ABSTRACT
This statement was released in June 2020 by the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine to provide guidance for the 2020-2021 residency application cycle in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. While many of the recommendations are specific to this cycle, others, such as the Department Summary Letter of Evaluation, are meant to be an enduring change to the internal medicine residency application process. AAIM realizes that some schools may not yet have the tools or resources to implement the template fully this cycle and look toward collaboration within the internal medicine education community to facilitate adoption in the cycles to come.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Correspondence as Topic , Internal Medicine/organization & administration , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Job Application , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , COVID-19 , HumansABSTRACT
Disseminating scholarly work as a clinician educator is critical to furthering new knowledge in medical education, creating an evidence base for new practices, and increasing the likelihood of promotion. Knowing how to initiate scholarship and develop habits to support it, however, may not be clear. This perspective is designed to help readers choose and narrow their focus of scholarly interest, garner mentors, find potential project funding, and identify outside support through involvement with national organizations, collaborators, and faculty development programs. By incorporating these suggestions into their daily work, educators can find ways to connect their clinical and educational interests and make their daily work count toward scholarship.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical/standards , Faculty, Medical/standards , Fellowships and Scholarships/standards , Schools, Medical/standards , Staff Development/standards , Education, Medical/methods , Fellowships and Scholarships/methods , Humans , Staff Development/methodsABSTRACT
As medical educators continue to redefine learning and assessment across the continuum, implementation of competency-based medical education in the undergraduate setting has become a focus of many medical schools. While standards of competency have been defined for the graduating student, there is no uniform approach for defining competency expectations for students during their core clerkship year. The authors describe the process by which an Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine task force developed a paradigm for competency-based assessment of students during their inpatient internal medicine (IM) clerkship. Building on work at the resident and fellowship levels, the task force focused on the development of key learning outcomes as defined by entrustable professional activities (EPAs) that were specific to educational experiences on the IM clerkship, as well as identification of high-priority assessment domains. The work was informed by a national survey of clerkship directors.Six key EPAs emerged: generating a differential diagnosis, obtaining a complete and accurate history and physical exam, obtaining focused histories and clinically relevant physical exams, preparing an oral presentation, interpreting the results of basic diagnostic studies, and providing well-organized clinical documentation. A model for assessment was proposed, with descriptors aligned to the scale of supervision and mapped to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education domains of competence. The proposed paradigm offers a standardized template that may be used across IM clerkships, and which would effectively bridge competency evaluation in the clerkship to fourth-year assessment as well as eventual postgraduate training.
Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship/standards , Competency-Based Education/methods , Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Internal Medicine/education , Accreditation , Advisory Committees , Clinical Competence/standards , Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities/organization & administration , Curriculum , Education, Medical/methods , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/standards , Educational Measurement/methods , Humans , Internal Medicine/organization & administration , Problem-Based Learning/methods , Schools, Medical/standards , StudentsABSTRACT
The purpose of the fourth year of medical school remains controversial. Competing demands during this transitional phase cause confusion for students and educators. In 2014, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) released 13 Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency (CEPAERs). A committee comprising members of the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine and the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine applied these principles to preparing students for internal medicine residencies. The authors propose a curricular framework based on five CEPAERs that were felt to be most relevant to residency preparation, informed by prior stakeholder surveys. The critical areas outlined include entering orders, forming and answering clinical questions, conducting patient care handovers, collaborating interprofessionally, and recognizing patients requiring urgent care and initiating that care. For each CEPAER, the authors offer suggestions about instruction and assessment of competency. The fourth year of medical school can be rewarding for students, while adequately preparing them to begin residency, by addressing important elements defined in the core entrustable activities. Thus prepared, new residents can function safely and competently in supervised postgraduate settings.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Internal Medicine/education , Internal Medicine/methods , Schools, Medical , Students, Medical , Career Mobility , Curriculum/trends , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/trends , Female , Humans , Internal Medicine/trends , Internship and Residency/methods , Internship and Residency/trends , Male , Schools, Medical/trendsABSTRACT
We conducted a review of published medical education articles to identify high-quality research and innovation relevant to educators in general medicine. Our review team consisted of six general internists with expertise in medical education and a professional medical librarian. We manually searched 15 journals in pairs (a total of 3062 citations) for original research articles in medical education published in 2014. Each pair of reviewers independently rated the relevance, importance, and generalizability of articles on medical education in their assigned journals using a 27-point scale (maximum of 9 points for each characteristic). From this list, each team member independently reviewed the 22 articles that received a score of 20 or higher from both initial reviewers, and for each selected article rated the quality and global relevance for the generalist educator. We included the seven top-rated articles for presentation in this review, and categorized the studies into four general themes: continuity clinic scheduling, remediation, interprofessional education, and quality improvement and patient safety. We summarized key findings and identified significant limitations of each study. Further studies assessing patient outcomes are needed to strengthen the literature in medical education. This summary of relevant medical education articles can inform future research, teaching, and practice.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical/trends , General Practitioners/education , General Practitioners/trends , Periodicals as Topic/trends , Education, Medical/methods , HumansABSTRACT
We conducted a review of articles published in 2013 to identify high-quality research in medical education that was relevant to general medicine education practice. Our review team consisted of six general internists with expertise in medical education of varying ranks, as well as a professional medical librarian. We manually searched 15 journals in pairs, and performed an online search using the PubMed search engine for all original research articles in medical education published in 2013. From the total 4,181 citations identified, we selected 65 articles considered most relevant to general medicine educational practice. Each team member then independently reviewed and rated the quality of each selected article using the modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. We then reviewed the quality and relevance of each selected study and grouped them into categories of propensity for inclusion. Nineteen studies were felt to be of adequate quality and were of moderate to high propensity for inclusion. Team members then independently voted for studies they felt to be of the highest relevance and quality within the 19 selected studies. The ten articles with the greatest number of votes were included in the review. We categorized the studies into five general themes: Improving Clinical Skills in UME, Inpatient Clinical Teaching Methods, Advancements in Continuity Clinic, Handoffs/Transitions in Care, and Trainee Assessment. Most studies in our review of the 2013 literature in general medical education were limited to single institutions and non-randomized study designs; we identified significant limitations of each study. Selected articles may inform future research and practice of medical educators.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical/trends , General Practitioners/education , General Practitioners/trends , Organizational Innovation , Clinical Competence/standards , Education, Medical/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/trends , General Practitioners/standards , HumansABSTRACT
Continuity of care is a core value of patients and primary care physicians, yet in graduate medical education (GME), creating effective clinical teaching environments that emphasize continuity poses challenges. In this Perspective, the authors review three dimensions of continuity for patient care-informational, longitudinal, and interpersonal-and propose analogous dimensions describing continuity for learning that address both residents learning from patient care and supervisors and interprofessional team members supporting residents' competency development. The authors review primary care GME reform efforts through the lens of continuity, including the growing body of evidence that highlights the importance of longitudinal continuity between learners and supervisors for making competency judgments. The authors consider the challenges that primary care residency programs face in the wake of practice transformation to patient-centered medical home models and make recommendations to maximize the opportunity that these practice models provide. First, educators, researchers, and policy makers must be more precise with terms describing various dimensions of continuity. Second, research should prioritize developing assessments that enable the study of the impact of interpersonal continuity on clinical outcomes for patients and learning outcomes for residents. Third, residency programs should establish program structures that provide informational and longitudinal continuity to enable the development of interpersonal continuity for care and learning. Fourth, these educational models and continuity assessments should extend to the level of the interprofessional team. Fifth, policy leaders should develop a meaningful recognition process that rewards academic practices for training the primary care workforce.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency/methods , Models, Educational , Patient-Centered Care , Physicians, Primary Care/education , Program Development , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many different components factor into the final grade assigned for the internal medicine clerkship. Failure of one or more of these requires consideration of remedial measures. PURPOSE: To determine which assessment components are used to assign students a passing grade for the clerkship and what remediation measures are required when students do not pass a component. METHODS: A national cross-sectional survey of Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM) institutional members was conducted in April 2011. The survey included sections on remediation, grading practices, and demographics. The authors analyzed responses using descriptive and comparative statistics. RESULTS: Response rate was 73% (86/113). Medicine clerkships required students to pass the following components: clinical evaluations 83 (97%), NBME subject exam 76 (88%), written assignments 40 (46%), OSCE 35 (41%), in-house written exam 23 (27%), and mini-CEX 19 (22%). When students failed a component of the clerkship for the first time, 55 schools (64%) simply allowed students to make up the component, while only 16 (18%) allowed a simple make-up for a second failure. Additional ward time was required by 24 schools (28%) for a first-time failure of one component of the clerkship and by 49 (57%) for a second failure. The presence or absence of true remedial measures in a school was not associated with clerkship director academic rank, grading scheme, or percent of students who failed the clerkship in the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: Most schools required passing clinical evaluations and NBME subject exam components to pass the medicine clerkship, but there was variability in other requirements. Most schools allowed students to simply re-take the component for a first-time failure. This study raises the question of whether true remediation is being undertaken before students are asked to re-demonstrate competence in a failed area of the clerkship to be ready for the subinternship level.
Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship , Clinical Competence , Educational Measurement/methods , Faculty, Medical , Internal Medicine/education , Canada , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Schools, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
Clinician Educators (CEs) play an essential role in the education and patient care missions of academic medical centers. Despite their crucial role, academic advancement is slower for CEs than for other faculty. Increased clinical productivity demands and financial stressors at academic medical centers add to the existing challenges faced by CEs. This perspective seeks to provide a framework for junior CEs to consider with the goal of maximizing their chance of academic success. We discuss six action areas that we consider central to flourishing at academic medical centers: 1. Clarify what success means and define goals; 2. Seek mentorship and be a responsible mentee; 3. Develop a niche and engage in relevant professional development; 4. Network; 5. Transform educational activities into scholarship; and 6. Seek funding and other resources.
Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Faculty, Medical/organization & administration , Teaching/organization & administration , Career Mobility , Fellowships and Scholarships/organization & administration , Goals , Humans , Mentors , Time Management/organization & administrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A rapidly evolving body of literature in medical education can impact the practice of clinical educators in graduate medical education. OBJECTIVE: To aggregate studies published in the medical education literature in 2011 to provide teachers in general internal medicine with an overview of the current, relevant medical education literature. REVIEW: We systematically searched major medical education journals and the general clinical literature for medical education studies with sound design and relevance to the educational practice of graduate medical education teachers. We chose 12 studies, grouped into themes, using a consensus method, and critiqued these studies. RESULTS: Four themes emerged. They encompass (1) learner assessment, (2) duty hour limits and teaching in the inpatient setting, (3) innovations in teaching, and (4) learner distress. With each article we also present recommendations for how readers may use them as resources to update their clinical teaching. While we sought to identify the studies with the highest quality and greatest relevance to educators, limitation of the studies selected include their single-site and small sample nature, and the frequent lack of objective measures of outcomes. These limitations are shared with the larger body of medical education literature. CONCLUSIONS: The themes and the recommendations for how to incorporate this information into clinical teaching have the potential to inform the educational practice of general internist educators as well as that of teachers in other specialties.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reflective writing programs have been implemented at many medical schools, but it is unclear to what extent and how they are structured. METHODS: We surveyed the 107 Clerkship Directors of Internal Medicine member institutions on use of reflective writing assignments during the internal medicine clerkship. RESULTS: Eighty-six of 107 (80%) institutional members completed the survey. Thirty-five percent reported having a reflective writing assignment, 48% did not, and 6% did not but were considering starting one within the next 2 years. Of the 30 assignments, most were partially structured (60%), involved small-group discussion (57%), and provided individual student feedback (73%). A minority (30%) contributed to the students' grade. Respondents believed assignments contributed to students' learning in multiple domains, most often Professionalism (97%) and Communication (77%). CONCLUSIONS: Although reflective writing programs were common, variability existed in their structure. Further research is needed to determine how best to implement them.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Internal Medicine/education , Students, Medical/psychology , Teaching/methods , Writing , Adult , Data Collection , Feedback , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Learning , Male , Prevalence , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Schools, Medical , Statistics as Topic , United StatesABSTRACT
Integrating public health into medical curricula poses a substantial challenge to educators. However, the needs of trainees and the population requirements of accrediting bodies provide a compelling call to action to improve how tomorrow's medical practitioners are prepared to incorporate public health into their practices. This article provides insights about the nature of the challenges, and it identifies opportunities and practical approaches to integrating public health content into medical school curricula. The paper incorporates authors' opinions with a synthesis of the discussions from a workshop at the 2010 "Patients and Populations: Public Health in Medical Education" conference.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Public Health/education , Accreditation , Curriculum , Education, Medical/standards , Education, Medical/trends , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Schools, Medical/standards , Schools, Medical/trendsABSTRACT
This is one of six short papers that describe additional innovations to help integrate public health into medical education; these were featured in the "Patients and Populations: Public Health in Medical Education" conference. They represent relatively new endeavors or curricular components that had not been explored in prior publications. Although evaluation data are lacking, it was felt that sharing a description of the mapping process for linking public health competencies to clinical clerkship activities at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health would be of value to medical educators.