Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Laryngoscope ; 2024 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963255

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The incidence and risk factors for facial nerve dysfunction (FND) following CyberKnife® therapy for vestibular schwannoma (VS) remain poorly understood. This study investigates whether differential radiation doses to vulnerable segments of the facial nerve may be associated with FND outcomes. METHODS: Patients were identified who underwent CyberKnife® radiosurgery for VS at a single institution. Basic demographics, tumor characteristics, and facial nerve function were collected. Total radiation doses to tumor, internal auditory canal (IAC), and labyrinthine segment of facial nerve (LSFN) were evaluated. RESULTS: Six out of 64 patients experienced FND following CyberKnife® treatment for VS (9.38%, 6/64). Patients with FND were compared to those without FND (control). Of the 64 patients, complete radiation records were obtained for 30 patients (6 FND vs. 24 control). There were no significant differences in demographic or tumor characteristics between control and FND cohorts. More severe FND (HB ≥ 4) had significantly larger tumors (3.74 vs. 1.27 cm3, p = 0.037) with directionally decreased time to FND (3.50 vs. 33.5 months, p = 0.106) than patients with HB < 4, respectively. There were directionally, nonsignificant differences between maximum radiation doses to the LSFN (2492.4 vs. 2557.0 cGy, p = 0.121) and IAC (2877.3 vs. 2895.5 cGy, p = 0.824) between the control and FND cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FND may represent an underrecognized sequelae of CyberKnife® radiosurgery for VS that can occur many months following treatment. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effect of differential radiation exposure to the facial nerve with FND following treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (Retrospective Cohort Study) Laryngoscope, 2024.

2.
Head Neck ; 46(7): 1698-1705, 2024 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38433326

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of both COVID-19 infection and vaccination status on patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of COVID-19 infection and vaccination status on 60-day mortality, cardiovascular, and respiratory complications in patients with a prior diagnosis of HNSCC. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study through the Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse of Veterans with HNSCC who were tested for COVID-19 during any inpatient VA medical center admission. A cohort of patients was created of Veterans with a diagnosis of HNSCC of the oral cavity,oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and nasopharynx based on International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes. Data collected included clinical/demographic data, vaccination status, and incidence of 60-day mortality, 60-day cardiovascular complication (including myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism, cerebrovascular accident), and 60-day respiratory complication (including acute respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pneumonia). The interactions between COVID-19 infection, vaccination status, morbidity and mortality were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 14 262 patients with HNSCC who were tested for COVID-19 during inpatient admission, 4754 tested positive (33.3%), and 9508 (67.7%) tested negative. Patients who tested positive demonstrated increased 60-day mortality (4.7% vs. 2.0%, respectively; p < 0.001), acute respiratory failure (ARF; 15.4% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.001), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; 0.9% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001), and pneumonia (PNA; 20.0% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001) compared to those who never tested positive, respectively. Patients who received COVID-19 vaccination between 2 weeks and 6 months prior to a positive test demonstrated decreased rates of ARF (13.2% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.034) and PNA (16.7% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.003) compared to the unvaccinated group. A logistic regression of patients with COVID-19 infections who died within 60 days was performed, with no significant survival advantage among patients vaccinated between 2 weeks and 6 months prior to the positive test. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection may significantly increase rates of 60-day mortality and respiratory complications in patients with HNSCC. COVID-19 vaccination between 2 weeks and 6 months prior to infection may decrease severity of respiratory complications but did not show significant mortality benefits in this study. These data highlight the need for surveillance of respiratory infection and vaccination in this vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Veterans , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/complications , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/mortality , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/virology , United States/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 Vaccines
3.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ; 8(6): 1507-1515, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38130257

ABSTRACT

Objective: To provide an analysis of complications following eustachian tube balloon dilation as well as their treatments and outcomes. Data Sources: PubMed, Ovid Embase, and MAUDE Database. Review Methods: A systematic approach following PRISMA guidelines was used to identify publications pertaining to balloon dilation of the eustachian tube from PubMed and Ovid Embase databases was used. Once these publications were critically reviewed, the primary outcome extracted were reported complications. Additional complications were collected in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database using the product class "eustachian tube dilation device" and searching through relevant manufacturers. Complications and outcomes were compared between these sources. Results: Fifty five full-length manuscripts involving 7155 patients were included and 98 complications reported for a 1.4% complication rate. The most frequently reported adverse events were subcutaneous emphysema of the head and neck (19%), epistaxis (12%), and acute otitis media (11%). The MAUDE search returned 18 distinct patient entries, of which 12 (67%) reported complications. The most reported complications in the MAUDE database included subcutaneous emphysema (8, 67%) and pneumomediastinum (3, 25%). The most serious complication was a carotid artery dissection reported in one patient in the MAUDE database. Conclusion: Eustachian tube dilation is rarely associated with complications, which nevertheless may lead to morbidity and medical emergencies. Patients and providers should recognize potential risks associated with this intervention as well as methods to manage complications.

4.
Head Neck ; 45(12): 3033-3041, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37802658

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancer (HNC) have potentially high perioperative complication rates. Recent studies indicate that preoperative COVID-19 infection poses increased risk for postoperative complications in other fields. However, to date, there has not been data showing the effect of COVID-19 on complication rates for HNC. Here, a large database was employed to assess if perioperative COVID-19 increased the risk of perioperative complications among those undergoing HNC surgery. METHODS: A retrospective investigation was conducted using a multi-institutional research database. Subjects who underwent HNC surgery from January 2020 to September 2022 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedure Terminology codes. Thirty-day surgical and medical complications were assessed for those diagnosed with COVID-19 infection from 7 days before or after surgery compared to those who were COVID-19 negative. Cohorts were propensity scores matched by age, sex, and race. RESULTS: Perioperative COVID-19 was present in n = 208 and absent in n = 15 158 subjects that underwent HNC surgery. For unmatched analyses, there was a statistically significant increased risk in the 30-day postoperative period in COVID-19-positive patients for the following surgical complications: surgical site fistula, free tissue transfer (FTT) complication, FTT failure, and death. Additionally, there was a statistically significant increased risk in the 30-day postoperative period in COVID-19-positive patients for the following medical complications: ventilator support, pneumonia, vasopressor, acute renal failure, and myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: This large, retrospective populational study suggests HNC patients are at increased risk for death and several perioperative complications. This investigation is the first to address this clinical question.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Multicenter Studies as Topic
5.
Teach Learn Med ; 35(2): 157-167, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35689361

ABSTRACT

PHENOMENON: The 2020-2021 residency application cycle was subject to major alterations following the COVID-19 global pandemic. This study determined the online presence of US-based residency training programs during this time period. APPROACH: An official list of accredited US residency programs for 24 medical specialties was obtained through the Electronic Residency Application Service Programs' online presence and was evaluated for website ownership in addition to Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook account ownership. Date of social media account foundation and virtual opportunities offered were recorded. Doximity Residency Navigator for 2020-2021 was used to determine program rank, and programs were stratified by location using Association of American Medical Colleges regions. Program rank and geographic location were used to determine potential trends in online presence. This study was performed during the residency application cycle from September 2, 2020, to November 29, 2020, during which applications were submitted and the interview cycle began. FINDINGS: Fifty-seven percent of the 4,562 programs had a presence on social media. One-third of all accounts were created after March 1, 2020, and most (58%) were residency program-associated. A total of 1,315 programs offered virtual open houses through Twitter (829), Instagram (792), and Facebook (295). First-quartile programs had significantly more social media accounts per program on average (1.8) than those in subsequent quartiles, and Western region programs had significantly more accounts per program on average (1.3) than the Central (1.0), Northeastern (1.0), and Southern (1.1) regions. INSIGHTS: US residency programs created social media accounts and online opportunities for applicants following March 1, 2020. Online interactions may serve as substitutes at a time when in-person interaction is not possible. Future studies may examine the influence and impact of virtual interactions.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2022.2047050.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Medicine , Social Media , Humans
7.
Epilepsia ; 63(11): 2754-2781, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35847999

ABSTRACT

Several instruments and outcomes measures have been reported in pediatric patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. The objective of this systematic review is to summarize, evaluate, and quantify outcome metrics for the surgical treatment of pediatric epilepsy that address seizure frequency, neuropsychological, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). We performed a systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify publications between 2010 and June 2021 from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews that report clinical outcomes in pediatric epilepsy surgery. Eighty-one articles were included for review. Overall, rates of postoperative seizure frequency were the most common metric reported (n = 78 studies, 96%). Among the seizure frequency metrics, the Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale (n = 48 studies, 59%) was most commonly reported. Neuropsychological outcomes, performed in 32 studies (40%) were assessed using 36 different named metrics. HRQL outcomes were performed in 16 studies (20%) using 13 different metrics. Forty-six studies (57%) reported postoperative changes in antiepileptic drug (AED) regimen, and time-to-event analysis was performed in 15 (19%) studies. Only 13 outcomes metrics (1/5 seizure frequency, 6/13 HRQL, 6/36 neuropsychological) have been validated for use in pediatric patients with epilepsy and only 13 have been assessed through reliability studies (4/5 seizure frequency, 6/13 HRQL, and 3/36 neuropsychological). Of the 81 included studies, 17 (21%) used at least one validated metric. Outcome variable metrics in pediatric epilepsy surgery are highly variable. Although nearly all studies report seizure frequency, there is considerable variation in reporting. HRQL and neuropsychological outcomes are less frequently and much more heterogeneously reported. Reliable and validated outcomes metrics should be used to increase standardization and accuracy of reporting outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing epilepsy surgery.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Quality of Life , Humans , Child , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Epilepsy/surgery , Epilepsy/psychology , Seizures , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
8.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 43(1): 103268, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34695698

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine if a more restrictive transfusion protocol results in increased rates of adverse flap outcomes in patients undergoing free tissue transfer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mixed retrospective and prospective cohort study. Patients who underwent surgery before the protocol change were collected retrospectively. Patients who underwent surgery after the protocol change were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Of the 460 patients who underwent free tissue transfer, 116 patients in the pre-change cohort (N = 211) underwent transfusion (54.98%) and 78 in the post-change cohort(N = 249) (31.33%) (p < 0.001). The mean number of units transfused was 1.55 + 2.00 in the pre-change cohort, and 0.78 + 1.51 in the post-change cohort (p < 0.001). When separated temporally, the pre-change cohort received significantly more blood transfusions than the post-change cohort in the operating room (33.65% vs 18.07%) (p < 0.01), within 72 h of surgery (35.55% vs 15.66%) (p < 0.001), and after 72 h after surgery to discharge (16.59% vs 8.03%) (p = 0.018017). The rate of flap failure was 6.70% in the pre-change cohort, and 5.31% in the post-change cohort (p = 0.67). In a logistic regression model controlling for potential confounders, transfusion protocol was not significantly associated with flap failure (OR = 1.1080, 95% CI: 0.48-2.54). There were no significant differences between cohorts for medical morbidity, ICU transfer, or death. CONCLUSION: Our data support the conclusion that patients undergoing free tissue transfer to the head and neck can be transfused following the same protocols as other patients, without increasing the rate of flap failure or other morbidities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 (mixed retrospective, prospective cohort study).


Subject(s)
Erythrocyte Transfusion/adverse effects , Erythrocyte Transfusion/methods , Free Tissue Flaps , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Male , Perioperative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
9.
Interdiscip Neurosurg ; 25: 101177, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34611517

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed medical education, including the upcoming residency application cycle. External rotations have been restricted, but virtual opportunities for applicants have not yet been assessed. OBJECTIVES: To describe how neurosurgical residency programs are adapting to the 2021 application cycle through augmented social media usage and establishment of virtual sub-I's and open houses. METHODS: One hundred fifteen separate programs were identified on ERAS. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, residency websites, and the Visiting Student Application Service (VSAS) were reviewed for virtual open house and sub-I opportunities. Professional neurosurgery society websites were also reviewed. All data is updated as of February 14 th, 2021. RESULTS: Eighty-eight (77%) programs had some social media presence. Fourty-three (30%) departmental accounts were created in 2020. Twenty-four (57%) of the residency program accounts were created in 2020. Programs offered 35 (18%) open house opportunities on Twitter, 19 (17%) on Facebook, and 23 (20%) on Instagram. Nineteen (17%) virtual sub-I opportunities were on Twitter, 9 (8%) on Facebook, and 10 (9%) on Instagram.Virtual opportunities were updated on 13 (12%) residency websites. The National Neurosurgery MedEd website had the most website listings of virtual opportunities with 34 (30%) programs listing open houses and 18 (16%) programs listing virtual sub-I's. No program specific virtual opportunities were found on the AANS or CNS websites. VSAS identified only 4 (4%) virtual sub-internships. CONCLUSION: Many neurosurgical residency programs increased their virtual presence amid the COVID-19 pandemic. More programs could utilize these platforms to mitigate applicant restriction in upcoming neurosurgery residency application cycles.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL