ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sociodemographic status (SDS) including race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status as approximated by education, income, and insurance status impact pulmonary disease in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). The relationship between SDS and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remains understudied. METHODS: In a prospective, multi-institutional study, adult PwCF completed the 22-Question SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Smell Identification Test (SIT), Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorder Negative Statements (QOD-NS), and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R). Lund-Kennedy scores, sinus computed tomography, and clinical data were collected. Data were analyzed across race/ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic factors using multivariate regression. RESULTS: Seventy-three PwCF participated with a mean age of 34.7 ± 10.9 years and 49 (67.1%) were female. Linear regression identified that elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) use (ß = â4.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] [â6.08, â2.11], p < 0.001), female sex (ß = â2.14, 95% CI [â4.11, â0.17], p = 0.034), and increasing age (ß = â0.14, 95% CI [â0.22, â0.05], p = 0.003) were associated with lower/better endoscopy scores. Private health insurance (ß = 17.76, 95% CI [5.20, 30.32], p = 0.006) and >16 educational years (ß = 13.50, 95% CI [2.21, 24.80], p = 0.020) were associated with higher baseline percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV1). Medicaid/Medicare insurance was associated with worse endoscopy scores, CFQ-R respiratory scores, and ppFEV1 (all p < 0.017), and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was associated with worse SNOT-22 scores (p = 0.047), prior to adjustment for other cofactors. No other SDS factors were associated with SNOT-22, QOD-NS, or SIT scores. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in objective measures of CRS severity exist among PwCF related to sex, age, and ETI use. Variant status and race did not influence patient-reported CRS severity measures or olfaction in this study. Understanding how these factors impact response to treatment may improve care disparities among PwCF. CLINICAL TRIALS: NCT04469439.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The 22-question SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) assesses chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) severity. We aimed to identify predictors of SNOT-22 score improvement following highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) initiation and to corroborate the SNOT-22 minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: Prospective observational data was pooled from four studies across 10 US centers investigating people with CF (PwCF) and CRS. Three studies evaluated HEMT's impact on CRS. For participants enrolled prior to HEMT initiation, SNOT-22 scores were obtained at baseline and after 3-6 months of HEMT. Multivariate regression identified predictors of improvement. Cronbach's alpha and four distribution-based methods were used to assess internal consistency and calculate the MCID of the SNOT-22. RESULTS: A total of 184 PwCF participated with mean baseline SNOT-22 scores ranging from 18.1 to 56.7. Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.90 across sites. Participants at sites with pre- and post-HEMT data reported improvement in SNOT-22 scores after initiating HEMT (all p < 0.05). Worse baseline SNOT-22 score (odds ratio (OR): 1.05, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08), F508del homozygosity (OR: 4.30, p = 0.040, 95% CI: 1.14-18.99), and absence of prior modulator therapy (OR: 4.99, p = 0.017, 95% CI: 1.39-20.11) were associated with greater SNOT-22 improvement. The mean MCID calculated via distribution-based methods was 8.5. CONCLUSION: Worse baseline sinonasal symptoms, F508del homozygosity, and absence of prior modulator therapy predicted greater improvement after HEMT initiation. The mean MCID for SNOT-22 in PwCF is 8.5 points, similar to non-CF individuals with CRS, and provides a threshold specifically for PwCF. The SNOT-22 has strong internal consistency in PwCF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3965-3973, 2024.
Subject(s)
Cystic Fibrosis , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Female , Male , Adult , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Chronic Disease , Sino-Nasal Outcome Test , Minimal Clinically Important Difference , Treatment Outcome , Aminophenols/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Quinolones/therapeutic use , Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator/geneticsABSTRACT
Background: Little is known about how depression and appearance anxiety affect patient reporting of synkinesis severity. Learning/Study Objective: Measure prevalence of depression and appearance anxiety in facial synkinesis and correlations between subjective and surgeon-graded synkinesis severity. Design Type: Prospective cohort. Methods: Patients with synkinesis volunteered and completed: Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ), facial clinimetric evaluation (FaCE) scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and Fear of Negative Appearance Evaluation Scale (FNAES). Standardized videos were scored by facial plastic surgeons using Sunnybrook Scale and eFaCE. Multivariate linear regression was used to compare patient- and surgeon-graded metrics. Results: One hundred patients participated, 91 were female. Mean age was 56.4 (12.3). Eight percent identified as Black and 87% White. The most common nerve injury etiology was idiopathic (47%). Mean synkinesis duration was 7.6 years (6.2). Twenty percent and 15% reported history of an anxiety or depressive disorder, respectively. Patient (SAQ, FaCE) and clinician (Sunnybrook, eFaCE) scores were correlated (Pearson's r 0.223-0.294, p < 0.05). Upon adjusting for CES-D/FNAES, correlations between most patient and clinician metrics became stronger. As CES-D and FNAES worsened, patient-clinician correlations weakened. Conclusions: Depression and appearance anxiety may affect patient reporting of synkinesis severity. Worse mental health scores may decorrelate patient and clinician synkinesis assessments.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is common in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). Rhinologic symptom prioritization and areas that influence CRS treatment choices, including pursuing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), remain understudied. METHODS: Adult PwCF + CRS were enrolled at eight centers into a prospective, observational study (2019-2023). Participants were administered the 22-SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) survey and a modified SNOT-22 instrument examining symptom importance. We determined importance rankings for individual symptoms and SNOT-22 symptom importance subdomains in two sets of subgroups-those pursuing ESS versus continuing medical management (CMT), and those on elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) versus not on ETI. RESULTS: Among 69 participants, the highest priorities were nasal congestion (n = 48, 69.6% important), post-nasal discharge (32, 46.4%), facial pain (29, 43.3%), waking up tired (27, 39.1%), and fatigue (26, 37.7%). Those electing surgery (n = 23) prioritized sleep and psychological dysfunction symptoms compared to those pursuing CMT (n = 49) (sleep median score = 19.0 [interquartile range: 12.0, 25.0] vs. 4.5 [0.0, 12.8]; p < 0.0001; psychological = 17.0 [7.0, 26.0] vs. 7.0 [0.0, 15.8]; p = 0.002). ETI users had comparable SNOT-22 total symptom importance scores to non-ETI users (p = 0.14). Non-ETI users (n = 34) showed a trend toward prioritizing sleep symptoms compared to ETI users (n = 35) (13.0 [2.8, 22.3] vs. 6.0 [2.0, 17.0]; p = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS: Nasal congestion and post-nasal discharge were top priorities reported by PwCF + CRS. Those electing surgery prioritized sleep and psychological symptoms, highlighting their importance in pre-operative discussions. Non-ETI users' prioritization of sleep improvement may highlight their unique disease impact and therapeutic needs; however, additional investigation is required.
Subject(s)
Aminophenols , Cystic Fibrosis , Rhinosinusitis , Humans , Aminophenols/therapeutic use , Benzodioxoles , Chronic Disease , Cystic Fibrosis/surgery , Cystic Fibrosis/complications , Cystic Fibrosis/psychology , Drug Combinations , Endoscopy , Indoles/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Quinolones/therapeutic use , Rhinosinusitis/drug therapy , Rhinosinusitis/surgery , Sino-Nasal Outcome TestABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is thought to result from complex interactions between the host immune system, microbiota, and environmental exposures. Currently, there is limited data regarding the impact of ambient particulate matter ≤2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5) in the pathogenesis of CRS, despite evidence linking PM2.5 to other respiratory diseases. We hypothesized that PM2.5 may result in differential cytokine patterns that could inform our mechanistic understanding of the effect of environmental factors on CRS. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of data prospectively collected from 308 CRS patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. Cytokines were quantified in intraoperative mucus specimens using a multiplex flow cytometric bead assay. Clinical and demographic data including zip codes were extracted and used to obtain tract-level income and rurality measures. A spatiotemporal machine learning model was used to estimate daily PM2.5 levels for the year prior to each patient's surgery date. Spearman correlations and regression analysis were performed to characterize the relationship between mucus cytokines and PM2.5. RESULTS: Several inflammatory cytokines including IL-2, IL-5/IL-13, IL-12, and 21 were significantly correlated with estimated average 6, 9, and 12-month preoperative PM2.5 levels. These relationships were maintained for most cytokines after adjusting for age, income, body mass index, rurality, polyps, asthma, and allergic rhinitis (AR) (p < .05). There were also higher odds of asthma (OR = 1.5, p = .01) and AR (OR = 1.48, p = .03) with increasing 12-month PM2.5 exposure. Higher tissue eosinophil counts were associated with increasing PM2.5 levels across multiple timeframes (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic PM2.5 exposure may be an independent risk factor for development of a mixed, type-2 dominant CRS inflammatory response.
Subject(s)
Cytokines , Environmental Exposure , Eosinophils , Particulate Matter , Rhinosinusitis , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Chronic Disease , Cytokines/metabolism , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Eosinophils/immunology , Eosinophils/metabolism , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Rhinosinusitis/etiology , Rhinosinusitis/immunologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The modified five-item frailty index (mFI-5) is a validated risk stratification tool with the ability to predict adverse outcomes following surgery. In this study, we sought to use mFI-5 to assess the potential relationship between unhealthy aging and postoperative endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent sinus surgery at Vanderbilt between 2014 and 2018 were identified and assessed using the mFI-5, which is calculated based on the presence of five comorbidities: diabetes mellitus, hypertension requiring medication, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and non-independent functional status. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to quantify the association of mFI-5 score on need for rescue oral antibiotics, oral steroids, and antibiotic irrigations within 1 year following ESS, adjusting for relevant potential confounders. RESULTS: Four hundred and three patients met inclusion criteria. Within 6 months of surgery, 312 (77%) required rescue antibiotics, 243 (60%) required oral corticosteroids (OCS), and 31 (8%) initiated antibiotic irrigations. Increasing mFI-5 scores were significantly associated with higher postoperative use of rescue antibiotics (p < 0.0001), OCS (p = 0.032), and antibiotic irrigation (p < 0.0001). Frailty scores remained as an independent predictor of these outcomes after adjustment for age, polyp status, preoperative sinonasal outcomes test (SNOT-22) score, and revision surgery status. CONCLUSIONS: Modified frailty scores may be a useful clinical tool to predict the need for postoperative rescue medication use after ESS.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Endoscopy , Frailty , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Frailty/diagnosis , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery , Sinusitis/surgery , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS: In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS: The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION: As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Hypersensitivity , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms , Humans , Quality of Life , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/therapy , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remains unresolved for many people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). While highly effective modulator therapy improves quality-of-life and symptom severity, the impact of this intervention and other factors associated with pursuing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) remains understudied. METHODS: Adult PwCF + CRS were enrolled into a prospective, observational, multi-institutional study. Participants completed validated outcome measures to evaluate respiratory symptom severity, depression, headache, and sleep quality, as well as nasal endoscopy, sinus computed tomography (CT), and olfactory testing. Bivariate comparisons and regression modeling evaluated treatment cofactors, disease characteristics, and outcome measures associated with pursuing ESS. RESULTS: Sixty PwCF were analyzed, including 24 (40%) who elected ESS. Pursuing ESS was associated with worse SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) total, rhinologic, psychological, and sleep dysfunction domain scores; worse Patient Health Questionnaire-9-Revised depression scores; worse Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total scores; worse weight, role, emotion, and eating domain scores on the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised; more severe disease on nasal endoscopy; and lack of modulator therapy (all p < 0.050). Multivariable regression identified that worse SNOT-22 total score was associated with electing ESS (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.16, p = 0.015) and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) treatment (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.004-0.34, p = 0.004) was associated with pursing medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Worse sinonasal symptom burden, lack of ETI treatment, sleep quality, depression, and nasal endoscopy scores were associated with electing ESS, while lung disease severity and sinus CT scores were not. ETI use was associated with lower odds of pursuing ESS independent of sinonasal symptom burden.
Subject(s)
Cystic Fibrosis , Paranasal Sinuses , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Adult , Humans , Prospective Studies , Cystic Fibrosis/drug therapy , Cystic Fibrosis/surgery , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Rhinitis/surgery , Paranasal Sinuses/diagnostic imaging , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/surgery , Endoscopy/methods , Chronic Disease , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is common among people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). The Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) is a validated instrument that evaluates olfactory-specific quality-of-life. The QOD minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and factors associated with olfactory improvement after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor have not been determined for PwCF. METHODS: Prospective observational data were pooled from three studies that enrolled adult PwCF with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). QOD scores and disease characteristics were assessed. To evaluate internal consistency and calculate the QOD MCID, Cronbach's alpha and four distribution-based methods were employed. For participants who enrolled prior to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD scores were obtained at baseline and after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor initiation. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with QOD improvement. RESULTS: Of 129 PwCF included, 65 had QOD scores before and 3-6 months after starting elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Mean baseline QOD score was 6.5 ± 7.9. Mean Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.85. The MCID estimates were as follows: Cohen's effect size = 1.6, standard error of measurement = 2.5, ½ baseline standard deviation = 4.0, and minimal detectable change = 6.9. Mean MCID was 3.7. Of those with pre/post elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor QOD scores, the mean change in QOD was -1.3 ± 5.4. After elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD improvement surpassed the MCID in 22% of participants (14/65). Worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps were associated with improved QOD scores after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (both p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: The QOD MCID in PwCF was estimated to be 3.7. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor led to qualitative but not clinically meaningful improvements in QOD score for most PwCF; PwCF with worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps improved in a clinically significant manner.
Subject(s)
Aminophenols , Benzodioxoles , Cystic Fibrosis , Indoles , Minimal Clinically Important Difference , Olfaction Disorders , Humans , Cystic Fibrosis/drug therapy , Cystic Fibrosis/complications , Male , Female , Adult , Aminophenols/therapeutic use , Surveys and Questionnaires , Indoles/therapeutic use , Benzodioxoles/therapeutic use , Olfaction Disorders/drug therapy , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Quinolones/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Drug Combinations , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Chronic Disease , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Treatment Outcome , Middle Aged , PyrrolidinesABSTRACT
Background: The paramedian forehead flap (PMFF) is a well-established technique utilized for reconstruction of complex nasal defects. Objective: To identify the different techniques and management of patients undergoing PMFF reconstruction and compare these with current literature. Methods: Members of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery were sent a practice survey highlighting various nuances in PMFF reconstruction. The survey included questions about flap design, operative techniques, and perioperative care. Results: In total, 172 responses were received (14% response rate). Mean years of practice after fellowship was 15.8 years with most respondents performing either 1-5 (33.1%) or 6-10 (27.3%) PMFFs per year. Common practices included the use of general anesthesia, elevation of PMFF in the subgaleal plane (59.6%), and pedicle division at 3 weeks (80%) (p < 0.001). Complication rates ranged between 1% and 5%. The nose was the most common site for revision (p < 0.001) and the average number of secondary procedures after forehead flap division was 1.1 (standard deviation 0.81). The most variability in responses was seen for methods of internal lining reconstruction. Conclusion: Reconstructive surgeons frequently divide the PMFF pedicle at 3 weeks or later and have variable approaches to reconstruction of the internal lining with low complication rates overall.
Subject(s)
Forehead , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surgical Flaps , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Forehead/surgery , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Rhinoplasty/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Surgery, Plastic/methods , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To develop a machine learning-based referral guideline for patients undergoing cochlear implant candidacy evaluation (CICE) and to compare with the widely used 60/60 guideline. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: 772 adults undergoing CICE from 2015 to 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Variables included demographics, unaided thresholds, and word recognition score. A random forest classification model was trained on patients undergoing CICE, and bootstrap cross-validation was used to assess the modeling approach's performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The machine learning-based referral tool was evaluated against the 60/60 guideline based on ability to identify CI candidates under traditional and expanded criteria. RESULTS: Of 587 patients with complete data, 563 (96%) met candidacy at our center, and the 60/60 guideline identified 512 (87%) patients. In the random forest model, word recognition score; thresholds at 3000, 2000, and 125; and age at CICE had the largest impact on candidacy (mean decrease in Gini coefficient, 2.83, 1.60, 1.20, 1.17, and 1.16, respectively). The 60/60 guideline had a sensitivity of 0.91, a specificity of 0.42, and an accuracy of 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.91). The random forest model obtained higher sensitivity (0.96), specificity (1.00), and accuracy (0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.98). Across 1,000 bootstrapped iterations, the model yielded a median sensitivity of 0.92 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.85-0.98), specificity of 1.00 (IQR, 0.88-1.00), accuracy of 0.93 (IQR, 0.85-0.97), and area under the curve of 0.96 (IQR, 0.93-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: A novel machine learning-based screening model is highly sensitive, specific, and accurate in predicting CI candidacy. Bootstrapping confirmed that this approach is potentially generalizable with consistent results.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Machine Learning , Patient SelectionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) is an emerging phenotype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) characterized by prominent central nasal inflammatory changes. This study compares the inflammatory characteristics of CCAD relative to other phenotypes of CRSwNP. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of data from a prospective clinical study was performed on patients with CRSwNP who were undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Patients with CCAD, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS), and non-typed CRSwNP (CRSwNP NOS) were included and mucus cytokine levels and demographic data were analyzed for each group. Chi-squared/Mann-Whitney U tests and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were performed for comparison and classification. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were analyzed (CRSwNP, n = 137; AFRS, n = 50; AERD, n = 42; CCAD, n = 24). Patients with CCAD were the least likely to have comorbid asthma (p = 0.0004). The incidence of allergic rhinitis in CCAD patients did not vary significantly compared to patients with AFRS and AERD, but was higher compared to patients with CRSwNP NOS (p = 0.04). On univariate analysis, CCAD was characterized by less inflammatory burden, with reduced levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8, interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and eotaxin relative to other groups and significantly lower type 2 cytokines (IL-5, IL-13) relative to both AERD and AFRS. These findings were supported by multivariate PLS-DA, which clustered CCAD patients into a relatively homogenous low-inflammatory cytokine profile. CONCLUSIONS: CCAD has unique endotypic features compared to other patients with CRSwNP. The lower inflammatory burden may be reflective of a less severe variant of CRSwNP.
Subject(s)
Allergic Fungal Sinusitis , Asthma, Aspirin-Induced , Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Rhinitis/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies , Sinusitis/epidemiology , Sinusitis/surgery , Sinusitis/microbiology , Chronic Disease , Nasal Polyps/surgery , Asthma, Aspirin-Induced/epidemiology , CytokinesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory patterns in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) may predict disease severity, need for multiple sinus surgeries, and treatment response. This study analyzes nasal mucus inflammatory cytokine patterns in patients with (CRSwNP) and without (CRSsNP) nasal polyposis and their association with revision sinus surgery. METHODS: A total of 319 CRS patients who underwent sinus surgery were included. Cytokines were quantified in intraoperative mucus specimens using a multiplex flow cytometric bead assay. Cytokine expression patterns in patients with 0, 1, and ≥2 previous surgeries were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and principal component (PC) regression analyses. RESULTS: There were 122 (38%) patients with CRSsNP and 197 (62%) with CRSwNP. On univariate analysis, interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-21 were associated with increasing number of sinus surgeries in CRSsNP, as were IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-17A, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in CRSwNP. PC analysis with continuous Poisson regression in CRSwNP demonstrated that high IL-5 and IL-13 and low IL-1ß, IL-12, and IL-21 were associated with more prior surgeries. In CRSsNP low IL-13 and high IL-5 and regulated-on-activation, normal T-cell-expressed and secreted (RANTES) were associated with more prior surgeries. Age remained a significant covariate in the full regression model for CRSsNP, but was nonsignificant in CRSwNP. CONCLUSION: In CRSwNP, elevated IL-5 and IL-13 levels were higher at time of surgery in patients with more prior surgeries. Type 2 cytokines in CRSsNP demonstrated mixed associations with revision surgery. For both phenotypes, IL-10, IL-12, and IL-21 were consistently lower as number of prior surgeries increased, suggesting that treatment-resistant disease may be modulated by impairment in these signaling pathways.
Subject(s)
Cytokines , Reoperation , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Chronic Disease , Cytokines/immunology , Interleukin-12 , Interleukin-13 , Interleukin-5 , Interleukin-6 , Nasal Polyps/immunology , Nasal Polyps/surgery , Rhinitis/immunology , Rhinitis/surgery , Sinusitis/immunology , Sinusitis/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To clarify in patients with covid-19 the recovery rate of smell and taste, proportion with persistent dysfunction of smell and taste, and prognostic factors associated with recovery of smell and taste. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and medRxiv from inception to 3 October 2021. REVIEW METHODS: Two blinded reviewers selected observational studies of adults (≥18 years) with covid-19 related dysfunction of smell or taste. Descriptive prognosis studies with time-to-event curves and prognostic association studies of any prognostic factor were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers extracted data, evaluated study bias using QUIPS, and appraised evidence quality using GRADE, following PRISMA and MOOSE reporting guidelines. Using iterative numerical algorithms, time-to-event individual patient data (IPD) were reconstructed and pooled to retrieve distribution-free summary survival curves, with recovery rates reported at 30 day intervals for participants who remained alive. To estimate the proportion with persistent smell and taste dysfunction, cure fractions from Weibull non-mixture cure models of plateaued survival curves were logit transformed and pooled in a two stage meta-analysis. Conventional aggregate data meta-analysis was performed to explore unadjusted associations of prognostic factors with recovery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the proportions of patients remaining with smell or taste dysfunction. Secondary outcomes were the odds ratios of prognostic variables associated with recovery of smell and taste. RESULTS: 18 studies (3699 patients) from 4180 records were included in reconstructed IPD meta-analyses. Risk of bias was low to moderate; conclusions remained unaltered after exclusion of four high risk studies. Evidence quality was moderate to high. Based on parametric cure modelling, persistent self-reported smell and taste dysfunction could develop in an estimated 5.6% (95% confidence interval 2.7% to 11.0%, I2=70%, τ2=0.756, 95% prediction interval 0.7% to 33.5%) and 4.4% (1.2% to 14.6%, I2=67%, τ2=0.684, 95% prediction interval 0.0% to 49.0%) of patients, respectively. Sensitivity analyses suggest these could be underestimates. At 30, 60, 90, and 180 days, respectively, 74.1% (95% confidence interval 64.0% to 81.3%), 85.8% (77.6% to 90.9%), 90.0% (83.3% to 94.0%), and 95.7% (89.5% to 98.3%) of patients recovered their sense of smell (I2=0.0-77.2%, τ2=0.006-0.050) and 78.8% (70.5% to 84.7%), 87.7% (82.0% to 91.6%), 90.3% (83.5% to 94.3%), and 98.0% (92.2% to 95.5%) recovered their sense of taste (range of I2=0.0-72.1%, τ2=0.000-0.015). Women were less likely to recover their sense of smell (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.72, seven studies, I2=20%, τ2=0.0224) and taste (0.31, 0.13 to 0.72, seven studies, I2=78%, τ2=0.5121) than men, and patients with greater initial severity of dysfunction (0.48, 0.31 to 0.73, five studies, I2=10%, τ2<0.001) or nasal congestion (0.42, 0.18 to 0.97, three studies, I2=0%, τ2<0.001) were less likely to recover their sense of smell. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients with covid-19 might develop long lasting change in their sense of smell or taste. This could contribute to the growing burden of long covid. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021283922.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Olfaction Disorders , COVID-19/complications , Female , Humans , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Prognosis , Smell , Taste , Taste Disorders/etiology , Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeABSTRACT
Chronic rhinosinusitis is characterized by persistent locoregional mucosal inflammation of the paranasal sinuses and upper airway that has substantial associated health care costs. Personalized approaches to care that incorporate use of molecular biomarkers, phenotypes, and inflammatory endotypes is a major focus of research at this time, and the concurrent rise of targeted therapeutics and biologic therapies has the potential to rapidly advance care and improve outcomes. Recent findings suggest that improved understanding of chronic rhinosinusitis phenotypic and endotypic heterogeneity, and incorporation of these characteristics into clinical care pathways, may facilitate more effective selection of surgical and/or therapeutic interventions. Ultimately, these personalized approaches have the potential to target specific inflammatory pathways, increase efficacy, reduce costs, and limit side effects. This review summarizes recent advances in the identification and characterization of chronic rhinosinusitis phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarkers and reviews potential implications for targeted therapeutics.
Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Biomarkers , Chronic Disease , Humans , Phenotype , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapySubject(s)
COVID-19 , Olfaction Disorders , COVID-19/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , SmellABSTRACT
Sinonasal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC) is an extremely rare and aggressive neoplasm that can arise in the sinonasal region. These tumors are associated with high morbidity and mortality, are difficult to diagnose, and are hard to treat. We describe 2 cases of this poorly understood malignancy and review imaging, pathology, and treatment decisions. A 41-year-old male and a 64-year-old female presented to a tertiary center in 2019 after developing nasal obstruction and were found to have sinonasal masses on imaging. Both biopsies showed strong expression of pancytokeratin with dot-like reactivity and expression of neuroendocrine markers chromogranin and synaptophysin. The findings were diagnostic of SNEC. Staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography and brain MRI were performed, and patients were discussed at a multidisciplinary tumor board. Neither had distant metastatic disease at presentation. One patient had no intracranial or orbital disease and underwent a subtotal endoscopic resection with adjuvant chemoradiation. The other patient demonstrated middle cranial fossa, dural, and orbital involvement as well as cranial nerve V palsy. This patient was treated with induction chemotherapy, followed by concurrent chemoradiation. Both patients are presently alive at 4 months follow-up, but one with persistent local disease and the other distant metastasis. Sinonasal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare and poorly understood malignancy with an aggressive clinical course. Continued careful review of pathology and study of molecular features are needed for improved understanding of SNEC, and particularly for head and neck SNEC, to establish a staging system and better formulate treatment protocols.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine , Carcinoma, Small Cell , Nasal Obstruction , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms , Adult , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/pathology , Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine/therapy , Carcinoma, Small Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Small Cell/therapy , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/therapySubject(s)
COVID-19 , Olfaction Disorders , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , SmellABSTRACT
Importance: The opioid epidemic has generated interest in optimizing opioid prescribing after common surgeries. Recent studies have shown a broad range of analgesic prescription patterns following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Objective: To compare the efficacy of different analgesic regimens after ESS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multi-institutional, nonblinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at 6 tertiary centers across the US and Canada and included participants who underwent ESS for acute or chronic rhinosinusitis. The study was conducted from March 2019 to March 2020, and the data were analyzed in November to December 2020. Interventions: All participants received acetaminophen, 650 mg, as the first-line analgesic. From there, patients were randomized to either oxycodone rescue (oxycodone, 5 mg, as second-line therapy) or ibuprofen rescue (ibuprofen, 600 mg, as second-line therapy, with oxycodone, 5 mg, reserved for breakthrough pain). Main Outcomes and Measures: Baseline characteristics and disease severity were collected at enrollment. Medication logs, pain scores, and epistaxis measures were collected until postoperative day 7. The primary outcome was the postoperative visual analog scale score for pain. Brief Pain Inventory Pain Severity and Pain Interference Scores were also collected. Results: A total of 118 patients were randomized (62 [52.5%] oxycodone rescue, 56 [47.5%] ibuprofen rescue; mean [SD] age, 46.7 [16.3] years; 44 women [44.0%]; 83 White [83.0%], 7 Black [7.0%], and 7 Asian individuals [7.0%]). After exclusions for loss to follow-up and noncompliance, 51 remained in the oxycodone rescue group and 49 in the ibuprofen rescue group. The groups had similar demographic characteristics and disease severity. Thirty-two (63%) in the oxycodone rescue group had adequate pain management with acetaminophen only, while 19 (37%) consumed at least 1 oxycodone dose. In the ibuprofen rescue group, 18 (16%) required only acetaminophen, 28 (57%) used only acetaminophen and ibuprofen, and the remaining 13 (26%) consumed 1 or more oxycodone doses. The groups had similar average acetaminophen (9.69 vs 7.96 doses; difference, 1.73; 95% CI, -1.37 to 4.83) and oxycodone (1.89 vs 0.77 doses; difference, 1.13; 95% CI, -0.11 to 2.36) use. Both groups had similar postoperative visual analog scale scores. A subanalysis that compared opioids users with nonusers showed clinically significant lower pain scores in nonusers at multiple postoperative points. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, most patients who underwent ESS could be treated postoperatively using a nonopioid regimen of either acetaminophen alone or acetaminophen and ibuprofen. Ibuprofen as a second-line therapy did not reduce overall narcotic consumption, but the overall narcotic use was low in both groups. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03783702.