MicroCT and Histological Analysis of Clot Composition in Acute Ischemic Stroke : A Comparative Study of MT-Retrieved Clots and Clot Analogs.

PURPOSE: Assessing clot composition on prethrombectomy computed tomography (CT) imaging may help in stroke treatment planning. In this study we seek to use microCT imaging of fabricated blood clots to understand the relationship between CT radiographic signals and the biological makeup. METHODS: Clots (n = 10) retrieved by mechanical thrombectomy (MT) were collected, and 6 clot analogs of varying RBC composition were made. We performed paired microCT and histological image analysis of all 16 clots using a ScanCo microCT 100 (4.9 µm resolution) and standard H&E staining (imaged at 40×). From these data types, first order statistic (FOS) radiomics were computed from microCT, and percent composition of RBCs (%RBC) was computed from histology. Polynomial and linear regression (LR) were used to build statistical models based on retrieved thrombus microCT and %RBC that were evaluated for their ability to predict the %RBC of clot analogs from mean HU. Correlation analyses of microCT FOS with composition were completed for both retrieved clots and analogs. RESULTS: The LR model fits relating MT-retrieved clot %RBC with mean (R2 = 0.625, p = 0.006) and standard deviation (R2 = 0.564, p < 0.05) in HUs on microCT were significant. Similarly, LR models relating analog histological %RBC to analog protocol %RBC (R2 = 0.915, p = 0.003) and mean HUs on microCT (R2 = 0.872, p = 0.007) were also significant. When the LR model built using MT-retrieved clots was used to predict analog %RBC from mean HUs, significant correlation was observed between predictions and actual histological %RBC (R2 = 0.852, p = 0.009). For retrieved clots, significant correlations were observed for energy and total energy with %RBC and %FP (|R| > 0.7, q < 0.01). Analogs further demonstrated significant correlation between FOS energy, total energy, variance and %WBC (|R| > 0.9, q < 0.01). CONCLUSION: MicroCT can be used to build models that predict AIS clot composition from routine CT parameters and help us to better understand radiomic signatures associated with clot composition and first pass outcomes. In future work, such observations can be used to better infer clot composition and inform thrombectomy prognostics from pretreatment CTs.

Tectonic infarct analysis: A computational tool for automated whole-brain infarct analysis from TTC-stained tissue.

Background: Infarct volume measured from 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC)-stained brain slices is critical to in vivo stroke models. In this study, we developed an interactive, tunable, software that automatically computes whole-brain infarct metrics from serial TTC-stained brain sections. Methods: Three rat ischemic stroke cohorts were used in this study (Total n = 91 rats; Cohort 1 n = 21, Cohort 2 n = 40, Cohort 3 n = 30). For each, brains were serially-sliced, stained with TTC and scanned on both anterior and posterior sides. Ground truth annotation and infarct morphometric analysis (e.g., brain-Vbrain, infarct-Vinfarct, and non-infarct-Vnon-infarct volumes) were completed by domain experts. We used Cohort 1 for brain and infarct segmentation model development (n = 3 training cases with 36 slices [18 anterior and posterior faces], n = 18 testing cases with 218 slices [109 anterior and posterior faces]), as well as infarct morphometrics automation. The infarct quantification pipeline and pre-trained model were packaged as a standalone software and applied to Cohort 2, an internal validation dataset. Finally, software and model trainability were tested as a use-case with Cohort 3, a dataset from a separate institute. Results: Both high segmentation and statistically significant quantification performance (correlation between manual and software) were observed across all datasets. Segmentation performance: Cohort 1 brain accuracy = 0.95/f1-score = 0.90, infarct accuracy = 0.96/f1-score = 0.89; Cohort 2 brain accuracy = 0.97/f1-score = 0.90, infarct accuracy = 0.97/f1-score = 0.80; Cohort 3 brain accuracy = 0.96/f1-score = 0.92, infarct accuracy = 0.95/f1-score = 0.82. Infarct quantification (cohort average): Vbrain (ρ = 0.87, p < 0.001), Vinfarct (0.92, p < 0.001), Vnon-infarct (0.80, p < 0.001), %infarct (0.87, p = 0.001), and infarct:non-infact ratio (ρ = 0.92, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Tectonic Infarct Analysis software offers a robust and adaptable approach for rapid TTC-based stroke assessment.