Uncharted Territories: Dynamic Hip Screw Migration Into the Pelvis Requiring Laparotomy.

Hip fractures are common in patients with poor bone quality and are seen to affect the elderly and frail population. We report a case of implant failure after fixing an unstable intertrochanteric fracture with a dynamic hip screw (DHS). The patient presented with a DHS that had migrated into the pelvis approximately six months after surgery. Plain radiographs showed migration of the DHS through the acetabulum and into the pelvis. Migration of DHS into the pelvis is an extremely rare complication and has only been reported a few times. A 71-year-old man presented with a fall and confusion. The patient reported having a fall but could not recall the exact events. Past medical history included Alzheimer's dementia, osteoporosis, left total hip replacement, right DHS, peripheral neuropathy, and recurrent falls. He had undergone reduction and fixation of a right intertrochanteric fracture with DHS implant via direct lateral approach six months before hospital admission. On examination, he had right-sided hip pain and was unable to straighten leg raise. His abdomen was soft and non-tender, with no distension or palpable masses. Neurovascular status was normal, and no signs of infection were detected. On the anteroposterior radiograph, the implant seemed to have migrated through the acetabulum and into the abdomen. A CT of the abdomen and pelvis was performed to identify any visceral injuries (negative) and for surgical planning. The patient underwent a midline laparotomy to remove the implant. Although the exact reason for the implant failure is unknown, the migration of an unbroken hip screw into the abdomen and pelvis requiring laparotomy has not been reported in literature.

Variation in Visiting and Isolation Policies in Neonatal Units: A U.K. Nationwide Survey.

Global pandemics, such as H1N1, are a major risk for neonatal patients. We surveyed U.K. tertiary and district neonatal units about visiting and infection control policies relating to viral respiratory infections. There was marked variation with visiting policies, tertiary units being more restrictive. Isolation, screening, and outbreak management of infected babies was highly variable posing a risk in future pandemics.

Outcomes of Nosocomial Viral Respiratory Infections in High-Risk Neonates.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Neonatal respiratory disease, particularly bronchopulmonary dysplasia, remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in newborn infants. Recent evidence suggests nosocomially acquired viral respiratory tract infections (VRTIs) are not uncommon in the NICU. The goal of this study was to assess the association between nosocomial VRTIs, neonatal respiratory disease, and the health care related costs. METHODS: A matched case-control study was conducted in 2 tertiary NICUs during a 6-year period in Nottingham, United Kingdom. Case subjects were symptomatic neonatal patients with a confirmed real-time polymerase chain reaction diagnosis of a VRTI. Matched controls had never tested positive for a VRTI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test for associations with key respiratory outcomes. RESULTS: There were 7995 admissions during the study period, with 92 case subjects matched to 183 control subjects. Baseline characteristics were similar, with a median gestation of 29 weeks. Rhinovirus was found in 74% of VRTIs. During VRTIs, 51% of infants needed escalation of respiratory support, and case subjects required significantly more respiratory pressure support overall (25 vs 7 days; P < .001). Case subjects spent longer in the hospital (76 vs 41 days; P < .001), twice as many required home oxygen (37%; odds ratio: 3.94 [95% confidence interval: 1.92-8.06]; P < .001), and in-hospital care costs were significantly higher (£49 664 [$71 861] vs £22 155 [$32 057]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Nosocomial VRTIs in neonatal patients are associated with significant greater respiratory morbidity and health care costs. Prevention efforts must be explored.

Distraction of Mental Arithmetic by Background Speech.

When solving mental arithmetic problems, one can easily be distracted by someone speaking in the background and this distraction is greater if the speech comprises numbers. We explored the basis of this disruption by asking participants to solve mental addition problems (e.g., "45 + 17 = ?") in three different conditions: background speech comprising numbers in ascending order (e.g., "61, 62, 63, 64, 65"), background speech comprising numbers in descending order (e.g., "65, 64, 63, 62, 61"), and quiet. Performance was best in quiet, worse in the descending numbers condition, and poorest in the ascending numbers condition. In view of these findings, we suggest that disruption arises as a by-product of preventing the primed, but inaccurate, candidate responses from assuming the control of action. Alternative explanations are also discussed.