Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Manag Care ; 22(4): e147-52, 2016 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27143351

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To provide a review of the outcomes and costs in patients seen by Clinical Pharmacy Specialist (CPS) Certified Diabetes Educators in ambulatory care for diabetes management. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. METHODS: All patients discharged by a CPS for diabetes management between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013, were included. RESULTS: A total of 915 patients were discharged from CPS services. The majority of patients had type 2 diabetes (98.7%) and were female (63.1%), Hispanic (53.3%), and on average, were aged 56 years. The patients were seen by the CPS for approximately 5.3 face-to-face visits, and by their provider for 1.9 face-to-face visits. The average difference from baseline for glycated hemoglobin was -2.6%, while the average systolic and diastolic blood pressures improved by -8 mm Hg and -3 mm Hg, respectively. The major lipid parameters also reported improvement, averaging -23 mg/dL for total cholesterol, -54 mg/dL for triglycerides, -15 mg/dL for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, -23 mg/dL for non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and +0.8 mg/dL for HDL-C. Overall, the average difference from baseline to final visit for the numbers and costs of medications and diabetes supplies per patient increased slightly. Medication adherence also improved each year in patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The CPSs directly impact patient care through improvements in clinical outcomes. They help patients achieve disease-state goals for diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia through a variety of clinical interventions and by promoting medication adherence. These data demonstrate the significant positive impact to the institution that clinical pharmacy services have in diabetes management.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/economics , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Uncompensated Care/economics , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Databases, Factual , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uncompensated Care/statistics & numerical data , United States
2.
J Clin Lipidol ; 9(3): 326-33, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26073390

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the use and effectiveness of over-the-counter (OTC) fish oil supplements for triglyceride (TG) lowering. OBJECTIVES: To (1) perform a medication-use evaluation (MUE) and (2) assess the efficacy of OTC fish oil. METHODS: Retrospective, observational cohort study using electronic medical records and the pharmacy database from Parkland Health and Hospital System in Dallas, Texas. Parkland is a tax-supported county institution that provides patients with single-brand OTC fish oil. Two separate analyses were conducted. Six hundred seventeen patients (prescribed fish oil between July 1, 2012, and August 31, 2012) were included in the MUE analysis and 235 patients (109 fish oil, 72 fenofibrate, and 54 gemfibrozil, prescribed between January 1, 2012, and July 31, 2013) were included in the efficacy analysis. The main outcome measure for the MUE was fish oil prescribing habits including dosages and patient adherence, as defined by medication possession ratio. The main outcome measure for the efficacy analysis was change in lipids measured using the last value before fish oil treatment and the first value after fish oil treatment. RESULTS: MUE: 617 patients received prescriptions for OTC fish oil. Sixty-four percent were prescribed a total daily dose of 2000 mg. Only 25% of patients were adherent. Efficacy analysis: despite being prescribed suboptimal doses, fish oil reduced TGs by 29% (95% confidence interval, 34.3-22.7). Compared with fish oil therapy, fibrate therapy resulted in a greater TG reduction: 48.5% (55.1-41.0) with fenofibrate and 49.8% (57.6-40.5) with gemfibrozil (P < .0001, both medications compared with fish oil). CONCLUSIONS: Health care providers prescribe suboptimal doses of fish oil, and adherence is poor. Even at low doses (2 g/d), though, fish oil lowers TGs by 29%.


Subject(s)
Fish Oils/administration & dosage , Hypolipidemic Agents/administration & dosage , Nonprescription Drugs/administration & dosage , Triglycerides/blood , Adult , Aged , Female , Fenofibrate/administration & dosage , Gemfibrozil/administration & dosage , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL