Performance of the Medical Priority Dispatch System® in Identifying Patients Requiring Chest Compressions at Overdose Prevention Services: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS)® is used to triage 9-1-1 calls according to acuity, with certain coding receiving telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) for suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, this may be challenging for those with drug poisoning emergencies, who may resemble OHCA. We sought to examine the performance of the system to correctly identify cases requiring T-CPR, specifically at overdose prevention services (OPS). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients attended by the provincial emergency medical system (EMS) (May 1, 2019-January 31, 2023). We calculated the diagnostic performance of MPDS® assessment of whether the case required T-CPR instructions against the gold standard of whether the patient was found pulseless on EMS clinician arrival. We compared performance among subgroups, specifically OPS vs other locations and drug poisoning-classified cases vs other case classifications. RESULTS: Comparing OPS to other locations, the sensitivity of MPDS® was similar (66.7% vs 62.4%, p = 0.4), with lower specificity (87.3% vs 98.1%, p < 0.01) and positive predictive value (0.3% vs 35.7%, p < 0.01) and higher negative predictive value (99.9% vs 99.4%, p < 0.01). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS® was 0.381 at OPS locations, compared with 0.383 at other locations, while the positive likelihood ratio was 5.24, compared with 32.36. In patients with drug poisoning emergencies, compared with other 9-1-1 events, MPDS® had higher sensitivity (83.6% vs 60.6%, p < 0.01) but lower specificity (77.6% vs 98.9%, p < 0.01) and positive predictive value (10.5% vs 48.5%, p < 0.01), and similar negative predictive value (99.33% vs 99.35%, p = 0.03). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS® was 0.212 in drug poisoning emergencies compared with 0.398 for all other presentations, and the positive likelihood ratio was 3.73 compared with 57.88. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The ability of MPDS® to correctly identify patients needing telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions differed between OPS settings and other locations, frequently recommending T-CPR for patients not suffering OHCA at an OPS. Different strategies developed in collaboration with people who use substances are required to better tailor dispatch instructions prior to EMS arrival to avoid delays in life-saving interventions.

Associations with experience of non-fatal opioid overdose in British Columbia, Canada: a repeated cross sectional survey study.

INTRODUCTION: Lives lost in North America due to the unregulated drug poisoning emergency are preventable and those who survive an opioid overdose may suffer long-term disability. Rates of opioid overdose more than doubled following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Canada. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our analytical sample was comprised of 1447 participants from the 2018, 2019, and 2021 Harm Reduction Client Survey who responded yes or no to having experienced an opioid overdose in the past 6 months. Participants were recruited from harm reduction sites from across British Columbia. We used logistic regression to explore associations of experiencing an opioid overdose. RESULTS: Overall, 21.8% of participants reported experiencing an opioid overdose in the last six months (18.2% in 2019 and 26.6% in 2021). The following factors were positively associated with increased adjusted odds of experiencing a non-fatal opioid overdose: cis men relative to cis women (AOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.10-2.02), unstably housed compared to people with stable housing (AOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.40-2.50), and participants from 2021 compared to those from 2019 (AOR 3.06, 95% CI 1.57-5.97). The effects of both previous experience of a stimulant overdose and having witnessed an opioid overdose depended on the year of study, with both effects decreasing over subsequent years. CONCLUSIONS: Overdoses have increased over time; in 2021 more than one in four participants experienced an overdose. There is an urgent need for policy and program development to meaningfully address the unregulated drug poisoning emergency through acceptable life-saving interventions and services to prevent overdoses and support overdose survivors.

Document d'orientation sur la distribution et l'utilisation de trousses de naloxone à emporter par les intervenants et intervenantes communautaires en cas de surdose au Canada.

CONTEXTE: La toxicité croissante des opioïdes dans le marché illicite des drogues a fait exploser le nombre de surdoses au Canada et ailleurs dans le monde; le programme de naloxone à emporter (NàE) est une intervention fondée sur des données probantes qui consiste à distribuer des trousses contenant de la naloxone aux membres de la communauté susceptibles d'être témoins d'une surdose. L'objectif du présent document d'orientation est de formuler des recommandations stratégiques à l'intention des programmes fédéraux, provinciaux et territoriaux de NàE, en s'appuyant sur des données probantes issues de la documentation scientifique, de la littérature grise et des communautés, à la lumière de 11 années de distribution de NàE au Canada. MÉTHODES : Le groupe d'élaboration des documents d'orientation sur la naloxone, une équipe multidisciplinaire composée de personnes ayant une expertise et une expérience vécue en matière de toxicomanie, a appliqué l'outil AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation) afin d'éclairer l'élaboration du présent document d'orientation. En vue de l'élaboration de nos recommandations, nous avons procédé entre décembre 2021 et septembre 2022 à une revue systématique de tous les types d'ouvrages dans le but de recueillir les données probantes publiées, ainsi que les données probantes et l'expertise issues de la communauté. Nous avons sollicité des commentaires sur nos recommandations préliminaires par le biais d'un comité de révision externe et d'un processus de participation du public. Le projet a été financé par les Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada dans le cadre de l'Initiative canadienne de recherche sur l'abus de substances (ICRAS). Nous avons appliqué les principes du Réseau international en matière de lignes directrices (Guidelines International Network) pour gérer les intérêts concurrents. RECOMMANDATIONS: Les données probantes existantes issues de la documentation sur la NàE étaient de faible qualité. Pour élaborer nos recommandations, nous avons incorporé des données probantes tirées de la documentation scientifique et de la littérature grise, ainsi que l'expertise de la communauté. Nos recommandations portent sur 3 volets : les voies d'administration de la naloxone, le contenu des trousses de NàE et les interventions en cas de situations de surdose. Les trousses distribuées par les programmes de naloxone à emporter doivent offrir le choix entre les préparations intramusculaire et intranasale. Le contenu recommandé de la trousse comprend la naloxone, un dispositif d'administration de la naloxone, un équipement de protection individuelle, des instructions et un étui de transport. Les intervenants et intervenantes communautaires formés à la réponse aux surdoses doivent prioriser la respiration artificielle en cas de dépression respiratoire, et la réanimation cardiorespiratoire (RCR) conventionnelle en cas d'arrêt cardiaque, entre autres interventions. INTERPRÉTATION : Ce projet d'élaboration d'un document d'orientation vise à guider les programmes de NàE au Canada dans un contexte où les données probantes publiées sont rares; les recommandations ont été élaborées en collaboration avec diverses parties prenantes.

Preferred stimulant safer supply and associations with methamphetamine preference among people who use stimulants in British Columbia: Findings from a 2021 cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: As safer supply programs expand in Canada, stimulant safer supply is often overlooked despite the harms and criminalization faced by people who use stimulants. METHODS: The 2021 Harm Reduction Client Survey was administered at 17 harm reduction sites around British Columbia, Canada. The survey included a question about what specific substance participants would want to receive as stimulant safer supply. We investigated preference of stimulant safer substance by looking at frequency of stated preference and by using multivariable logistic regression to understand factors associated with the most frequently chosen substance. RESULTS: Of 330 participants who reported a stimulant safer supply preference, 58.5% (n = 193) chose crystal methamphetamine, 13% (n = 43) crack cocaine and 12.4% (n = 41) cocaine powder. The options that were available by prescription at the time of data collection were chosen by under 11% of participants (dextroamphetamine n = 21, methylphenidate n = 15). A preference for crystal methamphetamine was associated with being 29 and under compared to 50 and over (AOR: 3.96, 95% CI: 1.42-11.07, p-value: 0.01); self-identifying as a cis man versus a cis woman (AOR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.03-2.97, p-value: 0.04); and using drugs every day (AOR: 15.43, 95% CI: 3.38-70.51, p-value: < 0.01) or a few times a week (AOR: 8.90, 95% CI: 1.78-44.44, p-value: 0.01) compared to a few times a month. CONCLUSIONS: Preference of stimulant safer supply is associated with age, gender, and substance use characteristics. Safer supply programs that offer limited substances risk being poorly accessed, resulting in a continued reliance on an unregulated supply. Moreover, programs that do not offer a range of substances can contribute to health inequities.

Guidance on take-home naloxone distribution and use by community overdose responders in Canada.

BACKGROUND: The increasing toxicity of opioids in the unregulated drug market has led to escalating numbers of overdoses in Canada and worldwide; takehome naloxone (THN) is an evidence-based intervention that distributes kits containing naloxone to people in the community who may witness an overdose. The purpose of this guidance is to provide policy recommendations for territorial, provincial and federal THN programs, using evidence from scientific and grey literature and community evidence that reflects 11 years of THN distribution in Canada. METHODS: The Naloxone Guidance Development Group - a multidisciplinary team including people with lived and living experience and expertise of drug use - used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument to inform development of this guidance. We considered published evidence identified through systematic reviews of all literature types, along with community evidence and expertise, to generate recommendations between December 2021 and September 2022. We solicited feedback on preliminary recommendations through an External Review Committee and a public input process. The project was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research through the Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse. We used the Guideline International Network principles for managing competing interests. RECOMMENDATIONS: Existing evidence from the literature on THN was of low quality. We incorporated evidence from scientific and grey literature, and community expertise to develop our recommendations. These were in 3 areas: routes of naloxone administration, THN kit contents and overdose response. Take-home naloxone programs should offer the choice of both intramuscular and intranasal formulations of naloxone in THN kits. Recommended kit contents include naloxone, a naloxone delivery device, personal protective equipment, instructions and a carrying case. Trained community overdose responders should prioritize rescue breathing in the case of respiratory depression, and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the case of cardiac arrest, among other interventions. INTERPRETATION: This guidance development project provides direction for THN programs in Canada in the context of limited published evidence, with recommendations developed in collaboration with diverse stakeholders.