Management of adverse events from the treatment of encorafenib plus cetuximab for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: insights from the BEACON CRC study.

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with a 5-year relative survival of 14% in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients with BRAF V600E mutations, which occur in ∼10%-15% of patients with mCRC, have a poorer prognosis compared with those with wild-type BRAF tumours. The combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab currently represents the only chemotherapy-free targeted therapy approved in the USA and Europe for previously treated patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC. As a class, BRAF inhibitors are associated with dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and renal events, as well as pyrexia and secondary skin malignancies. Adverse event (AE) profiles of specific BRAF inhibitors vary, however, and are affected by the specific agents given in combination. In patients with mCRC, commonly reported AEs of cetuximab monotherapy include infusion reactions and dermatologic toxicities. Data from the phase III BEACON CRC study indicate that the combination of encorafenib with cetuximab has a distinct safety profile. Here we review the most frequently reported AEs that occurred with this combination in BEACON CRC and best practices for managing and mitigating AEs that require more than standard supportive care.

Phase 1b investigation of the MEK inhibitor binimetinib in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer.

Background The MAPK pathway plays a central role in regulation of several cellular processes, and its dysregulation is a hallmark of biliary tract cancer (BTC). Binimetinib (MEK162), a potent, selective oral MEK1/2 inhibitor, was assessed in patients with advanced BTC. Patients and Methods An expansion cohort study in patients who received ≤1 line of therapy for advanced BTC was conducted after determination of the maximum tolerated dose in this Phase 1 trial. Patients received binimetinib 60 mg twice daily. The primary objectives were to characterize the safety profile and pharmacokinetics of binimetinib in advanced BTC. Secondary objectives included assessment of clinical efficacy, changes in weight and lean body mass, and pharmacodynamic effects. Tumor samples were assessed for mutations in relevant genes. Results Twenty-eight patients received binimetinib. Common adverse events (AEs) were mild, with rash (82%) and nausea (54%) being most common. Two patients experienced grade 4 AEs, one generalized edema and the other pulmonary embolism. The pharmacokinetics in this patient population were consistent with those previously reported (Bendell JC et al., Br J Cancer 2017;116:575-583). Twelve patients (43%) experienced stable disease and two had objective responses (1 complete response, 1 partial response) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and stable metabolic disease by positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Most patients (18/25; 72%) did not have KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, PI3KCA, or PTEN mutations, nor was there correlation between mutation status and response. The average non-fluid weight gain was 1.3% for lean muscle and 4.7% for adipose tissue. Conclusion Binimetinib was well tolerated and showed promising evidence of activity in patients with BTC. Correlative studies suggested the potential for binimetinib to promote muscle gain in patients with BTC.

Multiple-dose, placebo-controlled, phase I study of oral dolasetron.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of increasing dose levels of oral dolasetron mesylate, a new 5-HT3 antagonist. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase I study. SETTING: A clinical research center. PATIENTS: Forty healthy male volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Eight subjects at each dose level were randomized in a ratio of 3:1 to receive either dolasetron mesylate 25, 50, 100, 150, or 200 mg in a single oral dose on days 1 and 9, and twice/day on days 2-8, or placebo for 9 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Dolasetron was well tolerated at all dose levels. The adverse event rates for dolasetron- and placebo-treated subjects who experienced at least one adverse event were 80% and 50%, respectively. Most frequently reported by subjects receiving dolasetron were headache, constipation, flatulence, and lightheadedness. They generally were mild, and none was severe. No dose-response relationship was apparent for any adverse event. There were no clinically significant changes in mean laboratory values or vital signs. Asymptomatic treatment-related electrocardiographic changes were consistent with the drug's electrophysiologic properties. These changes have been well characterized and have thus far been clinically unimportant. Pharmacokinetics of the reduced metabolite were dose independent, and multiple-dose exposure of this metabolite can be predicted from its single-dose values. CONCLUSION: Oral dolasetron mesylate was well tolerated when administered in doses up to 200 mg/day for 9 days in healthy volunteers.