Firework-Related Ocular Trauma at a Level 1 Trauma Center During a City-Wide Pandemic Lockdown: A Case Series.

Purpose To report six ocular injury cases caused by unlicensed fireworks and subsequent complications at a level 1 trauma center in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related shelter-in-place orders. Observations All six cases occurred between March 2020 and July 2020 and involved fireworks of non-official use. A majority of subjects were male between the ages of 17 and 53 years old. Ocular trauma presented as the following: Case 1 is a 17-year-old male who sustained a left-sided corneal abrasion and small intraocular foreign body after a firework exploded in his hand. Case 2 is a 47-year-old male who presented with a right globe rupture after being struck with a projectile from a neighborhood fireworks display. Case 3 is a 36-year-old male with corneal abrasion, traumatic iritis, and commotio retinae after a firework injury in the setting of alcohol use. Case 4 is a 35-year-old male who presented with left lid injury, corneal abrasion, and hyphema after being struck by a firework with evidence of penetrating eye trauma on subsequent exams. Case 5 is a 53-year-old male who developed bilateral subconjunctival hemorrhages and a partial-thickness corneal laceration after a firework exploded in his left hand. Case 6 is a 48-year-old woman who sustained bilateral corneal stromal foreign bodies while cooking after a firework exploded near her vicinity. Conclusions and importance Fireworks are a preventable cause of mortality and long-term ocular morbidity. The index of suspicion for open globe injuries related to fireworks should be high given the mechanism of injury. These presenting cases at a level 1 trauma center and safety net hospital may be an unforeseen by-product of COVID-19 lockdowns. Our findings are relevant to trauma centers and safety net hospitals with large cases of firework injuries. Further initiatives to improve awareness of the dangers of fireworks should be prioritized to limit harms for all community members.

Homelessness and Incidence and Causes of Sudden Death: Data From the POST SCD Study.

Importance: Over 580 000 people in the US experience homelessness, with one of the largest concentrations residing in San Francisco, California. Unhoused individuals have a life expectancy of approximately 50 years, yet how sudden death contributes to this early mortality is unknown. Objective: To compare incidence and causes of sudden death by autopsy among housed and unhoused individuals in San Francisco County. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the Postmortem Systematic Investigation of Sudden Cardiac Death (POST SCD) study, a prospective cohort of consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest deaths countywide among individuals aged 18 to 90 years. Cases meeting World Health Organization criteria for presumed SCD underwent autopsy, toxicologic analysis, and medical record review. For rate calculations, all 525 incident SCDs in the initial cohort were used (February 1, 2011, to March 1, 2014). For analysis of causes, 343 SCDs (incident cases approximately every third day) were added from the extended cohort (March 1, 2014, to December 16, 2018). Data analysis was performed from July 1, 2022, to July 1, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were incidence and causes of presumed SCD by housing status. Causes of sudden death were adjudicated as arrhythmic (potentially rescuable with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator), cardiac nonarrhythmic (eg, tamponade), or noncardiac (eg, overdose). Results: A total of 868 presumed SCDs over 8 years were identified: 151 unhoused individuals (17.4%) and 717 housed individuals (82.6%). Unhoused individuals compared with housed individuals were younger (mean [SD] age, 56.7 [0.8] vs 61.0 [0.5] years, respectively) and more often male (132 [87.4%] vs 499 [69.6%]), with statistically significant racial differences. Paramedic response times were similar (mean [SD] time to arrival, unhoused individuals: 5.6 [0.4] minutes; housed individuals: 5.6 [0.2] minutes; P = .99), while proportion of witnessed sudden deaths was lower among unhoused individuals compared with housed individuals (27 [18.0%] vs 184 [25.7%], respectively, P = .04). Unhoused individuals had higher rates of sudden death (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 16.2; 95% CI, 5.1-51.2; P < .001) and arrhythmic death (IRR, 7.2; 95% CI, 1.3-40.1; P = .02). These associations remained statistically significant after adjustment for differences in age and sex. Noncardiac causes (96 [63.6%] vs 270 [37.7%], P < .001), including occult overdose (48 [31.8%] vs 90 [12.6%], P < .001), gastrointestinal causes (8 [5.3%] vs 15 [2.1%], P = .03), and infection (11 [7.3%] vs 20 [2.8%], P = .01), were more common among sudden deaths in unhoused individuals. A lower proportion of sudden deaths in unhoused individuals were due to arrhythmic causes (48 of 151 [31.8%] vs 420 of 717 [58.6%], P < .001), including acute and chronic coronary disease. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study among individuals who experienced sudden death in San Francisco County, homelessness was associated with greater risk of sudden death from both noncardiac causes and arrhythmic causes potentially preventable with a defibrillator.

Population-Level Health Effects of Involuntary Displacement of People Experiencing Unsheltered Homelessness Who Inject Drugs in US Cities.

Importance: At least 500 000 people in the US experience homelessness nightly. More than 30% of people experiencing homelessness also have a substance use disorder. Involuntary displacement is a common practice in responding to unsheltered people experiencing homelessness. Understanding the health implications of displacement (eg, "sweeps," "clearings," "cleanups") is important, especially as they relate to key substance use disorder outcomes. Objective: To estimate the long-term health effects of involuntary displacement of people experiencing homelessness who inject drugs in 23 US cities. Design, Setting, and Participants: A closed cohort microsimulation model that simulates the natural history of injection drug use and health outcomes among people experiencing homelessness who inject drugs in 23 US cities. The model was populated with city-level data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system and published data to make representative cohorts of people experiencing homelessness who inject drugs in those cities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Projected outcomes included overdose mortality, serious injection-related infections and mortality related to serious injection-related infections, hospitalizations, initiations of medications for opioid use disorder, and life-years lived over a 10-year period for 2 scenarios: "no displacement" and "continual involuntary displacement." The population-attributable fraction of continual displacement to mortality was estimated among this population. Results: Models estimated between 974 and 2175 additional overdose deaths per 10 000 people experiencing homelessness at 10 years in scenarios in which people experiencing homelessness who inject drugs were continually involuntarily displaced compared with no displacement. Between 611 and 1360 additional people experiencing homelessness who inject drugs per 10 000 people were estimated to be hospitalized with continual involuntary displacement, and there will be an estimated 3140 to 8812 fewer initiations of medications for opioid use disorder per 10 000 people. Continual involuntary displacement may contribute to between 15.6% and 24.4% of additional deaths among unsheltered people experiencing homelessness who inject drugs over a 10-year period. Conclusion and Relevance: Involuntary displacement of people experiencing homelessness may substantially increase drug-related morbidity and mortality. These findings have implications for the practice of involuntary displacement, as well as policies such as access to housing and supportive services, that could mitigate these harms.

Health risk associated with residential relocation among people who inject drugs in Los Angeles and San Francisco, CA: a cross sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Given the housing instability and frequent residential relocation (both volitional and hegemonic) of people who inject drugs, we sought to determine whether residential relocation (defined as sleeping in a different place in the past 30 days) is associated with health outcomes in a sample of people who inject drugs (PWID). METHODS: We recruited 601 PWID using targeted sampling and interviewed them between 2016 and 2018 in San Francisco and Los Angeles, CA about housing, drug use practices, and service utilization. We then developed multivariable regression models to investigate how residential relocation is associated with violence, health outcomes, and social service access. We analyzed our data between June 2018 and October 2019. RESULTS: Participants who relocated in the past 30 days had lower odds of being in substance use treatment (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 0.62, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.42, 0.89) and higher odds of nonfatal overdose (AOR = 2.50, CI = 1.28, 4.90), receptive syringe sharing (AOR = 2.26, CI = 1.18, 4.32), severe food insecurity (AOR = 1.69, CI = 1.14, 2.50), having belongings stolen (AOR = 2.14, CI = 1.42, 3.21), experiencing physical assault (AOR = 1.58, CI = 1.03, 2.43), arrest (AOR = 1.64, CI = 1.02, 2.65), and jail (AOR = 1.90, CI = 1.16, 3.13) in the past 6 months when compared to those who did not relocate. CONCLUSIONS: PWID who have relocated in the past 30 days have higher odds of experiencing violence and life- threatening adverse outcomes, and policies that disrupt living circumstances of PWID should be ended in favor of those that support housing stability.

Spontaneous hyphema in the setting of COVID-19 pneumonia.

PURPOSE: To report a challenging case of spontaneous hyphema in the setting of prone positioning for COVID-19 pneumonia. OBSERVATIONS: A previously healthy patient was concomitantly diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and COVID-19 infection. During his hospitalization he required intubation and prone positioning. Following change from prone to supine positioning, he was noted to have developed a large unilateral spontaneous hyphema. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: We present a challenging case of spontaneous hyphema due to a hematologic malignancy in the setting of prone positioning for COVID-19 pneumonia.