CKD-Associated Pruritus and Clinical Outcomes in Nondialysis CKD.

Rationale & Objective: Itching is a frequent symptom experienced by people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We investigated the associations of CKD-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) with clinical outcomes. Study Design: This was a longitudinal cohort study. Setting & Participants: Patients from Brazil, France, and the United States enrolled in the Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (CKDopps) from 2013 to 2021, an international prospective cohort study of adults with nondialysis dependent CKD, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were included. Exposure: CKD-aP was self-reported by response to the question: "During the past 4 weeks, to what extent were you bothered by itchy skin?" Outcomes: The outcomes were as follows: CKD progression, kidney replacement therapy (KRT) initiation, mortality, hospitalization, cardiovascular events, infection events. Analytical Approach: Associations with time-to-event outcomes were investigated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for potential confounders. Results: There were 4,410 patients from 91 clinics with a median age of 69 years and a median eGFR at patient questionnaire completion of 29 (21-38) mL/min/1.73 m2. The proportion of patients not at all, somewhat, moderately, very much, and extremely bothered by itchy skin was 49%, 27%, 13%, 7%, and 3%, respectively. Patients with more advanced stages of CKD, older age, and greater comorbidities reported to be more likely bothered by itchy skin. Among patients at least moderately bothered, 23% were prescribed at least 1 pharmacotherapy (35% in the United States, 19% in France, 4% in Brazil), including antihistamine (10%), gabapentin (6%), topical corticosteroids (4%), pregabalin (3%), or sedating antihistamine (3%). The HR (95% CI) for patients extremely (vs not at all) bothered was 1.74 (1.11-2.73) for all-cause mortality, 1.56 (1.11-2.18) for all-cause hospitalization, and 1.84 (1.22-2.75) for cardiovascular events. As CKD-aP severity increased, patients also had higher rates of infection events (P = 0.04); CKD-aP severity was not associated with KRT initiation (P = 0.20) or CKD progression (P = 0.87). Limitations: The limitations were 25% nonresponse rate, recall bias, and residual confounding factors. Conclusions: These results demonstrate a strong association between severe itch and clinical outcomes, providing the nephrology community new insights into the possible adverse consequences of CKD-aP in individuals with nondialysis CKD, and warrant further exploration. Plain-Language Summary: Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is a common disturbing symptom of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This article analyzes longitudinal data from the Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (CKDopps) to describe prevalence of CKD-aP in 4,410 individuals with nondialysis CKD, and its association with clinical outcomes. We found that 51% of the surveyed population were bothered by pruritus. CKD-aP was more prevalent in those with more advanced stages of CKD, older age, and with more comorbid conditions. Compared to those not at all bothered by pruritus, those who were extremely bothered had a higher risk of all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, and cardiovascular events. Severity of CKD-aP was not associated with CKD progression or initiation of kidney replacement therapy.

The Burden of Pruritus Associated With CKD: A Mixed Methods Analysis Among Patients Undergoing Dialysis.

Rationale & Objective: Despite its prevalence and distress to patients, chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is poorly characterized, which may contribute to the condition's underdiagnosis and inadequate management. This study aimed to understand the symptom experience of patients with CKD-aP and the extent to which pruritus impacts their lives. Study Design: Mixed methods study including one-on-one qualitative interviews and completion of the Skindex-10 Questionnaire (measuring itch-related quality of life). Setting & Participants: A total of 23 patients undergoing hemodialysis and reporting pruritus at 4 dialysis centers in the United States. Analytical Approach: Interviews followed a semistructured guide that included targeted and follow-up questions to elicit discussion of patients' symptoms of pruritus, including frequency and variability, impact on activities of daily living, and emotional and social functioning. Interviews were digitally audio-recorded. A coding dictionary was developed from transcripts to analyze themes and concepts. Results: Participants described their itch with various terms, including "numbness," "pain," and "tingling" on their skin. Itch affected multiple areas but especially the back, usually occurred daily, and was often worse at night. For some, itching was a constant experience. Patients relieved their itch through scratching and various off-label treatments; some reported skin damage from excessive scratching and most indicated treatments provided limited relief. Pruritus considerably disrupted physical function, including sleep, daily activities, social functioning and relationships, and emotional and psychological wellbeing. All participants reported being bothered by their itching during the past week on the Skindex-10 Questionnaire. Limitations: All participants were from the United States, so the findings may not be generalizable to other countries. Conclusions: Although symptom experience varies considerably, CKD-aP causes severe distress for many patients undergoing hemodialysis and can profoundly impair their quality of life. The results of this study show the impact of itch from patients' perspectives and highlight the need for greater awareness and better management of this condition. Plain-Language Summary: Patients with chronic kidney disease often experience itching, or pruritus, but its importance to patients is regularly overlooked. This study used one-on-one interviews to investigate patients' experiences of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus and how it impacts their lives. We found that participants experienced itch on various body areas and used different words to describe their itch (eg, "numbness" and "pain"). Some reported skin damage from excessive scratching, and many used off-label treatments and other interventions (eg, rubbing alcohol and multiple showers daily), which provided limited relief. For many, itching was experienced daily and severely disrupted sleep, daily activities, interactions with others, and mental wellbeing. These findings reveal chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus severely impacts patients and highlights the need for improved management of this condition.

Burden of Disease and Unmet Needs in Atopic Dermatitis: Results From a Patient Survey.

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) affects 2%-10% of adults worldwide. Occurrence and severity of symptoms and treatment success vary among patients. Objective: To determine disease severity, burden, and treatment use and satisfaction in adults with AD. Methods: An international internet-based survey was conducted (October 5-November 1, 2021) in participants with AD from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Results: Of 2005 AD patients surveyed, 92% had body surface area (BSA) involvement <10%. Itch was the most bothersome symptom; 48.5% of participants reported severe itch in the past week (Itch Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] 7-10; 45.9% for BSA <10%, 75.0% for BSA ≥10%). Most participants reported moderate or severe sleep disturbance in the past week (Sleep NRS 4-10; 67.1% for BSA <10%, 92.3% for BSA ≥10%). Itch was the top reason for participants' most recent health care provider visit; reducing itching was their top treatment goal. Topical therapies, which were most commonly used, resulted in low treatment satisfaction. Conclusions: Itch was the most bothersome AD symptom. Although clinical development has focused on improving skin lesions, improving itch is patients' top treatment goal. This survey highlights the need for systemic antipruritic therapies that could reduce itch in nonlesional and lesional skin.

Phase 2 Trial of Difelikefalin in Notalgia Paresthetica.

BACKGROUND: Notalgia paresthetica is a neuropathic disorder characterized by pruritus in a circumscribed region of the upper back. Difelikefalin, a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist, has shown efficacy in other chronic pruritic conditions and is being investigated for the treatment of notalgia paresthetica. METHODS: In this phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with moderate-to-severe pruritus caused by notalgia paresthetica to receive 2 mg of oral difelikefalin or placebo twice daily for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline at week 8 in the weekly mean score on the daily Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS; scores range from 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst itch imaginable]). The secondary clinical outcomes were itch-related quality-of-life and itch-related sleep measures. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were enrolled; 62 patients were assigned to receive difelikefalin, and 63 were assigned to receive placebo. One patient who had been assigned to receive difelikefalin withdrew consent before the first dose and is not included in the main analyses. The mean baseline WI-NRS score was 7.6 (indicating severe itch) in each group. The change from baseline in the weekly mean WI-NRS score at week 8 was -4.0 points in the difelikefalin group and -2.4 points in the placebo group (difference in change, -1.6 points; 95% confidence interval, -2.6 to -0.6; P = 0.001). The results for the secondary outcomes generally did not support those of the primary analysis. Headache, dizziness, constipation, and increased urine output occurred more frequently in the difelikefalin group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with notalgia paresthetica, oral treatment with difelikefalin resulted in modestly greater reductions in itch intensity scores than placebo over a period of 8 weeks but was associated with adverse events. Larger and longer trials are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of difelikefalin treatment in this disorder. (Funded by Cara Therapeutics; KOMFORT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04706975.).

Efficacy of Difelikefalin for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients: Pooled Analysis of KALM-1 and KALM-2 Phase 3 Studies.

Rationale & Objective: Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) in patients treated by hemodialysis (HD) impairs quality of life (QoL). Difelikefalin, a selective κ-opioid receptor agonist, decreased the intensity of CKD-aP in patients undergoing HD. This pooled analysis evaluated difelikefalin's efficacy and the itch-related QoL overall and in subgroups defined by demographics or disease characteristics. Study Design: In KALM-1 and KALM-2, participants were randomized (1:1) to receive intravenous difelikefalin or placebo 3 times/wk for 12 weeks, followed by a 52-week open-label extension. Setting & Participants: Adults with moderate to severe CKD-aP treated by HD in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Intervention: Intravenous difelikefalin at 0.5 mcg/kg or placebo. Outcomes: Itch intensity (Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale [WI-NRS]) and itch-related QoL (Skindex-10 and 5-D Itch questionnaires). Results: 851 participants were randomized (difelikefalin, n = 426; placebo, n = 425). This pooled analysis demonstrated early     (week 1), sustained difelikefalin efficacy, with significantly greater achievement of ≥3-point WI-NRS reduction with difelikefalin (51.1%) versus placebo (35.2%; P < 0.001). Achievement of a ≥4-point WI-NRS reduction was significantly greater with difelikefalin (38.7%) versus placebo (23.4%; P < 0.001). Difelikefalin reduced itch intensity in subgroups based on age, sex, anti-itch medication use, the presence of specific medical conditions, and gabapentin or pregabalin use. More participants receiving difelikefalin versus placebo achieved clinically meaningful decreases of ≥15 points on the Skindex-10 scale (55.5% vs 40.5%, respectively; P < 0.001) and ≥5 points on the 5-D Itch scale (52.1% vs 42.3%, respectively; P = 0.01), with sustained 5-D Itch effects up to 64 weeks. Limitations: Subgroup samples were small. The WI-NRS, Skindex-10, and 5-D Itch are not used in routine clinical care of dialysis patients; therefore, findings may not reflect the real-world effectiveness of difelikefalin. Conclusions: Difelikefalin demonstrated rapid, sustained efficacy, with consistent results in diverse populations of patients treated by HD. Funding: Cara Therapeutics, Inc. Trial Registration: The KALM-1 trial is registered as NCT03422653 and the KALM-2 trial is registered as NCT03636269.

Characteristics of Patients with Psoriasis Treated with Apremilast in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Data on the characteristics of apremilast patients in real-world settings are limited. We assessed the demographics and disease characteristics of apremilast-treated patients in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry overall and by treatment history. METHODS: The Corrona Psoriasis Registry is a large, independent, prospective, observational registry of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who initiate an eligible systemic medication for treatment of psoriasis at or after enrollment (incident users) or within 12 months before enrollment (prevalent users). The current analyses included psoriasis patients enrolled in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry between April 1, 2015, and January 7, 2018. Patients were adults (age ≥ 18 years) with psoriasis who were enrolled between April 1, 2015, and January 7, 2018 and initiated apremilast at the time of registry enrollment or a subsequent visit (incident users) or within the 12 months prior to registry enrollment (prevalent users). Patient characteristics were evaluated descriptively at the index date, defined as the enrollment date for prevalent users and the visit when apremilast was initiated for incident users. RESULTS: Among 660 patients who initiated apremilast at registry enrollment or a visit thereafter, psoriatic arthritis, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were common. There were more systemic-experienced (61.4%) versus systemic-naive (38.6%) patients; 43.8% had prior biologic exposure. Most patients were not receiving concomitant systemic treatment (70.2%); 27.4% were receiving concomitant biologic therapy. Most patients had mild or moderate disease (psoriasis-involved body surface area ≤ 10% [76.0%], Investigator Global Assessment ≤ 3 [88.3%], Psoriasis Area and Severity Index ≤ 10 [84.5%]). Dermatologist-reported psoriatic arthritis was present in 47.0% of patients; 33.9% of patients had a Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool score of ≥ 3, suggestive of psoriatic arthritis. Systemic-experienced apremilast patients had higher rates of obesity and comorbidities and experienced a greater impact on quality of life (mean Dermatology Life Quality Index, 7.3 vs. 6.5) versus systemic-naive patients. CONCLUSION: In this real-world observational study of apremilast users in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry, most patients had less-severe disease and higher rates of prior exposure to biologic treatments compared with patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis enrolled in phase 3 clinical studies.

Apremilast mechanism of efficacy in systemic-naive patients with moderate plaque psoriasis: Pharmacodynamic results from the UNVEIL study.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacodynamic (PD) subanalyses of clinical trials in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis demonstrated the efficacy of apremilast correlated with reductions in cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: This PD subanalysis of a phase IV, randomized, controlled trial (UNVEIL) in systemic-naive patients with moderate plaque psoriasis (psoriasis-involved body surface area [BSA] 5%-10%; static Physician's Global Assessment [sPGA] = 3) evaluated the relationship between efficacy and changes in inflammatory biomarkers with apremilast 30 mg twice daily (BID) versus placebo. METHODS: Patients were randomized (2:1) to apremilast 30 mg BID or placebo for 16 weeks. Blood samples were analyzed for interleukins (IL)-17A, -17F, -22, and -23; cardiometabolic biomarkers (leptin; adiponectin; apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, B, and E); and the number of T-helper 17 (Th17) cells, regulatory T cells, and total T cells at Weeks 0, 4, and 16. Correlations were examined between percentage change in biomarkers and efficacy (based on PGAxBSA). RESULTS: Of 221 randomized patients, 38 were included in PD analyses (placebo, n = 12; apremilast, n = 26). Median percentage reductions in plasma cytokine levels were significantly greater with apremilast versus placebo for IL-17A (P < 0.05), IL -17F (P < 0.001), and IL-22 (P < 0.01) at Week 4 and IL-22 (P < 0.05) at Week 16. At Week 16, in patients receiving apremilast, improvement in PGAxBSA significantly correlated with change in IL-17A (r = 0.45, P = 0.04). Adipokines, apolipoproteins, and T-cell population levels were largely unchanged. CONCLUSION: Clinical improvements in psoriasis correlated with apremilast-mediated decreases in IL-17A without significantly affecting systemic IL-23 levels, adipokines, or Th17 and regulatory T-cell numbers.

Hyponatremia in critical care patients: frequency, outcome, characteristics, and treatment with the vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist tolvaptan.

Hyponatremia is a common problem in critical care patients and is associated with increased duration of hospital stay and increased morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of hyponatremia in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been reported to be as high as 30% to 40%. Recent studies have found hyponatremia at ICU admission in up to 14% of patients in unselected groups; patients with hyponatremia were at elevated risk of mortality vs normonatremic patients. Most cases in the ICU are euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia, with the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone being a predominant cause. The oral selective vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist tolvaptan is effective in treating euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia and may be useful in the management of hyponatremic critical care patients. Tolvaptan treatment increases serum sodium via aquaresis-ie, increased electrolyte-free water excretion-and thus presents an advantage in patients with syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone or other euvolemic states or hypervolemic hyponatremia. This article provides a review of hyponatremia and of the potential use of tolvaptan in critical care settings. Case reports provide examples of tolvaptan use in correcting severe hyponatremia and associated abnormal mental status and in resolving hyponatremia prior to surgery.

Adaptive trial design: its growing role in clinical research and implications for pharmacists.

PURPOSE: Current trends and recent developments in use of adaptive trial design methodology for pharmaceutical research, as well as barriers to wider acceptance and implications for pharmacists, are discussed. SUMMARY: Traditional clinical drug trials typically take many months or years to complete. In contrast, trials incorporating adaptive design elements allow researchers to make midstudy adjustments so that trial objectives are addressed more efficiently. Properly designed adaptive trials can enable researchers to conclude trials of unsuccessful treatments earlier or bring effective drugs to market sooner, improving patient safety and yielding substantial time and cost savings. Challenges and concerns with adaptive trial methodology include inadequate knowledge of adaptive design techniques among health care professionals and increased potential for bias or misinterpretation of trial results stemming from earlier access to data. Over the past decade, U.S. and European regulatory bodies have issued a number of documents to better define acceptable practices for designing, conducting, and reporting the results of adaptive trials, including updated Food and Drug Administration guidance released in 2010. Pharmacists need to stay current with developments in the field to properly assess and interpret trial results. CONCLUSION: Adaptive trial design is an emerging study methodology that allows for design modifications during a study, with the objective of implementing trial data as early as possible for the benefit of patients and the drug development process.