Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Odontology ; 107(2): 268, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29644480

ABSTRACT

In the original publication of the article, one of the author names was published incorrectly as José L. Calvo. The correct name is José L. Calvo-Guirado.

2.
Odontology ; 99(1): 49-54, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21271326

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a colutory (XeroLacer, Lacer), prescribed for the treatment of xerostomy, on microleakage into class V cavities filled with a composite (Z100, 3M ESPE) or a compomer (F2000, 3M ESPE) in combination with either a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Scotchbond 1XT, 3M ESPE) or a self-etching adhesive (Adper Prompt L-Pop, 3M ESPE). Class V cavities were made in the buccal surfaces of 80 bovine lower incisors which were randomly divided into four groups (n = 20): (1) Adper Scotchbond 1XT/Z100; (2) Adper Scotchbond 1XT/F2000; (3) Adper Prompt L-Pop/Z100; and (4) Adper PLP/F2000. All specimens were immersed in distilled water for 3 months and ten specimens of each group were immersed and vibrated in XeroLacer for 2 min three times a day. The specimens were dyed with 1% methylene blue for 24 h. Longitudinal sections were made and percentages of microleakage were determined by image analysis. In distilled water, microleakage with the Adper Scotchbond 1XT/F2000 combination was significantly greater than with Adper Scotchbond 1XT/Z100 or Adper Prompt L-Pop/Z100, and microleakage with Adper Prompt L-Pop/F2000 was significantly greater than that with Adper Prompt L-Pop/Z100. No significant differences were detected among the groups exposed to XeroLacer. However microleakage was significantly less with Adper Scotchbond 1XT/F2000 after exposure to XeroLacer than after immersion in distilled water only. In conclusion, exposure to XeroLacer decreased microleakage into cavities restored with the compomer.


Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Dental Leakage/prevention & control , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Excipients/pharmacology , Xerostomia/drug therapy , Animals , Cattle , Compomers , Composite Resins , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Leakage/etiology , Dental Restoration, Permanent/adverse effects , Dental Restoration, Permanent/classification , Excipients/therapeutic use , Materials Testing , Random Allocation , Saliva/metabolism , Stimulation, Chemical
3.
J Pineal Res ; 47(2): 164-172, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19570131

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the topical application of melatonin mixed with collagenized porcine bone to accelerate the osteointegration on the rough discrete calcium deposit (DCD) surface implants in Beagle dogs 3 months after their insertion. In preparation for subsequent insertion of dental implants, lower premolars and molars were extracted from 12 Beagle dogs. Each mandible received three parallel wall implants with discrete calcium deposit (DCD) surface of 4 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length. The implants were randomly assigned to the distal sites on each side of the mandible in three groups: group I implants alone, group II implants with melatonin and group III implants with melatonin and porcine bone. Prior to implanting, 5 mg lyophylized powdered melatonin was applied to one bone hole at each side of the mandible. None was applied at the control sites. Ten histological sections per implant were obtained for histomorphometric studies. After a 4-wk treatment period, melatonin significantly increased the perimeter of bone that was in direct contact with the treated implants (P < 0.0001), bone density (P < 0.0001), new bone formation (P < 0.0001) in comparison with control implants. Topical application of melatonin on DCD surface may act as a biomimetic agent in the placement of endo-osseous dental implants and enhance the osteointegration. Melatonin combined with porcine bone on DCD implants reveals more bone to implant contact at 12 wk (84.5 +/- 1.5%) compared with melatonin treated (75.1 +/- 1.4%) and nonmelatonin treated surface implants (64 +/- 1.4%).


Subject(s)
Bone and Bones , Calcium/pharmacology , Dental Implants , Melatonin/pharmacology , Osseointegration/drug effects , Animals , Dogs , Histocytochemistry , Male , Photography, Dental , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...