Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; : 10781552241226861, 2024 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38258352

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Procarbazine is an oral chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of brain malignancies and is associated with hypersensitivity reactions. In case of grade 4 reactions, rechallenge should be avoided, and the agent should be replaced, unless the treatment is curative, in which case the application of a desensitization protocol should be considered. We present a successful case of desensitization in procarbazine anaphylaxis. CASE REPORT: A 53-year-old male patient was diagnosed with recurrent anaplastic oligodendroglioblastoma. The patient received three cycles of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine chemotherapy for malignancy recurrence. In the fourth cycle, on the 12th day of procarbazine treatment, the patient developed anaphylaxis. Procarbazine was given together with premedication as part of the 12-step desensitization process, and the fourth cycle was successfully completed. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Procarbazine hypersensitivity reactions are observed less frequently than reactions to other chemotherapeutics. We presented a case of procarbazine-associated severe anaphylaxis that was able to continue procarbazine chemotherapy with successful desensitization. This case is important in terms of confirming the procarbazine desensitization protocol. DISCUSSION: In literature there is only one protocol developed was successfully applied in one patient with procarbazine anaphylaxis. In the current case, we took this protocol into consideration in the management of our patient. Following the use of this protocol, the patient was able to continue procarbazine chemotherapy successfully. Procarbazine anaphylaxis is rare, and more cases are needed to be reported to confirm the desensitization protocol and when to continue procarbazine treatment.

2.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 44(4): e3-e10, 2023 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37480202

ABSTRACT

Background: There are insufficient data on changes in disease control after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or vaccination in patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD). Objective: This study aimed to investigate the history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with N-ERD, determine whether they experienced exacerbations of asthma or rhinitis after COVID-19, and evaluate their postvaccination asthma and rhinitis control data. Methods: The demographic characteristics of patients with N-ERD and whether they had had symptoms of asthma, changes in nasal symptom scores Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22), Asthma Control Test (ACT) within 1 month after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection were recorded. The prevalence of COVID-19 in patients with N-ERD and in healthy controls was estimated. Results: A total of 103 patients with N-ERD and 100 healthy controls were included in the study. Thirty seven of the patients (35.9%) and 65 of the controls (65%) had a history of COVID-19. There were no significant differences in changes in the ACT and SNOT-22 scores after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (p = 0.999). Although, the change in ACT score after infection was significant (p = 0.017; r = 0.39), there was no significant change in level of asthma control (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The history of COVID-19 was less frequent in the N-ERD group. There was no deterioration in asthma and rhinitis controls after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Although a significant decrease was observed in the ACT scores after COVID-19, there was no deterioration in the level of asthma control.


Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Respiration Disorders , Rhinitis , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Asthma/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
3.
J Asthma ; 60(10): 1885-1894, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36971076

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) is characterized by exacerbation of respiratory symptoms after NSAID intake. While research for specific treatment options continues in patients who cannot tolerate or are unresponsive to aspirin treatment after aspirin desensitization (ATAD), biologicals have emerged as a new therapeutic option in NERD patients. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of life, and the sinonasal and respiratory outcomes of NERD patients treated with ATAD or biologicals. METHODS: Patients who have been followed up at a tertiary care allergy center and who have been receiving at least one of ATAD, mepolizumab or omalizumab for at least six months were included. Evaluations were made using sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22), asthma control test (ACT), short form-36 (SF-36), blood eosinophil counts, need for recurrent functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS), and asthma or rhinitis exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (OCS). RESULTS: A total of 59 patients comprised of 35 (59%) females and 24 (41%) males with a mean age of 46.1 (min-max, 20-70) years were included. The baseline blood eosinophil count was higher, and a significant decrease in blood eosinophil counts was observed in the mepolizumab group compared to ATAD group (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). At follow-up, the rate of recurrent FESS was lower in the group that received mepolizumab (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In NERD patients, mepolizumab significantly decreased blood eosinophil counts and recurrent FESS. There was no significant difference between the patients receiving ATAD or mepolizumab regarding other clinical parameters.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Biological Products , Male , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Aspirin/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Asthma/diagnosis , Biological Products/adverse effects , Quality of Life
4.
J Asthma ; 60(5): 931-937, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35912568

ABSTRACT

Background: Mepolizumab 300 mg is an approved treatment option for patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), yet, the adequacy of 100 mg of mepolizumab in disease control is controversial.Objective: To evaluate the sinonasal and respiratory outcomes of EGPA patients treated with 100 mg mepolizumab for one year.Methods: Evaluations of 11 patients were made of the sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) (nasal, otologic, sleep, and emotional domains), asthma control test (ACT), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), blood eosinophil counts and oral steroid doses before mepolizumab treatment (T0) and at the 6th (T6) and 12th (T12) months.Results: A significant decrease was observed in the total SNOT-22 scores in the 6th month, after which the scores continued to be stable until the 12th month. (SNOT-22 median (IQR); T0: 70(53-82); T6: 19(4-35); T12: 11(6-40); T0-T6, p = 0.02; T6-T12, p = 0.85). In the subdomains of SNOT-22, nasal and sleep-related domains improved significantly in the first 6 months, and the otologic and emotional domains only improved from baseline in the 12th month. There was a significant decrease in blood eosinophil counts in the 6th month and oral steroid dose in the 12th month (eosinophils, median(IQR), T0: 1000(700-1800), T6: 100(0-200), p = 0.02; OCS dose, median(IQR), T0: 16(8-16); T6: 4(0-4); T12: 0(0-4); T0-T12, p = 0.002). A significant improvement was observed in ACT values in the 6th month (ACT median (IQR); T0:16(8-18); T6: 22(21-25); p = 0.01).Conclusion: Mepolizumab 100 mg provided a significant decrease in SNOT-22 values, especially in nasal and sleep domains, eosinophil counts and OCS dose in the 6th month.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Churg-Strauss Syndrome , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/drug therapy , Churg-Strauss Syndrome/drug therapy , Asthma/drug therapy , Eosinophils , Steroids/therapeutic use
5.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 32(5): 606-612, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35546696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic importance of pulmonary functions and their effect on survival in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who underwent surgical resection and/or received medical treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between June 2013 and March 2020. METHODOLOGY: The study included a total of 70 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), comprising 35 who underwent surgical treatment and 35 who were treated medically. The effects of age, gender, additional comorbidities, smoking status, complications after surgery and/or radiotherapy, and pulmonary function test values ​​on survival were investigated. RESULTS:  The median overall survival time of the patients was 1973±769.1 (466-3.480) days. According to the univariate Cox regression analysis, the preoperative and postoperative values of the forced expiratory volume in 1 second were not important risk factors affecting survival (p=0.752 and p=0.878) respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed in survival probability between the patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD) (p=0.005). There was also a statistically significant difference between the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance groups in terms of survival probability (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There was no relationship between pulmonary functions and survival in patients with operable NSCLC, but this evaluation should be undertaken in larger patient groups. This study demonstrated the importance of patients' performance status and comorbidities, such as CAD in survival. KEY WORDS: Non-small cell lung cancer, Survival, Respiratory function test.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Cohort Studies , Humans , Lung , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies
6.
Sleep Breath ; 26(3): 1459-1464, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34386891

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a cause of hypoxia, and the correlation between hypoxia and microvascular complications is well known. Microalbuminuria (MAU) is a marker for endovascular dysfunction and an indicator of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in the general population. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between microvascular damage and the metabolic complications of OSA based on the presence of MAU. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) and microalbumin level were examined in patients with an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) greater than 5/h (study group) and in patients with an AHI less than 5/h (control group). The exclusion criteria were other possible causes of MAU (hypertension, nephropathy, coronary artery disease, and severe thyroid dysfunction). RESULTS: Of 103 patients enrolled, 80 formed the group with OSA and 23 served as controls. According to the AHI values, the patients were divided into four groups as normal, mild, moderate and severe. There was no significant difference between the four groups in terms of the microalbumin level and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio. CONCLUSION: In this study, no significant relationship was found between MAU and sleep apnoea.


Subject(s)
Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Albumins , Albuminuria , Creatinine , Humans , Hypoxia , Polysomnography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...