Mortality in paediatric burns at the Women's and Children's Hospital (WCH), Adelaide, South Australia: 1960-2017.

BACKGROUND: Burn injuries are the third leading cause of preventable death in children worldwide, resulting in over 100 000 annual hospitalisations. In the paediatric population, scalds are the commonest mechanism and burn injuries of greater than 40% total burn surface area (TBSA) are associated with a high mortality and morbidity rate. AIMS: The aim of this study was to review mortality in paediatric burns in a tertiary burns centre over a 60-year period, providing an understanding of local causes of mortality and directing future clinical research. METHODS: We reviewed data collected prospectively from patients treated for burn injuries at the WCH from 1960 to 2017. Data of age, gender, mechanism of injury and TBSA were collected. TBSA of 40% and greater were included in the study. RESULTS: All patients with total burn surface area (TBSA) less than 40% survived. There were a total of 75 patients who sustained burns of or greater than 40% TBSA. Overall mortality was 34% (26 of 75) of which 24 occurred in the 1960s. Of the 21 patients who died of flame burn injuries, 12 of them were described as clothes catching alight from being in close proximity to the source of flame. Average length of stay for patients who did not survive was 7 days (1-26). CONCLUSION: Mortality has since declined and the prognosis for survival good, even in TBSA of greater than 90%. The investigations in fabric flammability led by Dr Thomas Pressley and Mr Murray Clarke prompted the rewriting of Australian standards for production of children's clothing. This, in combination with advances in paediatric resuscitation, surgical techniques as well as wound care has improved survival rates and outcomes in extensive burn injuries. Future studies focus to see not only better survival rates, but also better aesthetic and functional outcomes in burn survivors.

A comparison study of methods for estimation of a burn surface area: Lund and Browder, e-burn and Mersey Burns.

INTRODUCTION: One of the greatest challenges in burn care is the estimation of a total burn surface area (TBSA). It is especially challenging and needs to take into account the growing proportions and the age of a paediatric patient. The aims of this study is to: (1) assess the reliability of the three modalities (LB, MB, and EB) in calculating the extent of burn injuries and fluid resuscitation, and (2) compare the features in terms of usability and efficacy. METHODS: Participants were recruited from Women's and Children's Hospital (WCH), South Australia's surgical and emergency department. Participants were introduced to LB, MB and EB, and then commenced calculation of TBSA on two simulated paediatric (patient A: 12 months, patient B: 4 years) burns. The participants were categorized into three groups; (1) Burns-naïve, (2) Burns-experienced, and (3) Burns-expert. RESULTS: A total of 45 participants took part in this validation study: doctors (49%), nurses (33%), nursing students (11%) and medical students (7%). The burns-naïve group demonstrated higher means in both patients and has greater variance, TBSA mean 28.8%, range 14-40.5% and mean 37.4%, range 20-52.3% in patient A and B respectively. Two-way ANOVA analysis shows a statistically significant interaction between the effects of level of experience and use of applications on estimation of TBSA in larger burns. CONCLUSION: Innovative software and mobile applications demonstrate a high potential as clinical adjuncts in achieving better health outcomes in any health care system. Both Mersey Burns and e-burn reduced the risk of human error particularly from untrained or non-specialised clinicians, however, e-burn proved to be more favourable in our study. Technology-aided models are the future of burns assessment, and further studies are warranted to determine their impact on overall clinical outcome.

Otoplasty techniques in children: a comparative study of outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Numerous otoplasty techniques have been described in the literature to correct prominent ears; however, few have focused on the complication rates. We reviewed our experience aiming to assess peri-operative care requirements and complication rates. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective review of 207 otoplasty procedures performed in 119 patients over a 5-year period (2009-2014) at the Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide. Information pertaining to demographic details, length of stay, otoplasty technique and complications (early and late) were obtained. RESULTS: In the study period, 97% of the 119 patients had an overnight stay. There was an early complication of 2.2% (return to theatre for bleeding) in the modified Chongchet technique and 0.9% (wound infection) in the Mustarde technique. Late complications included suture extrusion (1.9%) with the Mustarde technique and hypertrophic scarring (2.2%) in the modified Chongchet technique. The recurrence rate requiring revision following modified Chongchet technique was 10% and Mustarde technique was 2.9%. The Mustarde otoplasty technique was associated with a slightly lower antiemetic requirement than the Chongchet technique (3.2 versus 14.3%, P = 0.032). Both techniques had comparable opioid analgesic requirement of 30-35% post-operatively (P = 0.248). CONCLUSION: Our results are comparable to the huge variation in available literature. We note the higher revision rate following modified Chongchet technique. Both techniques had a low and acceptable rate of post-operative analgesia and antiemetic requirement. We are considering either otoplasty technique as a day surgery procedure within our unit with the provision of adequate patient support as a safe and economical advance.