Update on Neuro-ophthalmic Manifestations of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use has been on the rise for treatment of many different malignancies. Subsequently, more has been learned about immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that occur up to 12 months after treatment. This review summarizes the latest findings and management of neuro-ophthalmic associated irAEs. RECENT FINDINGS: irAEs can affect the afferent and efferent neuro-ophthalmic pathways, thereby targeting central and peripheral nervous systems. As more cases are being reported, it is becoming apparent that neuro-ophthalmic irAEs often present with atypical features when compared to their spontaneous autoimmune counterparts. These neuro-ophthalmic presentations can also be signs of a more extensive inflammatory process that spans other organ systems, such as myopathies, endocrinopathies, and paraneoplastic syndromes. Awareness of neuro-ophthalmic irAEs and their atypical presentations can lead to early detection, termination of ICI treatment, and immunosuppressant therapy initiation.

Cranial nerve involvement, visual complications and headache syndromes in Lyme disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide a summary of the visual manifestations and cranial neuropathies seen in Lyme disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Lyme facial palsy remains the most common manifestation of Lyme neuroborreliosis. Recent investigations show likely evidence of vagal involvement in Lyme disease. SUMMARY: The literature on Lyme neuroborreliosis continues to evolve. Lyme disease can affect nearly any cranial nerve in addition to causing various headache syndromes. The most common manifestation is Lyme disease facial palsy, occurring in up to 5-10% of patients with documented Lyme disease. Headache syndromes are common in the context of facial palsy but can occur in isolation, and more specific headache syndromes including trigeminal and geniculate neuralgias can occur rarely. Signs and symptoms indicative of vestibulocochlear nerve involvement are relatively common, although it could be that these represent other vestibular involvement rather than a specific cranial neuropathy. Optic neuritis is a controversial entity within Lyme disease and is likely overdiagnosed, but convincing cases do exist. Physicians who see any cranial neuropathy, including optic neuritis, in an endemic area can consider Lyme disease as a possible cause.

SARS-CoV-2 Parainfectious Optic Neuropathy: 3 Case Reports and a Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Parainfectious optic neuritis is an inflammatory reaction that occurs shortly after an infection without direct invasion by a pathogen. The clinical profile depends on the infectious organism. Cases of SARS-CoV-2 parainfectious optic neuritis have been reported in the literature, but there are no reviews that have applied strict inclusion criteria to more definitively establish the clinical profile associated with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We present 3 new cases of SARS-CoV-2 parainfectious optic neuritis. We also review the literature for definite cases by selecting only those with unambiguous clinical features and MRI findings of optic neuritis, positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction or serology, and the absence of myelin oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein or aquaporin-4 antibodies or other diseases associated with optic neuritis. RESULTS: We report 2 cases of monophasic, unilateral SARS-CoV-2 parainfectious optic neuritis with optic disc edema and nadir visual acuities of finger counting. We report 1 case of mild SARS-CoV-2 parainfectious optic neuritis that featured cotton wool spots, peripapillary wrinkles and hemorrhages, and recurrence after an initial steroid taper. We identified 6 cases of unambiguous SARS-CoV-2 parainfectious optic neuritis from the literature. Combining our case series with the case reports in the literature, the average age was 42.8 years, 3/9 had bilateral disease, 6/8 had optic disc edema, 8/9 had nadir visual acuity of finger counting or worse, and all recovered visual acuity to 20/40 or better after therapy with steroids. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 parainfectious optic neuritis has a clinical profile that is atypical for idiopathic optic neuritis but fairly typical of parainfectious forms of optic neuritis with a severely reduced nadir visual acuity, high likelihood of bilaterality, high incidence of optic disc edema, and prompt and significant response to corticosteroids. Further study with long-term follow-up and epidemiologic investigation will be needed to further characterize this clinical entity.

Neuro-ophthalmic complications of varicella-zoster virus.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review broadly describes recent neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) reported in literature. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite varicella vaccination, the incidence of herpes zoster continues to rise, potentially leading to devastating consequences when ocular complications occur.A small but growing literature documents cases of retinal disease because of varicella reactivation after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, ischemic optic neuropathy occurring during herpes zoster ophthalmicus, VZV-induced orbital apex syndrome, and immune-mediated ocular complications in patients with prior neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of VZV. SUMMARY: It is important for clinicians to keep abreast of the diverse neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of VZV as early diagnosis and treatment often lead to better visual outcomes.

A novel approach to hypophysitis: outcomes using non-glucocorticoid immunosuppressive therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine pituitary function before and after nonglucocorticoid immunosuppressive therapy (NGIT) in subjects with hypophysitis and evaluate their clinical and radiologic outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal study. METHODS: We reviewed a large database, selected subjects with hypophysitis treated with NGIT, and collected information on the duration of therapy, and clinical, hormonal, and radiologic outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve subjects met the inclusion criteria. Five subjects had primary hypophysitis (PH), while seven had secondary hypophysitis (SH) due to an underlying systemic inflammatory disease. Mean age ± SD was 48.0 ± 15.7 years and 40.9 ± 13.0 years, for PH and SH, respectively. The majority were female (PH 60% and SH 86%). BMI ± SD at presentation was 25.2 ± 2.5 kg/m2 and 26.8 ± 6.7 kg/m2 for PH and SH, respectively. The most common symptom at presentation was fatigue (75%). All PH subjects (100%) and 2 (28.6%) SH subjects had polyuria/polydipsia. There was a significant decrease in mean pituitary stalk thickness after NGIT (P = .0051) (mean duration 16.5 ± 4.8 months). New hormone loss or recovery occurred rarely. Mycophenolate mofetil was the most used NGIT: adverse effects prompted discontinuation in 2 out of 7 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with hypophysitis receiving NGIT had stable or improved brain/pituitary magnetic resonance imaging findings with a significant decrease in pituitary stalk thickness. NGITs did not improve anterior pituitary function. Our findings suggest that NGIT may be considered as an alternative therapy for patients with hypophysitis who require immunosuppression.

Small fiber neuropathy associated with ANCA positivity: a case series and brief literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Small fiber neuropathy [SFN] is a common peripheral neurologic disorder with a vast array of implicated etiologies. It has previously been proposed that some forms of immune-mediated small fiber neuropathy are driven by vasculitis, though antinuclear cytoplasmic antibodies [ANCA] antibodies have not commonly been reported in association with SFN, thus far. We present this case series to discuss the observation of a possible novel association between ANCA and SFN. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of 6 patients with SFN and ANCA positivity, with and without systemic manifestations. Patients included were diagnosed with SFN by skin biopsy or autonomic function testing and were seropositive for ANCA by ELISA. RESULTS: Six patients are outlined, including 4 females and 2 males. Antigen specific antibodies were MPO alone in 4 cases, PR3 alone in 1 case and both MPO and PR3 in 1 case. Systemic vasculitis was noted in 2 patients. Five patients received immunosuppression. Three patients experienced partial improvement, while symptoms stabilized in 3 patients. DISCUSSION: This is the first series of patients with suspected immune-mediated SFN and ANCA antibody positivity, raising the possibility of ANCA mediated isolated SFN. This is in contradistinction to the more typical ANCA-mediated peripheral neuropathy manifestations of mononeuropathy multiplex or axonal sensorimotor neuropathy. We cannot unequivocally prove ANCA-associated vasculitis [AAV] causality in these cases; however, the stabilization in SFN symptomatology and associated improvement in ANCA antibody titer, after AAV treatment, may be indicative of an association.

Treatment of IgG4-related disease-associated hypertrophic pachymeningitis with intrathecal rituximab: a case report.

IgG4-related disease-associated hypertrophic pachymeningitis (IgG4RD-HP) is a fibroinflammatory autoimmune disorder in which diagnosis is difficult without biopsy. Guidance on management of disease refractory to glucocorticoids and intravenous rituximab is limited. We present the case of a 68-year-old woman with IgG4RD-HP who developed sensorineural hearing loss with associated bulky basilar pachymeningeal enhancement. Her cerebrospinal fluid was inflammatory and had an elevated IgG4 concentration, strongly suggestive of IgG4RD-HP. Biopsy of involved meninges was not possible due to surgical risk. Over years she developed bilateral optic neuropathies and hydrocephalus, requiring intravenous rituximab and ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Her disease was refractory to glucocorticoids. Despite maintenance intravenous rituximab, she developed slowly progressive symptoms of intracranial hypertension and hydrocephalus with persistently inflammatory spinal fluid. Switching to intrathecal rituximab therapy led to dramatic improvement in gait and headache and reduced pachymeningeal bulk and metabolic activity. In patients with IgG4RD-HP refractory to glucocorticoids and intravenous rituximab, intrathecal rituximab may be an efficacious therapy.

The Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis.

Despite the high incidence of optic neuritis (ON), and the growing number of therapeutic options for the long-term treatment of diseases associated with ON including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and MOG antibody associated disease (MOGAD), there are still only limited therapeutic options for treating an acute event of optic neuritis. These include steroids, plasma exchange (PLEX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). High-dose steroids remain the mainstay of acute treatment. However, evidence is emerging that when optic neuritis is accompanied with certain atypical features that suggest a more unfavorable outcome this mandates special consideration such as early addition of other therapeutic agents or tapering the steroid very slowly. This review will distinguish between typical and atypical neuritis and discuss acute treatment options.

COVID-19-induced headache in Boston and the vicinity.

Headache is a common neurological symptom of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. However, the prevalence, comorbidities, and ethnic susceptibilities of COVID-19-induced headaches are not well-defined. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV2 by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in March and April 2020 at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. In the study, we identified 450 patients, 202 (44.9%) male, and 248 (55.1%) female, who tested positive for COVID-19. Headache is a significant painful symptom affecting 26% of patients. Female predominance is determined in sore throat, nasal congestion, hypogeusia, headache, and ear pain. In contrast, pneumonia and inpatient hospitalization were more prevalent in males. Younger patients (< 50) were more likely to develop sore throat, fatigue, anosmia, hypogeusia, ear pain, myalgia /arthralgia, and headache. In contrast, older (> 50) patients were prone to develop pneumonia and required hospitalization. Ethnic subgroup analysis suggests Hispanic patients were prone to headaches, nausea/vomiting, nasal congestion, fever, fatigue, anosmia, and myalgia/arthralgia compared to non-Hispanics. Headache risk factors include nausea/vomiting, sore throat, nasal congestion, fever, cough, fatigue, anosmia, hypogeusia, dizziness, ear pain, eye pain, and myalgia/arthralgia. Our study demonstrates regional gender, age, and ethnic variabilities in COVID symptomatology in Boston and the vicinity. It identifies mild viral, painful, and neurological symptoms are positive predictors of headache development in COVID-19.

Fluorescein Angiography Findings in Susac Syndrome: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Susac syndrome is a vasculopathy, resulting in the classic triad of branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO), inner ear ischemia, and brain ischemia. In this retrospective chart review, we characterize fluorescein angiography (FA) findings and other ancillary studies in Susac syndrome, including the appearance of persistent disease activity and the occurrence of new subclinical disease on FA. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective case series was institutional review board-approved and included patients with the complete triad of Susac syndrome evaluated with FA, contrasted MRI of the brain, and audiometry from 2010 to 2020. The medical records were reviewed for these ancillary tests, along with demographics, symptoms, visual acuity, visual field defects, and findings on fundoscopy. Clinical relapse was defined as any objective evidence of disease activity during the follow-up period after initial induction of clinical quiescence. The main outcome measure was the sensitivity of ancillary testing, including FA, MRI, and audiometry, to detect relapse. RESULTS: Twenty of the 31 (64%) patients had the complete triad of brain, retinal, and vestibulocochlear involvement from Susac syndrome and were included. Median age at diagnosis was 43.5 years (range 21-63), and 14 (70%) were women. Hearing loss occurred in 20 (100%), encephalopathy in 13 (65%), vertigo in 15 (75%), and headaches in 19 (95%) throughout the course of follow-up. Median visual acuity at both onset and final visit was 20/20 in both eyes. Seventeen (85%) had BRAO at baseline, and 10 (50%) experienced subsequent BRAO during follow-up. FA revealed nonspecific leakage from previous arteriolar damage in 20 (100%), including in patients who were otherwise in remission. Of the 11 episodes of disease activity in which all testing modalities were performed, visual field testing/fundoscopy was abnormal in 4 (36.4%), MRI brain in 2 (18.2%), audiogram in 8 (72.7%), and FA in 9 (81.8%). CONCLUSIONS: New leakage on FA is the most sensitive marker of active disease. Persistent leakage represents previous damage, whereas new areas of leakage suggest ongoing disease activity that requires consideration of modifying immunosuppressive therapy.

Randomized trial of bilateral gene therapy injection for m.11778G>A MT-ND4 Leber optic neuropathy.

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is an important example of mitochondrial blindness with the m.11778G>A mutation in the MT-ND4 gene being the most common disease-causing mtDNA variant worldwide. The REFLECT phase 3 pivotal study is a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of bilateral intravitreal injection of lenadogene nolparvovec in patients with a confirmed m.11778G>A mutation, using a recombinant adeno-associated virus vector 2, serotype 2 (rAAV2/2-ND4). The first-affected eye received gene therapy; the fellow (affected/not-yet-affected) eye was randomly injected with gene therapy or placebo. The primary end point was the difference in change from baseline of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec versus placebo at 1.5 years post-treatment, expressed in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR). Forty-eight patients were treated bilaterally and 50 unilaterally. At 1.5 years, the change from baseline in BCVA was not statistically different between second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes receiving lenadogene nolparvovec and placebo (primary end point). A statistically significant improvement in BCVA was reported from baseline to 1.5 years in lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes: -0.23 LogMAR for the first-affected eyes of bilaterally treated patients (P < 0.01); and -0.15 LogMAR for second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of bilaterally treated patients and the first-affected eyes of unilaterally treated patients (P < 0.05). The mean improvement in BCVA from nadir to 1.5 years was -0.38 (0.052) LogMAR and -0.33 (0.052) LogMAR in first-affected and second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec, respectively (bilateral treatment group). A mean improvement of -0.33 (0.051) LogMAR and -0.26 (0.051) LogMAR was observed in first-affected lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes and second-affected/not-yet-affected placebo-treated eyes, respectively (unilateral treatment group). The proportion of patients with one or both eyes on-chart at 1.5 years was 85.4% and 72.0% for bilaterally and unilaterally treated patients, respectively. The gene therapy was well tolerated, with no systemic issues. Intraocular inflammation, which was mostly mild and well controlled with topical corticosteroids, occurred in 70.7% of lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes versus 10.2% of placebo-treated eyes. Among eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec, there was no difference in the incidence of intraocular inflammation between bilaterally and unilaterally treated patients. Overall, the REFLECT trial demonstrated an improvement of BCVA in LHON eyes carrying the m.11778G>A mtDNA mutation treated with lenadogene nolparvovec or placebo to a degree not reported in natural history studies and supports an improved benefit/risk profile for bilateral injections of lenadogene nolparvovec relative to unilateral injections.

Safety of Lenadogene Nolparvovec Gene Therapy Over 5 Years in 189 Patients With Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety profile of lenadogene nolparvovec (Lumevoq) in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of safety data from 5 clinical studies. METHODS: A total of 189 patients received single unilateral or bilateral intravitreal injections of a recombinant adeno-associated virus 2 (rAAV2/2) vector encoding the human wild-type ND4 gene. Adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the studies, up to 5 years. Intraocular inflammation and increased intraocular pressure (IOP) were ocular AEs of special interest. Other assessments included ocular examinations, vector bio-dissemination, and systemic immune responses against rAAV2/2. RESULTS: Almost all patients (95.2%) received 9 × 1010 viral genomes and 87.8% had at least 2 years of follow-up. Most patients (75.1%) experienced at least one systemic AE, but systemic treatment-related AEs occurred in 3 patients; none were serious. Intraocular inflammation was reported in 75.6% of lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes. Almost all intraocular inflammations occurred in the anterior chamber (58.8%) or in the vitreous (40.3%), and were of mild (90.3%) or moderate (8.8%) intensity; most resolved with topical corticosteroids alone. All IOP increases were mild to moderate in intensity. No AE led to study discontinuation. Bio-dissemination of lenadogene nolparvovec and systemic immune response were limited. The safety profile was comparable for patients treated bilaterally and unilaterally. CONCLUSIONS: Lenadogene nolparvovec had a good overall safety profile with excellent systemic tolerability, consistent with limited bio-dissemination. The product was well tolerated, with mostly mild ocular side effects responsive to conventional ophthalmologic treatments.

Indirect Comparison of Lenadogene Nolparvovec Gene Therapy Versus Natural History in Patients with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Carrying the m.11778G>A MT-ND4 Mutation.

INTRODUCTION: Lenadogene nolparvovec is a promising novel gene therapy for patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) carrying the m.11778G>A ND4 mutation (MT-ND4). A previous pooled analysis of phase 3 studies showed an improvement in visual acuity of patients injected with lenadogene nolparvovec compared to natural history. Here, we report updated results by incorporating data from the latest phase 3 trial REFLECT in the pool, increasing the number of treated patients from 76 to 174. METHODS: The visual acuity of 174 MT-ND4-carrying patients with LHON injected in one or both eyes with lenadogene nolparvovec from four pooled phase 3 studies (REVERSE, RESCUE and their long-term extension trial RESTORE; and REFLECT trial) was compared to the spontaneous evolution of an external control group of 208 matched patients from 11 natural history studies. RESULTS: Treated patients showed a clinically relevant and sustained improvement in their visual acuity when compared to natural history. Mean improvement versus natural history was - 0.30 logMAR (+ 15 ETDRS letters equivalent) at last observation (P < 0.01) with a maximal follow-up of 3.9 years after injection. Most treated eyes were on-chart as compared to less than half of natural history eyes at 48 months after vision loss (89.6% versus 48.1%; P < 0.01) and at last observation (76.1% versus 44.4%; P < 0.01). When we adjusted for covariates of interest (gender, age of onset, ethnicity, and duration of follow-up), the estimated mean gain was - 0.43 logMAR (+ 21.5 ETDRS letters equivalent) versus natural history at last observation (P < 0.0001). Treatment effect was consistent across all phase 3 clinical trials. Analyses from REFLECT suggest a larger treatment effect in patients receiving bilateral injection compared to unilateral injection. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of lenadogene nolparvovec in improving visual acuity in MT-ND4 LHON was confirmed in a large cohort of patients, compared to the spontaneous natural history decline. Bilateral injection of gene therapy may offer added benefits over unilateral injection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02652780 (REVERSE); NCT02652767 (RESCUE); NCT03406104 (RESTORE); NCT03293524 (REFLECT); NCT03295071 (REALITY).

Optic perineuritis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review paper aims at discussing pathogenesis, etiology, clinical features, management, and prognosis of OPN. RECENT FINDINGS: Optic perineuritis (OPN) is an inflammatory process primarily involving the optic nerve sheath. Clinically, OPN usually presents with unilateral, gradual decline of visual function, eye pain, and/or pain on eye movements, disc edema and various features of optic nerve dysfunction, including visual field defects. It can mimic typical optic neuritis. In most cases of OPN, the disease is isolated with no specific etiology being identified, however, it can also occur secondary to a wide range of underlying systemic diseases. OPN is clinically diagnosed and radiologically confirmed based on the finding of circumferential perineural enhancement of the optic nerve sheath on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). SUMMARY: Unlike optic nerve, OPN is not typically self-limited without treatment. High-dose oral corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment in OPN. The initiation of therapy usually causes rapid and dramatic improvement in signs and symptoms. In general, OPN usually has a relatively good visual prognosis, which is influenced by delays between the onset of visual loss and the initiation of steroid therapy as well as the presence of underlying systemic diseases.

Treatment and Relapse Prevention of Typical and Atypical Optic Neuritis.

Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammatory condition involving the optic nerve. Several important typical and atypical ON variants are now recognized. Typical ON has a more favorable prognosis; it can be idiopathic or represent an early manifestation of demyelinating diseases, mostly multiple sclerosis (MS). The atypical spectrum includes entities such as antibody-driven ON associated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD), chronic/relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION), and sarcoidosis-associated ON. Appropriate and timely diagnosis is essential to rapidly decide on the appropriate treatment, maximize visual recovery, and minimize recurrences. This review paper aims at presenting the currently available state-of-the-art treatment strategies for typical and atypical ON, both in the acute phase and in the long-term. Moreover, emerging therapeutic approaches and novel steps in the direction of achieving remyelination are discussed.

The Treatment of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody Disease: A State-of-the-Art Review.

BACKGROUND: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) is an important etiology of neurologic morbidity and specifically, atypical, and relapsing optic neuritis. This review summarizes acute treatment and long-term prevention approaches in MOGAD. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed and Google Scholar databases were manually searched and reviewed. RESULTS: We review the evidence base for acute treatment of MOGAD with corticosteroids and adjunct therapies, such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange. We discuss the utility of prolonged corticosteroid tapering after the acute attack. We then summarize the commonly used disease-modifying treatments for relapsing MOGAD, including chronic low-dose corticosteroids, classic antirheumatic immune suppressants, biologic agents, and IVIg. CONCLUSIONS: While acute MOGAD attacks are usually treated with high-dose IV corticosteroids, longer oral corticosteroid tapers may prevent rapid relapse. Multiple long-term treatment strategies are being employed in recurrent MOGAD, with IVIg is emerging as probably the most effective therapy.