Week 4 viral load predicts long-term suppression of hepatitis B virus DNA during antiviral therapy: improving hepatitis B treatment in the real world.

BACKGROUND: Entecavir and tenofovir potently suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication so that serum HBV DNA levels <20 IU/mL can be achieved after 2 years. Despite this, inadequate suppression is reported in >20% of cases for unclear reasons. AIM: We tested whether 4-week viral load (VL) assessment could improve 96-week treatment outcome. METHODS: Data on all chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir between 2005 and 2014 were entered prospectively. Full data capture included pre-treatment, weeks 4, 24, 48 and 96 HBV DNA titre, HBeAg, age, gender, antiviral agent and dose escalation. Compliance data were compiled from pharmacy records, doctors' letters and clinic bookings/attendance. Time to achieve complete viral suppression (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL) was graphed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Factors affecting this were examined using a multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard model. RESULTS: Among 156 patients treated, 72 received entecavir and 84 tenofovir. Pre-treatment HBV DNA titre, 4-week assessment and compliance impacted significantly on time to complete viral suppression. At 96 weeks, 90% of those assessed as compliant by 4-week HBV DNA had complete viral suppression versus 50% followed by 6-month VL estimation. Continuing care by the same physician was related to 4-week VL testing and optimal compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Medium-term outcomes of HBV antiviral therapy are improved by early on-treatment VL testing, facilitating patient engagement and improved compliance. The observation that 90% complete viral suppression after 2 years monotherapy is achievable in a routine clinic setting questions the need for combination therapy in HBV cases with suboptimal response.

Management of diabetes in Indigenous communities: lessons from the Australian Aboriginal population.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and other chronic cardio-metabolic conditions are significant contributors to the large disparities in life expectancy between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Type 2 diabetes is more prevalent from a young age among Indigenous Australians and is often preceded by a cluster of risk factors, including central obesity, dyslipidaemia, albuminuria and socio-economic disadvantage. Management of type 2 diabetes in Australian Indigenous peoples can be challenging in the setting of limited resources and socio-economic disadvantage. Key strategies to address these challenges include working in partnership with patients, communities and primary healthcare services (PHC, Aboriginal community controlled and government services) and working in a multidisciplinary team. Population prevention measures are required within and beyond the health system, commencing as early as possible in the life course.

Glatiramer acetate induced hepatotoxicity.

INTRODUCTION: Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), a polypeptide has been approved for treating patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the first case of severe acute hepatitis after commencing treatment for multiple sclerosis with glatiramer acetate. A 31-year-old female with multiple sclerosis presented with anorexia, lethargy and jaundice five weeks after commencing glatiramer acetate. She had never received beta-interferon treatment. Investigations revealed a bilirubin of 0.109 mmol/L (0.002-0.02 mmoL/L) and prothrombin time of 21 secs (9-15 secs). Her liver function tests were normal before commencing glatiramer acetate. A liver biopsy performed approximately 6 weeks after commencement of glatiramer acetate showed predominantly centrilobular hepatocyte necrosis with portal-venous bridging, along with mild portal and interface hepatitis. The necrosis was not accompanied by an acute inflammatory or chronic inflammatory infiltrate. The features were not suggestive of autoimmune hepatitis but consistent with drug toxicity. The liver tests returned to normal within 2 months after cessation of glatiramer acetate. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware that glatiramer acetate can be associated with uncommon but yet significantly severe liver toxicity.

Drug-induced cholestasis.

The spectrum of drug-induced cholestasis ranges from 'bland' reversible cholestasis to chronic forms due to the vanishing bile duct syndrome. Agents known for many years to cause cholestasis include estrogens and anabolic steroids, chlorpromazine, erythromycin, and the oxypenicillins; structurally similar congeners of these drugs (tamoxifen, newer macrolides) may also cause cholestasis. Contemporary drugs linked to cholestastic liver injury include ticlopidine, terfenadine, terbinafine, nimesulide, irbesartan, fluoroquinolones, cholesterol-lowering 'statins,' and some herbal remedies (greater celandine, glycyrrhizin, chaparral). Amoxillin-clavulanate, ibuprofen, and pediatric cases of the vanishing bile duct syndrome are recent additions to a long list of drugs associated with the vanishing bile duct syndrome. Particular human leukocyte antigen profiles have recently been identified among those who have developed cholestasis with specific drugs (tiopronin and amoxicillin-clavulanate), and the mechanistic relevance of these genetic associations is being explored. The treatment of drug-induced cholestasis is largely supportive. The offending drug should be withdrawn immediately. Cholestyramine or ursodeoxycholic acid are used to alleviate pruritus, with rifampicin and opioid antagonists being reserved for those who fail first line therapy. Nutritional support is essential for those with prolonged cholestasis, a subgroup who are at risk of developing biliary cirrhosis and liver failure. Timely referral for liver transplant assessment is crucial in these patients.

Etiopathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

The definable causes of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) include jejunoileal bypass surgery (JIB), other causes of rapid and profound weight loss in obese subjects, total parenteral nutrition, drugs, industrial toxins, copper toxicity, and disorders characterized by extreme insulin resistance. However, the etiopathogenesis in most cases of NASH appears multifactorial. Obesity, type 2 diabetes, and hypertriglyceridemia are often associated with hepatic steatosis, and although this does not invariably lead to NASH, the fatty liver is vulnerable to hepatocellular injury initiated by reactive oxygen species (ROS). It is critical to understand not only the triggers for hepatitis (injury and inflammation) in NASH but also how this is perpetuated as chronic liver disease. The present focus is on whether the biochemical processes that generate oxidative stress lead to hepatocyte injury and secondary recruitment of inflammation or whether inflammation is the primary mediator of liver cell injury. Insulin resistance is a reproducible pathogenic factor in NASH. It favors accumulation of free fatty acids in the liver and predisposes to oxidative stress by stimulating microsomal lipid peroxidases and by the direct effects of high insulin levels in decreasing mitochondrial beta-oxidation. CYP2E1 is normally suppressed by insulin but is invariably increased in the livers of patients with NASH. In rodent dietary models of steatohepatitis, CYP2E1 is the catalyst of microsomal lipid peroxidation, while in Cyp 2e1 nullizygous mice, CYP4A proteins are induced and function as alternative microsomal lipid peroxidases. Other studies implicate activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPAR alpha) as leading to NASH; PPAR alpha is a transcription factor that governs both microsomal (via CYP4A) and peroxisomal (beta-oxidation) pathways of lipid oxidation and ultimately production of ROS. Increased lipid peroxidation is a crucial difference between the livers of rodents with experimental NASH and those of ob/ob genetically obese mice that have uncomplicated steatosis. Administration of endotoxin, through the release of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), provokes liver inflammation with hepatocyte injury in the steatotic liver. This may be particularly relevant in JIB and has been suggested as a pathogenic mechanism in primary NASH. It has been proposed that inheriting one or more copies of the hemochromatosis gene, C282Y, promotes fibrotic progression in NASH because of increased hepatic iron deposition, but recent studies have failed to confirm this. The relationship between the severity of hepatitis in NASH and progression to cirrhosis implies that products of the inflammatory infiltrate play a role in fibrogenesis. In summary, NASH can be regarded as the hepatic consequence of the metabolic syndrome (or syndrome X). Attention should now shift from steatosis, a generally benign process that is less evident in the advanced stages of cirrhosis, to the mechanisms for hepatocellular injury, inflammation, and hepatic fibrosis. In particular, the genetic, molecular, and cellular factors that ordain and moderate fibrosis in the context of steatohepatitis will be of greatest relevance to effective therapy and clinical outcome.

Herbal hepatotoxicity: an expanding but poorly defined problem.

Alternative therapies, including herbal remedies, are popular in the general population and even more so among patients with liver disease. The use of such products is now well established in western society and is no longer confined to traditional medicine practitioners in Asia, Africa and the Middle-East. Their perceived benefits remain generally unproven and concern about adverse effects is leading to closer scrutiny of these products. Herbal hepatotoxicity has been recognized for many years, but new agents are constantly being identified. The varied manifestations of liver injury include steatosis, acute and chronic hepatitis, hepatic fibrosis, zonal or diffuse hepatic necrosis, bile duct injury, veno-occlusive disease, acute liver failure requiring liver transplantation and carcinogenesis. Potential interactions between herbal medicines and conventional drugs may interfere with patient management. Concurrent use of such products is not often disclosed unless specifically sought after and can lead to perpetuation of the liver injury. The present review focuses on emerging herbal hepatotoxins, newer patterns of liver injury among the older agents and provides an updated tabulation of the adverse effects of major herbal hepatotoxins. Key issues of diagnosis and prevention of this growing problem are addressed. Continued public education, physician awareness and more stringent licensing are required to tackle this growing problem.

Drug-Induced Liver Disease.

Drug-induced liver disease can result from dosage-dependent hepatotoxicity or from adverse reactions to drugs used in therapeutic dosage. The latter idiosyncratic hepatotoxins can cause clinical syndromes that mimic all known liver diseases, so that drugs must be considered as the possible causal agent for all unexplained cases of liver disease. The only specific antidote for dosage-dependent hepatotoxicity is n-acetylcysteine (and some other sulfhydryl donors), which is highly effective for the prevention of significant hepatotoxicity after acetaminophen overdose. Early diagnosis and prompt withdrawal of the offending drug is the key to successful management of most drug-induced liver diseases. The mainstay of treatment is supportive care, with careful monitoring for signs of acute liver failure or progression to chronic liver disease. In cases of liver failure, close liaison with a liver transplant center is crucial; referral for liver transplantation should be considered if standard transplant criteria are fulfilled. Pruritus is a major symptom of drug-induced cholestasis; protracted cases may respond to ursodeoxycholic acid. Corticosteroids can be considered for cases of drug-induced hepatitis, especially those with evidence of immune hypersensitivity, if no improvement is seen in 8 to 12 weeks. Although there are no controlled trials, some patients may respond favorably.

Predictors of liver-related complications in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Chronic hepatitis C is the leading cause of decompensated liver disease requiring liver transplantation and a major cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In liver clinic series, about 20% of those chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) develop cirrhosis over 20 years. From epidemiological data, however, it is clear that certain subgroups of patients are more likely to develop liver-related complications than others. Both host and viral factors have been implicated in individual susceptibility to adverse outcomes. The impact of host factors, such as alcoholism, is now well defined, and viral factors, such as genotype and viral load, appear to be less influential than previously considered. Coinfections with HIV, hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) may influence the rate of fibrotic progression and the subsequent development of complications in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The stage of fibrosis on biopsy and biochemical markers, such as a low serum albumin, can help identify patients who are more likely to develop complications. The role of the immune system in modifying the course of HCV is only now being defined. This editorial explores the role of host and viral factors in the development of liver-related complications in HCV-infected individuals.