Experiencing Unmet Medical Needs or Delayed Care Because of Cost: Foreign-Born Adults in the U.S. by Region of Birth.

UNLABELLED: Healthy People 2020 in the United States highlights timely access to necessary health care as a major factor that can reduce health-related disparities. This study examined the prevalence of delaying/missing necessary health care because of cost among foreign-born adults (26+ years old) in the United States by their region of origin, after controlling for geographic clustering at the county and state levels. METHODS: Using the pooled 2007-2011 National Health Interview Survey and linked state/county-level data, this study analyzed data on 61,732 foreign-born adults from nine regions of birth. Three-level multilevel modeling (state > county > individual) was conducted. The age-adjusted percentages of foreign-born adults who delayed/missed necessary health care because of cost varied by region of birth, ranging from 7.0% (Southeast Asia) and 11.9% (Europe) to 15.5% (Mexico/Central America/Caribbean) and 16.7% (the Middle East). However, after controlling for geographic clustering and other individual-level covariates (e.g., insurance), adults from Mexico/Central America/Caribbean were less likely to delay or not receive necessary care compared to their counterparts from all other parts of the world except for those from Asian regions. This study implies that disparities can be reduced if some known risk factors (e.g., insurance) are improved among foreign-born adults.

Racial-ethnic variation in U.S. mental health service use among Latino and Asian non-U.S. citizens.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the factors associated with service utilization for mental health conditions among Latino and Asian non-U.S. citizens in the United States by service type and race. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS). The sample for this study was 849 Latino and 595 Asian non-U.S. citizens between ages 18 and 64 (N=1,444). Mental health services obtained through three types of service providers were examined: specialty mental health services, general medical services, and other services. Guided by the modified Andersen health behavioral model, analyses involved logistic regression models conducted with penalized maximum likelihood estimation. RESULTS: Although having a psychiatric disorder increased mental health service use in both groups, only 32% of Latino and 52% of Asian non-U.S. citizens with psychiatric needs reported using mental health services during the past 12 months. Overall, noncitizen Latinos and Asians were more likely to use mental health services from general health care providers and other providers than from specialty mental health providers. Several significant predisposing, enabling, and need factors, such as age, health insurance, and having psychiatric conditions, also interacted with race. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of the study suggest that there are ethnoracial variations in mental health service use between Latino and Asian non-U.S. citizens. Mental health professionals should consider developing tailored mental health interventions that account for cultural variations to enhance access to services for these vulnerable subgroups of Latinos and Asians. Further research should examine ethnic disparities in mental health service use among various non-U.S. citizen racial-ethnic subgroups.