Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 40(1): 53, 2024 Feb 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340215

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Over the years, congenital lung malformations (CLM) management remains a controversial topic in pediatric thoracic surgery. The Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery performed a national survey to study the current management variability among centers, trying to define national guidelines and a standardized approach of children with congenital lung malformations. METHODS: Following a National Society approval, an electronic survey including 35 items on post-natal management was designed, focusing on surgical, anesthesiology, radiology and pneumology aspects. The survey was conducted contacting all pediatric surgical units performing thoracic surgery. RESULTS: 39 pediatric surgery units (97.5%) participated in the study. 13 centers (33.3%) were classified as high-volume (Group A), while 26 centers (66.7%) were low volume (Group B). Variances in diagnostic imaging protocols were observed, with Group A performing fewer CT scans compared to Group B (p = 0.012). Surgical indications favored operative approaches for asymptomatic CLM and pulmonary sequestrations in both groups, while a wait-and-see approach was common for congenital lobar emphysema. Surgical timing for asymptomatic CLM differed significantly, with most high-volume centers operating on patients younger than 12 months (p = 0.02). Thoracoscopy was the preferred approach for asymptomatic CLM in most of centers, while postoperative long-term follow-up was not performed in most of the centers. CONCLUSION: Thoracoscopic approach seems uniform in asymptomatic CLM patients and variable in symptomatic children. Lack of uniformity in surgical timing and preoperative imaging assessment has been identified as key areas to establish a common national pattern of care for CLM.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases , Respiratory System Abnormalities , Humans , Child , Lung Diseases/congenital , Respiratory System Abnormalities/surgery , Pneumonectomy/methods , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/surgery , Lung/abnormalities , Italy , Retrospective Studies
2.
Updates Surg ; 75(6): 1625-1631, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37145226

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to report a multicentric national experience about the outcomes of pediatric endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (PEPSiT). The medical records of all pediatric patients, aged up to 18 years, who underwent PEPSiT in the period 2019-2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographics, operative details, and post-operative outcomes were assessed. A total of 294 patients (182 boys), with median age of 14 years (range 10-18), receiving PEPSiT in the study period, were enrolled. Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) was primary in 258 (87.8%) and recurrent in 36 (12.2%). The median operative time was 36 min (range 11-120). The median VAS pain score was 0.86 (range 0-3) and the median duration of analgesic use was 27 h (range 12-60). The overall success rate was 95.2% (280/294) and the median time to full healing was 23.4 days (range 19-50). Six/294 (2.0%) patients developed Clavien 2 post-operative complications. The recurrence rate was 4.8% (14/294) and all recurrences were re-operated using PEPSiT. Redo-surgery for wound debridement was performed in one (0.3%) patient with late healing. On multivariate analysis, hirsutism and typology of sinus (pits ≥ 2, paramedian and more proximal to the anus) were predictors of PSD recurrence (p = 0.001). To date, this is the largest series of PEPSiT published in the pediatric population. The outcomes reported after a 3 years experience confirm that PEPSiT is a safe, effective, and real minimally invasive procedure to treat adolescents with PSD. It provides patients quick and painless recovery, satisfactory success, and high quality of life.


Subject(s)
Pilonidal Sinus , Male , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Aged , Pilonidal Sinus/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Recurrence
3.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 32(10): 1108-1113, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35796702

ABSTRACT

Background: This study aimed to create a consensus statement on the indications, applications, and limitations of robotics in pediatric urology. Methods: After a panel and interactive discussion focused on pediatric robotics, a televoting with 10 questions was administered to 100 pediatric surgeons/urologists attending the joint meeting of the French Group of Pediatric Laparoscopy (GECI)/Italian Society of Videosurgery in Infancy (SIVI) in 2021. The results of televoting were analyzed electronically using Mentometer software. Results: Ninety-four percent of participants stated that the cutoff weight for robotics should be >10-15 kg. A minimum of 20-30 procedures should be performed to become confident in robotics (74%). Pediatric urology is the main field of application (73%) and pyeloplasty is the best indication for robotics (63%). Technical problems may happen intraoperatively in 1/10-15 cases (64%). The mean duration of robotic procedures ranges from 150 to 200 minutes (72%). The main drawbacks of robotics are high costs and limited development of miniaturized instruments (74%). Ninety-five percent believed that the costs of robotics may significantly drop with the availability of more robotic brands. The main advantages of robotics over laparoscopy include improved dexterity, easier suturing, and better ergonomics (100%), whereas the main disadvantage of sharing the robot with other specialties is the wearing out of instruments (100%). Conclusions: This is the first consensus statement, endorsed by the GECI and SIVI societies, on the use of robotics in pediatric urology. The need to introduce more robotic brands on the market to lower the costs and to develop miniaturized instruments to be adopted in infants less than 10 kg emerged. Pediatric urology is the main field of application of pediatric robotics, and robotic pyeloplasty is the most common procedure performed. Proctorship is needed for the first 20-30 procedures and technical problems may occur intraoperatively in 1/10-15 cases. The main advantages of robotics over laparoscopy are improved dexterity, easier suturing, and better surgeon ergonomics.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Urology , Child , Humans , Infant , Laparoscopy/methods , Robotics/methods , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods
4.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 871819, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35664866

ABSTRACT

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) time exacerbated some of the conditions already considered critical in pediatric health assistance before the pandemic. A new form of pediatric social abandonment has arisen leading to diagnostic delays in surgical disorders and a lack of support for the chronic ones. Health services were interrupted and ministerial appointments for pediatric surgical healthcare reprogramming were postponed. As a result, any determination to regulate the term "pediatric" specificity was lost. The aim is, while facing the critical issues exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, to rebuild future perspectives of pediatric surgical care in Italy. Methods: Each Pediatric Society, including the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP), was asked by the Italian Federation of Pediatric Associations and Scientific Societies to fill a questionnaire, including the following the main issues: evaluation of pre-pandemic criticalities, pediatric care during the pandemic and recovery, and current criticalities. The future care model of our specialty was analyzed in the second part of the questionnaire. Results: Children are seriously penalized both for surgical treatment as well as for the diagnostic component. In most centers, the pediatric surgical teams have been integrated with the adult ones and the specificity of training the pediatric operating nursing is in danger of survival. "Emotional" management of the child is not considered by the general management and the child has become again an adults patient of reduced size. Conclusion: A new functional pediatric surgical model needs to be established in general hospitals, including activities for day surgery and outpatient surgery. To support the care of the fragile child, a national health plan for the pediatric surgery is required.

5.
Ital J Pediatr ; 46(1): 134, 2020 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32938472

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This is the report of the first official survey from the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (ISPS) to appraise the distribution and organization of bedside surgery in the neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Italy. METHODS: A questionnaire requesting general data, staff data and workload data of the centers was developed and sent by means of an online cloud-based software instrument to all Italian pediatric surgery Units. RESULTS: The survey was answered by 34 (65%) out of 52 centers. NICU bedside surgery is reported in 81.8% of the pediatric surgery centers. A lower prevalence of bedside surgical practice in the NICU was reported for Southern Italy and the islands than for Northern Italy and Central Italy (Southern

Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Italy , Societies, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Front Pediatr ; 8: 259, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32550670

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hospital response to the COVID-19 outbreak has involved the cancellation of elective, deferrable surgeries throughout Europe in order to ensure capacity for emergent surgery and a selection of elective but non-deferrable surgeries. The purpose of this document is to propose technical strategies to assist the pediatric surgeons to minimize the potential aerosolization of viral particles in COVID-19 patients undergoing urgent or emergent surgical treatment using laparoscopic approaches, based on the currently available literature. The situation and recommendations are subject to change with emerging information. Materials and Methods: The Scientific Committee and the Board of the European Society of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgeons gathered together in order to address the issue of minimally invasive surgery during this COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic search through PubMed, Embase, and World Wide Web of the terms "COVID-19," "Coronavirus," and "SARS-CoV-2" matched with "pneumoperitoneum," "laparoscopy," "thoracoscopy," "retroperitoneoscopy," and "surgery" was performed. Non-English language papers were excluded. A PRISMA report was performed. Criticalities were identified and a consensus was achieved over a number of key aspects. Results: We identified 121 documents. A total of 11 full-text documents were assessed to address all concerns related to the adoption of minimally invasive surgery. All aspect of pediatric minimally invasive surgery, including elective surgery, urgent surgery, laparoscopy, thoracoscopy, retroperitoneoscopy, and pneumoperitoneum creation and maintainance were extensively addressed through systematic review. A consensus regarding urgent laparoscopic procedures, setting and operation techniques was obtained within the Committee and the Board. Conclusions: The ESPES proposes the following recommendations in case minimally invasive surgery is needed in a COVID-19 positive pediatric patients: (1) consider conservative treatment whenever safely possible, (2) dedicate a theater, columns and reusable laparoscopic instrumentation to COVID-19 pediatric patients, (3) prefer disposable instrumentation and cables, (4) use low CO2 insufflation pressures, (5) use low power electrocautery, (6) prefer closed-systems CO2 insufflation and desufflation systems, and (7) avoid leaks through ports. These recommendations are subject to change with emerging information and might be amended in the near future.

7.
Surg Endosc ; 33(3): 832-839, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30006841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Very limited informations are currently available about the best approach to perform retroperitoneoscopic surgery. This multicentric international study aimed to compare the outcome of lateral versus prone approach for retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in children. METHODS: The records of 164 patients underwent RPN in 7 international centers of pediatric surgery over the last 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-one patients (42 girls and 19 boys, average age 3.8 years) were operated using lateral approach (G1), whereas 103 patients (66 girls and 37 boys, average age 3.0 years) underwent prone RPN (G2). The two groups were compared in regard to operative time, postoperative outcome, postoperative complications, and re-operations. RESULTS: The average operative time was significantly shorter in G2 (99 min) compared to G1 (160 min) (p = 0.001). Only 2 lateral RPN required conversion to open surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups as for intraoperative complications (G1:2/61, 3.3%; G2:6/103, 5.8%; p = 0.48), postoperative complications (G1:9/61, 14.7%; G2:17/103, 16.5%; p = 0.80), and re-operations (G1:2/61, 3.3%; G2:4/103, 3.8%; p = 0.85). Regarding postoperative complications, the incidence of symptomatic residual distal ureteric stumps (RDUS) was significantly higher in G2 (7/103, 6.8%) compared to G1 (1/61, 1.6%) (p = 0.001). Most re-operations (4/6, 66.6%) were performed to remove a RDUS . CONCLUSIONS: Both lateral and prone approach are feasible and reasonably safe to perform RPN in children but the superiority of one approach over another is not still confirmed. Although prone technique resulted faster compared to lateral approach, the choice of the technique remains dependent on the surgeon's personal preference and experience. Our results would suggest that the lateral approach should be preferred to the prone technique when a longer ureterectomy is required, for example in cases of vesico-ureteral reflux into the affected kidney moiety, in order to avoid to leave a long ureteric stump that could become symptomatic and require a re-intervention.


Subject(s)
Conversion to Open Surgery , Intraoperative Complications , Laparoscopy/methods , Nephrectomy , Postoperative Complications , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Child, Preschool , Conversion to Open Surgery/methods , Conversion to Open Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Incidence , Internationality , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Intraoperative Complications/surgery , Male , Nephrectomy/adverse effects , Nephrectomy/instrumentation , Nephrectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
8.
World J Urol ; 34(7): 939-48, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26577623

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approach for partial nephrectomy in infants and children with duplex kidneys. METHODS: Data of 102 patients underwent partial nephrectomy in a 5-year period using MIS procedures were analyzed. Fifty-two children underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), and 50 children underwent retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN). Median age at surgery was 4.2 years. Statistical analysis was performed using χ (2) test and Student's t test. RESULTS: The overall complications rate was significantly higher after RPN (15/50, 30 %) than after LPN (10/52, 19 %) [χ (2) = 0.05]. In LPN group, complications [4 urinomas, 2 symptomatic refluxing distal ureteral stumps (RDUS) and 4 urinary leakages] were conservatively managed. In RPN group, complications (6 urinomas, 8 RDUS, 1 opening of remaining calyxes) required a re-operation in 2 patients. In both groups no conversion to open surgery was reported. Operative time (LPN:166.2 min vs RPN: 255 min; p < 0.001) and hospitalization (LPN: 3.5 days vs RPN: 4.1 days; p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in LPN group. No postoperative loss of renal function was reported in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that RPN remains a technically demanding procedure with a significantly higher complications and re-operation rate compared to LPN. In addition, length of surgery and hospitalization were significantly shorter after LPN compared to RPN. LPN seems to be a faster, safer and technically easier procedure to perform in children compared to RPN due to a larger operative space and the possibility to perform a complete ureterectomy in refluxing systems.


Subject(s)
Kidney/abnormalities , Kidney/surgery , Laparoscopy , Nephrectomy/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant , Male , Retroperitoneal Space , Retrospective Studies
9.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 25(10): 864-9, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26390256

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in children is considered a complex technique with limited diffusion among pediatric surgeons and urologists. We aimed to report the outcome of this technique in infants and children with duplex kidney in a 5-year retrospective multicentric international survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 50 children who underwent RPN (41 upper-pole nephrectomies and 9 lower-pole nephrectomies) were retrospectively collected in this six-institution survey. Median age at surgery was 3.3 years. There were 35 girls and 15 boys. The left side was affected in 28 patients, versus the right side in 22 patients. We assessed intraoperative and postoperative morbidity. Follow-up (median, 2.5 years; range, 12 months-5 years) was based on clinical controls and echo color Doppler renal ultrasound scans. RESULTS: Median duration of surgery was 255 minutes. Surgery was always performed with the patient in a lateral position. Special hemostatic devices were used for dissection and parenchymal section in all centers. Three patients from two centers (6%) required conversion to open surgery. We recorded seven complications (six peritoneal perforations, one opening of the remaining calyxes) in the 50 cases. Re-operation rate was 0%. Average length of hospital stay was 4.1 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey shows that RPN remains a challenging procedure with a long learning curve, performed only in pediatric centers with huge experience in this field. In our survey operative time was longer than 4 hours. The complication rate remains high (7/50, or 14%), with complications classified as Grade II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. They did not require further surgery, but they were associated with a prolonged hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Kidney/abnormalities , Kidney/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Nephrectomy/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Conversion to Open Surgery , Female , Humans , Infant , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/instrumentation , Length of Stay , Male , Nephrectomy/adverse effects , Nephrectomy/instrumentation , Operative Time , Peritoneum/injuries , Retroperitoneal Space , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
10.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 31(4): 367-73, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25667047

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this paper was to propose structured guidelines for a European pediatric MIS training program created by ESPES. METHODS: A questionnaire, focused on how the pediatric training program in MIS has to be structured, was proposed to all participants at the ESPES Congress in Marseille in 2013. RESULTS: We received 178 questionnaires but only 139 questionnaires were fully completed and analyzed. All respondents agree that the training program has to be divided into 4 steps: (1) theoretical part: 2 theoretical courses in laparoscopy (101/139 respondents, 72.7 %), 1 theoretical course in retroperitoneoscopy (99/139 respondents, 71.2 %) and 1 in thoracoscopy (91/139 respondents, 65.5 %); (2) experimental part: 10-20 h of training on pelvic trainer (103/139 respondents, 74.1 %) and 10 h of training on animal models (91/139 respondents, 65.5 %); (3) stages in European centers of reference for MIS: a 1-3 months stage (96/139 respondents, 69.1 %); (4) personal experience: 30 procedures as cameraman (98/139 respondents, 70.5 %) and >50 basic MIS procedures as main surgeon under supervision (114/139 respondents, 82 %). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our survey ESPES MIS training curriculum for pediatric surgeons must contain the following educational components: (1) theoretical knowledge; (2) practice-based learning and improvement in experimental setting; (3) stages in European centers of reference for MIS; (4) personal operative experience. At the end of the training program, ESPES will analyze the candidate training booklet and release for each applicant an ESPES certification after an exam.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Continuing/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/education , Pediatrics/education , Societies, Medical , Surgeons/education , Certification , Child , Humans , Internship and Residency
11.
Lancet ; 383(9931): 1807-13, 2014 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24856026

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis is the renal replacement therapy of choice for acute kidney injury in neonates, but in some cases is not feasible or effective. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) machines are used off label in infants smaller than 15 kg and are not designed specifically for small infants. We aimed to design and create a CRRT machine specifically for neonates and small infants. METHODS: We prospectively planned a 5-year project to conceive, design, and create a miniaturised Cardio-Renal Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Machine (CARPEDIEM), specifically for neonates and small infants. We created the new device and assessed it with in-vitro laboratory tests, completed its development to meet regulatory requirements, and obtained a licence for human use. Once approved, we used the machine to treat a critically ill neonate FINDINGS: The main characteristics of CARPEDIEM are the low priming volume of the circuit (less than 30 mL), miniaturised roller pumps, and accurate ultrafiltration control via calibrated scales with a precision of 1 g. In-vitro tests confirmed that both hardware and software met the specifications. We treated a 2·9 kg neonate with haemorrhagic shock, multiple organ dysfunction, and severe fluid overload for more than 400 h with the CARPEDIEM, using continuous venovenous haemofiltration, single-pass albumin dialysis, blood exchange, and plasma exchange. The patient's 65% fluid overload, raised creatinine and bilirubin concentrations, and severe acidosis were all managed safely and effectively. Despite the severity of the illness, organ function was restored and the neonate survived and was discharged from hospital with only mild renal insufficiency that did not require renal replacement therapy. INTERPRETATION: The CARPEDIEM CRRT machine can be used to provide various treatment modalities and support for multiple organ dysfunction in neonates and small infants. The CARPEDIEM could reduce the range of indications for peritoneal dialysis, widen the range of indications for CRRT, make the use of CRRT less traumatic, and expand its use as supportive therapy even when complete renal replacement therapy is not indicated. FUNDING: Associazione Amici del Rene di Vicenza.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Kidneys, Artificial , Renal Replacement Therapy/instrumentation , Acute Kidney Injury/blood , Bilirubin/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Creatinine/blood , Equipment Design , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care, Neonatal/methods , Materials Testing/methods , Multiple Organ Failure/blood , Multiple Organ Failure/therapy , Prospective Studies
12.
J Pediatr Surg ; 49(4): 660-3, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24726132

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The lymphatic preservation to prevent hydrocele formation after laparoscopic varicocelectomy is essential. Lymphatic sparing procedures using scrotal injection give a rate of mapping failures of 20%-30%. The aim of the present study is to standardize the technique of injection to perform a lymphatic sparing procedure in case of laparoscopic varicocelectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy from July 2010 to July 2013. Patients were divided into two groups: G1 (25 patients) those who underwent a classical isosulfan blue scrotal intra-dartos injection and G2 (25 patients) those who underwent the new standardized isosulfan blue scrotal intra-dartos/intra-testicular injection. RESULTS: In G1 lymphatic vessels were identified as blue coloured in 19/25 of cases (76%), in G2 in 25/25 of cases (100%). The results were analyzed using test χ(2) with Yates' correction and there was a statistically significant difference (χ(2)=0.05,1) between G2 and G1. Postoperative hydrocele was noted in 2/6 patients of G1 in whom the lymphatic vessels were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy is an effective procedure to adopt in children with varicocele. The intra-dartos/intra-testicular injection of isosulfan blue is significantly better than the previously described intra-dartos injection, permitting to identify lymphatic vessels in 100% of cases in our series. No allergy to isosulfan blue was reported in both groups.


Subject(s)
Coloring Agents , Laparoscopy/methods , Lymphatic Vessels , Rosaniline Dyes , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods , Varicocele/surgery , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Laparoscopy/standards , Male , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Testicular Hydrocele/etiology , Testicular Hydrocele/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...