ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Mentally ill patients have worse health outcomes when they suffer from somatic conditions compared to other patients. The objective of this study was to assess the association of mental illness with hospital inpatient costs for somatic reasons. METHODS: All adult inpatient stays for somatic reasons in acute care hospitals between 2009 and 2013 were included using French exhaustive hospital discharge databases. Total inpatient costs were calculated from the all-payer perspective and compared in patients with and without a mental disorder. Only patients who had been admitted at least once for a mental disorder (either full-time or part-time) were considered to be mentally ill in this study. Generalized linear models with and without interaction terms studied the factors associated with hospital inpatient costs. RESULTS: 17,728,424 patients corresponding to 37,458,810 admissions were included. 1,163,972 patients (6.57%) were identified as having a mental illness. A previous full-time or part-time admission for a mental disorder significantly increased hospital inpatient costs (+32.64%, 95%CI=1.3243-1.3284). Interaction terms found an increased impact of mental disorders on costs in patients with low socio-economic status, as well as in men, patients aged between 45 and 60, and patients with a cardiovascular disease or diabetes. CONCLUSION: Mentally ill patients have higher hospital costs than non-mentally ill patients. Improving curative and preventive treatments in those patients could improve their health and decrease the burden on healthcare systems.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Psychotic Disorders , Adult , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Hospitalization , Hospital Costs , France/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that oral high-dose methylprednisolone (MP) is non-inferior to intravenous MP in treating multiple sclerosis relapses in terms of effectiveness and tolerance. In order to assist with resource allocation and decision-making, its cost-effectiveness must also be assessed. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-utility of per os high-dose MP as well as the cost-savings associated with implementing the strategy. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis at 28 days was carried out using data from the French COPOUSEP multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled non-inferiority trial and the statutory health insurance reimbursement database. Costs were calculated using a societal perspective, including both direct and indirect costs. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and bootstrapping methods assessed the uncertainty surrounding the results. An alternative scenario analysis in which MP was administered at home was also carried out. A budgetary impact analysis was carried at five years. RESULTS: In the conditions of the trial (hospitalized patients), there was no significant difference in utilities and costs at 28 days. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 15,360 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. If multiple sclerosis relapses were treated at home, oral MP would be more effective, less costly and associated with annual savings up to 25 million euros for the French healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: Oral MP is cost-effective in the treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses and associated with major savings.
Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , RecurrenceABSTRACT
AIMS: There is a need of more quantitative standardised data to compare local Mental Health Systems (MHSs) across international jurisdictions. Problems related to terminological variability and commensurability in the evaluation of services hamper like-with-like comparisons and hinder the development of work in this area. This study was aimed to provide standard assessment and comparison of MHS in selected local areas in Europe, contributing to a better understanding of MHS and related allocation of resources at local level and to lessen the scarcity in standard service comparison in Europe. This study is part of the Seventh Framework programme REFINEMENT (Research on Financing Systems' Effect on the Quality of Mental Health Care in Europe) project. METHODS: A total of eight study areas from European countries with different systems of care (Austria, England, Finland, France, Italy, Norway, Romania, Spain) were analysed using a standard open-access classification system (Description and Evaluation of Services for Long Term Care in Europe, DESDE-LTC). All publicly funded services universally accessible to adults (≥18 years) with a psychiatric disorder were coded. Care availability, diversity and capacity were compared across these eight local MHS. RESULTS: The comparison of MHS revealed more community-oriented delivery systems in the areas of England (Hampshire) and Southern European countries (Verona - Italy and Girona - Spain). Community-oriented systems with a higher proportion of hospital care were identified in Austria (Industrieviertel) and Scandinavian countries (Sør-Trøndelag in Norway and Helsinki-Uusimaa in Finland), while Loiret (France) was considered as a predominantly hospital-based system. The MHS in Suceava (Romania) was still in transition to community care. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant variation in care availability and capacity across MHS of local areas in Europe. This information is relevant for understanding the process of implementation of community-oriented mental health care in local areas. Standard comparison of care provision in local areas is important for context analysis and policy planning.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/standards , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Health Services/standards , Residential Facilities/standards , Adult , Efficiency, Organizational , Europe , Humans , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental HealthABSTRACT
AIMS.: People with a mental illness have a shorter lifespan and higher rates of somatic illnesses than the general population. They also face multiple barriers which interfere with access to healthcare. Our objective was to assess the effect of mental illness on the timeliness and optimality of access to healthcare for somatic reasons by comparing indicators reflecting the quality of prior somatic care in hospitalised patients. METHODS.: An observational nation-wide study was carried out using exhaustive national hospital discharge databases for the years 2009-2013. All adult inpatient stays for somatic reasons in acute care hospitals were included with the exception of obstetrics and day admissions. Admissions with coding errors were excluded. Patients with a mental illness were identified by their admissions for a psychiatric reason and/or contacts with psychiatric hospitals. The quality of prior somatic care was assessed using the number of admissions, admissions through the emergency room (ER), avoidable hospitalisations, high-severity hospitalisations, mean length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital death. Generalised linear models studied the factors associated with poor quality of primary care. RESULTS.: A total of 17 620 770 patients were included, and 6.58% had been admitted at least once for a mental illness, corresponding to 8.96% of hospital admissions. Mentally ill patients were more often hospitalised (+41% compared with non-mentally patients) and for a longer LOS (+16%). They also had more high-severity hospitalisations (+77%), were more often admitted to the ER (+113%) and had more avoidable hospitalisations (+50%). After adjusting for other covariates, regression models found that suffering from a mental illness was significantly associated with a worse state for each indicator of the quality of care except in-hospital death. CONCLUSION.: Inadequate primary care of mentally ill patients leads to more serious conditions upon admission to hospital and avoidable hospitalisations. It is, therefore, necessary to improve primary care and prevention for those patients.
Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Primary Health Care/methods , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Adult , Comorbidity , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Services Research , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Mental Disorders/epidemiologyABSTRACT
AIMS: Although many mental health care systems provide care interventions that are not related to direct health care, little is known about the interfaces between the latter and core health care. 'Core health care' refers to services whose explicit aim is direct clinical treatment which is usually provided by health professionals, i.e., physicians, nurses, psychologists. 'Other care' is typically provided by other staff and includes accommodation, training, promotion of independence, employment support and social skills. In such a definition, 'other care' does not necessarily mean being funded or governed differently. The aims of the study were: (1) using a standard classification system (Description and Evaluation of Services and Directories in Europe for Long Term Care, DESDE-LTC) to identify 'core health' and 'other care' services provided to adults with mental health problems; and (2) to investigate the balance of care by analysing the types and characteristics of core health and other care services. METHODS: The study was conducted in eight selected local areas in eight European countries with different mental health systems. All publicly funded mental health services, regardless of the funding agency, for people over 18 years old were identified and coded. The availability, capacity and the workforce of the local mental health services were described using their functional main activity or 'Main Types of Care' (MTC) as the standard for international comparison, following the DESDE-LTC system. RESULTS: In these European study areas, 822 MTCs were identified as providing core health care and 448 provided other types of care. Even though one-third of mental health services in the selected study areas provided interventions that were coded as 'other care', significant variation was found in the typology and characteristics of these services across the eight study areas. CONCLUSIONS: The functional distinction between core health and other care overcomes the traditional division between 'health' and 'social' sectors based on governance and funding. The overall balance between core health and other care services varied significantly across the European sites. Mental health systems cannot be understood or planned without taking into account the availability and capacity of all services specifically available for this target population, including those outside the health sector.
Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Adult , Europe , Health Services Research , Humans , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Health , Urban PopulationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adult deprived patients consume more healthcare resources than others, particularly in terms of increased length of stay (LOS) and costs. Very few pediatric studies have focused on LOS, although the effect of deprivation could be greater in children due to the vulnerability of this population. Our objective was to compare LOS between deprived and nondeprived children hospitalized for acute infectious diseases in two university-affiliated pediatric departments located in a low-income area of northern Paris. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational multicenter study in two university-affiliated hospitals, Hôpital Robert-Debré and Hôpital Jean-Verdier. All the patients under 15 years of age admitted to the general pediatric department for pneumonia, bronchiolitis, gastroenteritis, or pyelonephritis between 20 October 2016 and 20 March 2017 were included. Deprivation was assessed with an individual questionnaire and score (EPICES). Endpoints included length of stay, costs, and readmission rates at 15 days in each quintile of deprivation. Multivariate regression assessed the association between deprivation and each endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 556 patients were included in the study and 540 were analyzed. Sixty percent were boys and the mean age was 9 months±18. Bronchiolitis was the most frequent diagnosis (67.8%). Fifty-six percent of patients were considered to be deprived based on the EPICES questionnaire. Mean LOS was 4.6±3.5 days and we found no significant difference in LOS between the different deprivation quintiles (P=0.83). Multivariate regression did not show an association between LOS and deprivation. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between deprived and nondeprived patients in terms of LOS. Deprivation may therefore impact hospitals in other ways such as admission rates. The impact of deprivation during hospitalization for chronic diseases should also be investigated.
Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Psychosocial Deprivation , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Paris/epidemiology , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To date, there has been no published comprehensive estimation of costs related to Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Our objective was therefore to provide data on the economic burden and health-related quality of life associated with PWS in France in order to raise awareness of the repercussions on individuals suffering from this syndrome and on caregivers as well as on the health and social care systems. METHOD: A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 51 individuals recruited through the French PWS patient association. Data on their demographic characteristics and resource use were obtained from an online questionnaire, and costs were estimated by a bottom-up approach. The EQ-5D-5L health questionnaire was used to measure the health-related quality of life of individuals suffering from PWS and their caregivers. RESULTS: The average annual cost of PWS was estimated at 58 890 per individual, with direct healthcare accounting for 42 299, direct non-healthcare formal costs 13 865 and direct non-healthcare informal costs 8459. The main contributors to PWS costs were hospitalisations and social services. Indirect costs resulting from loss of productivity in the labour market was 32 542 for adults suffering from PWS. Mean EQ-5D utility scores were 0.4 for individuals with PWS and 0.7 for caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Prader-Willi syndrome represents a major economic burden from a societal perspective and has a significant impact on health-related quality of life both for individuals suffering from PWS and for their caregivers in France. These results underscore the need to develop tailored policies targeted at improving care. Likewise, a larger study collecting a broader range of medical characteristics should be undertaken to achieve more precise estimations.
Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Prader-Willi Syndrome/economics , Prader-Willi Syndrome/nursing , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , France , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to estimate the commitment to mental health research by the European Union (EU) through the 7th framework (FP7) and the competitiveness and innovation (CIP) programmes during the 2007-2013 period. METHODS: Research projects dedicated or partially related to mental health were identified using keywords in the CORDIS database that inventories all FP7 and CIP research projects. We then contacted projects' principal investigators to access the budget breakdown by country and performed an imputation of the distribution of funding between countries based on projects' and participants' characteristics where information was missing. RESULTS: Among the 25 783 research projects funded by the FP7 and the CIP, 215 (0.8%) were specifically dedicated to mental health and 170 (0.7%) were partially related to mental health. They received 607.1 million representing 1.4% of FP7 total funding. Within the FP7-Health subprogramme, the projects represented 5.2% of funding. Important variations appeared across EU countries both for raw funding, which varied between 0 and 77M, and for funding per 100 inhabitants, which varied between 0 and 293. CONCLUSION: EU funding of mental health research does not match the burden incurred by mental disorders and must be increased in the next framework programme.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/economics , Mental Health/economics , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , European Union , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the economic burden from a societal perspective and the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in Europe. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with JIA from Germany, Italy, Spain, France, the United Kingdom, Bulgaria, and Sweden. Data on demographic characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, informal care, labor productivity losses, and HRQOL were collected from the questionnaires completed by patients or their caregivers. HRQOL was measured with the EuroQol 5-domain (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients (67 Germany, 34 Sweden, 33 Italy, 23 United Kingdom, 4 France, and 1 Bulgaria) completed the questionnaire. Excluding Bulgarian results, due to small sample size, country-specific annual health care costs ranged from 18,913 to 36,396 (reference year: 2012). Estimated direct healthcare costs ranged from 11,068 to 22,138; direct non-healthcare costs ranged from 7837 to 14,155 and labor productivity losses ranged from 0 to 8715. Costs are also shown to differ between children and adults. The mean EQ-5D index score for JIA patients was estimated at between 0.44 and 0.88, and the mean EQ-5D visual analogue scale score was estimated at between 62 and 79. CONCLUSIONS: JIA patients incur considerable societal costs and experience substantial deterioration in HRQOL in some countries. Compared with previous studies, our results show a remarkable increase in annual healthcare costs for JIA patients. Reasons for the increase are the inclusion of non-professional caregiver costs, a wider use of biologics, and longer hospital stays.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Arthritis, Juvenile/psychology , Caregivers , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care/economics , Sick Leave/economics , Sickness Impact Profile , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the main hereditary cause of intellectual disability. Although the associated burden appears to be considerable, to date no study has comprehensively assessed the cost incurred because of FXS, including its specific impact on health-related quality of life and the burden on caregivers using standardised quantitative tools. The aim of this article is to provide data in order to increase awareness of the repercussions of FXS on patients and caregivers as well as on the health and social care systems in France. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 145 patients recruited through Le Goëland X-Fragile and Mosaïques, the French FXS patient associations. Data on their demographic characteristics and resource use were obtained from an online questionnaire, and costs were estimated by a bottom-up approach. The EQ-5D health questionnaire was used to measure patients' and caregivers' health-related quality of life. Perceived burden of care was measured using the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview. The Barthel index, a non-utility-based assessment, was used to measure patients' level of dependence. RESULTS: The annual total direct cost of FXS was estimated at 25 800 per patient. The main contributors were informal care provided by the main caregiver (10 500) and social services (8400). Healthcare costs, estimated at 2700, represented only a minor share. Mean EQ-5D utility scores were 0.49 for patients and 0.75 for caregivers. The mean burden for caregivers as measured by the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview was 39.9. CONCLUSIONS: Fragile X syndrome requires significant resources that are mainly of a non-medical nature and are higher for children than for adults. Compared with related diseases, it constitutes a particularly high burden for caregivers. Using a bottom-up approach and a wide range of standardised measures, this study underscores the need for greater awareness of the burden of FXS as well as an assessment of new and existing interventions to address it.
Subject(s)
Caregivers/economics , Cost of Illness , Fragile X Syndrome/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Fragile X Syndrome/nursing , France , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To provide data on the economic burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc) in France and to raise awareness of the repercussions of this disease for patients and caregivers and on the health and social care system. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 147 patients recruited through the Association des Sclérodermiques de France (ASF), the French association for SSc patients. Data on the patients' use of resources were obtained retrospectively from an online questionnaire and costs were estimated by a bottom-up approach. The HRQoL patients and caregivers was assessed with the five-level EURQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) health questionnaire. RESULTS: The average annual cost of SSc was estimated at EUR 22,459 per patient. Direct healthcare costs amounted to EUR 8452, direct non-healthcare formal costs to EUR 1606, direct non-healthcare informal costs to EUR 1875, and indirect costs resulting from patients' absence from the labour market to EUR 10,526. The main contributors to SSc costs were hospitalizations and early retirement. Mean EQ-5D utility scores were 0.49 for patients and 0.66 for caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Although SSc is a rare disease, its economic burden from a societal perspective is substantial and the consequences for HRQoL are significant for both patients and caregivers in France, underscoring the need to develop tailored policies targeted at improving patients' care and reducing the long-term impact of SSc.
Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Health Status , Quality of Life/psychology , Scleroderma, Systemic/economics , Adult , Aged , Cost of Illness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , France , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care/economics , Retirement/economics , Retrospective Studies , Scleroderma, Systemic/physiopathology , Scleroderma, Systemic/psychology , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
Stigma and social exclusion related to mental health are of substantial public health importance for Europe. As part of ROAMER (ROAdmap for MEntal health Research in Europe), we used systematic mapping techniques to describe the current state of research on stigma and social exclusion across Europe. Findings demonstrate growing interest in this field between 2007 and 2012. Most studies were descriptive (60%), focused on adults of working age (60%) and were performed in Northwest Europe-primarily in the UK (32%), Finland (8%), Sweden (8%) and Germany (7%). In terms of mental health characteristics, the largest proportion of studies investigated general mental health (20%), common mental disorders (16%), schizophrenia (16%) or depression (14%). There is a paucity of research looking at mechanisms to reduce stigma and promote social inclusion, or at factors that might promote resilience or protect against stigma/social exclusion across the life course. Evidence is also limited in relation to evaluations of interventions. Increasing incentives for cross-country research collaborations, especially with new EU Member States and collaboration across European professional organizations and disciplines, could improve understanding of the range of underpinning social and cultural factors which promote inclusion or contribute toward lower levels of stigma, especially during times of hardship.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/psychology , Prejudice , Psychological Distance , Social Stigma , Stereotyping , Europe , Humans , Mental Health , ResearchABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A cost of illness study was undertaken on behalf of the French Ministry of Health to estimate the annual cost of stroke in France with the goal of better understanding the current economic burden so that improved strategies for care may be developed. METHODS: Using primary data from exhaustive national databases and both top-down and bottom-up approaches, the stroke-related costs for healthcare, nursing care and lost productivity were estimated. RESULTS: The total healthcare cost of stroke patients in France in 2007 was 5.3 billion, 92% of which was borne by statutory health insurance. The average cost of incident cases was 16 686 per patient in the first year, while the annual cost of prevalent cases was a little less than half that amount (8099). Nursing care costs were estimated at 2.4 billion. Lost productivity reached 255.9 million and that income loss for stroke patients was partially compensated by 63.3 million in social benefit payments. CONCLUSIONS: With healthcare costs representing 3% of total health expenditure in France, stroke constitutes an ongoing burden for the health system and overall economy. Nursing care added nearly half again the amount spent on healthcare, while productivity losses were more limited because nearly 80% of acute incident strokes were in patients over age 65. The high cost of illness underscores the need for improved prevention and interventions to limit the disabling effects of stroke.
Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Stroke/economics , France/epidemiology , Health Care Costs , Humans , Incidence , Insurance, Health/economics , Nursing Care/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Stroke/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Schizophrenia represents a major burden for patients, their families, healthcare systems and societies. The objective of this literature review is to document the economic burden of schizophrenia. METHOD: The literature search was performed using the MEDLINE-PUBMED database and the following keywords: schizophrenia and cost, burden of disease, qaly or price. The grey literature search was performed using several databases (e.g. Banque de Données en Santé Publique) and the Google Scholar(®) web search engine. The studies that met the following criteria were included: published since 1998, written in English or French, studied OECD countries and presented costs data that were given in monetary terms. The costs data identified in the literature were classified into the following five main categories: cost for healthcare system, cost for social and medico-social system (medico-social system is a French specificity), cost for prison and legal systems, cost of informal care given by family, and cost associated with productivity losses. To improve comparability, costs were reported as a percentage of health care expenditures and as a per-ten-thousand of GDP (gross domestic product). RESULTS: Among the 201 articles identified as potentially relevant to the topic, nine were included in the literature review. Schizophrenia health care costs ranged from four (Ireland) to 140000 of GDP (Spain). Hospital care was the main health care cost driver but ranged from 19 (USA) to 92% (Belgium) demonstrating a great variability in treatment patterns. The costs for social and medico-social system ranged from 1.3 (Korea) to 13.80000 of GDP (USA) and the costs of informal caregivers ranged from 1.2 (Australia) to 12.70000 of GDP (Spain). The productivity losses associated with unemployment ranged from 6.2 (Australia) to 21.30000 of GDP (USA). The productivity losses associated with premature mortality ranged from less than 0.01 (Canada) to 3.850000 (Ireland). Among others factors, such as targeted population, the choice of valuation method between "Friction costs" and "Human Capital" could account for the heterogeneity of estimates. DISCUSSION: Median health care costs of schizophrenia represented 1.1% of total national health care expenditures. Productivity losses associated with morbidity constituted the major cost burden of schizophrenia. Valuation method, costs items, target populations and prevalence rates differed widely from study to study. Furthermore, the burden attributable to loss of quality of life was not estimated in the studies. CONCLUSION: Cost-of-illness studies of schizophrenia provide information about its burden on society. The external validity of such studies however is poor and justifies country-specific data collection.
Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/economics , Schizophrenia/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Caregivers/economics , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Home Nursing/economics , Humans , Prisons/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
STUDY QUESTION: How do the different forms of regulation and public financing of IVF affect utilization in otherwise similar European welfare state systems? SUMMARY ANSWER: Countries with more liberal social eligibility regulations had higher levels of IVF utilization, which diminished as the countries' policies became more restrictive. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Europe is a world leader in the development and utilization of IVF, yet surveillance reveals significant differences in uptake among countries which have adopted different approaches to the regulation and and public financing of IVF. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A descriptive and comparative analysis of legal restrictions on access to IVF in 13 of the EU15 countries that affirmatively regulate and publicly finance IVF. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Using 2009 data from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology study of regulatory frameworks in Europe and additional legislative research, we examined and described restrictions on access to IVF in terms of general eligibility, public financing and the scope of available services. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to identify patterns of regulation and groups of countries with similar regulatory patterns and to explore the effects on utilization of IVF, using data from the most recent European and international IVF monitoring reports. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Regulations based on social characteristics of treatment seekers who are not applicable to other medical treatments, including relationship status and sexual orientation, appear to have the greatest impact on utilization. Countries with the most generous public financing schemes tend to restrict access to covered IVF to a greater degree. However, no link could be established between IVF utilization and the manner in which coverage was regulated or the level of public financing. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Owing to the lack of data regarding the actual level of public versus private financing of IVF it is impossible to draw conclusions regarding equity of access. Moreover, the regulatory and utilization data were not completely temporally matched in what can be a quickly changing regulatory landscape. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Whether motivated by cost, eligility restrictions or the availability of particular services, cross-border treatment seeking is driven by regulatory policies, underscoring the extra-territorial implications of in-country political decisions regarding access to IVF. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There was no funding source for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro/economics , Fertilization in Vitro/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Healthcare Financing , Infertility, Female/therapy , Infertility, Male/therapy , Legislation, Medical , Adult , Age Factors , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Europe , Female , Financing, Government/legislation & jurisprudence , Financing, Personal , Health Care Costs , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Humans , Infertility, Female/economics , Infertility, Male/economics , Male , Marital Status , Sexual Behavior , Single Embryo Transfer/economics , Tissue and Organ Procurement/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Asthma, the most frequent chronic disease in childhood, is often treated by a continuous preventive treatment associated to the treatment of attacks. This therapeutic scheme fits well with educative skills. The Robert Debré's asthma school has been created in December 1999. Two nurses specialized in child asthma education are working in the school, helped by the pediatric pulmonologists. Children 6-year-old or more, that are treated in the hospital for asthma may be sent to the asthma school for education. They receive individual or collective education for cognitive, psycho-affective and sensory-motor targets related to asthma. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the outcome of educative action in childhood asthma and to study hospitalizations costs. SUBJECTS: children who received education for the first time in the year 2000 or 2001 and in whom exhaustive computerized data were available were eligible for the study. METHODS: retrospective and comparative study one-year-before/one-year-after the first educational intervention, assessed by comparison of the numbers of scheduled medical consultations and hospitalizations (and their cost). RESULTS: Sixty-six children were studied. We registered a significant increase of scheduled medical consultations (177 vs. 223; P < 0.03), and a very significant decrease of hospitalizations for asthma attacks (32 vs. 11; P < 0.001) without influence of the number of educational interventions and with a 52% decrease in costs (84,788 vs. 40,073 euros; P < 0.03). CONCLUSION: Asthmatic children education is a useful tool to improve medical follow-up and to decrease hospitalizations number. In a two-year survey, the decrease of cost in a group of 66 children is 44,715 euros.