Neurocognitive Function and Quality of Life Outcomes in the ONTRAC Study for Skin Cancer Chemoprevention by Nicotinamide.

Nicotinamide (vitamin B3) has photoprotective effects and reduces skin cancer incidence in high risk patients. Nicotinamide also improves cognition in animal models. As part of the ONTRAC (Oral Nicotinamide To Reduce Actinic Cancer) phase III placebo-controlled, randomized trial to assess nicotinamide's efficacy in skin cancer prevention, we included clinical neurocognitive function and patient-reported quality of life assessments at baseline and after 12 months of intervention in individuals with previous skin cancer in order to assess any effect of oral nicotinamide (500 mg po twice daily) on cognitive function and quality of life. In our sample of 310 participants who completed neurocognitive function testing at baseline and at 12 months, we were not able to detect any significant effect of oral nicotinamide on cognitive function nor on quality of life. Further studies of nicotinamide's effects on cognition in humans might include individuals with pre-existing mild cognitive impairment, and it may be that higher doses of nicotinamide are required to significantly influence cognitive function compared to doses required to reduce skin cancer.

Direct Cost-Analysis of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Traditional Excision for Basal Cell Carcinoma at Initial Margin Clearance.

BACKGROUND: The literature provides mixed results regarding cost comparisons of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and traditional excision (TE). OBJECTIVE: To complete a prospective cohort study comparing true costs of MMS with projected costs of TE for head and neck basal cell carcinoma (BCC). METHODS: Patients referred for MMS of biopsy-proven BCC were eligible for inclusion. For each case, surgery with TE was planned before the patient proceeded to MMS. The true costs of MMS were compared with projected costs of TE. All TE patients with inadequate excision were assumed to have subsequent TE, and the cost of the subsequent procedure was assumed to be equal to the first. RESULTS: The mean cost of MMS was $628.47 (95% CI: $617.73-$639.21) compared with $587.51 (95% CI: $558.42-$616.59) for TE. This difference of $40.96 to initial margin clearance was significant (z = 4.48, p < .001). CONCLUSION: On average, MMS was found to be $40.96 more expensive than TE in treating BCC-a small but appreciable difference. This being the case, any fiscal comparison must also be tempered with a consideration of effectiveness. Accordingly, further work in the form of a cost-utility study is required to truly define the cost-effectiveness of MMS compared with TE in this setting.

A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Nicotinamide for Skin-Cancer Chemoprevention.

BACKGROUND: Nonmelanoma skin cancers, such as basal-cell carcinoma and squamous-cell carcinoma, are common cancers that are caused principally by ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Nicotinamide (vitamin B3) has been shown to have protective effects against damage caused by UV radiation and to reduce the rate of new premalignant actinic keratoses. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, 386 participants who had had at least two nonmelanoma skin cancers in the previous 5 years to receive 500 mg of nicotinamide twice daily or placebo for 12 months. Participants were evaluated by dermatologists at 3-month intervals for 18 months. The primary end point was the number of new nonmelanoma skin cancers (i.e., basal-cell carcinomas plus squamous-cell carcinomas) during the 12-month intervention period. Secondary end points included the number of new squamous-cell carcinomas and basal-cell carcinomas and the number of actinic keratoses during the 12-month intervention period, the number of nonmelanoma skin cancers in the 6-month postintervention period, and the safety of nicotinamide. RESULTS: At 12 months, the rate of new nonmelanoma skin cancers was lower by 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 38) in the nicotinamide group than in the placebo group (P=0.02). Similar differences were found between the nicotinamide group and the placebo group with respect to new basal-cell carcinomas (20% [95% CI, -6 to 39] lower rate with nicotinamide, P=0.12) and new squamous-cell carcinomas (30% [95% CI, 0 to 51] lower rate, P=0.05). The number of actinic keratoses was 11% lower in the nicotinamide group than in the placebo group at 3 months (P=0.01), 14% lower at 6 months (P<0.001), 20% lower at 9 months (P<0.001), and 13% lower at 12 months (P=0.001). No noteworthy between-group differences were found with respect to the number or types of adverse events during the 12-month intervention period, and there was no evidence of benefit after nicotinamide was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: Oral nicotinamide was safe and effective in reducing the rates of new nonmelanoma skin cancers and actinic keratoses in high-risk patients. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council; ONTRAC Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12612000625875.).

Cutaneous non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease: A case series.

We report the first case series of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplant patients with graft versus host disease who developed cutaneous non-tuberculous mycobacteria infection. A multidisciplinary approach, reduction of immunosuppressive medications, combination of antibiotics, close skin surveillance and excision of suitable lesions are recommended in this specific subgroup.

Panniculitis in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors: a case series.

Panniculitis is a rare complication of BRAF inhibitor therapy that is used to treat patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. We present a clinicopathologic review of 9 patients who developed panniculitis while on BRAF inhibitor therapy. In 13% of patients on vemurafenib, 3% of patients on dabrafenib and 10% on combination of dabrafenib + trametinib, tender erythematous nodular lesions of panniculitis appeared on legs, arms and trunk. Histological evaluation of 8 biopsies from 7 patients showed predominantly neutrophilic infiltrate in 4, lymphocytic in 1, and mixed in 3. Lesions with neutrophilic infiltrate appeared in earlier stages of treatment than those with mixed or lymphocytic infiltrate. All biopsies showed lobular involvement and 5 also had a septal component. In addition, 1 biopsy had lichenoid inflammation in the epidermis and the other had evidence of vasculitis. Most patients responded to conservative medical management without the need to reduce or to stop BRAF inhibitor therapy. Panniculitis seems to be a rare class effect of BRAF inhibitors that is predominantly lobular and neutrophilic, although other patterns can be seen.