Center-level variation in hospitalization costs of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a highly morbid operation with significant resource utilization. Using a national cohort, we examined the interhospital variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy hospitalization cost in the United States. METHODS: Adults undergoing elective pancreaticoduodenectomy in the setting of pancreatic cancer were tabulated from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. A 2-level mixed-effects model was developed to evaluate the interhospital variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy hospitalization costs. Institutions within the top decile of risk-adjusted expenditures were defined as high-cost hospitals. Multivariable regression models were fitted to examine the association between high-cost hospital status and outcomes of interest. To account for the effects of complications on expenditures, a subgroup analysis comprising of patients with no adverse events was conducted. RESULTS: The study included an estimated 24,779 patients with a median hospitalization cost of $38,800. After mixed-effects modeling, 40.9% of the cost variation was attributable to hospital, rather than patient, factors. Multivariable regression models revealed an association between high-cost hospital status and greater odds of complications and longer length of stay. Among patients without an adverse event, interhospital cost variation remained significant at 61.0%, and treatment at high-cost hospitals was similarly linked to longer length of stay. CONCLUSION: Our study identified significant interhospital variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy hospitalization costs in the United States. Although high-cost hospital status was associated with increased odds of complications, variation remained significant even among patients without an adverse event. These results suggest the important role of hospital practices as contributors to expenditures. Further efforts to identify drivers of costs and standardize pancreatic surgical care are warranted.

Interhospital variation in the nonoperative management of acute cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy remains the standard management for acute cholecystitis. Given that rates of nonoperative management have increased, we hypothesize the existence of significant hospital-level variability in operative rates. Thus, we characterized patients who were managed nonoperatively at normal and lower operative hospitals (>90th percentile). METHODS: All adult admissions for acute cholecystitis were queried using the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Centers were ranked by nonoperative rate using multi-level, mixed effects modeling. Hospitals in the top decile of nonoperative rate (>9.4%) were classified as Low Operative Hospitals (LOH; others:nLOH). Separate regression models were created to determine factors associated with nonoperative management at LOH and nLOH. RESULTS: Of an estimated 418,545 patients, 9.9% were managed at 880 LOH. Multilevel modeling demonstrated that 20.6% of the variability was due to hospital factors alone. After adjustment, older age (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.02/year, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.01-1.02) and public insurance (Medicare AOR 1.31, CI 1.21-1.43 and Medicaid AOR 1.43, CI 1.31-1.57; reference: Private Insurance) were associated with nonoperative management at LOH. These were similar at nLOH. At LOH, SNH status (AOR 1.17, CI 1.07-1.28) and small institution size (AOR 1.20, CI 1.09-1.34) were associated with increased odds of nonoperative management. CONCLUSION: We noted a significant variability in the interhospital variation of the nonoperative management of acute cholecystitis. Nevertheless, comparable clinical and socioeconomic factors contribute to nonoperative management at both LOH and non-LOH. Directed strategies to address persistent non-clinical disparities are necessary to minimize deviation from standard protocol and ensure equitable care.

Association of hospital volume and operative approach with clinical and financial outcomes of elective esophagectomy in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Literature regarding the impact of esophagectomy approach on hospitalizations costs and short-term outcomes is limited. Moreover, few have examined how institutional MIS experience affects costs. We thus examined utilization trends, costs, and short-term outcomes of open and minimally invasive (MIS) esophagectomy as well as assessing the relationship between institutional MIS volume and hospitalization costs. METHODS: All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy were identified from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multiple regression models were used to assess approach with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications. Additionally, annual hospital MIS esophagectomy volume was modeled as a restricted cubic spline against costs. Institutions performing > 16 cases/year corresponding with the inflection point were categorized as high-volume hospitals (HVH). We subsequently examined the association of HVH status with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. RESULTS: Of an estimated 29,116 patients meeting inclusion, 10,876 (37.4%) underwent MIS esophagectomy. MIS approaches were associated with $10,600 in increased incremental costs (95% CI 8,800-12,500), but lower odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96) or major complications (AOR 0.68; 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). Moreover, HVH status was associated with decreased adjusted costs, as well as lower odds of postoperative complications for patients undergoing MIS operations. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide study, MIS esophagectomy was associated with increased hospitalization costs, but improved short-term outcomes. In MIS operations, cost differences were mitigated by volume, as HVH status was linked with decreased costs in the setting of decreased odds of complications. Centralization of care to HVH centers should be considered as MIS approaches are increasingly utilized.

Nationwide Trends in Utilization of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Blunt Abdominal Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing use of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques for trauma, limited large-scale studies have evaluated trends, outcomes, and resource utilization at centers that utilize MIS modalities for blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: Operative adult admissions after blunt assault, falls, or vehicular collisions were tabulated from the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Patients who received diagnostic laparoscopy or other laparoscopic and robotic intervention were classified as MIS. Institutions with at least one MIS trauma operation in a year were defined as an MIS Performing Institution (MPI; rest: non-MPI). The primary endpoint was mortality, with secondary outcomes of reoperation, complication, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs. Mixed regression models were used to determine the association of MPI status on the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, the proportion of MIS operations and MPI significantly increased from 22.6 to 29.8% and 45.9 to 58.8%, respectively. Of an estimated 77,480 patients, 66.7% underwent care at MPI. After adjustment, MPI status was not associated with increased odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] [.96,1.24]), reoperation (AOR 1.02, CI [.87,1.19]), or any of the tabulated complications. There was additionally no difference in adjusted LOS (ß-.18, CI [-.85, +.49]) or costs (ß+$1600, CI [-1600, +4800]), between MPI and non-MPI. DISCUSSION: The use of MIS operations in blunt abdominal trauma has significantly increased, with performing centers experiencing no difference in mortality or resource utilization. Prospectively collected data on outcomes following MIS trauma surgery is necessary to elucidate appropriate applications.

Socioeconomic disparities in risk of financial toxicity following elective cardiac operations in the United States.

BACKGROUND: While insurance reimbursements allay a portion of costs associated with cardiac operations, uncovered and additional fees are absorbed by patients. An examination of financial toxicity (FT), defined as the burden of patient medical expenses on quality of life, is warranted. Therefore, the present study used a nationally representative database to demonstrate the association between insurance status and risk of financial toxicity (FT) among patients undergoing major cardiac operations. METHODS: Adults admitted for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and isolated or concomitant valve operations were assessed using the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample. FT risk was defined as out-of-pocket expenditure >40% of post-subsistence income. Regression models were developed to determine factors associated with FT risk in insured and uninsured populations. To demonstrate the association between insurance status and risk of FT among patients undergoing major cardiac operations. RESULTS: Of an estimated 567,865 patients, 15.6% were at risk of FT. A greater proportion of uninsured patients were at risk of FT (81.3 vs. 14.8%, p<0.001), compared to insured. After adjustment, FT risk among insured patients was not affected by non-income factors. However, Hispanic race (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.60), length of stay (AOR 1.17/day), and combined CABG-valve operations (AOR 2.31, all p<0.05) were associated with increased risk of FT in the uninsured. CONCLUSION: Uninsured patients demonstrated higher FT risk after undergoing major cardiac operation. Hispanic race, longer lengths of stay, and combined CABG-valve operations were independently associated with increased risk of FT amongst the uninsured. Conversely, non-income factors did not impact FT risk in the insured cohort. Culturally-informed reimbursement strategies are necessary to reduce disparities in already financially disadvantaged populations.

Social determinants as predictors of resection and long-term mortality in Black patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Minorities diminished returns theory posits that socioeconomic attainment conveys fewer health benefits for Black than White individuals. The current study evaluates the effects of social constructs on resection rates and survival for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with potentially resectable NSCLC stage IA to IIIA were identified using the 2004 to 2017 National Cancer Database. Patients were stratified into quartiles based on population-level education and income. Logistic regression was used to predict risk-adjusted resection rates. Mortality was assessed with Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: Of the 416,025 patients identified, 213,643 (51.4%) underwent resection. Among White patients, the lowest income (adjusted odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.78, P < .01) and education quartiles (adjusted odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.84, P < .01) were associated with decreased odds of resection. The lowest education quartile among Black patients was not associated with lower resection rates. The lowest income quartile (adjusted odds ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.61-0.74, P < .01) was associated with reduced resection. White patients in the lowest education and income quartiles experienced increased hazard of 5-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.11-1.15, P < .01 and adjusted hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.11, P < .01 respectively). In Black patients, there were no significant differences in 5-year survival between Black patients in the highest education and income quartiles and those in the lowest quartiles. CONCLUSION: Among Black patients with NSCLC, educational attainment is not associated with increased resection rates. In addition, higher education and income were not associated with improved 5-year survival. The diminished gains experienced by Black patients, compared to Whites patients, illustrate the presence of pervasive race-specific mechanisms in observed inequalities in cancer outcomes.

Persistent racial disparities in refusal of resection in non-small cell lung cancer patients at high-volume and Black-serving institutions.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the standard of care for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Black patients have higher surgical refusal rates than White patients. We evaluated factors associated with the refusal of resection and subsequent non-small cell lung cancer outcomes. METHODS: We identified patients with non-small cell lung cancer stages IA to IIIA eligible for surgical resection (lobectomy or pneumonectomy) listed between 2004 and 2017 in the National Cancer Database. We stratified hospitals by the proportion of Black patients served and lung cancer resection volume. We used multivariable regression models to identify factors associated with refusal of resection and assessed 5-year mortality using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: Of 221,396 patients identified, 7,753 (3.5%) refused surgery. Black race was associated with increased refusal (adjusted odds ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.90-2.22). Compared to White race, Black race was associated with increased refusal across the highest (adjusted odds ratio 2.29, 95% confidence interval 1.94-2.54), intermediate (adjusted odds ratio 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.78-2.37), and lowest (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.58-1.99) volume tertiles. Similarly, Black race was associated with increased refusal across the highest (adjusted odds ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.78-2.17), intermediate (adjusted odds ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.80-2.40), and lowest (adjusted odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.06) Black-serving tertiles. However, surgical resection yielded similar 5-year survival for Black and White patients. CONCLUSION: Racial disparities in non-small cell lung cancer surgery refusal persist regardless of hospital volume or proportion of Black patients served. These findings suggest that a better understanding of patient and patient-provider level interventions could facilitate a better understanding of treatment decision-making.

Survival After Cardiac Transplantation in Adults With Single-Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: Without large-scale analyses of adults with single-ventricle congenital heart disease (CHD) undergoing heart transplantation, little evidence exists to guide listing practices and patient counseling. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate survival after heart transplantation in adults with single and biventricular CHD and compare it to that of non-CHD transplant recipients. METHODS: In this 15-year (2005-2020) retrospective analysis, outcome-blinded investigators used probability-linkage to merge the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data sets. RESULTS: Of 382 adult (≥18 years of age) heart transplant recipients with CHD, 185 (48%) had single-ventricle physiology. Compared to biventricular CHD, single-ventricle patients showed significantly reduced survival at 1 (80% vs 91%; HR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.40-4.49; P = 0.002) and 10 years (54% vs 71%; HR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.38-3.18; P < 0.001). Among patients who survived the first post-transplantation year, biventricular CHD patients exhibited similar 10-year survival as single-ventricle patients, except for those with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (79% vs 71%; HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 0.85-2.92; P = 0.15). Additionally, biventricular CHD transplant recipients showed significantly better 10-year conditional survival compared to their non-CHD counterparts (79% vs 68%; HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59-0.90; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Among adult CHD transplant recipients, single-ventricle physiology correlated with higher short-term mortality. However, 10-year conditional survival was similar for biventricular and most single-ventricle CHD patients, and notably better for biventricular CHD patients compared to non-CHD heart transplant recipients. These findings have significant implications towards patient selection and listing strategies, easing concerns related to heart transplantation in adults with CHD and destigmatizing most subtypes of single-ventricle CHD.

Expanded Criteria Donor Heart Allograft Utilization: National Trends and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: To examine recent trends in the use of expanded criteria donor organs in heart transplantation, this study assessed center-level variation in acceptance of these allografts and analyzed their posttransplantation outcomes. METHODS: Adult (aged ≥18 years) heart transplant recipients between 2011 and 2022 were identified in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. Expanded criteria allografts were defined using a previously validated risk score. After stratifying centers by cumulative transplantation volume, those centers in the top tertile (≥23/year) were considered high volume. Subsequently, the ratio of transplantations using expanded criteria allografts to total transplantations was calculated for each high-volume center. On the basis of tertiles, centers were then categorized as high-, medium-, and low-use centers. The primary outcome was death after transplantation. RESULTS: Of 23,290 transplantations performed, 5017 (22%) used expanded criteria donor allografts. High-volume heart transplantation centers performed 72% (3628) of these transplantations-1183 (75%) between 2011 and 2014, 1383 (73%) between 2015 and October 2018, and 1062 (68%) between November 2018 and June 2021. Compared with low-volume programs, undergoing expanded criteria heart transplantation at high-volume centers was associated with a significantly reduced hazard of mortality at 1 year (hazard ratio, 0.78; CI, 0.65-0.94; P = .01) and 5 years (hazard ratio, 0.85; CI, 0.75-0.98; P = .02). During the study period, survival rates 1 year after transplantation were similar across high-volume centers, regardless of their use of expanded criteria allografts. CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing heart transplantation with an expanded criteria donor allograft at a high-volume transplantation center provides a significant survival benefit. Further, the use of more expanded criteria criteria organs, in the right clinical settings, does not negatively affect overall patient outcomes at high-volume centers.

Impact of delayed intervention following admission for small bowel obstruction: A contemporary analysis.

Background: The optimal timing of surgical intervention for small bowel obstruction (SBO) remains debated. Methods: All adults admitted for SBO were identified in the 2018-2019 National Inpatient Sample. Patients undergoing small bowel resection or lysis of adhesion after three days were considered part of the Delayed cohort. All others were classified as Early. Multivariable regressions were used to assess independent predictors of delayed surgical intervention as well as associations between delayed management and in-hospital mortality, major adverse events (MAE), perioperative complications, postoperative length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs and non-home discharge. Results: Among 28,440 patients who met study criteria, 52.0 % underwent delayed intervention. Black race (AOR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.03-1.36, ref.: White) and Medicare coverage (AOR 1.16, 95 % CI 1.01-1.33, ref.: private payer) were associated with increased odds of delayed surgical management. While delayed intervention was not significantly associated with death (AOR 1.27, 95 % CI 0.97-1.68), it was linked to greater odds of MAE (AOR 1.30, 95 % CI 1.16-1.45) and several perioperative complications. The Delayed cohort also faced an incremental increase in postoperative LOS (+1.29 days, 95 % CI 0.89-1.70) and hospitalization costs (+$11,000, 95 % CI 10,000-12,000). Moreover, delayed intervention was linked to increased odds of non-home discharge (AOR 1.64, 95 % CI 1.47-1.84). Conclusions: Delay in surgical management following SBO is linked to inferior clinical outcomes and increased resource use. Our findings highlight the need to ensure proper timing of surgery for SBO as well as efforts to standardize these practices across all demographics of patients.

Association of postoperative length of stay with outcomes following orthotopic heart transplantation-A national analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of standardized recovery protocols, there is little evidence to guide postoperative care to ensure optimal in-hospital and long-term outcomes following heart transplantation (HT). Using two national databases, we examined the association between postoperative length of stay (LOS) with patient/graft survival, index hospitalization costs, and non-elective readmissions. METHODS: Adult HT recipients from 2010 to 2019 were identified and analyzed within the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Database and Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). The risk-adjusted relationship between 1-year mortality and LOS was assessed with restricted cubic splines and subsequently used to stratify patients into Expedited (7-11 days), Routine (12-16 days), and Delayed (>16) discharge groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Restricted Means Survival Time analysis (RMST) and multivariable Cox models. RESULTS: Of 9995 HT recipients within the OPTN, 3777 (38%) were categorized as Expedited, and 3040 (30%) as Routine. After adjustment, expedited discharge was not associated with inferior 90-day (ΔRMST -.01, p = .91) and 1-year patient survival (ΔRMST -.02, p = .53). Additionally, expedited was not associated with increased odds of non-elective readmission at 90-days (HR 1.04, CI .77-1.43) relative to Routine discharge. Counterfactual analysis revealed an estimated cost saving of $50 million if all Routine patients received an expedited discharge. CONCLUSION: Expedited discharge after HT seems to be cost-effective and is not associated with inferior outcomes. Institutional-level outcome analyses should be performed to identify patients that would benefit from expedited discharge, and future studies should analyze the feasibility of implementing standardized discharge protocols following HT.

Effect of surgical timing on outcomes after cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective and single-center studies have demonstrated that early cholecystectomy is associated with shorter length of stay in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis. However, these studies are not powered to detect differences in adverse events. Using a nationally representative cohort, we evaluated the association of timing for cholecystectomy with clinical outcomes and resource use in patients with gallstone pancreatitis. METHODS: All adult hospitalizations for gallstone pancreatitis were tabulated from the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes, patient comorbidities and operative characteristics were determined. Patients with end-organ dysfunction or cholangitis were excluded to isolate those with only mild gallstone pancreatitis. Major adverse events were defined as a composite of 30-day mortality and perioperative (cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, infectious, and thromboembolic) complications. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was divided into Early (within 2 days of admission) and Late (>2 days after admission) cohorts. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were then used to evaluate the association of cholecystectomy timing with major adverse events and secondary outcomes of interest, including postoperative hospital duration of stay, costs, non-home discharge, and readmission rate within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: Of an estimated 129,451 admissions for acute gallstone pancreatitis, 25.6% comprised the Early cohort. Compared to patients in the Early cohort, Late cohort patients were older (56 [40-69] vs 53 [37-66] years, P < .001), more likely male (36.6 vs 32.8%, P < .001), and more frequently underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (22.2 vs 10.9%, P < .001). In addition, the Late cohort had higher unadjusted rates of major adverse events and index hospitalization costs, compared to Early. After risk adjustment, late cholecystectomy was associated with higher odds of major adverse events (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.29-1.51) and overall adjusted hospitalization costs by $2,700 (95% confidence interval 2,400-2,800). In addition, compared to the Early group, those in the Late cohort had increased odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.23) and non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.31-1.55). CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy >2 days after admission for mild gallstone pancreatitis was independently associated with increased major adverse events, costs, 30-day readmissions, and non-home discharge. Given the significant clinical and financial consequences, reduced timing to surgery should be prioritized in the overall management of this patient population.

Postoperative length of stay following kidney transplantation in patients without delayed graft function-An analysis of center-level variation and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Early discharge after surgical procedures has been proposed as a novel strategy to reduce healthcare expenditures. However, national analyses of the association between discharge timing and post-transplant outcomes following kidney transplantation are lacking. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all adult kidney transplant recipients without delayed graft function from 2014 to 2019 in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and Nationwide Readmissions Databases. Recipients were divided into Early (LOS ≤ 4 days), Routine (LOS 5-7), and Delayed (LOS > 7) cohorts. RESULTS: Of 61 798 kidney transplant recipients, 26 821 (43%) were discharged Early and 23 279 (38%) Routine. Compared to Routine, patients discharged Early were younger (52 [41-61] vs. 54 [43-62] years, p < .001), less commonly Black (33% vs. 34%, p < .001), and more frequently had private insurance (41% vs. 35%, p < .001). After adjustment, Early discharge was not associated with inferior 1-year patient survival (Hazard Ratio [HR] .74, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.66-0.84) or increased likelihood of nonelective readmission at 90-days (HR .93, CI .89-.97), relative to Routine discharge. Discharging all Routine patients as Early would result in an estimated cost saving of ∼$40 million per year. Multi-level modeling of post-transplantation LOS revealed that 28.8% of the variation in LOS was attributable to interhospital differences rather than patient factors. CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge after kidney transplantation appears to be cost-efficient and not associated with inferior post-transplant survival or increased readmission at 90 days. Future work should elucidate the benefits of early discharge and develop standardized enhanced recovery protocols to be implemented across transplant centers.

Dementia is Associated With Inferior Outcomes Following Emergency General Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Given the steadily aging United States population, we used a national database to examine the association of dementia with clinical and financial outcomes following emergency general surgery. METHODS: All adults undergoing non-elective appendectomy, cholecystectomy, small bowel resection, large bowel resection, repair of perforated ulcer, or lysis of adhesions were identified within the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Entropy balancing and multivariable regressions were used to assess the risk-adjusted association between dementia and in-hospital mortality, complications, length of stay, costs, non-home discharge, and 30-day unplanned readmissions. RESULTS: Of an estimated 1,332,922 patients, 2.7% had dementia. Compared to those without, patients with dementia were older, more commonly male, and had a greater burden of chronic conditions. Following entropy balancing and multivariable risk-adjustment, dementia was associated with increased odds of mortality and sepsis across all operations except perforated ulcer repair. Dementia was also linked to greater likelihood of pneumonia across all operative categories. Moreover, dementia was associated with increased length of stay for patients in all operative categories except perforated ulcer repair, while costs were only increased for those undergoing appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and lysis of adhesions. Dementia was also linked to higher odds of non-home discharge following all operations, while non-elective readmissions were only increased for patients undergoing cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found dementia to be associated with a significant clinical and financial burden. Our findings may help inform shared decision making with patients and their families.

Evaluation of hospital readmission rates as a quality metric in adult cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of 30-day non-elective readmissions as a quality metric for adult cardiac surgery. BACKGROUND: Unplanned readmissions is a quality metric for adult cardiac surgery. However, its reliability in benchmarking hospitals remains under-explored. METHODS: Adults undergoing elective isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), surgical aortic valve replacement/repair (SAVR) or mitral valve replacement/repair (MVR) were tabulated from 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multi-level regressions were developed to model the likelihood of 30-day unplanned readmissions and major adverse events (MAE). Random intercepts were estimated, and associations between hospital-specific risk-adjusted rates of readmissions and were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: Of an estimated 86 024 patients meeting study criteria across 298 hospitals, 62.6% underwent CABG, 22.5% SAVR and 14.9% MVR. Unadjusted readmission rates following CABG, SAVR and MVR were 8.4%, 9.3% and 11.8%, respectively. Unadjusted MAE rates following CABG, SAVR and MVR were 35.1%, 32.3% and 37.0%, respectively. Following adjustment, interhospital differences accounted for 4.1% of explained variance in readmissions for CABG, 7.6% for SAVR and 10.0% for MVR. There was no association between readmission rates for CABG and SAVR (r=0.10, p=0.09) or SAVR and MVR (r=0.09, p=0.1). A weak association was noted between readmission rates for CABG and MVR (r=0.20, p<0.001). There was no significant association between readmission and MAE for CABG (r=0.06, p=0.2), SAVR (r=0.04, p=0.4) and MVR (r=-0.03, p=0.6). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that readmissions following adult cardiac surgery may not be an ideal quality measure as hospital factors do not appear to influence this outcome.

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes, Costs, and Readmission Between Total and Subtotal Cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: An increasing body of literature supports subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) in the management of patients with difficult gallbladder anatomy; however, large-scale studies examining outcomes of total cholecystectomy and STC are lacking. METHODS: All adults undergoing total cholecystectomy or STC were tabulated from the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Entropy balancing was performed to adjust for patient differences based on extent of resection. Subsequent multivariable regression models were used to assess the association of STC with major adverse events, postoperative length of stay (pLOS), hospitalization costs, and 30-day non-elective readmission rates. RESULTS: Of an estimated 854 357 patients, 7089 (.8%) underwent STC. Compared to total, STC patients were significantly older, less commonly female, and had a higher Elixhauser Index (all P < .001). Both cohorts had similar rates of postoperative ERCP (1.7% vs 1.5%, P = .33); however, the STC cohort had significantly higher utilization of subsequent drainage procedures (1.8% vs .5%, P < .001). After entropy balancing and multivariable risk-adjustment, STC was not associated with greater odds of MAE (AOR 1.11, 95% CI .99-1.23, P = .06). Notably, relative to total, STC was associated with longer pLOS (ß .14, 95% CI .11-.17, P < .001) and greater hospitalization costs (ß + $1,900, 95% CI 1300-2,500, P < .001). However, the extent of resection was not associated with the likelihood of 30-day non-elective readmission (AOR 1.01, 95% CI .91-1.13, P = .86). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that STC is a viable, yet resource intensive, option in the management of complex cholecystitis.

Textbook outcomes in heart transplantation: A quality metric for the modern era.

BACKGROUND: Traditional quality metrics like one-year survival do not fully encapsulate the multifaceted nature of solid organ transplantation in contemporary practice. Therefore, investigators have proposed using a more comprehensive measure, the textbook outcome. However, the textbook outcome remains ill-defined in the setting of heart transplantation. METHODS: Within the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, the textbook outcome was defined as having: (1) No postoperative stroke, pacemaker insertion, or dialysis, (2) no extracorporeal membrane oxygenation requirement within 72 hours of transplantation, (3) index length of stay <21 days, (4) no acute rejection or primary graft dysfunction, (5) no readmission for rejection or infection, or re-transplantation within one year, and (6) an ejection fraction >50% at one year. RESULTS: Of 26,885 heart transplantation recipients between 2011 to 2022, 9,841 (37%) achieved a textbook outcome. Following adjustment, textbook outcome patients demonstrated significantly reduced hazard of mortality at 5- (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.78; P < .001) and 10-years (hazard ratio 0.73, CI 0.68-0.79; P < .001), and significantly greater likelihood of graft survival at 5- (hazard ratio 0.69, CI 0.63-0.75; P < .001) and 10-years (hazard ratio 0.72, CI 0.67-0.77; P < .001). Following estimation of random effects, hospital-specific, risk-adjusted rates of textbook outcome ranged from 39% to 91%, compared to a range of 97% to 99% for one-year patient survival. Multi-level modeling of post-transplantation rates of textbook outcomes revealed that 9% of the variation between transplant programs was attributable to inter-hospital differences. CONCLUSION: Textbook outcomes offer a nuanced, composite alternative to using one-year survival when evaluating heart transplantation outcomes and comparing transplant program performance.

Expanding the heart donor pool: Can left ventricular assist devices substitute for marginal donor heart allografts?

BACKGROUND: Generally, heart transplantation with marginal donor allografts is reserved for a subset of high-risk patients. However, given the improved survival rates for patients on left ventricular assist devices, it is worth analyzing if they could potentially substitute for marginal donor allografts. This study aimed to compare survival outcomes of waitlisted patients with left ventricular assist devices who did not undergo heart transplantation to those who underwent heart transplantation with marginal allografts. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years) listed for heart transplantation between 2010 and 2022 in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. A previously validated risk score was used to define marginal donor organs. The primary outcome was death after transplantation or on the waitlist, as appropriate. RESULTS: Of 5,713 patients with left ventricular assist devices, 4,683 (82%) comprised the left ventricular assist devices group and 1,030 (18%) the marginal group. The marginal cohort was older (57 [49-64] vs 55 [45-62] years, P < .001), similarly female (26 vs 24%, P = .16), and less often White (51 vs 60%, P < .001). Relative to the left ventricular assist devices group, the marginal group demonstrated higher 5-year survival from 2010 to 2014 (81 vs 43%, P < .001) and from 2015 to 2019 (77 vs 66%, P < .001). After adjustment, marginal patients demonstrated a significantly reduced hazard of 5-year mortality for those listed from 2010 to 2014 (hazard ratio 0.25, confidence interval 0.20-0.31; P < .001) and from 2015 to 2019 (hazard ratio 0.46, confidence interval 0.37-0.57; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our study validates the superiority of transplantation relative to left ventricular assist devices but also underscores the survival benefit of heart transplantation with marginal donor allografts, even in high-risk patients.

Racial disparities in outcomes for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) outcomes in patients with a broad set of indications are not well documented. METHODS: Adults requiring ECMO were identified in the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample. Patient and hospital characteristics, including mortality, clinical outcomes, and resource utilization were analyzed using multivariable regressions. RESULTS: Of 43,190 adult ECMO patients, 67.8% were classified as White, 18.1% Black, and 10.4% Hispanic. Although mortality for Whites declined from 47.5 to 41.0% (P = 0.002), it remained steady for others. Compared to White, Asian/Pacific Islander (PI) race was linked to increased odds of mortalty (AOR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-2.0). Black race was associated with increased odds of acute kidney injury (AOR = 1.4, 95%-CI: 1.2-1.7), while Hispanic race was linked to neurologic complications (AOR 21.6; 95% CI 1.2-2.3). Black and Hispanic race were also associated with increased incremental costs. CONCLUSIONS: Race-based disparities in ECMO outcomes persist in the United States. Further work should aim to understand and mitigate the underlying reasons for such findings.