Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 40
Filter
1.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(3): 503-508, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38295673

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Influenza epidemics are a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in older adults; thus, vaccination is recommended. However, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic could affect influenza vaccination. METHODS: The influenza vaccination rate was estimated from the Korea Community Health Survey data from 2011 to 2021 using Joinpoint regression. We used multiple logistic regression analysis from each two flu seasons data before (2017-18 and 2018-19 seasons) and during (2019-20 and 2020-21 seasons) the COVID-19 pandemic to identify older adults who were not been vaccinated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, we stratified changes in influenza vaccination according to the flu season, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, and health status. RESULTS: The annual percentage change in influenza non-vaccination rate from 2010-11 to 2018-19 seasons and from 2019-20 to 2020-21 seasons was -8.31% (confidence interval (CI), -9.60 to -7.00) and 11.41% (CI, -3.22 to 28.25), respectively. Compared to before COVID-19, in the 2019-20 and 2020-21 seasons, the odds ratio (OR) of non-vaccination was 0.87 (CI, 0.83-0.91) and 1.18 (95% CI, 1.13-1.24), respectively. The decrease in influenza vaccination among older individuals with higher education (OR, 1.24; CI, 1.11-1.39) was greater than that among those with lower education (OR, 1.09; CI, 0.98-1.22). Older individuals with the lowest income level or poor self-rated health showed reduced influenza vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: We estimated the trends of influenza vaccination and identified subgroups with decreased vaccination rates during the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults in South Korea. Health policy decision-makers, practitioners, and researchers should consider the implications of COVID-19 on changes in influenza vaccination, particularly for older individuals at risk of influenza.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Humans , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Pandemics , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Seasons
2.
Geriatrics (Basel) ; 8(5)2023 Oct 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37887978

ABSTRACT

In an aging society, maintaining healthy aging, preventing death, and enabling a continuation of economic activities are crucial. This study sought to develop a model for predicting survival times among community-dwelling older individuals using a deep learning method, and to identify the level of influence of various risk factors on the survival period, so that older individuals can manage their own health. This study used the Korean National Health Insurance Service claims data. We observed community-dwelling older people, aged 66 years, for 11 years and developed a survival time prediction model. Of the 189,697 individuals enrolled at baseline, 180,235 (95.0%) survived from 2009 to 2019, while 9462 (5.0%) died. Using deep-learning-based models (C statistics = 0.7011), we identified various factors impacting survival: Charlson's comorbidity index; the frailty index; long-term care benefit grade; disability grade; income level; a combination of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; sex; smoking status; and alcohol consumption habits. In particular, Charlson's comorbidity index (SHAP value: 0.0445) and frailty index (SHAP value: 0.0443) were strong predictors of survival time. Prediction models may help researchers to identify potentially modifiable risk factors that may affect survival.

3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35410005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neighborhood environmental factors along with individual factors are beginning to make a mark as factors which influence individual health outcomes. The goal of this study is to look at the combined impact of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on all-cause mortality in diabetic patients who have just been diagnosed. METHODS: The Korean National Health Insurance (2002-2013) was employed in this cohort research, which used a stratified random sample. During the years 2003-2006, a total of 15,882 individuals who were newly diagnosed with diabetes and using oral disease-controlling medication were included in the study. Individual income and neighborhood deprivation index were used to examine the combined effect on all-cause mortality. The frailty model was performed using Cox's proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: During the study period, 28.3 percent (n = 4493) of the 15,882 eligible individuals died. In a Cox regression analysis after adjusting for all covariates, with advantaged and disadvantaged neighborhoods classified according to individual household income, the adjusted HR for patients living in a disadvantaged area was higher compared to patients living in an advantaged area in patients with middle income, compared to the reference group (a high income within an advantaged neighborhood) (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.09-1.35; HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25, respectively). The adjusted HR for patients with low income who lived in a disadvantaged location was greater than for patients who lived in an advantaged area (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.18-1.53 vs. HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.49). CONCLUSIONS: Individual SES has a greater impact on all-cause mortality among diabetic patients when they live in a low-income neighborhood.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Residence Characteristics , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Humans , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Social Class , Socioeconomic Factors
4.
Microbiol Resour Announc ; 10(19)2021 05 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33986075

ABSTRACT

We report the complete 8.94-Mb genome sequence of the type strain of Cupriavidus basilensis (DSM 11853T = CCUG 49340T = RK1T), formed by two chromosomes and six putative plasmids, which offers insights into its chloroaromatic-biodegrading capabilities.

5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(20): e15353, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31096434

ABSTRACT

Ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are diseases with golden hour. This study aimed to identify and compare factors that affect in-hospital mortality in patients with stroke and AMI who admitted via the emergency department.This study used the Korean National Health Insurance claims data from 2002 to 2013. The study sample included 7693 patients who had an ischemic stroke, 2828 patients who had a hemorrhagic stroke, and 4916 patients with AMI who were admitted via the emergency departments of a superior general hospital and general hospital, did not transfer to another hospital or come from another hospital, and were aged ≥20 years. This study was analyzed by using Cox's proportional hazards frailty model.Five hundred (6.5%) of 7693 patients with ischemic stroke, 569 (20.1%) of 2828 patients with hemorrhagic stroke, and 399 (8.1%) of 4916 patients with AMI were dead. The clinical factors were associated with in-hospital mortality such as age, CCI, hypertension, and diabetes of patient characteristics. In treatment characteristics, performing PCI and weekday admission was associated with in-hospital mortality (aHR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.67; aHR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.77, respectively). In hospital characteristics, the volume, the proportion of transferred patient to other hospital and ratio of beds per one nurse was associated with in-hospital mortality.Clinical factors of patient characteristics, intervention such as performing PCI and reducing ICP of treatment characteristics, and the volume, transferred rate, and the number of nurse of hospital characteristics were associated with in-hospital mortality.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia/mortality , Hospital Mortality/trends , Intracranial Hemorrhages/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Stroke/mortality , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Patient Transfer , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Quality of Health Care/trends , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Stroke/epidemiology
6.
Microbiologyopen ; 8(3): e00656, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30117297

ABSTRACT

Members of the genus Nocardia are widespread in diverse environments; a wide range of Nocardia species are known to cause nocardiosis in several animals, including cat, dog, fish, and humans. Of the pathogenic Nocardia species, N. seriolae is known to cause disease in cultured fish, resulting in major economic loss. We isolated two N. seriolae strains, CK-14008 and EM15050, from diseased fish and sequenced their genomes using the PacBio sequencing platform. To identify their genomic features, we compared their genomes with those of other Nocardia species. Phylogenetic analysis showed that N. seriolae shares a common ancestor with a putative human pathogenic Nocardia species. Moreover, N. seriolae strains were phylogenetically divided into four clusters according to host fish families. Through genome comparison, we observed that the putative pathogenic Nocardia strains had additional genes for iron acquisition. Dozens of antibiotic resistance genes were detected in the genomes of N. seriolae strains; most of the antibiotics were involved in the inhibition of the biosynthesis of proteins or cell walls. Our results demonstrated the virulence features and antibiotic resistance of fish pathogenic N. seriolae strains at the genomic level. These results may be useful to develop strategies for the prevention of fish nocardiosis.


Subject(s)
Fish Diseases/microbiology , Genome, Bacterial , Nocardia Infections/veterinary , Nocardia/genetics , Nocardia/isolation & purification , Animals , Cluster Analysis , Computational Biology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Genes, Bacterial , Iron/metabolism , Nocardia Infections/microbiology , Phylogeny , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Virulence Factors/metabolism
7.
PLoS One ; 13(11): e0205955, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30403688

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate relationships among neonatal hypothyroidism, family income, and intellectual disability, as well as the combined effects of neonatal hypothyroidism and low family income on intellectual disability. METHODS: Data were extracted from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort from 2002 to 2011. This retrospective study included 91,247 infants. The presence of intellectual disability was based on the disability evaluation system in Korea. Newborn hypothyroidism was identified from diagnosis and prescription codes. Family income was determined from average monthly insurance premiums. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios. RESULTS: Of the 91,247 infants, 208 were considered to have intellectual disability (29.18 cases per 100,000 person-year). The risk of intellectual disability was higher in infants with hypothyroidism than in those without hypothyroidism (hazard ratio = 5.28, P: < .0001). The risk of intellectual disability was higher in infants with low family income than in those with high family income (hazard ratio = 2.32, P: < .0001). The risk of intellectual disability was higher in infants with hypothyroidism and low family income than in those without hypothyroidism and with high family income (hazard ratio = 36.05, P: < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal hypothyroidism and low family income were associated with the risk of intellectual disability in Korea. Additionally, neonatal hypothyroidism and low family income significantly increased the risk of intellectual disability. Public health policymakers should consider providing additional resources for alleviating neonatal hypothyroidism among low-income families.


Subject(s)
Hypothyroidism/complications , Income , Intellectual Disability/complications , Intellectual Disability/economics , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Male , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors
8.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 27(10): 2849-2856, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30072175

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To assess whether the type of primary caregiver is a risk factor of the incidence of fracture among older adults who have survived a stroke. METHODS: Data from 4282 stroke survivors in the National Health Insurance Service-Senior Cohort (2002-2013) were used in this study. We categorized type of primary caregiver as none, spouse/family caregiver, and formal caregiver. The incidence of fracture within the year postdischarge was used as the outcome variable. These data were subjected to a survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Of the 4282 stroke survivors, 308 (7.2%) experienced a fracture during the 1-year follow-up period. According to type of primary caregiver, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of fracture was lower among those whose caregiver was a spouse (HR = .68, 95% confidence interval [CI], .48-.96] and those with a formal caregiver (HR = .59, 95% CI, .36-.97) compared to stroke survivors with no caregiver. In particular, those with a family or formal caregiver who were being cared for in nursing facilities were less likely to be associated with fracture than those with no caregiver. CONCLUSIONS: The adjusted HR of fracture among stroke survivors was lower among those with primary caregivers compared to those without them. Thus, the government should monitor and allocate the appropriate attention to stroke survivors after discharge in order to ensure that they obtain the needed health care, especially for stroke survivors who are without a primary caregiver.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Spouses , Stroke/therapy , Survivors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Female , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge , Proportional Hazards Models , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Skilled Nursing Facilities , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/epidemiology , Time Factors
9.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 152, 2018 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29499719

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Korea's rapidly aging population has led to a rise in the prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (which reached upwards of 21.3% in 2017) in elderly people aged 65 years and over. Most patients with knee osteoarthritis require ongoing management in the community or through primary care. Continuity of care is a desirable attribute of primary care. However, previous studies on the association between continuity of care and health outcomes have focused on specific disease populations, particularly diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The objectives of this study were to determine whether there is an association between continuity of care for outpatients with knee osteoarthritis and health outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using claims data from 2014. The study population included 131,566 patients. We measured hospital admission and medical costs during the final 3 months and the continuity of care by Most Frequent Provider Continuity (MFPC), Modified Modified Continuity Index (MMCI), and Continuity of Care (COC) index in the 9 preceding months, using multiple logistic regression analyses to determine which index best explains continuity. We evaluated the relationship between COC and hospital admissions, using negative binomial regression analysis due to over-dispersion. Finally, multiple regressions were used to examine the relationship between the COC and medical costs. RESULTS: We selected the COC index to determine the association between hospital admission and cost; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the COC was the largest (0.904), while those for the MFPC (0.894) and MMCI (0.893) were similar. The negative binomial regression analysis showed that continuity of care was significantly related to hospitalization, with the relative risk (RR) of hospital admission being low for patients with high continuity of care [RR = 27.17 for those with the reference group COC (0.76-1.00); 95% CI, 3.09-3.51]. Continuity of care was significantly related to medical costs after considering other covariates. A higher COC index was associated with a lower cost. CONCLUSIONS: Higher continuity of care for knee osteoarthritis patients might decrease hospital admission and medical costs.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Services Research , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Insurance, Health , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Republic of Korea , Risk
10.
Respir Med ; 130: 75-84, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29206637

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Both inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting ?-agonists (LABA) have been recommended for the treatment of severe/moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but mild COPD has not been frequently studied. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study to compare the effect of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and ICS/long-acting ?-agonist (LABA) in a single inhaler on all-cause mortality and adverse events, such as pneumonia and fracture, in patients with newly diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We used representative nationwide cohort data from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database (2002-2013). Patients who were at least 40-years-old, newly diagnosed with COPD, and prescribed ICS or ICS/LABA in a single inhaler (N = 1995). To analyze the data, we utilized a Cox's proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Among the total of 1995 patients, 807 had severe COPD (FEV1 < 50%) and 1188 had mild/moderate COPD (FEV1 ? 50%). The cumulative incidence and 5-year cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 59.5% and 29.6% for ICS users, and 35.8% and 20.2% for single inhaler ICS/LABA users, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause mortality for new ICS/LABA users, compared with that in new ICS users, was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62-0.95) for the total population. For the severe and non-severe COPD groups, the adjusted HRs of all-cause mortality for new ICS/LABA users were 1.07 (95% CI: 0.65-1.76) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.55-0.89), respectively. There was no difference in the risk for the first hospitalization due to pneumonia between new ICS and ICS/LABA users among the total population (HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.79-1.34). The adjusted HR of the first hospitalization for fractures in new ICS/LABA users, compared with that in new ICS users, was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.39-0.92) for the total population. CONCLUSIONS: Among newly diagnosed COPD patients and new users of ICS or ICS/LABA, use of ICS/LABA in a single inhaler was associated with lowered risk of all-cause mortality and delayed first hospitalization for fracture, as compared with use of ICS alone. However, there was no significant difference in terms of first hospitalization for pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Fractures, Bone/chemically induced , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/trends , Pneumonia/chemically induced , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Administration, Inhalation , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/drug effects , Fractures, Bone/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pneumonia/complications , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/mortality , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Respiratory Function Tests/methods
11.
BMC Psychiatry ; 17(1): 274, 2017 07 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28754158

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined associations between sitting time and negative health outcomes and mental health. However, the relationship between overall sitting time and major depressive disorder (MDD) in South Korea has not been studied. This study examined the association between MDD and overall sitting time and physical activity in South Koreans. METHODS: Data from the sixth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey, were analyzed. Total participants were 4145 in 2014. MDD was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Participants' data regarding self-reported sitting time and physical activity were analyzed via multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Results showed that people who sat for 8-10 h (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.15-2.11) or more than 10 h (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.23-2.39) had increased risk of MDD compared to those who sat for less than 5 h a day. Subgroup analysis showed that the strongest effect of reported sitting time on risk of MDD was found in men with lower levels of physical activity who sat for 8 to 10 h (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.15-8.01) or more than 10 h (OR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.26-9.35). Level of physical activity was not an independent predictor for MDD. CONCLUSIONS: Sitting for long periods was associated with greater risk of MDD in South Korean adults. Reducing sitting time in people with MDD could help to prevent associated physical health problems and may improve mental health.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Exercise/psychology , Posture , Time Factors , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Nutrition Surveys , Republic of Korea , Sedentary Behavior , Self Report
12.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 18(7): 638.e1-638.e5, 2017 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28587851

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether type of long-term care service is a risk factor of the incidence of pressure ulcers among older adults with dementia who are receiving long-term care insurance (LTCI). METHODS: Data from LTCI beneficiaries (benefit level 1 or 2) with dementia, aged 60 and older (n = 7841), in the Korean Elderly Cohort data set from 2008 to 2013 were used. Type of long-term care service was categorized into home or institutional care using the LTCI Claims Database. The National Health Insurance Claims Database was used to identify the incidence of pressure ulcers as the outcome variable in a survival analysis using the time-dependent Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Of the 7841 participants, 98 (1.2%) exhibited pressure ulcers. Compared with beneficiaries receiving home care, those receiving institutional care had a higher adjusted hazard ratio for pressure ulcers (hazard ratio 6.48, 95% confidence interval 3.48-10.86). These associations were particularly strong among beneficiaries without pressure ulcers during the mandatory assessment for benefit eligibility and who were partially ambulatory. DISCUSSION: Beneficiaries receiving institutional care were more likely to have pressure ulcers than were those receiving home care. The government must monitor the quality of institutional long-term care services and encourage service providers to improve such care.


Subject(s)
Dementia/epidemiology , Health Services for the Aged/organization & administration , Home Care Services/organization & administration , Insurance, Long-Term Care/statistics & numerical data , Long-Term Care/organization & administration , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Dementia/therapy , Female , Health Services for the Aged/economics , Home Care Services/economics , Humans , Long-Term Care/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Republic of Korea
13.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 17(1): 393, 2017 06 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28595583

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to reduce readmission of patients with pneumonia and improve quality of care. To assess the association between hospital resources and quality of care, we examined the effect of number of doctors per bed on 30-day readmission and investigated the combined effect of number of doctors per bed and number of beds. METHODS: We used nationwide cohort sample data of health insurance claims by the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) from 2002 to 2013. Pneumonia admissions to acute care hospitals among 7446 inpatients older than 65 were examined. We conducted a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model to analyze the association between the number of doctors per bed and 30-day readmission, as well as that of pneumonia-specific 30-day readmission with the combined effects of number of doctors per bed and number of beds. RESULTS: Overall, 1421 (19.1%) patients were readmitted within 30 days and 756 (11.2%) patients were readmitted for pneumonia within 30 days. Patients with pneumonia treated by very low or low number of doctors per bed showed higher readmission (pneumonia-specific readmission: hazard ratio [HR] = 1. 406, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.072-1.843 for low number of doctors per bed; all-cause readmissions: HR = 1.276, 95% CI = 1.026-1.587 for very low number of doctors per bed, and HR = 1.280, 95% CI = 1.064-1.540 for low number of doctors per bed). CONCLUSIONS: This empirical study showed that patients with pneumonia cared for in hospitals with more doctors were less likely to be readmitted. Pneumonia-specific 30-day readmission was also significantly associated with the combined effect of the number of doctors and the number of hospital beds.


Subject(s)
Medical Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Male , National Health Programs , Pneumonia/therapy , Proportional Hazards Models , Quality Improvement , Republic of Korea
14.
J Affect Disord ; 218: 53-58, 2017 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28458116

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relationships between breastfeeding discontinuation and cesarean section delivery, and the occurrence of postpartum depression (PPD) remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association of breastfeeding discontinuation and cesarean section delivery with PPD during the first 6 months after delivery. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort for 81,447 women who delivered during 2004-2013. PPD status was determined using the diagnosis code at outpatient or inpatient visit during the 6-month postpartum period. Breastfeeding discontinuation and cesarean section delivery were identified from prescription of lactation suppression drugs and diagnosis, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios. RESULTS: Of the 81,447 women, 666 (0.82%) had PPD. PPD risk was higher in women who discontinued breastfeeding than in those who continued breastfeeding (hazard ratio=3.23, P<0.0001), in women with cesarean section delivery than in those with vaginal delivery (hazard ratio=1.26, P=0.0040), and in women with cesarean section delivery who discontinued breastfeeding than in those with vaginal delivery who continued breastfeeding (hazard ratio=4.92, P<0.0001). LIMITATIONS: Study limitations include low PPD incidence; use of indirect indicators for PPD, breastfeeding discontinuation, and working status, which could introduce selection bias and errors due to miscoding; and potential lack of adjustment for important confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Breastfeeding discontinuation and cesarean section delivery were associated with PPD during the 6-month postpartum period. Our results support the implementation of breastfeeding promoting policies, and PPD screening and treatment programs during the early postpartum period.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Cesarean Section/psychology , Delivery, Obstetric/psychology , Depression, Postpartum/etiology , Adult , Breast Feeding/psychology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Parturition , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Republic of Korea , Young Adult
15.
J Epidemiol ; 27(2): 56-62, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28142012

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is reported to be more prevalent among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in various countries. The effect of poverty on child development appears to depend on how long poverty lasts. The timing of poverty also seems to be important for childhood outcomes. Lifetime socioeconomic status may shape current health. Thus, we investigated the effects of household income changes from birth to 4 years on the occurrence of ADHD. METHODS: Data were obtained from 18,029 participants in the Korean National Health Insurance cohort who were born in 2002 and 2003. All individuals were followed until December 2013 or the occurrence of ADHD, whichever came first. Household income trajectories were estimated using the national health insurance premium and the group-based model. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare incidence rates between different income trajectory groups after adjustment for possible confounding risk factors. RESULTS: Of 18,029 participants, 554 subjects (3.1%) were identified as having ADHD by age 10 or 11. Seven household income trajectories within three categories were found. Children living in decreasing, consistently low, and consistently mid-low income households had an increased risk of ADHD compared to children who consistently lived in the mid-high household income group. CONCLUSIONS: Children who live in decreasing-income or consistently low-income households have a higher risk for ADHD. Promotion of targeted policies and priority support may help reduce ADHD in this vulnerable group.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Health Status Disparities , Income/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Proportional Hazards Models , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Social Class
16.
Qual Life Res ; 26(5): 1303-1314, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27817103

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of different living arrangements on quality of life (QoL) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the elderly. METHODS: We used data from the first to fourth wave of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging. Using the first wave as a baseline, the data included 5050 individuals aged 60 years and older with at least one living child. QoL and HRQoL were measured using a visual analogue scale developed by the Korean Labor Institute that bears similarity to the EQ-VAS. Living arrangements were categorized based on household composition (single household, one-generation household, two-generation household, and three-generation household) and the marital status of a cohabiting adult child. A generalized estimating equation was used to examine the association between living arrangements and QoL/HRQoL. RESULTS: Compared to elderly individuals living in three-generation families with a married child, those in a single household (QoL: ß = -2.67 [P = 0.001]; HRQoL: ß = -2.24 [P = 0.007]), those living in a three-generation family with an unmarried adult child (QoL: ß = -5.19 [P < 0.0001]; HRQoL: ß = -3.41 [P < 0.0001]), and those living in a two-generation family with an unmarried adult child (QoL: ß = -2.88 [P < 0.0001]; HRQoL: ß = -2.80 [P < 0.0001]) were more likely to have lower QoL and HRQoL. These associations were particularly strong for women and individuals in the lowest equivalent household income group. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to devise government programs not only for elderly individuals living alone, but also for those living with an unmarried adult child; elderly persons who are female and part of the lowest equivalent household income group must receive particular attention.


Subject(s)
Quality of Life/psychology , Residence Characteristics , Aged , Aging , Asian People , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Marital Status , Middle Aged
17.
Am J Nephrol ; 45(1): 32-39, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27866205

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The socioeconomic status of a person has an impact on his or her access to kidney transplantation as has been reported in western countries. This study examined the association between income level and kidney transplantation among chronic kidney disease patients undergoing dialysis in South Korea. METHODS: We analyzed data from 1,792 chronic kidney disease patients undergoing dialysis and listed in the Korean National Health Insurance Claim Database (2003-2013). The likelihood of receiving the first kidney transplant over time was analyzed using competing risk proportional hazard models on time from initiating dialysis to receiving a transplant. RESULTS: Of 1,792 patients on dialysis, only 184 patients (10.3%) received kidney transplants. Patients with medical aid had the lowest kidney transplantation rate (hazard ratio 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.51). A lower income level was significantly associated with a low kidney transplantation rate, after adjusting for covariates, compared to patients in the high-income level group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that in South Korea, the total number of kidney transplants is remarkably low and there exists income disparity with regard to access to kidney transplantation. Thus, we suggest that plans be implemented to encourage organ donation and increase organ transplant accessibility for all patients irrespective of their socioeconomic status.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Healthcare Disparities , Income , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Kidney Transplantation , Renal Dialysis , Social Class , Adult , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Republic of Korea
18.
Stem Cell Res Ther ; 7(1): 153, 2016 10 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27765070

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow-derived cell therapy has been used to treat acute myocardial infarction. However, the therapeutic efficacy of this approach remains controversial. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate short-term and long-term effectiveness of bone marrow-derived therapy. METHODS: We searched eight databases (Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, Cochrane Library, KoreaMed, KMBASE, KISS, RISS, and KisTi) up to December 2014. Demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, and adverse events were analyzed. We identified 5534 potentially relevant studies; 405 were subjected to a full-text review. Forty-three studies with 2635 patients were included in this review. RESULTS: No safety issues related to cell injection were reported during follow-up. At 6 months, cell-injected patients showed modest improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with the control group. However, there were no differences between groups at other time points. In the cardiac MRI analysis, there were no significant differences in infarct size reduction between groups. Interestingly, mortality tended to be reduced at the 3-year follow-up, and at the 5-year follow-up, cell injection significantly decreased all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated discrepancies between short-term LV functional improvement and long-term all-cause mortality. Future clinical trials should include long-term follow-up outcomes to validate the therapeutic efficacy of cell therapy.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow/physiology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/methods , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology
19.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 28(12): 2055-2066, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27456081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Suicide rates are high among elderly individuals experiencing socioeconomic insecurity. Socioeconomic security is of critical importance for elderly individuals and directly affects mental health, including suicidal behavior. Thus, we investigated the relationship between socioeconomic status and suicidal ideation in elderly individuals. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data on 58,590 individuals 65 years of age or older from the Korean Community Health Survey 2013. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify relationships between socioeconomic factors (food insecurity, household income, and living arrangement) and suicidal ideation in the elderly population. RESULTS: The study included 58,590 participants (24,246 males and 34,344 females). Of those, 2,847 males and 6,418 females experienced suicidal ideation. Participants with food insecure were more likely to experience suicidal ideation than were those who were food secure (males: OR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.34-1.90; females: OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.38-1.72). We found a similar pattern among participants with a low household income and those living alone. Additionally, male and female subjects who were food insecure and living alone or food insecure and had a low household income showed a marked increase in suicidal ideation. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that low socioeconomic status is associated with an increased risk of suicidal ideation among the elderly. Furthermore, intervention programs that address the prevalence of elderly suicide, particularly among those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged, are needed.


Subject(s)
Food Supply/statistics & numerical data , Income/statistics & numerical data , Poverty/psychology , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Social Class , Suicidal Ideation , Suicide Prevention , Suicide , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Needs Assessment , Prevalence , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Suicide/psychology , Suicide/statistics & numerical data
20.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 28(4): 478-85, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27272406

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with greater continuity of care (COC) have fewer preventable hospitalizations. DESIGN: We conducted a cohort study using a stratified random sample of Korean National Health Insurance enrollees from 2002 to 2010. The COC index was calculated for each year post-diagnosis based on ambulatory care visits. We performed a recurrent event survival analysis via Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of preventable hospitalizations. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5163 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus in 2003-6 and receiving oral hypoglycemic medication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Preventable hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 5163 eligible participants, 6.4% (n = 328) experienced a preventable hospitalization during the study period. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 8.69 (95% CI, 2.62-28.83) for subjects with a COC score of 0.00-0.19, 7.03 (95% CI, 4.50-10.96) for those with a score of 0.20-0.39, 3.01 (95% CI, 2.06-4.40) for those with a score of 0.40-059, 4.42 (95% CI, 3.04-6.42) for those with a score of 0.60-0.79 and 5.82 (95% CI, 3.87-8.75) for those with a score of 0.80-0.99. The difference in cumulative incidence of preventable hospitalizations in patients with COC scores of 0.00-0.19 relative to those with COC scores of 1.00 was the greatest, at 0.97% points. CONCLUSIONS: Greater COC was associated with fewer preventable hospitalizations in subjects with type 2 diabetes.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Hospitalization/trends , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Republic of Korea , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...