Focal Cerebral Vasculitis due to SARS-CoV-2 Infection With a Robust Response to Intravenous Steroids.

INTRODUCTION: Severe and less common neurological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection include acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, central venous sinus thrombosis, and vasculitis. In this report, we present a case of a 42-year-old man with acute ischemic stroke due to SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated central nervous system vasculitis that improved with steroid therapy. CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old man with SARS-CoV-2 infection presented with non-fluent aphasia and right-sided hemiparesis. Computed tomography angiography revealed an occlusion of the proximal left middle cerebral artery (MCA), with acute infarcts in the left posterior parietal, lentiform nucleus, and cortical frontal cortex on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patient developed pulmonary emboli and was discharged on apixaban and atorvastatin. Four weeks later, the patient presented with recurring symptoms and was found to have worsening left MCA stenosis. MRI and MR angiography revealed a penumbra within the left MCA territory and pruning of the distal branches with severe stenosis. Laboratory workup for autoimmune causes of vasculitis was unrevealing. High-dose intravenous steroid treatment was initiated. Subsequent MRI and MR angiography revealed improved flow in the left cerebral vasculature and no novel ischemic infarcts. CONCLUSION: Central nervous system vasculitis is a rare manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This case suggests that high-dose intravenous steroids may have a therapeutic role in this patient population. Steroid use, in combination with vasopressor support to augment cerebral blood flow, may prevent further stroke burden.

Systolic blood pressure measurements are unreliable for the management of acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

PURPOSE: Whether systolic blood pressure (SBP) is reliable in acute spontaneous intracerebral (sICH) by assessing agreement between simultaneous BP measurements obtained from cuff non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and radial arterial invasive blood pressure (AIBP) devices. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among 766 prospectively screened sICH subjects, 303 (39.5%) had NIBP and AIBP measurements. During the first 24 h, 2157 simultaneous paired measurement readings were abstracted. Paired NIBP/AIBP measurements were included in a Bland-Altman technique with 95% agreement limits and coefficients from regression analysis derived from a bootstrap procedure. RESULTS: Variance for SBP was 66.1 mmHg, which was larger than the 44.3 mg Hg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) or the 46.1 mmHg for mean arterial pressure (MAP). Pairwise comparison of mean biases showed a significant difference between SBP when compared to DBP (p < 0.0001) or MAP (p < 0.0001). The mean bias between DBP and MAP was not different (p = 0.68). Regression-based Bland Altman analysis found significant bias (slope -0.16, 95% CI -0.23, -0.09, p < 0.05) over the range of mean SBP. Bias over the range of mean DBP or MAP was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that SBP is an unreliable blood pressure measurement in patients with sICH.