Urinary CTX-II concentrations are elevated and associated with knee pain and function in subjects with ACL reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) is prevalent after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Biomarkers that identify individuals likely to develop OA, especially symptomatic OA, can help target preventative and therapeutic strategies. This study examined the magnitude and change over time in urinary CTX-II (uCTX-II) concentrations shortly after ACL reconstruction, and, secondarily, the associations with knee pain and function. DESIGN: Subjects were 28 patients with ACLR and 28 age- and sex-matched controls (CNTRL). Testing was conducted at four time points spaced 4 weeks apart (4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks post-operative in ACLR). Measures included demographics, urine samples, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF). uCTX-II concentrations were determined with competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). uCTX-II concentrations at each time point in ACLR were compared to the mean concentration over time in CNTRL, with and without adjustment for body mass index (BMI). Changes over time in each measure and correlations between the slopes of change were examined. RESULTS: uCTX-II concentrations were significantly higher in ACLR than CNTRL through 16 weeks post-operative when adjusted for BMI. In ACLR, uCTX-II concentrations significantly decreased over time, and the slope was associated with NPRS (r = 0.406, P = 0.039) and IKDC-SKF (r = -0.402, P = 0.034) slopes. CONCLUSION: uCTX-II concentrations shortly after ACLR were elevated compared to CNTRL and declined over time. Decreasing uCTX-II concentrations were associated with decreasing knee pain and improving function. uCTX-II may have a role as a prognostic marker following ACLR and warrants further investigation.

Intertask comparison of frontal plane knee position and moment in female athletes during three distinct movement tasks.

Gender differences in dynamic frontal plane knee posture during functional tasks contribute to increased anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes. Many tasks have been used to assess frontal plane movement patterns, but few studies compare patterns across tasks or evaluate the influence of static alignment on dynamic postures. The purpose of our study was to (1) establish the intertask differences in frontal plane knee posture during step down, single leg land, and drop vertical jump tasks; (2) determine intra-athlete correlations in knee posture across tasks; and (3) investigate the intra-athlete correlations between frontal plane knee posture while standing and during movement. Thirty-seven female athletes from high demand sports participated in a motion analysis assessment. Substantial differences in the frontal plane knee angles and moments occurred between tasks. However, there were strong relationships in frontal plane knee angles (r=0.72-0.76) and moderate to good relationships in knee moments across tasks (r=0.426-0.627). No relationship existed between the standing and dynamic knee abduction angles (r<0.06). Female athletes who demonstrate at-risk knee position and loading are likely to do so across tasks. The lack of relationship between static and dynamic frontal plane knee posture suggests that neuromuscular mechanisms contribute to the consistency in movement patterns across tasks.

Dynamic postural control but not mechanical stability differs among those with and without chronic ankle instability.

The purpose of this investigation was to compare dynamic postural control and mechanical ankle stability among patients with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI) and controls. Seventy-two subjects were divided equally into three groups: uninjured controls, people with previous ankle injury but without CAI, and people with CAI. Subjects completed a single-leg hop-stabilization task, and then had an anterior drawer test and lateral ankle radiograph performed bilaterally. The dynamic postural stability index was calculated from the ground reaction forces of the single-leg hop-stabilization task. Ankle joint stiffness (N/m) was measured with an instrumented arthrometer during the anterior drawer test, and fibula position was assessed from the radiographic image. Patients with previous ankle injuries but without CAI demonstrated higher frontal plane dynamic postural stability scores than both the uninjured control and CAI groups (P<0.01). Patients with and without CAI had significantly higher sagittal plane dynamic postural stability scores (P<0.01) and increased ankle joint stiffness (P=0.045) relative to the control group. The increased frontal plane dynamic postural control may represent a component of a coping mechanism that limits recurrent sprains and the development of CAI. Mechanical stability alterations are speculated to result from the initial ankle trauma.

Elucidation of a potentially destabilizing control strategy in ACL deficient non-copers.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to differentiate the dynamic knee stabilization strategies of potential copers (individuals who have the potential to compensate for the absence of an ACL without episodes of giving way after return to pre-injury activities) and non-copers (those who have knee instability following ACL rupture with return to pre-injury activities). METHODS: Twenty subjects with ACL rupture were assigned to potential coper (n=10) and non-coper (n=10) groups via a screening examination. Ten active people without lower extremity injury were also tested. Knee angle, tibial position and muscle activity data were collected while subjects stood in unilateral stance on a platform that moved horizontally in an anterior direction. Analysis included the preparation for platform movement; and monosynaptic, intermediate reflex and voluntary response intervals after platform movement. RESULTS: Non-copers showed greater knee flexion than uninjured subjects, and had a posterior tibial position and altered hamstring recruitment compared to the other groups. Potential copers demonstrated greater medial quadriceps activity while maintaining knee kinematics similar to uninjured subjects. Both potential copers and non-copers had greater co-contraction between medial hamstrings and quadriceps than uninjured subjects. All excitatory muscle activation occurred in the intermediate reflex interval. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Non-copers displayed aberrant muscle recruitment that may contribute to knee instability. Potential copers maintained normal tibial position using a strategy that permits quadriceps activation without excessive anterior tibial translation. Muscle recruitment in the intermediate reflex interval suggests neuromuscular training may influence the strategies.

Evidence for differential control of tibial position in perturbed unilateral stance after acute ACL rupture.

Functional outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient "potential copers" and "non-copers" may be related to their knee stabilization strategies. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to differentiate dynamic knee stabilization strategies of potential copers and non-copers through analysis of sagittal plane knee angle and tibia position during disturbed and undisturbed unilateral standing. Ten uninjured potential coper and non-coper subjects stood in unilateral stance on a platform that translated anteriorly, posteriorly and laterally. Knee angle and tibia position with reference to the femur were calculated before and after platform movement. During perturbation trials, potential copers maintained kinematics that were similar to uninjured subjects across conditions. Conversely, non-copers stood with greater knee flexion than uninjured subjects and a tibia position that was more posterior than the other groups. Both non-copers and potential copers demonstrated small changes in tibia position following platform movement, but direction of movement was not similar. The similarities between the knee kinematics of potential copers and uninjured subjects suggest that potential copers compensated well from their injury by utilizing analogous dynamic knee stabilization strategies. In comparison to the other groups, by keeping the knee in greater flexion and the tibia in a more posterior position, non-copers appear to constrain the tibia in response to a challenging task, which is consistent with a "stiffening strategy". Based on the poor functional outcomes of non-copers, a stiffening strategy does not lead to dynamic knee stability, and the strategy may increase compressive forces which could contribute to or exacerbate articular cartilage degeneration.

Biomechanical evidence supporting a differential response to acute ACL injury.

OBJECTIVE: To describe movement patterns in people with complete anterior cruciate ligament rupture objectively identified as good candidates for non-operative management of the injury. DESIGN: Involved side kinematics and kinetics were compared to the uninvolved side and to uninjured subjects. BACKGROUND: High-level athletes with anterior cruciate ligament rupture and poor dynamic stability (non-copers) have movement alterations, including less knee flexion and a decreased internal knee extensor moment during loading response, that are not seen in those with excellent knee stability (copers). Our screening exam can identify people with good rehabilitation potential for non-operative management of anterior cruciate ligament injury (potential copers), but the movement strategies of these individuals are unknown. METHODS: Sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking and jogging were collected from 11 subjects who had an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture and met the criteria of the screening exam, and were compared to 10 uninjured subjects, who we studied previously. Variables were those in which non-copers differed from uninjured subjects. RESULTS: The potential copers flexed their involved knee less than uninjured subjects and their uninvolved side during walking. Potential copers, compared to uninjured subjects, also had a lower vertical ground reaction force during loading response, a lower knee support moment, and an increased ankle support moment during walking. In jogging, the involved knee angle at initial contact was more extended compared to uninjured subjects, and the amount of knee flexion was less than the uninvolved side. No differences in kinetics were present during jogging. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the potential copers identified by the screening examination have movement patterns that are consistent with people who have more knee stability than non-copers. RELEVANCE: Although potential copers have developed some characteristics of a successful stabilization strategy, the presence of kinematic alterations indicates that they may benefit from training programs designed to enhance dynamic knee stability.