ABSTRACT
Previously, we reported excellent results with the combination of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), abatacept and a short course of tacrolimus (CAST) for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) following peripheral blood haploidentical transplantation. To further substantiate these results, we performed a propensity score-matched analysis. Patients enrolled in the CAST trial were matched with patients from a contemporaneous cohort from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database who received PTCy, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, using nearest neighbor propensity score matching. An excellent balance between pairs was achieved as measured by the density distribution and standardized differences of covariates (median 0.09). The rates of acute GvHD grades II-IV at day +120 and one-year GvHD- and relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 16.7% and 66.7% in the CAST cohort versus 28.6% and 47.6% in the control group, respectively. This trend did not reach statistical significance (p= 0.14 and 0.07), possibly due to the small numbers of patients and events. On the other hand, CAST was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of relapse (9.5% versus 26.2%, p=0.045) with improved disease-free survival (85.7% versus 61.9%, p=0.01). Our data provides a strong impetus to examine CAST in a randomized clinical trial.
ABSTRACT
Romiplostim is indicated for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), though is often used off-label for other indications such as chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) and thrombocytopenia post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although romiplostim is FDA approved at a starting dose of 1â mcg/kg, it is often initiated at 2-4â mcg/kg depending on the severity of thrombocytopenia in clinical practice. Given the limited data, but interest in higher doses of romiplostim for indications other than ITP, we aimed to assess our inpatient romiplostim utilization at NYU Langone Health.This was a single-center, retrospective review of 84 adult patients from January 2019 to July 2021. The top three indications were ITP (51, 60.7%), CIT (13, 15.5%), and HSCT (10, 11.9%). The median initial romiplostim dose was 3.8â mcg/kg (range, 0.9-10.8). 51% of patients achieved a platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L by the end of week 1 of therapy. For patients achieving goal platelets by the end of week 1, the median dose of romiplostim was 2.4â mcg/kg (range, 0.9-10.8). There was 1 episode of thrombosis and 1 episode of stroke.We found that higher than FDA-recommended initial doses should be considered to achieve a platelet response. It appears to be safe to initiate romiplostim as higher doses, and to increase doses by greater increments than 1â mcg/kg in order to achieve a platelet response. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of romiplostim in off-label indications and should evaluate clinical outcomes such as bleeding and need for transfusions.
Subject(s)
Hemostatics , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic , Thrombocytopenia , Adult , Humans , Fibrinolytic Agents , Hemostatics/therapeutic use , Receptors, Thrombopoietin , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/drug therapy , Thrombocytopenia/drug therapy , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Receptors, Fc/therapeutic use , Thrombopoietin/therapeutic use , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/adverse effects , Academic Medical Centers , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Reducing the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is warranted. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is the main agent used for GVHD prevention in this setting. It remains unknown whether costimulation blockade can be safely combined with PTCy and enhance its efficacy. We performed a phase 1b-2 clinical trial to examine the combination of PTCy, abatacept, and a short course of tacrolimus (CAST) after peripheral blood haploidentical HSCT. The primary end point was the incidence of grades 2-4 acute GVHD by day +120. The study enrolled 46 patients with a median age of 60 years (range, 18-74 years). The cumulative incidences of grades 2-4 and 3 or 4 acute GVHD were 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2-32.9) and 4.4% (95% CI, 1.1-17.1), respectively. With a median follow-up of 15.3 months, the cumulative incidence of 1-year treatment-related mortality was 4.4% (95% CI, 1.1-17.1). The estimated 1-year moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD rate, relapse rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD- and relapse-free survival were 15.9% (95% CI, 8-31.7), 11.7% (95% CI, 5-27.2), 84.1% (95% CI, 73.8-95.7), 85.9% (95% CI, 75.9-97.2), and 66.1% (95% CI, 53.4-81.8), respectively. Toxicities were similar to those expected in patients receiving haploidentical HSCT. This clinical trial showed that the CAST regimen is safe and effective in reducing the rate of grades 2-4 acute GVHD after haploidentical peripheral blood HSCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04503616.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Tacrolimus , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Transplantation, Haploidentical , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapyABSTRACT
The backbone induction therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and rituximab, which can be combined with other chemotherapeutic agents. The optimal dose of HD-MTX remains unclear, as doses between 3 and 8 g/m2 have been shown to be effective. In this retrospective study, HD-MTX dosed at 3-5 g/m2 demonstrated an overall response of 81.8%, with 11 (50%) complete responses. The median overall survival was not met at 29 months and median progression free survival was 12.5 months.There were two discontinuations due to nephrotoxicity. The most common adverse event was hepatotoxicity (18.5%), with no treatment-related mortality events observed.Overall, HD-MTX dosed at 3-5 g/m2 demonstrated similar efficacy and lower toxicity compared to higher doses in PCNSL patients. Reducing the initial HD-MTX dose may help ensure tolerability and completion of induction therapy, especially in patients with co-morbidities or older age who have poorer outcomes.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Neoplasms , Lymphoma , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Central Nervous System , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/diagnosis , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/drug therapy , Humans , Lymphoma/diagnosis , Lymphoma/drug therapy , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy is a new treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies in which other therapies have failed. AREAS COVERED: The review provides an overview for recognizing and managing the most acute toxicities related to CAR-T cells. EXPERT OPINION: The development of immune-mediated toxicities is a common challenge of CAR-T therapy. The mechanism that determines this toxicity is still unclear, although an unfavorable tumor microenvironment and a pro-inflammatory state put patients at risk. The monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of post-CAR-T toxicities must be determined and based on international guidelines and internal clinical practice. It is urgent to identify biomarkers that can identify patients at greater risk of developing complications. The adoption of consistent grading criteria is necessary to improve toxicity management strategies continually. The first-line therapy consists of supportive care and treatment with tocilizumab or corticosteroids. An early start of cytokine blockade therapies could mitigate toxicity. The plan will include cytokine release prophylaxis, a risk-adapted treatment, prevention of on-target/off-tumor effect, and a switch on/off CAR-T approach.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/adverse effects , Patient Care Team , T-Lymphocytes , Tumor MicroenvironmentABSTRACT
Tacrolimus is a mainstay medication for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in combination with other immunosuppressive agents. Achieving therapeutic tacrolimus levels is vital in preventing acute GVHD (aGVHD), while supratherapeutic levels may increase risk of toxicity and relapse. We performed a single center retrospective chart review including all adult patients post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation who received initial tacrolimus continuous intravenous infusion for GVHD prophylaxis between June 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. The primary outcome was the percent of patients with an initial therapeutic tacrolimus level, defined as 5-12 ng/mL, after empiric weight-based dosing at 0.02 mg/kg/day. Secondary outcomes included evidence of tacrolimus toxicity within seven days of initiation, incidence of aGVHD by day 100, and relapse after six months. An initial therapeutic level was achieved in 47% of patients with a median initial level of 12.4 ng/mL. Fifty-two percent of patients had supratherapeutic levels. No significant nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, or neurotoxicity occurred within a week of starting tacrolimus or at neutrophil engraftment. Grade II-IV aGVHD by day 100 was observed in 22% of patients, and relapse after six months was found in 16% of patients. These results have led to consideration of an empiric 20% dose reduction to 0.016 mg/kg/day or an expanded initial tacrolimus target of 5-15 ng/mL as there was low aGVHD incidence and no increased risk of toxicity.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective Studies , Tacrolimus/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Following allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (BMT), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) continues to represent a significant cause of treatment failure, despite the routine use of conventional, mainly calcineurin inhibitor-based prophylaxis. Recently, post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has emerged as a safe and efficacious alternative. First, omitting the need for ex vivo T-cell depletion in the setting of haploidentical transplantation, growing evidence supports PTCy role in GvHD prevention in matched-related and matched-unrelated transplants. Through improved understanding of GvHD pathophysiology and advancements in drug development, PTCy emerges as a unique opportunity to design calcineurin inhibitor-free strategies by integrating agents that target different stages of GvHD development.
Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Animals , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , HLA Antigens/genetics , HLA Antigens/metabolism , Histocompatibility , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Transplantation, Haploidentical , Unrelated DonorsABSTRACT
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in its acute and chronic forms continues to represent a significant barrier to the success and wide-applicability of blood and marrow transplantation as a potentially curative treatment modality for a number of benign and malignant blood conditions. Presently, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimens remain the most commonly used prevention strategy, although post-transplant cyclophosphamide is emerging as an alternative approach, and is providing a backbone for innovative CNI-free combinations. In this paper, we review the current strategies used for the prevention of GvHD, and highlight some of the developing and promising combinations.
ABSTRACT
Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) is a highly prevalent virus that establishes lifelong latency in human hosts. Symptomatic HHV-6 reactivation rarely occurs in immunocompetent individuals and is best described in immunosuppressed patients such as recipients of bone marrow transplants (BMT). In that setting, HHV-6 reactivation has been associated with fever, rash, pneumonitis, encephalitis, and delayed engraftment. While these complications are well documented in allogeneic transplant, the clinical impact of such reactivation is not well known in autologous BMT. We described a case of HHV-6-associated encephalitis in a previously heavily treated patient with multiple myeloma (MM) following a second autologous BMT, and discuss the need for clinicians to be aware of the potential clinical impact of HHV-6 following autologous BMT in the era of immunomodulatory agents.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To describe our hospital pharmacy department's preparation for an influx of critically ill patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and offer guidance on clinical pharmacy services preparedness for similar crisis situations. SUMMARY: Personnel within the department of pharmacy at a medical center at the US epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic proactively prepared a staffing and pharmacotherapeutic action plan in anticipation of an expected surge in admissions of critically ill patients with COVID-19 and expansion of acute care and intensive care unit (ICU) capacity. Guidance documents focusing on supportive care and pharmacotherapeutic treatment options were developed. Repurposing of non-ICU-trained clinical pharmacotherapy specialists to work collaboratively with clinician teams in ICUs was quickly implemented; staff were prepared for these duties through use of shared tools to facilitate education and practice standardization. CONCLUSION: As challenges were encountered at the initial peak of the pandemic, interdisciplinary collaboration and teamwork was crucial to ensure that all patients were proactively assessed and that their respective pharmacotherapeutic regimens were optimized.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Medication Therapy Management/standards , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Care/organization & administration , Critical Care/standards , Critical Illness , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/standards , Emergencies , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/standards , Medication Therapy Management/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/standards , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Professional Role , Workforce/organization & administration , Workforce/standardsABSTRACT
Carfilzomib is a second-generation proteasome inhibitor that irreversibly inhibits chymotrypsin-like (CT-L) activities of the proteasome, and is indicated for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cardiotoxicity is a well-established adverse effect of carfilzomib. The extent of cardiac toxicity in the literature spans anywhere from palpitations to cardiac arrest, with the most commonly reported manifestation being new-onset or worsening heart failure. A pre-clinical study of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carfilzomib given via intravenous bolus or 30-minute infusion in rats showed that carfilzomib can strongly induce apoptosis and potently damage cardiac myocytes at clinically relevant concentrations. Moreover, the mortality rate with the bolus administration was 44% whereas the same dose administered as a 30-minute infusion did not result in mortality. There remains limited clinical data regarding the safety of carfilzomib at doses of 27-56 mg/m2 based on infusion times as these doses have not been well studied. This retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the safety of carfilzomib at doses >27 mg/m2 at all infusion times.
Subject(s)
Cardiotoxicity/diagnosis , Oligopeptides/administration & dosage , Oligopeptides/adverse effects , Proteasome Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Proteasome Inhibitors/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiotoxicity/physiopathology , Cohort Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/physiopathology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing induction chemotherapy are at increased risk of invasive fungal infection due to prolonged, severe neutropenia. Due to this risk, national guidelines recommend invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in this population until the resolution of neutropenia. Although posaconazole has demonstrated superiority over fluconazole and itraconazole, there is limited evidence for voriconazole for invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in this population. Even less data are available comparing posaconazole and voriconazole directly. The study objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of delayed-release posaconazole tablets versus voriconazole for primary invasive fungal infection prophylaxis. The primary outcome was rate of discontinuation of either agent. Secondary outcomes included specific rates of discontinuation due to adverse events and drug-drug interactions, rates of breakthrough invasive fungal infection, and 30-day and 100-day mortality rates. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to NYU Langone Health between 1 January 2014 and 31 August 2017 and initiated on invasive fungal infection prophylaxis during induction or reinduction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. RESULTS: In total, 77 patients were included in the study: 43 using posaconazole delayed-release tablets and 34 using oral voriconazole. In the posaconazole group, 30% of patients (n = 13) discontinued therapy for any reason compared with 35% (n = 12) of patients in the voriconazole group (p = 0.64). A higher percentage of patients in the voriconazole group discontinued due to adverse events (6 patients, 18% vs. 1 patient, 2%, p = 0.04). Mortality rates at 30 and 100 days were similar between both groups. No breakthrough invasive fungal infections was noted in either group. CONCLUSION: Overall, discontinuations for any reason were similar in patients taking both posaconazole delayed-release and oral voriconazole. Both posaconazole delayed-release tablets and oral voriconazole appear to be effective at preventing invasive fungal infection in acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients undergoing induction chemotherapy, although posaconazole may be more tolerable.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Invasive Fungal Infections/prevention & control , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/drug therapy , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Voriconazole/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Cancer is a known hypercoagulable state that leads to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Low molecular weight heparin remains the preferred anticoagulant for VTE in patients with cancer over vitamin K antagonist. However, the preferred anticoagulant in prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cancer has yet to be determined. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly being utilized; however their role in cancer has only recently been investigated. The objective of this retrospective cohort was to describe real-world anticoagulation prescribing patterns in cancer patients at a large academic medical center between January 1, 2013 and October 31, 2016. We sought to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DOACs in patients with cancer for either VTE and/or AF. Patient demographic, clinical characteristics, as well as bleeding and thrombotic events were collected. There were 214 patients in our analysis, of which 71 patients (33%) received a DOAC [apixaban (n = 22), dabigatran (n = 17), and rivaroxaban (n = 32)]. There were fewer bleeding events and/or discontinuations in the DOAC group compared to enoxaparin (13 vs. 27, p = 0.022). There was no difference in major or minor bleeds or thromboembolic events in comparing DOAC to enoxaparin or DOAC to warfarin. This was a retrospective, single-institution study assessing the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to warfarin or enoxaparin in patients with cancer. DOACs may represent an alternative to warfarin or enoxaparin in patients with cancer for VTE and/or stroke reduction in AF.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Adult , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Enoxaparin/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Warfarin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Human herpes virus type 6 can reactivate in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and has been associated with serious sequelae such as delayed engraftment and an increased risk of developing acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). This study investigated human herpes virus type 6 (HHV-6) reactivation within 60 days of transplantation in stem cell transplants utilizing single umbilical cord blood, double umbilical cord blood, or umbilical cord blood plus haploidentical stem cells. Of 92 patients, 60 (65%) had HHV-6 reactivation. Reactivation was not significantly influenced by any patient characteristics, disease characteristics, or by stem cell source (umbilical cord blood only versus haploidentical plus umbilical cord blood). We did not observe any impact of HHV-6 reactivation on neutrophil or platelet count recovery or on relapse-free survival. HHV-6 reactivation was associated with subsequent development of prerelapse acute GVHD (HR = 3.00; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.4; p = 0.004).
Subject(s)
Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Herpesvirus 6, Human/physiology , Roseolovirus Infections/etiology , Virus Activation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Blood Cell Count , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Roseolovirus Infections/diagnosis , Roseolovirus Infections/epidemiology , Roseolovirus Infections/therapy , Survival Analysis , Transplantation, Homologous , Virus Activation/immunology , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy is a neurotoxic adverse effect of ifosfamide chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of encephalopathy in patients with lymphoma and sarcoma receiving ifosfamide chemotherapy and assess for potential risk factors that influence the incidence of encephalopathy. METHODS: A retrospective study of sarcoma and lymphoma patients receiving ifosfamide chemotherapy was performed at the participating institutions. Enrollment began 1 July 2011 and continued chronologically backwards until 100 sarcoma and 100 lymphoma patients were enrolled. Identification of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy events was performed by reviewing provider documentation of ifosfamide infusions. Logistic regression was employed to determine associations between risk factors and ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy events. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients enrolled, 29 (14.5%) patients experienced encephalopathy. Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy occurred more frequently in the sarcoma population than the lymphoma population (24 vs. 5 patients, p < 0.001). In addition to cancer type, prior use of cisplatin, concomitant opioids, and use of CYP2B6 inhibitors remained as significant variables in the multivariate model conferring a 12.47, 2.81, and 5.17 increased odds of experiencing encephalopathy, respectively. The odds of experiencing encephalopathy were 9.0 and 1.37 times higher for a one-unit increase in serum creatinine and hemoglobin, respectively, and 0.15 times lower for a one-unit increase in albumin. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that patients with sarcoma experienced ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy more often than those with lymphoma. For all patients, predisposing factors for ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy included previous cisplatin exposure, concomitant opioids and CYP2B6 inhibitors. Laboratory values that increased ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy risk included low serum albumin, increased serum creatinine, and increased hemoglobin.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/adverse effects , Brain Diseases/chemically induced , Ifosfamide/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Cancer Care Facilities , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Ifosfamide/therapeutic use , Incidence , Lymphoma/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sarcoma/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vismodegib is an oral inhibitor of the Hedgehog pathway approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. It is the first systemic treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma that is not amenable to surgery and radiation. This is the first drug to use the Hedgehog pathway to inhibit the proliferation of tumors and is also implicated in the development of other cancers such as medulloblastoma. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this review was to summarize the development, pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of vismodegib. METHODS: Relevant English-language literature was identified and then evaluated based on results from database searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1975 to June 19, 2012. The terms searched included, but were not limited to, vismodegib, Erivedge, GDC-0449, basal cell carcinoma, and 2-chloro-N-[4-chloro-3-(pyridin-2-yl)phenyl]-4-(methylsulfonyl)benzamide. Additional literature was identified by assessing the reference lists of previously identified articles and through abstracts presented by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. RESULTS: A total of 70 full text citations were identified although two national conference proceedings were then excluded. An additional 10 published abstracts were also identified. A Phase II, nonrandomized, multicenter, international study demonstrated a 30.3% objective response rate in metastatic basal cell carcinoma and a 42.9% objective response rate in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma. The adverse effect profile for vismodegib is similar to other identified Hedgehog pathway inhibitors; muscle cramps (71.7%), alopecia (63.8%), and dysgeusia (55.1%) were the most common adverse effects seen in trials. A Phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Gorlin syndrome patients with basal cell carcinoma concluded that vismodegib was significantly better than placebo at reducing new basal cell carcinoma lesions (P < 0.001) and at decreasing the sum of the longest diameter of existing lesions (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with unresectable basal cell carcinoma or where resection would be cosmetically disadvantageous, vismodegib is an effective therapy with good response rates. At this time, the data are too limited to determine overall survival. The Hedgehog pathway is a newly identified area in which mutations or dysregulation can occur, leading to the development and progression of tumors. Studies continue to look at other cancers with involvement of the Hedgehog pathway.