Concomitant radio-chemotherapy based on platin compounds in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a meta-analysis of individual data from 1764 patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite several randomised trials comparing radiotherapy alone with concomitant radio-chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is not clear whether the addition of chemotherapy improves survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This meta-analysis was based on individual patient data from published and unpublished randomised trials which compared radiotherapy alone with the same radiotherapy combined with concomitant cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Trials with accrual completed after 2000 were excluded. Trials were sought in electronic databases, clinical trial registries and by additional manual searches. The primary endpoint was overall survival analysed using the log-rank test stratified by trials. RESULTS: There were twelve eligible trials that included a total of 1921 patients. The data from 3 trials were not available. Therefore, the analysis was based on 9 trials including 1764 patients. Median follow-up was 7.2 years. The hazard ratio of death among patients treated with radio-chemotherapy compared to radiotherapy alone was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.98; P = 0.02) corresponding to an absolute benefit of chemotherapy of 4% at 2 years. There was some evidence of heterogeneity among trials and sensitivity analyses did not lead to consistent results. The combination of platin with etoposide seemed more effective than platin alone. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant platin-based radio-chemotherapy may improve survival of patients with locally advanced NSCLC. However, the available data are insufficient to accurately define the size of such a potential treatment benefit and the optimal schedule of chemotherapy.

Combined modality trials of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of factors influencing survival and toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Combined modality therapy (CMT) is the standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, insufficient data are available regarding prognostic factors in this disease setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred and ninety-four patients included in five trials conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B evaluating CMT in stage III NSCLC were included in this analysis. The primary objective was to identify factors that were predictors of survival and selected radiation-related toxicities using Cox regression models and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The Cox model shows that performance status (PS) 1 [hazard ratio (HR) 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.45; P=0.009] and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) only (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.22-2.05; P=0.001) predicted for poorer survival, while baseline hemoglobin >/=12 g/dl predicted for improved survival (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.55-0.81; P 5% weight loss (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.3-6.6; P=0.008) and patients receiving concurrent chemoradiation (OR 7.3; 95% CI 3.4-15.6; P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline hemoglobin and PS, as well as the use of CMT, have the greatest effect on survival in unresectable stage III NSCLC. The use of concurrent chemoradiation increases the risk of esophagitis, which remains the primary radiation-related toxicity.

Carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer.

The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel in patients with untreated stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Carboplatin was administered intravenously (i.v.) at an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 with etoposide at either 80 or 100 mg/m2 i.v. days 1-3 and paclitaxel at 175 or 200 mg/m2 i.v. over 3 hours along with 5 g/kg of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor subcutaneously on days 4-18, repeated every 3 weeks for 6 courses. Thirty-one patients (five NSCLC and 26 SCLC) entered into this phase I study. The median age was 63 (range, 42 to 74 years), with 24 males and seven females. The recommended dose level for phase II testing was carboplatin AUC = 6, etoposide 80 mg/m2 days 1-3, and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours. With seven patients at this level, 14% had grade 4 neutropenia, 14% had grade 4 thrombocytopenia, none had grade 2/3 neurotoxicity, and no toxic deaths occurred. One of five (20%) patients with NSCLC responded, and 19 of 22 (86%) evaluable SCLC patients experienced a response to therapy. SCLC patients had a median survival of 10 months. The combination of carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel has significant activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with extensive SCLC.

Radiosensitization with carboplatin for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the administration of carboplatin concurrently with radiation treatment improves survival in patients with inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred eighty-three patients with inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer were entered onto a randomized trial by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Randomization was performed before initiation of any therapy. All patients received an induction chemotherapy program with vinblastine and cisplatin for 5 weeks, followed by 6,000 cGy of radiation therapy over 6 weeks. One hundred thirty-seven patients were randomized to this therapy regimen alone; 146 patients were randomized to receive carboplatin at 100 mg/m2/wk concurrent with the radiation therapy. RESULTS: The complete response was 18% with concurrent carboplatin versus 10% with radiotherapy alone (P = .101). There was no difference with respect to failure-free survival (10% with carboplatin and 9% with radiotherapy alone) or overall survival (13% with carboplatin and 10% with radiotherapy alone) at 4 years. In patients not receiving carboplatin, the relapse rate was 69% within the field of radiation and 53% in the boost volume. In patients receiving carboplatin, the relapse rate was 59% within the field of radiation and 43% in the boost volume. Patients with cancers more than 70 cm2 in size had significantly poorer survival (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Carboplatin at the dose and schedule used did not significantly impact on disease control or survival. The relapse rate within the chest remained more than 50%. More effective regimens will be required to impact on local disease control and survival.

High-dose paclitaxel plus G-CSF for malignant mesothelioma: CALGB phase II study 9234.

BACKGROUND: New agents with activity in mesothelioma are sorely needed. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) therefore performed a phase II study of high-dose paclitaxel in patients with malignant mesothelioma who had no prior chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients accrued to this multi-institutional phase II study of paclitaxel given as a 24-hour infusion at 250 mg/m2 every three weeks plus filgrastim (G-CSF) 300 mcg subcutaneously days 3-18. RESULTS: There were three (9%) regressions of evaluable disease. The median survival was five months (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.9-9.6 months), the one-year survival rate was 14% and the two-year survival rate was 6%. Toxicity was tolerable with one death from pneumonia (without neutropenia) on day 18 and a 23% rate of grade 4 granulocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The level of activity seen with paclitaxel is similar to that seen in other CALGB trials of the single agents carboplatin, trimetrexate and 5-azacytidine. Future studies of of paclitaxel (at lower doses) in combination with synergistic agents could be considered.

Phase I clinical study of fish oil fatty acid capsules for patients with cancer cachexia: cancer and leukemia group B study 9473.

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities of fish oil fatty acid capsules containing omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters. Twenty-two patients with neoplastic disease not amenable to curative therapy who had lost 2% of body weight over a previous 1 month time period were given an escalating dose of fish oil fatty acids. The maximum tolerated dose was found to be 0.3 g/kg per day of this preparation. This means that a 70-kg patient can generally tolerate up to 21 1-g capsules/day containing 13.1 g of eicosapentaenoic acid + docosahexaenoic acid, the two major omega-3 fatty acids. Dose-limiting toxicity was gastrointestinal, mainly diarrhea, and a poorly described toxicity designated as "unable to tolerate in esophagus or stomach." A patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia taking the fish oil provided an unusual opportunity to perform a detailed biochemical study of the effect of fish oil capsules on the lipids of malignant cells at several sequential time points in treatment. Studies of the malignant lymphocytes, serum, and whole blood of this one patient revealed an increase in eicosapentaenoic acid, the major component of the fish oil capsules, during fish oil capsule treatment. This study provides a scientific basis for the selection of omega-3 fatty acid doses for future studies in cancer. The maximum tolerated dose found is considerably higher than anticipated from published studies of many human diseases. The observation of a modification of the lipids of leukemic cells, serum, and blood in a patient with chronic leukemia provides a biochemical basis for a possible effect of fish oil supplements on cancer cachexia and tumor growth.

A Southwest Oncology Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B phase II study of doxorubicin, dacarbazine, ifosfamide, and mesna in adults with advanced osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Ewing's sarcomas, osteosarcomas, and rhabdomyosarcomas are significantly more responsive to chemotherapy than other sarcomas. Adjuvant chemotherapy is used routinely based on data from randomized trials. Although a percentage of children with locally advanced or metastatic tumors remain curable, few data exist regarding the tumor's natural history or response and survival in adults. METHODS: This Phase II study evaluated doxorubicin, dacarbazine, ifosfamide, and mesna (MAID) in adults with inoperable or metastatic Ewing's sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, or osteosarcoma. RESULTS: Between 1987-1991, 81 patients were entered; 69 patients were eligible. One patient died of neutropenic infection. Ten patients (14%) responded completely and 34 patients (49%) had a complete or partial response. Response rates were significantly higher for patients with Ewing's sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma than for those with osteosarcoma (77%, 64%, and 26%, respectively; P < 0.005). Although there were no significant differences in progression free survival by histology, survival for patients with Ewing's sarcoma was significantly longer than for patients with osteosarcoma (P = 0.004.) At the time of last follow-up, 7 patients (10%) were alive without progression: 3 with Ewing's sarcoma, 1 with osteosarcoma, and 3 with rhabdomyosarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: MAID chemotherapy is an active regimen in adults with advanced or metastatic Ewing's sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. Although there was no direct comparison with a doxorubicin and cisplatin-based regimen, the response rate and survival in patients with osteosarcoma suggest that doxorubicin and cisplatin-based chemotherapy would remain the accepted initial chemotherapy regimen. For patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma, 10-20% of patients remained disease free at 5 years.

Subcutaneous interleukin-2 as initial therapy for patients with extensive small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

In a prior Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB), 16% of a small cohort of patients with extensive small call lung cancer who had failed to obtain a complete remission with chemotherapy did obtain a complete remission after therapy with interleukin-2 (IL-2). In this current trial, 10 patients with extensive small cell lung cancer who had had no prior therapy were treated with subcutaneous IL-2 as induction therapy and then standard chemotherapy with etoposide/cisplatin. Only one patient experienced an objective response to the IL-2 administered prior to chemotherapy. The factors governing response to IL-2 in the first trial but not in this trial are discussed.

A phase II study evaluating the efficacy of carboplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer and extensive small cell lung cancer.

We initiated a phase II pilot study to determine whether adding paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) to combination carboplatin/etoposide is tolerable and active in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and extensive small cell lung cancer. Patients were given carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6) followed by etoposide 80 to 100 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 through 3 followed by paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours on day 3. On days 4 through 18, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg/kg was administered subcutaneously. Each cycle was repeated every 21 days. Fourteen patients have been accrued to the study and 12 were evaluated for toxicity, the first 10 of whom were treated with 80 mg/m2 etoposide. Among the first 10 evaluable patients, significant grade 4 neutropenia occurred in one patient, grade 4 thrombocytopenia in three patients, grade 2 neuropathy in two patients, and grade 3 neurotoxicity in two patients. None of the four patients with non-small cell lung cancer responded to treatment, while six of seven small cell lung cancer patients have obtained major responses to therapy. We have increased the etoposide dose to 100 mg/m2 in subsequent patients. The combination chemotherapy regimen of carboplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel is tolerable and active in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Phase I trial of etoposide, carboplatin, and GM-CSF in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study (CALGB 8832).

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of etoposide and carboplatin without growth factor support was previously defined by Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) as 200 and 125 mg/m2/day x 3, respectively, given every 28 days to previously untreated patients who have extensive, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Myelosuppression was dose-limiting. The purpose of this phase I trial was to determine if granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support allows the dosage of the combination of etoposide and carboplatin to be increased above the previously determined MTD. In this CALGB study of 44 evaluable patients with performance status 0-2, cohorts were treated with etoposide and carboplatin given intravenously on days 1-3 followed by GM-CSF (molgramostim) given subcutaneously on days 4-18. Four dose levels of bacteria-derived recombinant GM-CSF (5, 10, 20 microg/kg/day and 5 microg/kg every 12 h), three dose levels of etoposide (200, 250, and 300 mg/m2/day x 3), and two dose levels of carboplatin (125 and 150 mg/m2/day x 3) were evaluated. There was no chemotherapy dose escalation in individual patients. With 5 microg/kg/d GM-CSF, the first etoposide and carboplatin cycle of 300 and 150 mg/m2/day x 3, respectively, could be administered with acceptable toxicity. However, GM-CSF did not allow repeated administration of this dose-escalated regimen every 21 days, since delayed platelet and/or neutrophil recovery was dose limiting in later cycles. These results demonstrate that GM-CSF alone has limited capability to support the repeated administration of high doses of etoposide and carboplatin. CALGB currently is testing the ability of interleukin (IL)-6 given with GM-CSF to ameliorate the cumulative myelosuppression of this intense regimen.

Recruiting cancer patients to participate in motivating their relatives to quit smoking. A cancer control study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 9072).

BACKGROUND: A diagnosis of cancer provides a teachable moment in which a physician can counsel or teach the patient. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B hypothesized that this teachable moment could also be used to encourage counseling of the patients' relatives who smoke. The authors' first study sought to determine the feasibility of such an intervention, the cooperation of the patients, and the compliance of relatives who were smokers. The long-range goal is to recruit by mail a large population of adult smokers into an intervention program and to assist them in quitting cigarette smoking. METHODS: Oncologists and their clinical research associates asked recently diagnosed cancer patients to identify their relatives who were smokers and assist in persuading them to quit. Consenting patients spoke to relatives and mailed them a personalized motivational leaflet along with a list of the benefits of quitting smoking. Intervention was continued only with relatives who were contacted in this manner. The participating physicians then wrote to the smokers, advising them to quit; enclosed with each physician's letter were the National Cancer Institute booklet "Clearing the Air," which is about quitting smoking, and a questionnaire determining "stage of change" (the stage of the smoker's inaction or action regarding quitting smoking). After 6 months, a postintervention questionnaire was mailed to the relatives. RESULTS: Written consent was obtained from 89% of 144 eligible patients solicited. Eighty percent of patients involved in the study contacted relatives. Sixty-three percent of contacted relatives returned the first questionnaire and 40% answered the second. Nine percent of all contacted relatives reported having quit smoking after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention proved to be feasible and will lead to the next study, which will randomize relatives who smoke within a more intensive intervention over 12 months and compare the results with nonintervention controls.

Randomized trial of vinorelbine compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized trial was performed to compare the effectiveness of intravenous vinorelbine tartrate with intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) on the primary end points of survival, quality of life (QOL), and relief of cancer-related symptoms in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Secondary end points included tumor response rates and time to treatment failure. In addition, the safety of both treatment regimens was evaluated in this multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixteen patients with stage IV NSCLC were enrolled onto this study from 18 centers. Vinorelbine was administered at a dose of 30 mg/m2/wk. 5-FU/LV was administered at a dose of 425 mg/m2 and 20 mg/m2, respectively, for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Patients with progressive disease or toxicity were removed from study while responding and stable patients were continued on therapy. RESULTS: The median survival time of patients who received vinorelbine was 30 weeks, with 25% of patients alive at 1 year, compared with a median survival time of 22 weeks and 16% of patients alive at 1 year for those treated with 5-FU/LV (P = .03, log-rank test). This improvement in survival was associated with a higher objective response rate (12% v 3%) and time to treatment failure (10 weeks v 8 weeks) for vinorelbine versus 5-FU/LV. The dose-limiting toxicity of vinorelbine was granulocytopenia, with 54% of patients experiencing grade 3/4 granulocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity of vinorelbine was generally grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 toxicities were related to injection-site reactions. CONCLUSION: This trial confirms the efficacy of vinorelbine in patients with advanced NSCLC. The clinical activity and relatively favorable toxicity profile of this agent make it a reasonable and useful treatment option in the management of patients with this disease.

A phase I/II trial of etoposide and cisplatin in extensive small cell lung cancer: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

Patients with untreated extensive small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with CALGB performance scores 0-2 were treated with etoposide 200 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 and cisplatin doses of 20, 30, or 35 mg/m2/day days 1-3 in a Phase I/II format. Of the nine patients treated at the 35 mg/m2/day cisplatin dose in the Phase I portion of the study, Grade 4 leukopenia occurred in five patients and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia in four. There were two deaths due to myelosuppression and sepsis. This dose was thus considered the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and a Phase II trial was then conducted using this treatment program. In the Phase II trial of 39 patients, the objective response rate was 67% (95% confidence interval, 50-81%) with 21% complete responses (CI 9-36%). Median survival was 10.5 months. Grade 4-5 leukopenia was seen in 57% and Grade 4-5 thrombocytopenia in 56%. The MTD defined by this Phase I trial represents a 67-100% increase in etoposide and a 32-42% increase in cisplatin dosage compared to prior studies. The observed objective response rates with this regimen are comparable to studies using conventional doses, but hematological toxicity was higher.

A randomized phase II study of ifosfamide/mesna/cisplatin plus G-CSF or etoposide/cisplatin plus G-CSF in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

This Phase II study was designed to determine the efficacy of two chemotherapy regimens with G-CSF support for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One-hundred and one patients with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and performance status 0-1 were randomized to receive ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2 days 1-3, mesna 400 mg/m2 at 0, 4, 6 h days 1-3, cisplatin 33 mg/m2 days 1-3 or etoposide 200 mg/m2 days 1-3, cisplatin 35 mg/m2 days 1-3. Both groups received G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg SQ day 4 to the post day 11 absolute neutrophil count > 10 000. For the 47 eligible patients receiving ifosfamide/mesna/cisplatin, the response rate was 26% (95% confidence interval: 14-40%) and the median survival 7.5 months (95% confidence interval: 5.8-11.0 months). Grade 3 or worse toxicities were: neutropenia 75%, thrombocytopenia 70%, infection 21%. There were two treatment-related deaths due to infection. For course 1, the median absolute neutrophil count nadir was 1.3, platelet nadir 96 000 and incidence of febrile neutropenia 16%. For the 48 eligible patients receiving etoposide/cisplatin, the response rate was 21% (95% confidence interval: 11-35%) and median survival 5.8 months (95% confidence interval: 4.5-9.7 months). Grade 3 or worse toxicities were: neutropenia 90%, thrombocytopenia 58%, infection 29%. There were three treatment-related deaths due to infection. For course 1, the median absolute neutrophil count was 0.2, platelet nadir 80 000 and incidence of febrile neutropenia 33%. For both ifosfamide/mesna/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin, median duration of Grade IV neutropenia was short (< or = 4 days), time to subsequent courses 21 days and dose delivered > 95% of planned dose. Although G-CSF allowed full doses of drugs to be delivered on schedule, both ifosfamide/mesna/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin produced response rates and survival similar to other cisplatin-based regimens. In view of the significant cost of G-CSF and no obvious improvement in response rate, survival or toxicity profile, G-CSF cannot be recommended with these chemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Neurotoxicity in a phase I trial of continuous infusion cisplatin with hyperfractionated radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Both twice daily fractionated radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin with once-daily radiotherapy have been shown to improve local disease control in patients with head and neck cancer. The objective of this phase I trial was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of cisplatin which could be given as a continuous infusion concurrent with twice-daily radiotherapy to patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. METHODS: Patients were treated with radiotherapy at doses of 110 cGy twice daily for 5 days per week to a total dose of 7040-7590 cGy. Concurrent with radiotherapy, patients received continuous-infusion cisplatin for 5 days per week. Groups of 3-6 patients were treated with doses of 1-3 mg/m2/day. RESULTS: Central nervous system toxicity became dose-limiting. At 1 mg/m2, 2 mg/m2, and 3 mg/m2 confusion was observed and one patient had a seizure. At 3 mg/m2, another patient suffered severe sensory and motor neuropathy. Despite bulky tumors, 12 of the 14 patients had an objective response and 3 achieved a complete response. CONCLUSION: the combination of twice-daily fractionated radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin by continuous infusion is severely toxic and achieves results similar to less toxic programs. It is not recommended for further investigation or therapy.

Phase II trial of edatrexate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Edatrexate is an analog of methotrexate which in vitro demonstrated activity against human colon cancer xenografts grown in nude mice. In a phase II trial, 12 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and no prior chemotherapy were treated with Edatrexate 80 mg/m2/week for an initial period of 8 weeks. No objective responses were observed. Edatrexate is inactive against colon cancer at the dose and schedule used in this trial.

Etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin at maximum tolerated dose in non-small cell lung carcinoma: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

A multi-institutional cooperative group trial was undertaken by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of cisplatin and intravenous etoposide for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The doses used were those previously determined to be the maximally tolerated dose of this drug combination. Forty patients were entered into the trial, 37 of whom were eligible for evaluation. Cisplatin (35 mg/M2/day for 3 days) and etoposide (200 mg/M2/day for 3 days) were administered every 28 days for a planned 6 cycles of therapy. Sixteen of 37 evaluable patients (43%) responded to therapy. Myelosuppression was the dominant toxicity, with 89% of the patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia, and nearly half grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Median survival was 8.5 months, with 30% of the patients alive at 1 year and 10% alive at 2 years. Malaise, fatigue, and peripheral neuropathy were the other major toxicities. The combination of etoposide at the dose of 200 mg/M2/day for 3 days and cisplatin at 35 mg/M2/day for 3 days is a highly potent combination against metastatic non-small cell carcinoma.

Nonoperative management of non-small cell lung cancer: the current cancer and leukemia group B experience.

The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) is studying nonoperative management in two subgroups of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In patients with regional disease, primarily those with bulky N2 or T4 disease or those with contralateral mediastinal involvement (N3), a phase III trial is under way to explore concurrent carboplatin as intensification of local therapy and additional systemic treatment. This builds on prior CALGB work demonstrating the benefits of induction chemotherapy prior to radiation for selected patients with stage III disease. For patients with still more advanced disease, a trial evaluating efficacy and cost of two supportive care modalities during intensive chemotherapy is about to begin accrual. Following its completion, the CALGB plans to evaluate new chemotherapy combinations based on one or more of the exciting new agents now being tested for the nonoperative management of non-small cell lung cancer.

A phase II study of recombinant beta-interferon at maximum tolerated dose in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

Forty-one patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were entered into a phase II study of high dose recombinant interferon (rIFN)-beta. Patients received intravenous (i.v.) rIFN-beta on a Monday, Wednesday, Friday schedule with a weekly dose escalation until > or = grade 3 toxicity or 720 x 10(6) IU/dose was achieved. Thirty-eight patients were eligible. Seventeen patients received the highest planned dose of rIFN-beta and 11 experienced dose-limiting toxicity at lower doses. Ten patients developed progressive disease before grade 3 toxicity was reached. There were no objective responses observed. Significant and dose-limiting toxicities included nausea and vomiting, fever, rigors, severe dyspnea, hypotension, and hypertension. IFN-beta has no measurable antitumor activity against NSCLC even at maximum tolerated doses (MTDs).

A feasibility study of extended chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of cancer and leukemia group B.

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of additional chemotherapy beyond 5 weeks of vinblastine-cisplatin followed by radiation therapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. In this randomized phase II trial, the goal was to determine, in a similar population of patients, the toxicity of either of two additional chemotherapy programs. Ninety-one patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer received the same induction regime of vinblastine/cisplatin/radiotherapy. In patients randomized to regime 1, an additional four cycles of vinblastine/cisplatin were given after the radiotherapy. In regimen 2, six weekly doses of carboplatin were given concurrent with the radiotherapy. The additional four cycles of vinblastine and cisplatin were completed by 34% of patients; the concurrent carboplatin program was completed by 70% of patients. Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 53% of patients on regime 1 versus 17% on regime 2 (p < 0.003); grade 3 or 4 nausea/vomiting occurred in 20% of those on regime 1 versus 7% on regimen 2 (p = 0.175). Response rates and survival were similar for the two regimens, with approximately 30% of patients surviving at 2 years. Given the reduced toxicity and the improved capacity to complete the planned therapy with the concurrent carboplatin treatment, this regimen will be further examined in a phase III trial.