Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 107
Filter
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(6): 1075-1076, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33156187
2.
3.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(5): 1059-1060, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33030864
4.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(4): 847-848, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925619
5.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(3): 629-630, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32769636
7.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(1): 189-190, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32541287
8.
Obstet Gynecol ; 135(6): 1255-1256, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459415
9.
Obstet Gynecol ; 135(6): 1481-1483, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459441
10.
Obstet Gynecol ; 135(5): 1222-1223, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32282599
11.
Obstet Gynecol ; 135(4): 935-944, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32168227

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To predict a woman's risk of postpartum hemorrhage at labor admission using machine learning and statistical models. METHODS: Predictive models were constructed and compared using data from 10 of 12 sites in the U.S. Consortium for Safe Labor Study (2002-2008) that consistently reported estimated blood loss at delivery. The outcome was postpartum hemorrhage, defined as an estimated blood loss at least 1,000 mL. Fifty-five candidate risk factors routinely available on labor admission were considered. We used logistic regression with and without lasso regularization (lasso regression) as the two statistical models, and random forest and extreme gradient boosting as the two machine learning models to predict postpartum hemorrhage. Model performance was measured by C statistics (ie, concordance index), calibration, and decision curves. Models were constructed from the first phase (2002-2006) and externally validated (ie, temporally) in the second phase (2007-2008). Further validation was performed combining both temporal and site-specific validation. RESULTS: Of the 152,279 assessed births, 7,279 (4.8%, 95% CI 4.7-4.9) had postpartum hemorrhage. All models had good-to-excellent discrimination. The extreme gradient boosting model had the best discriminative ability to predict postpartum hemorrhage (C statistic: 0.93; 95% CI 0.92-0.93), followed by random forest (C statistic: 0.92; 95% CI 0.91-0.92). The lasso regression model (C statistic: 0.87; 95% CI 0.86-0.88) and logistic regression (C statistic: 0.87; 95% CI 0.86-0.87) had lower-but-good discriminative ability. The above results held with validation across both time and sites. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that, although all models provided superior net benefit when clinical decision thresholds were between 0% and 80% predicted risk, the extreme gradient boosting model provided the greatest net benefit. CONCLUSION: Postpartum hemorrhage on labor admission can be predicted with excellent discriminative ability using machine learning and statistical models. Further clinical application is needed, which may assist health care providers to be prepared and triage at-risk women.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Labor, Obstetric , Postpartum Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Machine Learning , Models, Statistical , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment , Triage , United States
12.
Obstet Gynecol ; 135(4): 967-968, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32168230
13.
Obstet Gynecol ; 135(3): 728-729, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32028511
14.
Obstet Gynecol ; 135(2): 479-480, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31923081
15.
Obstet Gynecol ; 135(1): 215-216, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31809446
16.
Obstet Gynecol ; 135(1): 1-3, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31809445
17.
Obstet Gynecol ; 134(6): 1361-1362, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31764751
18.
Obstet Gynecol ; 134(5): 1117, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31651819
19.
Obstet Gynecol ; 134(5): 1112-1113, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31599836
20.
Obstet Gynecol ; 134(4): 878-879, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31503143
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...