consultation with the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, and the ACGME Psychiatry Residency Review Committee, the ACGME appointed a working group to create the geriatric psychiatry milestones using the general psychiatry milestones as a guide. CONCLUSION: The geriatric psychiatry milestones are the result of an iterative process resulting in the definition of the characteristics vital to a fellowship-trained geriatric psychiatrist. It is premature to assess their effect on psychiatric training. The true impact of the milestones will be determined as each training director uses the milestones to re-evaluate their program curriculum and the educational and clinical learning environment. The ACGME is currently collecting the information about the milestone performance of residents and fellows to further refine and determine how the milestones can best be used to assist programs in improving training.

Differences in the indicators of depressive symptoms among a community sample of African-American and Caucasian older adults.

Depression among older adults is a major public health concern in the U.S. Yet, time and again this condition goes undiagnosed, or attributed to other causes. Despite being treatable, few individuals older than age 65 are treated for this disorder. Using a community sample of 404 African-American and Caucasian older adults, the aim of this study was to identify the sources of racial group variance in self-reports of depressive symptoms. Descriptive and multivariate analyses reveal no racial/ethnic differences in the mean level of depressive symptoms, but differences in the correlates of self-reported depression, as well as differences in the distribution of individual indicators of depressive symptoms.