Cardiovascular Events, Malignancies, and Efficacy Outcomes in Latin American Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Tofacitinib or Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ORAL Surveillance Study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: To assess safety/efficacy of tofacitinib and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients from Latin America (LATAM) in ORAL Surveillance. METHODS: In ORAL Surveillance, 4362 patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged ≥50 years with ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily or TNFi. This post hoc analysis stratified patients by geographical location (LATAM, n = 1202; non-LATAM, n = 3160). Incidence rates (IRs; patients with first event/100 patient-years) and hazard ratios for adverse events of special interest were reported. Efficacy outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index and American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 responses. RESULTS: Risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease and malignancies were less prevalent in the LATAM cohort compared with the non-LATAM cohort. IRs for patients receiving tofacitinib (combined doses) versus TNFi were 0.54 versus 0.28 (LATAM) and 1.14 versus 0.92 (non-LATAM) for major adverse cardiovascular events; 0.58 versus 0.27 (LATAM) and 1.33 versus 0.95 (non-LATAM) for malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer; and 0.69 versus 0.35 (LATAM) and 0.63 versus 0.33 (non-LATAM) for all-cause death. IRs for nonmelanoma skin cancer and venous thromboembolism were also numerically higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi and in the non-LATAM cohort versus LATAM. Efficacy was similar across treatment groups within each cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events of special interest were generally less frequent in LATAM versus non-LATAM patients, reflecting differences in baseline characteristics, and higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi in both cohorts, consistent with the overall findings of ORAL Surveillance. Our findings emphasize the importance of assessing individual risk factors to guide benefit/risk assessment and treatment decisions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02092467.

Tofacitinib Efficacy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Probable Depression/Anxiety: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3 and 3b/4 Randomized Controlled Trials.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our work is to assess the prevalence of probable major depressive disorder and/or probable generalized anxiety disorder (pMDD/pGAD) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to evaluate the efficacy of tofacitinib on RA symptoms stratified by baseline pMDD/pGAD status. METHODS: Data were pooled from five phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one phase 3b/4 RCT, assessing tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), adalimumab (two RCTs), or placebo. pMDD/pGAD was defined as Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) score ≤ 38. Efficacy outcomes over 12 months included least squares mean change from baseline in SF-36 MCS score and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, proportions of patients with pMDD/pGAD in those with baseline pMDD/pGAD, and American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 response, and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate remission (< 2.6) rates. RESULTS: A total of 4404 patients with non-missing baseline values were included. Baseline pMDD/pGAD was reported by 44.5%, 39.8%, 45.4%, and 39.1% of patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg BID, tofacitinib 10 mg BID, adalimumab, and placebo, respectively. SF-36 MCS improvements were greater for tofacitinib versus adalimumab/placebo through month 6, with numerical improvements for tofacitinib versus adalimumab sustained through month 12, when the proportions of patients with baseline pMDD/pGAD who continued to have pMDD/pGAD were reduced. RA efficacy outcomes were generally similar in patients with/without baseline pMDD/pGAD. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of patients with pMDD/pGAD reduced from baseline over 1 year of treatment with tofacitinib or adalimumab. Effective treatment of underlying RA may lead to improvements in depression and anxiety, based on the SF-36 MCS. Specially designed studies using gold-standard diagnostic tools would be warranted to investigate this further. Video Abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00960440, NCT00847613, NCT00814307, NCT00856544, NCT00853385, NCT02187055. Video Abstract (MP4 204475 KB).

Tofacitinib is a medicine used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (swollen and painful joints). A total of 4400 patients with moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis who were taking part in tofacitinib clinical trials completed a survey about their general health and well-being at that time. We used their answers to determine whether they were likely to have depression or anxiety. We then looked at how common depression or anxiety was in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and whether having depression or anxiety affected how patients responded to tofacitinib treatment. It is important to note that tofacitinib is not approved for the treatment of depression or anxiety, and these clinical trials were not designed to assess whether tofacitinib improved depression or anxiety symptoms. About 40% of patients likely had depression or anxiety when they started a clinical trial. This percentage decreased among patients who received tofacitinib treatment over a year. Patients treated with tofacitinib showed more improvement in their depression or anxiety than those treated with placebo. Over a year of treatment, tofacitinib improved signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, for example, the number of swollen or painful joints and fatigue. Having depression or anxiety did not change the way that patients responded to tofacitinib. This research shows how treating rheumatoid arthritis symptoms may also improve depression and anxiety symptoms. However, specially designed studies are needed to confirm this.

Humoral and T Cell Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and T cell response after a two-dose regimen of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this observational study, patients with RA who are ≥18 years of age and vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 according to the Argentine National Health Ministry's vaccination strategy were included. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies (ELISA-COVIDAR test), neutralizing activity (cytotoxicity in VERO cells), and specific T cell response (IFN-γ ELISpot Assay) were assessed after the first and second dose. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients with RA were included. Mostly, homologous regimens were used, including Gam-COVID-Vac (27.5%), ChAdOx1 (24.2%), and BBIBP-CorV (22.5%). The most frequent combination was Gam-COVID-Vac/mRNA-1273 (21.7%). After the second dose, 81.7% presented with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, 70.0% presented with neutralizing activity, and 65.3% presented with specific T cell response. The use of BBIBP-CorV and treatment with abatacept (ABA) and rituximab (RTX) were associated with undetectable antibodies and no neutralizing activity after two doses. BBIBP-CorV was also associated with the absence of T cell response. The total incidence of adverse events was 357.1 events per 1,000 doses, significantly lower with BBIBP-CorV (166.7 events per 1,000 doses, P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: In this RA cohort vaccinated with homologous and heterologous regimens against COVID-19, 2 out of 10 patients did not develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, 70% presented with neutralizing activity, and 65% presented with specific T cell response. The use of BBIBP-CorV was associated with deficient humoral and cellular response, whereas treatment with ABA and RTX resulted in an impaired anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG formation and neutralizing activity.

Hyposalivation and periodontal disease as oral non-articular characteristics in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association among rheumatoid arthritis (RA), saliva production, and periodontal status. METHODS: An observational study was carried out on 103 subjects with RA and 103 without RA matched by sex and age. Rheumatologic evaluation included serological and clinical variables. A full mouth periodontal examination was performed according to the American Academy of Periodontology (1999). Resting and stimulated whole salivary flows were determined after spiting during 5 min. RESULTS: RA was associated with a higher prevalence of severe periodontitis (12% vs. 4%), with a marked reduction in resting and stimulated saliva production, and with a higher prevalence of resting (19% vs. 0%) and also stimulated hyposalivation (54% vs. 10%), compared with the control group. The differences in mean resting and stimulated salivary flows between RA and control groups persisted after the exclusion of people with hyposalivation. Saliva production was not associated with the presence or the severity of periodontal disease, or with the rheumatic clinical characteristics of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: More than 50% of people with RA have some degree of reduction in their salivary flows, an affection not associated with the periodontal status or rheumatic activity, which are the expression of the two related inflammatory diseases. The influence of autonomic dysfunction on hyposalivation can be considered. While periodontitis would be a disease-associated comorbidity of RA, poor saliva production should be included among the extra-articular manifestations. Key Points • Rheumatoid arthritis patients are more prone to suffer from periodontitis and/or hyposalivation. • Periodontal disease is more prevalent in people with rheumatoid arthritis and also an association was found between the severities of both pathologies. • More than 50% of people with RA would have some degree of reduction in their salivary flows, an affection not associated with the periodontal status or rheumatic activity. • Reduced saliva production in rheumatoid arthritis patients should be included among the extra-articular manifestations.

Reporte de pacientes con espondiloartritis y arteritis de Takayasu en Argentina: ¿asociación causal o casual? / Report of patients with spondyloarthritis and Takayasu's arteritis in Argentina: is it a causal or casual association?

Introducción: tanto las espondiloartritis (EspA) como la arteritis de Takayasu (TAK) son enfermedades infrecuentes y su asociación es aún más rara. Objetivos: presentar una serie de pacientes con diagnóstico concomitante de EspA o con rasgos de EspA y TAK en Argentina, y realizar una revisión de la literatura respecto de esta asociación. Materiales y métodos: se recopilaron las características demográficas, clínicas y terapéuticas de pacientes con diagnóstico concomitante de EspA o con algunos rasgos de EspA y TAK, de distintos centros de salud de la República Argentina. Resultados: se describen 7 pacientes, de los cuales 4 presentaban EspA, uno con compromiso axial (EspAax) juvenil, otro con artritis psoriásica (APs), otro con espondilitis anquilosante (EA) y el último con EspAax pura, y 3 de ellos tuvieron rasgos de EspA (enfermedad Crohn, psoriasis y oligoartritis asimétrica de grandes articulaciones). En la mayoría de los casos, los rasgos de EspA se presentaron con una mediana de 4 años antes de la TAK. Conclusiones: varios reportes y series de casos relatan la superposición entre estas dos enfermedades. Si bien las mismas podrían compartir cierta base genética común, todavía no contamos con evidencia sólida que permita estimar que esta asociación no es casual.

Introduction: both spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) are rare diseases, and their association is even rarer. Objectives: to present a series of patients with a concomitant diagnosis of SpA or with features of SpA and TAK in Argentina and review the literature regarding this association. Materials and methods: the demographic, clinical and therapeutic characteristics of patients with a concomitant diagnosis of SpA or with some features of SpA and TAK were collected from different health centers in Argentina. Results: 7 patients are described, of which 4 had SpA, one with juvenile axial involvement (axSpA), another with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), another with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and the last patient with pure axSpA and 3 of them had features of SpA (Crohn's disease, psoriasis and asymmetric oligoarthritis of large joints). In most cases, SpA features presented a median of 4 years before TAK. Conclusions: several case reports and case series reported overlap between these two diseases. Although they could share a certain common genetic basis, we still do not have solid evidence that allows us to estimate that this association is not coincidental.

Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) comprises a spectrum of chronic inflammatory manifestations affecting the axial skeleton and represents a challenge for diagnosis and treatment. Our objective was to generate a set of evidence-based recommendations for the management of axSpA for physicians, health professionals, rheumatologists and policy decision makers in Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) countries. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation-ADOLOPMENT methodology was used to adapt existing recommendations after performing an independent systematic search and synthesis of the literature to update the evidence. A working group consisting of rheumatologists, epidemiologists and patient representatives from countries within the Americas prioritized 13 topics relevant to the context of these countries for the management of axSpA. This Evidence-Based Guideline article reports 13 recommendations addressing therapeutic targets, the use of NSAIDs and glucocorticoids, treatment with DMARDs (including conventional synthetic, biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs), therapeutic failure, optimization of the use of biologic DMARDs, the use of drugs for extra-musculoskeletal manifestations of axSpA, non-pharmacological interventions and the follow-up of patients with axSpA.

Compared efficacy of rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to methotrexate or TNF inhibitors agents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare the efficacy of rituximab, tocilizumab, and abatacept in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to treatments with MTX or TNFi agents. METHODS: We searched 6 databases until January 2023 for phase 2-4 RCTs evaluating patients with RA refractory to MTX or TNFi therapy treated with rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab (intervention arm) compared to controls. Study data were independently assessed by two investigators. The primary outcome was considered as achieving ACR70 response. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 19 RCTs, with 7,835 patients and a mean study duration of 1.2 years. Hazard ratios for achieving an ACR70 response at six months were not different among the bDMARDs, however, we found high heterogeneity. Three factors showing a critical imbalance among the bDMARD classes were identified: baseline HAQ score, study duration, and frequency of TNFi treatment in control arm. Multivariate meta-regression adjusted to these three factors were conducted for the relative risk (RR) for ACR70. Thus, heterogeneity was attenuated (I2 = 24%) and the explanatory power of the model increased (R2 = 85%). In this model, rituximab did not modify the chance of achieving an ACR70 response compared to abatacept (RR = 1.773, 95%CI 0.113-10.21, p = 0.765). In contrast, abatacept was associated with RR = 2.217 (95%CI 1.554-3.161, p < 0.001) for ACR70 compared to tocilizumab. CONCLUSION: We found high heterogeneity among studies comparing rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab. On multivariate metaregressions, if the conditions of the RCTs were similar, we estimate that abatacept could increase the chance of reaching an ACR70 response by 2.2-fold compared to tocilizumab.

Seguridad de las drogas biológicas y sintéticas dirigidas utilizadas en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inmunomediadas. Datos del registro BIOBADASAR 3.0 / Safety of biological and targeted synthetic drugs in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Data from the BIOBADASAR 3.0 registry

Introducción: conocer la seguridad de las drogas actualmente disponibles para el tratamiento de las enfermedades reumáticas es muy importante al momento de tomar decisiones terapéuticas objetivas e individualizadas en la consulta médica diaria. Asimismo, datos de la vida real amplían el conocimiento revelado por los ensayos clínicos. Objetivos: describir los eventos adversos (EA) reportados, estimar su frecuencia e identificar los factores relacionados con su desarrollo. Materiales y métodos: se utilizaron datos BIOBADASAR, un registro voluntario y prospectivo de seguimiento de EA de tratamientos biológicos y sintéticos dirigidos en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inmunomediadas. Los pacientes son seguidos hasta la muerte, pérdida de seguimiento o retiro del consentimiento informado. Para este análisis se extrajeron datos recopilados hasta el 31 de enero de 2023. Resultados: se incluyó un total de 6253 pacientes, los cuales aportaron 9533 ciclos de tratamiento, incluyendo 3647 (38,3%) ciclos sin drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad biológicas y sintéticas dirigidas (DME-b/sd) y 5886 (61,7%) con DME-b/sd. Dentro de estos últimos, los más utilizados fueron los inhibidores de TNF y abatacept. Se reportaron 5890 EA en un total de 2701 tratamientos (844 y 1857 sin y con DME-b/sd, respectivamente), con una incidencia de 53,9 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año (IC 95% 51,9-55,9). La misma fue mayor en los ciclos con DME-b/sd (71,1 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año, IC 95% 70,7-77,5 versus 33,7, IC 95% 31,5-36,1; p<0,001). Las infecciones, particularmente las de la vía aérea superior, fueron los EA más frecuentes en ambos grupos. El 10,9% fue serio y el 1,1% provocó la muerte del paciente. El 18,7% de los ciclos con DME-b/sd fue discontinuado a causa de un EA significativamente mayor a lo reportado en el otro grupo (11,5%; p<0,001). En el análisis ajustado, las DME-b/sd se asociaron a mayor riesgo de presentar al menos un EA (HR 1,82, IC 95% 1,64-1,96). De igual manera, la mayor edad, el mayor tiempo de evolución, el antecedente de enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, el diagnóstico de lupus eritematoso sistémico y el uso de corticoides se asociaron a mayor riesgo de EA. Conclusiones: la incidencia de EA fue significativamente superior durante los ciclos de tratamientos que incluían DME-b/sd.

Introduction: knowing the efficacy and safety of the drugs currently available for the treatment of rheumatic diseases is very important when making objective and individualized therapeutic decisions in daily medical consultation. Likewise, real-life data extends the knowledge revealed by clinical trials. Objectives: to describe the reported adverse events (AEs), estimate their frequency and identify factors associated to them. Materials and methods: BIOBADASAR data were used, which is a voluntary, prospective follow-up registry of AEs of biological and synthetic treatments in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Patients are followed until death, loss of followup, or withdrawal of informed consent. To carry out this analysis, the data collected up to January 31, 2023 was extracted. Results: a total of 6253 patients were included, who contributed with 9533 treatment periods, including 3647 (38.3%) periods without b/ts-DMARDs and 5886 (61.7%) with b/ts-DMARDs. Among the latter, the most used were TNF inhibitors and abatacept. A total of 5890 AEs were reported in a total of 2701 treatments (844 and 1857 without and with b/ts-DMARDs, respectively), with an incidence of 53.9 events per 1000 patients/ year (95% CI 51.9-55.9). It was higher during the periods with b/ts-DMARDs (71.1 events per 1000 patients/year, 95% CI 70.7-77.5 vs 33.7, 95% CI 31.5-36.1, p<0.001). Infections, particularly those of the upper respiratory tract, were the most frequent AEs in both groups. 10.9% were severe and 1.1% were associated with the death of the patient. 18.7% of the periods with b/ts-DMARDs were discontinued due to an AE, significantly higher than that reported in the other group (11.5%; p<0.001). In the adjusted analysis, b/ts-DMARDs were associated with a higher risk of presenting at least one AE (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.64-1.96). Similarly, older age, longer evolution time, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, and use of corticosteroids were associated with a higher risk of AE. Conclusions: the incidence of AEs was significantly higher during those treatment periods that included DME-b/sd.

Compared efficacy of rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to methotrexate or TNF inhibitors agents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract Background Our aim was to compare the efficacy of rituximab, tocilizumab, and abatacept in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to treatments with MTX or TNFi agents. Methods We searched 6 databases until January 2023 for phase 2-4 RCTs evaluating patients with RA refractory to MTX or TNFi therapy treated with rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab (intervention arm) compared to controls. Study data were independently assessed by two investigators. The primary outcome was considered as achieving ACR70 response. Results The meta-analysis included 19 RCTs, with 7,835 patients and a mean study duration of 1.2 years. Hazard ratios for achieving an ACR70 response at six months were not different among the bDMARDs, however, we found high heterogeneity. Three factors showing a critical imbalance among the bDMARD classes were identified: baseline HAQ score, study duration, and frequency of TNFi treatment in control arm. Multivariate meta-regression adjusted to these three factors were conducted for the relative risk (RR) for ACR70. Thus, heterogeneity was attenuated (I2 = 24%) and the explanatory power of the model increased (R2 = 85%). In this model, rituximab did not modify the chance of achieving an ACR70 response compared to abatacept (RR = 1.773, 95%CI 0.113-10.21, p = 0.765). In contrast, abatacept was associated with RR = 2.217 (95%CI 1.554-3.161, p < 0.001) for ACR70 compared to tocilizumab. Conclusion We found high heterogeneity among studies comparing rituximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab. On multivariate metaregressions, if the conditions of the RCTs were similar, we estimate that abatacept could increase the chance of reaching an ACR70 response by 2.2-fold compared to tocilizumab. Key messages Abatacept could increase the chance of reaching an ACR70 response by 2.2-fold compared to tocilizumab.

Estudio descriptivo de las adaptaciones de la consulta reumatológica durante la pandemia de COVID-19 / Descriptive study of the adaptations of the rheumatological consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introducción: la pandemia de COVID-19 tuvo un gran impacto en la sociedad en general. El aislamiento impuesto modificó las relaciones interpersonales, incluyendo las consultas médicas. Objetivos: describir las consultas reumatológicas en el Servicio de Reumatología del Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica (IREP) durante la pandemia por COVID-19, y compararlas con las recibidas durante 2019. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional. Se registraron las consultas recibidas durante marzo-septiembre de 2020. Se recolectaron datos sociodemográficos, número y motivo de las consultas realizadas por paciente. Se llevó a cabo un análisis de regresión logística múltiple para estimar las variables asociadas a la consulta presencial. Resultados: se registraron 1.703 consultas; 798 pacientes consultaron al menos una vez, la mediana de consulta por paciente fue de 3 (RIC 1-12). La principal vía de consulta fue por correo electrónico (57%), solo el 13% fue de forma presencial. El principal motivo fue la solicitud de recetas (60%) seguido por consultas por la enfermedad (23%). Se observó una reducción del total de las consultas con respecto al año previo del 57% (3.961) y una reducción mayor del 94% en el número de consultas presenciales (224). La consulta médica presencial durante la pandemia se asoció independientemente con el sexo masculino (OR: 2.4 IC 95% 1,6-3,6), la consulta por enfermedad de base (OR: 5.8 IC 95% 4,1-8,3) y la ausencia de cobertura social (OR: 2.3 IC 95% 1,6-3,3). Conclusiones: las consultas reumatológicas, especialmente las presenciales, disminuyeron sustancialmente durante la pandemia.

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic had a great impact on society in general. The imposed isolation modified interpersonal relationships, including medical consultations. Objectives: describe the rheumatologic consultations in the Rheumatology Service from Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica (IREP) during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare them with those received the previous year. Materials and methods: observational study. Consultations during March-September 2020 were recorded. Sociodemographics, numbers, and reasons for consultations made per patient were collected. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate variables associated with the in-person consultation. Results: 1,703 consultations were registered. 798 patients consulted at least 1 time, and the median number of consultations per patient was 3 (IQR 1-12). The main method of consultation was by email (57%); only 13% were in person. The main reason was requesting prescriptions (60%) followed by consultations for the disease (23%). We observed a reduction in the total number of consultations compared to the same period in 2019 of 57% (3,961 consultations) and an even greater reduction of 94% in the number of in-person consultations (224 consultations). In-person medical consultation during the pandemic was independently associated with male sex (OR: 2,4, 95%CI 1,6-3,6), consultation due to illness (OR: 5,8, 95%CI 4,1-8,3) and lack of social coverage (OR: 2,3. 95%CI 1,6-3,3). Conclusions: rheumatologic consultations, especially in-person, were substantially reduced during the pandemic.

Frecuencia de comorbilidades en pacientes con artritis psoriásica y evaluación de la adherencia de los médicos a las recomendaciones de tratamiento de las Guías GRAPPA 2015 / Frequency of comorbidities in patients with psoriatic arthritis and evaluation of the adherence of physicians to the treatment recommendations of the GRAPPA 2015 Guidelines

Introducción: los pacientes con artritis psoriásica (APs) presentan más comorbilidades. Las guías del Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) establecen lineamientos para los tratamientos de acuerdo a ellas. Objetivos: describir la prevalencia de comorbilidades en pacientes con APs según el Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI), analizar el efecto sobre la enfermedad y estudiar la adherencia a las guías GRAPPA. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional. Se incluyeron pacientes con APs de la cohorte RAPSODIA. Se reportaron características sociodemográficas y clínicas. Las comorbilidades se valoraron por RDCI. Se estudiaron variables asociadas a RDCI ≥1 mediante análisis multivariado. Se analizó el cumplimiento de las recomendaciones de tratamiento en relación a las comorbilidades según las guías GRAPPA. Resultados: se incluyeron 170 pacientes. El 67,6% presentó al menos una comorbilidad (RDCI ≥1); estos eran de mayor edad (X 57,3±12,7 años vs. 48,2±13,2 años; p<0,0001), presentaban más sobrepeso u obesidad (84,3% vs. 67,3%; p=0,011) y peor calidad de vida (PsAQoL X 7,6±6,6 vs. 5,2±6; p=0,025). El análisis multivariado evidenció asociación de la edad y el uso de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINEs) con RDCI ≥1. Contrariamente a las recomendaciones de GRAPPA, el 70% de los pacientes con cardiopatía utilizaba AINEs, y la mitad de aquellos con enfermedades hepáticas o renales tomaba AINEs o metotrexato. Conclusiones: la prevalencia de comorbilidades en los pacientes con APs es alta. En algunos casos no se cumplían las recomendaciones de tratamiento en relación a las comorbilidades.

Introduction: comorbidities are common in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The GRAPPA (Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis) guidelines strengthen the choice of treatments according to them. Objetives: to describe the prevalence of comorbidities in patients with psoriatic arthritis according to Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI) and to analyze the influence of them on disease activity, functional capacity and quality life and to assess adherence to GRAPPA 2015 treatment recommendations according to the presence of comorbidities. Materials and methods: adult patients with PsA (CASPAR criteria) from the RAPSODIA cohort were included. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, disease activity and current treatment were recorded. Comorbidities were assessed by the RDCI. Variables associated with RDCI≥1 were studied by multivariate analysis. Adherence to treatment recommendations in relation to the reported comorbidities was analyzed according to the 2015 GRAPPA guidelines. Results: a total of 170 patients were included. Patients with RDCI ≥1 were reported by 67.6%. These patients were older (57±13 years vs 48±13 years, p<0.0001), had a higher frequency of overweight or obesity (84.3% vs 67.3%, p=0.011), and had a poorer quality of life (PsAQoL 7.6±6.6 vs 5.2±6, p=0.025). The multivariate analysis showed an association between age and the use of NSAIDs with RDCI≥1. Contrary to GRAPPA recommendations, 70% of patients with heart disease were using NSAIDs. Moreover, about half of those with hepatic or kidney disease took NSAIDs or methotrexate. Conclusions: most patients with PsA presented at least one comorbidity. GRAPPA recommendations were not followed in a considerable number of patients.

Impacto de la presencia de depresión y ansiedad en pacientes con artritis psoriásica / Impact of depression and anxiety in patients with psoriatic arthritis

Introducción: un tercio de los pacientes con artritis psoriásica (APs) sufre ansiedad y/o depresión, lo que podría impactar negativamente en la actividad de la enfermedad. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron: evaluar la prevalencia de depresión y ansiedad en pacientes con APs, estudiar su asociación con diferentes factores sociodemográficos y clínicos, y determinar el efecto sobre los diferentes componentes de los índices compuestos de la actividad de la APs. Materiales y métodos: se incluyeron pacientes con APs que cumplían criterios de la Classification criteria of psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR). La depresión se definió según el Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) y la ansiedad según el cuestionario General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Se realizó regresión logística múltiple para identificar variables asociadas a ansiedad y depresión. Resultados: se incluyeron 100 pacientes con APs, de los cuales el 26% y el 59% presentaron depresión mayor y ansiedad respectivamente. Los pacientes con depresión mayor tuvieron mayor actividad de la enfermedad, dolor, fatiga, ansiedad, y menor educación formal y peor calidad de vida. Aquellos con ansiedad manifestaron mayor actividad de la enfermedad, dolor y fatiga, y peor calidad de vida y capacidad funcional. La alta actividad de la enfermedad y la menor educación formal se asociaron independientemente con depresión mayor. Conclusiones: la presencia de depresión mayor y ansiedad se asoció con mayor actividad de la enfermedad en pacientes con APs.

Introduction: nearly one-third of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients suffer from anxiety and/or depression. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with PsA, establish the relationship with different socio-demographic and clinical factors, and determine the effect of depression and anxiety on various components of disease activity scores. Materials and methods: patients with PsA who met the Classification criteria of psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR) criteria were included. Depression was defined according to the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and anxiety according to the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with anxiety and depression. Results: 100 patients were included. The prevalence of major depression and anxiety was 26% and 59%, respectively. Patients with major depression had higher disease activity, pain, fatigue and anxiety, less formal education and worse quality of life. In comparison those patients with anxiety showed higher disease activity, pain and fatigue and worse quality of life and functional capacity. High disease activity and low formal education were independently associated with the existence of major depression. Conclusions: patients with PsA who suffer from major depression and anxiety show higher disease activity levels.

Frecuencia de infección por SARS-CoV-2 en asistentes a un congreso médico en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Datos del Congreso Argentino de Reumatología 2021 / Frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection in attendees at a medical congress in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. Data from the Argentine Congress of Rheumatology 2021

Introducción: en el contexto de la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2, la Sociedad Argentina de Reumatología (SAR) organizó su congreso "híbrido" (presencial y virtual), en diciembre de 2021, en concordancia con la condición epidemiológica. El objetivo principal de este trabajo fue describir la frecuencia de nuevos casos de infección luego de asistir al Congreso y la opinión de los médicos sobre los aspectos de bioseguridad del evento, y como objetivo secundario, analizar las características de los asistentes durante la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2. Materiales y métodos: estudio transversal a través de una encuesta online, autoadministrada y anónima. Se encuestaron a los concurrentes (médicos y no médicos) al Congreso (presencial o virtual). La primera encuesta fue al momento de la inscripción y la segunda luego de 14 días de culminado, solo para los médicos. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de los resultados. Resultados: 1.322 individuos se inscribieron al Congreso; 1.039 (98,9%) eran médicos. 1.051 (79,5%) completaron la primera encuesta y 501 (48,2%) contestaron la segunda. Mientras 428 (85,4%) asistieron presencialmente, la virtualidad la eligieron aquellos con más años de ejercicio (p=0,023), con comorbilidades (p=0,03) y quienes tuvieron una internación previa por SARS-CoV-2 (p=0,05). Del total, 1.028 (97,8%) estaban vacunados. El 84,6% tuvo una opinión favorable sobre la modalidad "híbrida". Cinco (1,2%) presentaron síntomas de infección por SARS-CoV-2 y tres (0,7%) tuvieron confirmación diagnóstica. Conclusiones: cinco personas registraron la infección sintomática después del evento. Las medidas de bioseguridad tomadas fueron las aconsejadas por el Ministerio de Salud de la Nación y la opinión de los médicos sobre las mismas fueron favorables.

Introduction: in the context of the pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2, the Argentine Society of Rhematology organized its "hybrid" congress (face-to-face and virtual), on December 2021, in accordance with the epidemiological condition. The main objective of this work was to describe the frequency of new cases of infection after attending the Congress and the opinion of doctors on the biosafety aspects of the event, and as a secondary objective, to analyze the characteristics of those attending the Congress during the pandemic. by SARS-CoV-2. Materials and methods: cross-sectional study, through an online, self-administered and anonymous survey. The attendees (physician and non- physician) to the congress (face-to-face or virtual) were surveyed. The first survey was at the time of registration and the second after 14 days of finish, only for physicians. A descriptive analysis of the results was performed. Results: 1,322 subjects registered for Congress; 1,039 (98.9%) were physicians. 1,051 (79.5%) completed the first survey and 501 (48.2%) answered the second. While 428 (85.4%) attended in person, virtuality was chosen by those with more years of practice (p=0.023), with comorbidities (p=0.03) and those who had a previous hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 (p =0.05). Of the total, 1,028 (97.8%) were vaccinated. 84.6% had a favorable opinion about the "hybrid" modality. Five (1.2%) presented symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and three (0.7%) had diagnostic confirmation. Conclusions: five subjects had symptoms and three confirmed infections. The biosafety measures taken were those recommended by the Ministry of Health and the opinion of the colleagues about them was favorable.

Acceso al tratamiento con drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad biológicas o sintéticas dirigidas en pacientes con artritis reumatoidea / Access to treatment with biologic or synthetic targeted disease-modifying drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

En los últimos años el tratamiento de la artritis reumatoidea (AR) ha mejorado sustancialmente, no solo por la aparición de nuevas medicaciones, sino también por la implementación de la estrategia de tratamiento hacia el blanco o treat to target (T2T). El T2T tiene tres premisas importantes: un tratamiento temprano, un tratamiento intensivo y un tratamiento dirigido a un objetivo ideal que es la remisión de la enfermedad. Para el cumplimiento del T2T, el paciente con AR debe acceder rápidamente al médico reumatólogo. La European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recomienda que el paciente con AR temprana sea referido y atendido por el reumatólogo dentro de las primeras 6 semanas del inicio de los síntomas. La principal razón de esta premura radica en el inicio de un tratamiento específico con las denominadas drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad (diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs, DMARDs), ya sea DMARDs sintéticas convencionales (DMARDsc) como el metotrexato, o bien el ajuste del tratamiento con DMARDs biológicas (b) o sintéticas dirigidas (sd)

Consenso de inmunizaciones en adultos con enfermedades reumáticas inflamatorias crónicas autoinmunes / Consensus on immunizations in adults with autoimmune chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases

Aumento del riesgo de infecciones prevenibles y sus complicaciones en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inflamatorias crónicas (ERICA), con y sin tratamiento con inmunosupresores (IS), y beneficios de la vacunación.

Acceso al tratamiento con drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad, biológicas o sintéticas dirigidas en pacientes con artritis reumatoidea / Access to treatment with biologic or synthetic targeted disease-modifying drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

En los últimos años el tratamiento de la artritis reumatoidea (AR) ha mejorado sustancialmente, no solo por la aparición de nuevas medicaciones, sino también por la implementación de la estrategia de tratamiento hacia el blanco o treat to target (T2T). El T2T tiene tres premisas importantes: un tratamiento temprano, un tratamiento intensivo y un tratamiento dirigido a un objetivo ideal que es la remisión de la enfermedad. Para el cumplimiento del T2T, el paciente con AR debe acceder rápidamente al médico reumatólogo. La European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recomienda que el paciente con AR temprana sea referido y atendido por el reumatólogo dentro de las primeras 6 semanas del inicio de los síntomas. La principal razón de esta premura radica en el inicio de un tratamiento específico con las denominadas drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad (diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs, DMARDs), ya sea DMARDs sintéticas convencionales (DMARDsc) como el metotrexato, o bien el ajuste del tratamiento con DMARDs biológicas (b) o sintéticas dirigidas (sd)

Adherence to treatment with tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the adherence to treatment with Tofacitinib in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) using two versions of the self-questionnaire Compliance Questionnaire Rheumatology, CQR19 and CQR5, to determine the variables associated with adherence to Tofacitinib and to compare the performance of both questionnaires. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out. We included patients ≥18 years old, with RA (ACR/EULAR criteria 2010) under treatment with Tofacitinib. Sociodemographic data, clinical characteristics, treatment and data on patient evaluation. All the patients completed self-questionnaires CQR19 and CQR5. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics. t-Test or Mann Whitney to compare the continuous variables, Chi2 test or Fisher's exact test for the categorical ones. Kappa concordance index. Multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: We included 52 patients, 82.7% women, with a median (m) age of 57.7 years, disease duration m 16 years, 63.5% had comorbidities. Of the patients, 86.5% were treated with Tofacitinib (5 mg BID) and 48% received Tofacitinib as monotherapy. The median time of Tofacitinib treatment was 13 months, 42.3% suspended treatment, and only one patient permanently stopped treatment due to lack of provision. Median CQR19 was 89.5% and 84.6% had an adherence ≥ 80%. The variables significantly associated with adherence ≥ 80% were the presence of comorbidities (p = .014) and older age (p = .033). Considering the CQR5, a similar percentage of patients (82.7%) were adherents to treatment, however, the concordance with CQR19 was low. In the multivariate analysis, older age was the only variable independently associated with good adherence to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment adherence to Tofacitinib was very good for both presentations. Older age was associated with higher adherence. The agreement between the questionnaires CQR19 and CQR5 was low.

Disease activity and subcutaneous nodules are associated to severe periodontitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was significantly associated with increased overall risk of periodontitis, both chronic, inflammatory pathologies leading to connective tissue breakdown and bone destruction. To identify clinical and/or serological variables routinely evaluated during follow-up of people with RA which are associated with the severity of their periodontal disease. An observational, cross-sectional study was carried out, which included RA patients according to ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria having chronic periodontal disease. RA clinical parameters (disease duration, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum C-reactive protein, disease activity (DAS28) and rheumatoid factor, presence of bone erosions and rheumatic nodules) and also corticosteroid therapy were considered. Periodontitis was evaluated according to the American Academy of Periodontology (1999) and chronic periodontitis was assessed by full mouth periapical radiographic examination, periodontal probing depth, clinical attachment level and bleeding index. A total of 110 subjects with RA and chronic periodontitis were included. The female/male relation was 5.1, and no significant differences between genres were found in rheumatic or oral variables. RA patients with longer disease duration, higher disease activity and with rheumatic nodules had significantly greater periodontitis severity. Multivariate analysis confirmed that severe periodontitis was associated with DAS283 4.1 (OR 51.4, CI 95% 9.4-281.5) and the presence of rheumatic nodules (OR 6.4, CI 95% 1.3-31.6). Disease activity and rheumatic nodules were strongly associated with severe periodontitis. Based on these findings it would be desirable to include interdisciplinary management at an early stage of RA to ensure comprehensive treatment of both pathologies.

Respuesta immune humoral asociada a las vacunas contra SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con artritis reumatoidea: datos del registro SAR-CoVAC / Humoral immune response associated to the vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with rheumatic arthritis: data from the SAR-CoVAC registry

Introducción: la artritis reumatoidea (AR) y los tratamientos indicados para su manejo pueden afectar la respuesta a la vacuna para SARS-CoV-2. Sin embargo, aún no se cuenta con datos locales. Objetivos: evaluar la respuesta humoral de la vacuna para SARS-CoV-2 y su seguridad en esta población. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional. Se incluyeron pacientes ≥18 años, con AR ACR/EULAR 2010 que recibieron la vacunación para SARS-CoV-2. Detección de IgG anti-proteína S (kit COVIDAR). Resultados: se incluyeron 120 pacientes con AR. El 24,4% recibió tratamiento con glucocorticoides, 50,9% drogas biológicas y 13,3% inhibidores de JAK (janus kinases). El 6% había tenido infección por SARS-CoV-2 previamente. La vacuna más utilizada en la primera dosis fue Sputnik V (52,9%). El 25% recibió esquemas heterólogos. Luego de la primera dosis, el 59% presentó una prueba no reactiva o indeterminada, y un 18% luego de la segunda dosis. La aplicación de esquemas homólogos de vacuna Sinopharm (63,6% vs 13,3%, p<0,0001), y el uso de abatacept (27,3% vs 5,1%, p=0,005) y rituximab (18,2% vs 0%, p=0,001) al momento de la vacunación se asociaron a un resultado no reactivo o indeterminado. Conclusiones: similar a lo reportado en otras poblaciones internacionales, en esta cohorte, dos de cada 10 pacientes no desarrollaron anticuerpos. Una menor respuesta se asoció con la vacuna Sinopharm y al tratamiento con abatacept y rituximab.

Introduction: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its treatments can affect the response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. However, we still do not have local data. Objectives: to evaluate the humoral response of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and its safety in this population. Materials and methods: observational study. Patients ≥18 years of age, with RA ACR/EULAR 2010 who had received vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 were included. Detection of anti-protein S IgG (COVIDAR Kit). Results: a total of 120 patients with RA were included. A quarter was receiving glucocorticoids, 50.9% biological drugs and 13.3% JAK inhibitors (janus kinases). Only 6% had a history SARS-CoV-2 infection. The most used vaccine was Sputnik V (52.9%) and 25% received mixed regimenes. After the first dose, 59% had a non-reactive or indeterminate test, and after the second, 18% were still having this result. The application of homologous Sinopharm vaccine regimen (63.6% vs 13.3%, p<0.0001) and the use of abatacept (27.3% vs 5.1%, p=0.005) and rituximab (18.2% vs 0%, p=0.001) at vaccination was associated with a non-reactive or indeterminate result. Conclusions: similar to other international populations, in this cohort, two out of 10 patients did not develop antibodies. A lower response was associated with the Sinopharm vaccine and treatment with abatacept and rituximab.