ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated the risks and benefits of routine Fe-folic acid (IFA) supplementation in pregnant women living in low- and high-groundwater-Fe areas in Bangladesh. DESIGN: A case-controlled prospective longitudinal study design was used to compare the effect of daily Fe (60 mg) and folic acid (400 µg) supplementation for 3·5 months. SETTING: A rural community in Bangladesh. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women living in low-groundwater-Fe areas (n 260) and high-groundwater-Fe areas (n 262). RESULTS: Mean Hb and serum ferritin concentrations at baseline were significantly higher in pregnant women in the high-groundwater-Fe areas. After supplementation, the mean change in Hb concentration in the women in the low-groundwater-Fe areas (0·10 g/dl) was higher than that in the pregnant women in the high-groundwater-Fe areas (-0·08 g/dl; P = 0·052). No significant changes in the prevalence of anaemia or Fe deficiency (ID) in either group were observed after IFA supplementation; however, the prevalence of Fe-deficiency anaemia (IDA) decreased significantly in the women in the low-groundwater-Fe areas. The risk of anaemia, ID and IDA after supplementation did not differ significantly between the groups. None of the participants had Fe overload. However, a significant proportion of the women in the high- and low-groundwater-Fe areas remained anaemic and Fe-deficient after supplementation. CONCLUSION: IFA supplementation significantly increased the Hb concentration in pregnant women living in the low-groundwater-Fe areas. Routine supplementation with 60 mg Fe and 400 µg folic acid does not pose any significant risk of haemoconcentration or Fe overload. Further research to identify other nutritional and non-nutritional contributors to anaemia is warranted to prevent and treat anaemia.
Subject(s)
Anemia/epidemiology , Dietary Supplements , Folic Acid/administration & dosage , Iron/administration & dosage , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Anemia/blood , Anemia/prevention & control , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Folic Acid/blood , Folic Acid/therapeutic use , Groundwater , Humans , Iron/blood , Iron/therapeutic use , Longitudinal Studies , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent studies found a low rate of iron deficiency in Bangladeshi non-pregnant and non-lactating women. This was attributed to high iron concentrations in drinking water. However, there are limited data on iron deficiency among pregnant women in Bangladesh. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of anemia, iron deficiency, and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) among rural pregnant women and explore the association of groundwater iron concentration with anemia and iron deficiency in this group. METHODS: This study used data from a baseline assessment of an intervention study on rural pregnant women (n = 522), gestational age ≤20 wk, living in areas of low and high iron in groundwater. RESULTS: Overall, 34.7% of the pregnant women had anemia, 27% had iron deficiency, and 13.4% had IDA. Prevalence of anemia, iron deficiency, and IDA among the pregnant women living in low-groundwater-iron areas was significantly higher than among the pregnant women from high-groundwater-iron areas. The odds of iron deficiency were significantly lower among pregnant women in the higher quartiles of daily iron intake from drinking water. CONCLUSIONS: This study found a differential prevalence of anemia and iron deficiency among pregnant women living in areas of high and low groundwater iron. Iron status was independently associated with daily iron intake from drinking water. However, a significant proportion of the anemia could not be attributed to iron deficiency. Further research to identify other nutritional and non-nutritional contributors to anemia in Bangladesh is needed to formulate effective prevention and control programs for anemia.