ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate whether a portable, tablet-based central auditory processing (CAP) test system using native language training videos and administered by minimally trained community health workers can produce CAP results comparable to previously published norms. Our secondary aim was to determine subject parameters that influence test results. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Community-based settings in Chontales, Nicaragua, New Hampshire, and Florida. PATIENTS: English- and/or Spanish-speaking children and adolescents (n = 245; average age, 12.20 yr; range, 6-18 yr). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Completion of the following tests with responses comparable to published norms: Pure-tone average (PTA), gap detection threshold (GDT), fixed-level frequency threshold, masking level difference (MLD), Hearing in Noise Test (HINT), Dichotic Digits Test (DDT), and Frequency Pattern Recognition (FPR) test. RESULTS: GDT, HINT, and DDT had comparable results to previously published normative values. MLD and FPR results differed compared with previously published normative values. Most CAP tests (MLD, GDT, HINT) results were independent of age and PTA (p = 0.1-0.9). However, DDT was associated with age and PTA (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric CAP testing can be successfully completed in remote low- and middle- income country environments using a tablet-based platform without the presence of an audiologist. Performance on DDT improved with age but deteriorated with hearing loss. Further investigation is warranted to assess the variability of FPR.
Subject(s)
Deafness , Developing Countries , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Auditory Perception , Hearing TestsABSTRACT
A series of articles discussing advanced diagnostics that can be used to assess noise injury and associated noise-induced hearing disorders (NIHD) was developed under the umbrella of the United States Department of Defense Hearing Center of Excellence Pharmaceutical Interventions for Hearing Loss working group. The overarching goals of the current series were to provide insight into (1) well-established and more recently developed metrics that are sensitive for detection of cochlear pathology or diagnosis of NIHD, and (2) the tools that are available for characterizing individual noise hazard as personal exposure will vary based on distance to the sound source and placement of hearing protection devices. In addition to discussing the utility of advanced diagnostics in patient care settings, the current articles discuss the selection of outcomes and end points that can be considered for use in clinical trials investigating hearing loss prevention and hearing rehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced , Humans , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/etiology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/prevention & control , Noise , CochleaABSTRACT
Speech perception testing, defined as providing standardized speech stimuli and requiring a listener to provide a behavioral and scored response, has been an integral part of the audiologic test battery since the beginning of the audiology profession. Over the past several decades, limitations in the diagnostic and prognostic validity of standard speech perception testing as routinely administered in the clinic have been noted, and the promotion of speech-in-noise testing has been highlighted. This review will summarize emerging and innovative approaches to speech-in-noise testing with a focus on five applications: (1) pediatric considerations promoting the measurement of sensory and cognitive components separately; (2) appropriately serving underrepresented populations with special attention to racial, ethnic, and linguistic minorities, as well as considering biological sex and/or gender differences as variables of interest; (3) binaural fitness for duty assessments of functional hearing for occupational settings that demand the ability to detect, recognize, and localize sounds; (4) utilization of speech-in-noise tests in pharmacotherapeutic clinical trials with considerations to the drug mechanistic action, the patient populations, and the study design; and (5) online and mobile applications of hearing assessment that increase accessibility and the direct-to-consumer market.
Subject(s)
Speech Perception , Humans , Child , Speech Perception/physiology , Speech , Noise , Hearing/physiology , Hearing TestsABSTRACT
Noise exposure is encountered nearly everyday in both recreational and occupational settings, and can lead to a number of health concerns including hearing-loss, tinnitus, social-isolation and possibly dementia. Although guidelines exist to protect workers from noise, it remains a challenge to accurately quantify the noise exposure experienced by an individual due to the complexity and non-stationarity of noise sources. This is especially true for impulsive noise sources, such as weapons fire and industrial impact noise which are difficult to quantify due to technical challenges relating to sensor design and size, weight and power requirements. Because of this, personal noise dosimeters are often limited to a maximum 140 dB SPL and are not sufficient to measure impulse noise. This work details the design of a body-worn noise dosimeter (mNOISE) that processes both impulse and continuous noise ranging in level from 40 dBA-185 dBP (i.e. a quiet whisper to a shoulder fired rocket). Also detailed is the capability of the device to log the kurtosis of the sound pressure waveform in real-time, which is thought to be useful in characterizing complex noise exposures. Finally, we demonstrate the use of mNOISE in a military-flight noise environment. Clinical Relevance- On-body noise exposure monitoring can be used by audiologists industrial hygiene personnel and others to determine threshold of injury adequate hearing protection requirements and ultimately reduce permanent noise-induced hearing loss.
Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced , Noise, Occupational , Occupational Exposure , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/etiology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/prevention & control , Humans , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Occupations , Radiation Dosimeters/adverse effectsABSTRACT
This paper presents reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (RETSPLs) for the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System (WAHTS), a recently commercialized device developed for use as a boothless audiometer. Two initial studies were conducted following the ISO 389-9 standard [ISO 389-9 (2009). "Acoustics-Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 9: Preferred test conditions for the determinations of reference hearing threshold levels" (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva)]. Although the standard recruitment criteria are intended to yield otologically normal test subjects, the recruited populations appeared to have slightly elevated thresholds [5-10 dB hearing level (HL)]. Comparison of WAHTS thresholds to other clinical audiometric equipment revealed bias errors that were consistent with the elevated thresholds of the RETSPL populations. As the objective of RETSPLs is to ensure consistent thresholds regardless of the equipment, this paper presents the RETSPLs initially obtained following ISO 389-9:2009 and suggested correction to account for the elevated HLs of the originally recruited populations. Two additional independent studies demonstrate the validity of these corrected thresholds.
Subject(s)
Audiometry , Hearing Tests , Acoustics , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Humans , SoundABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: HIV positive (HIV+) individuals with otherwise normal hearing ability show central auditory processing deficits as evidenced by worse performance in speech-in-noise perception compared with HIV negative (HIV-) controls. HIV infection and treatment are also associated with lower neurocognitive screening test scores, suggesting underlying central nervous system damage. To determine how central auditory processing deficits in HIV+ individuals relate to brain alterations in the cortex involved with auditory processing, we compared auditory network (AN) functional connectivity between HIV+ adults with or without speech-in-noise perception difficulties and age-matched HIV- controls using resting-state fMRI. DESIGN: Based on the speech recognition threshold of the hearing-in-noise test, twenty-seven HIV+ individuals were divided into a group with speech-in-noise perception abnormalities (HIV+SPabnl, 38.2 ± 6.8 years; 11 males and 2 females) and one without (HIV+SPnl 34.4 ± 8.8 years; 14 males). An HIV- group with normal speech-in-noise perception (HIV-, 31.3 ± 5.2 years; 9 males and 3 females) was also enrolled. All of these younger and middle-aged adults had normal peripheral hearing determined by audiometry. Participants were studied using resting-state fMRI. Independent component analysis was applied to identify the AN. Group differences in the AN were identified using statistical parametric mapping. RESULTS: Both HIV+ groups had increased functional connectivity (FC) in parts of the AN including the superior temporal gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, and Rolandic operculum compared to the HIV- group. Compared with the HIV+SPnl group, the HIV+SPabnl group showed greater FC in parts of the AN including the middle frontal and inferior frontal gyri. CONCLUSIONS: The classical auditory areas in the temporal lobe are affected by HIV regardless of speech perception ability. Increased temporal FC in HIV+ individuals might reflect functional compensation to achieve normal primary auditory perception. Furthermore, increased frontal FC in the HIV+SPabnl group compared with the HIV+SPnl group suggest that speech-in-noise perception difficulties in HIV-infected adults also affect areas involved in higher-level cognition, providing imaging evidence consistent with the hypothesis that HIV-related neurocognitive deficits can include central auditory processing deficits.
Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex , HIV Infections , Speech Perception , Adult , Audiometry , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Female , HIV Infections/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Noise , Speech Perception/physiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Sampling distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at multiple f2/f1 ratios and f2 frequency values produces a DPOAE "map." This study examined the efficacy of DPOAE mapping compared with pure tone audiometry and standard DPOAEs for detecting noise effects in subjects exposed to loud sound. DESIGN: A map significance score was developed as a single measure of map change. Significance scores were evaluated before and after exposure to: loud music (LM), controlled noise (CN), and firing range noise (FR) in three separate sets of subjects. Scores were compared to audiometry and standard DPOAE results in the LM study. STUDY SAMPLE: The LM and CN exposure studies involved 22, and 20 healthy young subjects respectively with normal hearing. Eight Marines were studied before and after FR exposure. RESULTS: After LM exposure, audiometry showed significant changes at 1, 2, 4, and 6 kHz. Standard DPOAE measures were also significantly different at several frequencies. Map significance scores detected changes more effectively and showed the distribution of DPOAE alterations. CONCLUSIONS: Map significance scores detected changes after noise exposure more reliably than audiometry and standard DPOAEs. Additionally, maps showed a diffuse response to sound exposure perhaps explaining why individual DP-grams appear less sensitive.
Subject(s)
Music , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Audiometry, Pure-Tone/methods , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The development of neurocognitive deficits in people infected with HIV is a significant public health problem. Previous cross-sectional studies have shown that performance on central auditory tests (CATs) correlates with cognitive test results in those with HIV, but no longitudinal data exist for confirmation. We have been performing longitudinal assessments of central auditory and cognitive function on a cohort of HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania to understand how the central auditory system could be used to study and track the progress of central nervous system dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the project was to determine if CATs can track the trajectory of cognitive function over time in people diagnosed with HIV. METHODS: Tests of peripheral and central auditory function as well as cognitive performance were performed on 382 individuals over the course of 3.5 years. Visits were scheduled every 6 months. CATs included tests of auditory temporal processing (gap detection) and speech perception in noise (Hearing in Noise Test and Triple Digit Test). Cognitive tests included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA), and subtests from the Cogstate battery. HIV-positive subjects were divided into groups based on their CAT results at their final visit (bottom 20%, top 20%, middle 60%). Primary analyses focused on the comparison between HIV-positive individuals that performed worse on CATs (bottom 20%) and the overall HIV-positive group (middle 60%). Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models with time as the main fixed effect. RESULTS: The group with the worst (bottom 20%) CAT performance showed a difference in trajectory for the MoCA (P=.003), TOVA (P<.048), and Cogstate (P<.046) over the course of the study period compared to the overall HIV-positive group. A battery of three CATs showed a significant difference in cognitive trajectory over a relatively short study period of 3.5 years independent of age (bottom 20% vs HIV-positive group). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the ability for CATs to track cognitive function over time, suggesting that central auditory processing can provide a window into central nervous system performance. CATs can be simple to perform, and are relatively insensitive to education and socioeconomic status because they only require repeating sentences, numbers, or detecting gaps in noise. These tests could potentially provide a time-efficient, low-cost method to screen for and monitor cognitive decline in patients with HIV, making them a useful surveillance tool for this major public health problem.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) mapping characterises cochlear function, can include both the 2f1-2f2 and 2f2-2f1 DPOAEs, and shows promise for tracking cochlear changes. DPOAE amplitude measurements are not as repeatable longitudinally as pure-tone audiometry, likely due in part to probe placement sensitivity. We hypothesised that DPOAE level map variation over multiple testing sessions could be minimised by replacing traditional rubber tips with custom-moulded probe tips. DESIGN: Traditional rubber tips (TRT) and custom-moulded probes tips (CMPT) were used to measure DPOAE level maps repeatedly over five sessions. Probe placement was assessed using a frequency sweep in the ear canal. Repeatability of the DPOAE level maps was assessed using a Bland-Altman analysis. Overall map repeatability was assessed by measuring differences in distortion product amplitude over sessions. STUDY SAMPLE: Crossover study with a convenience sample size of six adults. RESULTS: The CMPT frequency sweeps showed reduced variability in probe placement. The repeatability coefficient for individual DPOAEs measurements improved from 6.9 dB SPL with the TRT to 5.1 dB SPL with the CMPT. Map repeatability improved for most subjects with the CMPT.
Subject(s)
Cochlea , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Cross-Over Studies , Culture , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Determine whether an electronic tablet-based Wireless Automated Hearing-Test System can perform high-quality audiometry to assess schoolchildren for hearing loss in the field in Nicaragua. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: A school and hospital-based audiology clinic in Jinotega, Nicaragua. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Second and third graders (nâ=â120) were randomly selected for hearing testing in a school. Air conduction hearing thresholds were obtained bilaterally using a Wireless Automated Hearing-Test System at 1000, 2000, and 4000âHz. Referral criteria were set at more than 25âdBHL at one or more frequencies. A cohort of children was retested with conventional audiometry in a hospital-based sound booth. Factors influencing false-positive examinations, including ambient noise and behavior, were examined. RESULTS: All children with hearing loss were detected using an automated, manual, or two-step (those referred from automated testing were tested manually) protocol in the school (sensitivityâ=â100%). Specificity was 76% for automated testing, 97% for manual testing, and 99% for the two-step protocol. The variability between thresholds obtained with automated testing was greater than manual testing when compared with conventional audiometry. The percentage of participant responses when no stimulus tone was presented during automated testing was higher in children with false-positive examinations. CONCLUSION: A Wireless Automated Hearing-Test System identified all children with hearing loss in a challenging field setting. A two-step protocol (those referred from automated testing are tested manually) reduced false-positive examinations and unnecessary referrals. Children who respond frequently when no tone is presented are more likely to have false-positive automated examinations and should be tested manually.
Subject(s)
Hearing , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Nicaragua , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Objective: The recent emphasis on outcomes-based medical research has motivated a need for technology that allows researchers and clinicians to reach a larger and more diverse subject population for recruitment and testing.Design: This article reports on open-source mobile software (TabSINT) that enables researchers to administer customised hearing tests and questionnaires on tablets located across multiple sites. Researchers create and modify test protocols using text-based templates and deploy it to the tablets via a cloud-based repository or USB-computer connection. Results are exported locally to the tablet SD card and can also be automatically posted to a cloud-based database.Results: Between 2014 and 2019, TabSINT collected 25,000+ test results using more than 200+ unique test protocols for researchers located worldwide.Conclusions:TabSINT is a powerful software system with the potential to greatly enhance research across multiple disciplines by enabling access to subject cohorts in remote and disparate locations. Released open-source, this software is available to researchers across the world to use and adapt to their specific needs. Researchers with engineering resources can contribute to the repository to extend the capability and robustness of this software.
Subject(s)
Audiology , Biomedical Research/methods , Medical Informatics Applications , Software , Database Management Systems , Hearing , Humans , Internet , Software DesignABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Evidence suggests damage to brain auditory pathways, rather than inner ear damage, underlies the hearing difficulties HIV+ individuals report. But, antiretroviral therapy (ART) may affect the hearing system and also lead to hearing complaints. DESIGN: Longitudinal study of HIV+ and HIV- individuals in Dar es Salaam Tanzania. A subset of this cohort started ART while in the study allowing the effects of ART to be studied directly. METHODS: The ability to hear quiet sounds (pure-tone audiometry), cochlear outer hair cell function [distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs)], and gaps-in-noise detection thresholds (a central auditory processing test) were assessed at each visit. Visits were scheduled for 6-month intervals, but the number and spacing of visits varied. In the group that started ART while in the study, 107 HIV+ individuals had audiometric thresholds, 98 had DPOAEs, and 98 had gap measurements suitable for analysis. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with time and starting ART as fixed effects and individual participant repeated measures as random effects. RESULTS: Starting ART did not affect audiometric or gap detection thresholds. The slope of the DPOAE amplitude vs. time relationship was more negative after starting ART but did not differ from the HIV- group. Gap thresholds were higher in the HIV+ group. CONCLUSION: ART did not affect audiometric thresholds significantly suggesting common ART drugs are not major ototoxins. The gap detection results from the study show effects on central auditory processing in HIV+ individuals, supporting the origin of HIV-related hearing complaints in the central auditory system.
Subject(s)
Brain Diseases/complications , HIV Infections/complications , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Retroviral Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Child , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Tanzania , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Validate use of the Extended Speech Intelligibility Index (ESII) for prediction of speech intelligibility in non-stationary real-world noise environments. Define a means of using these predictions for objective occupational hearing screening for hearing-critical public safety and law enforcement jobs. DESIGN: Analyses of predicted and measured speech intelligibility in recordings of real-world noise environments were performed in two studies using speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) and intelligibility measures. ESII analyses of the recordings were used to predict intelligibility. Noise recordings were made in prison environments and at US Army facilities for training ground and airborne forces. Speech materials included full bandwidth sentences and bandpass filtered sentences that simulated radio transmissions. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 22 adults with normal hearing (NH) and 15 with mild-moderate hearing impairment (HI) participated in the two studies. RESULTS: Average intelligibility predictions for individual NH and HI subjects were accurate in both studies (r2 ≥ 0.94). Pooled predictions were slightly less accurate (0.78 ≤ r2 ≤ 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: An individual's SRT and audiogram can accurately predict the likelihood of effective speech communication in noise environments with known ESII characteristics, where essential hearing-critical tasks are performed. These predictions provide an objective means of occupational hearing screening.
Subject(s)
Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Reception Threshold Test/standards , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hearing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Noise , Perceptual Masking , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Speech Reception Threshold Test/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article is to highlight mobile technology that is not yet standard of care but could be considered for use in an ototoxicity monitoring programme (OMP) as an adjunct to traditional audiometric testing. Current guidelines for ototoxicity monitoring include extensive test protocols performed by an audiologist in an audiometric booth. This approach is comprehensive, but it may be taxing for patients suffering from life-threatening illnesses and cost prohibitive if it requires serial clinical appointments. With the use of mobile technology, testing outside of the confines of the audiometric booth may be possible, which could create more efficient and less burdensome OMPs. DESIGN: A non-systematic review of new OMP technology was performed. Experts were canvassed regarding the impact of new technology on OMPs. STUDY SAMPLE: OMP devices and technologies that are commercially available and discussed in the literature. RESULTS: The benefits and limitations of portable, tablet-based technology that can be deployed for efficient ototoxicity monitoring are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: New mobile technology has the potential to influence the development and implementation of OMPs and lower barriers to patient access by providing time efficient, portable and self-administered testing options for use in the clinic and in the patient's home.
Subject(s)
Computers, Handheld , Drug Monitoring/instrumentation , Hearing Loss/chemically induced , Hearing Tests/instrumentation , Hearing/drug effects , Telemedicine/instrumentation , Diffusion of Innovation , Drug Monitoring/methods , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Tests/methods , Humans , Mobile Applications , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Telemedicine/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Human immunodeficiency virus positive (HIV+) individuals report hearing difficulties, but standard audiological tests show no, or small, changes in peripheral hearing ability. The hearing complaints may reflect central nervous system (CNS) auditory processing deficits, rather than middle or inner ear problems, and may result from CNS damage due to HIV infection or treatment. If central auditory task performance and cognitive deficits in HIV+ individuals are shown to be related, then central auditory tests might serve as a "window" into CNS function in these patients. DESIGN: We measured cognitive performance (Mandarin Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]) and speech in noise perception (Mandarin hearing-in-noise test [HINT]) in 166 normal-hearing HIV+ individuals (158 men, 8 women, average age 36 years) at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center in Shanghai, China. Data collection included audiometry, tympanometry, and the Amsterdam Inventory of Auditory Handicap (AIAH), which assesses the subjective ability to understand speech and localize sound. RESULTS: Subjects had no middle ear disease and met criteria for normal-hearing sensitivity (all thresholds 20 dB HL or less). A significant negative relationship between speech reception thresholds (SRT) and MoCA scores (r = 0.15, F = 28.2, p < 0.001) existed. Stepwise linear regression showed that when the factors of age, MoCA scores, hearing thresholds, and education level were considered, only age and MoCA scores contributed independently to the SRT results (overall model r = 0.30, F = 38.8, p < 0.001). Subjective hearing complaints from the AIAH supported the HINT results. AIAH and MoCA scores were also related (r = 0.05, F = 8.5, p = 0.004), with those with worse MoCA scores having more problems on the AIAH. When the cohort was divided into those with normal and abnormal performance on the MoCA, those with abnormal performance on the MoCA had significantly higher average SRTs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding speech in noise measured both objectively with the HINT and subjectively with the AIAH was inversely related to cognitive abilities despite a normal ability to hear soft sounds determined by audiometry. Although age was also an important independent factor affecting speech perception, the age relationship within the speech findings in this study may represent more than just age-related declines in speech in noise understanding. Although reliable data on disease duration are not available, the older members of this cohort likely had HIV longer and probably had more severe symptoms at presentation than the younger members because early detection and treatment of HIV in Shanghai has improved over time. Therefore, the age relationship may also include elements of disease duration and severity. Speech perception, especially in challenging listening conditions, involves cortical and subcortical centers and is a demanding neurological task. The problems interpreting speech in noise HIV+ individuals have may reflect HIV-related or HIV treatment-related, central nervous damage, suggesting that CNS complications in HIV+ individuals could potentially be diagnosed and monitored using central auditory tests.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , HIV Infections/psychology , Hearing Loss/etiology , Noise , Speech Perception , Acoustic Impedance Tests , Adult , Age Factors , Audiometry , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Female , HIV Infections/complications , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Perceptual Masking , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Hearing loss from ototoxicity is often most pronounced at high frequencies. To improve patient monitoring and compliance, high-frequency testing methods should be short and easy to administer. We evaluated the repeatability and accuracy of a Békésy-like, fixed-level frequency threshold (FLFT) technique. This test takes less than a minute and could provide a rapid and effective way to determine the highest audible frequency. We hypothesized the FLFT test would be repeatable in normal-hearing subjects, and accurate when compared with Békésy fixed-frequency audiometry in the sensitive region for ototoxicity (SRO). DESIGN: Twenty-nine normal-hearing subjects (20 females, 9 males) performed 2 different automated audiometry tests at least 4 times over a period of no less than 3 weeks. Ages ranged from 23 to 35 years (average = 28 years). Subjects completed testing under Sennheiser HDA-200 headsets. Initial fixed-frequency audiometry thresholds were obtained at frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 20 kHz to identify each subject's highest audible frequency, which was used to determine the SRO. The SRO was defined as the seven frequencies at and below the highest audible frequency in 1/6-octave steps. These frequencies were monitored with fixed-frequency audiometry. At each session, the FLFT test was administered at 80 dB SPL. Subjects used a Békésy-style tracking method to determine the frequency threshold. All testing was completed in a sound booth (single wall, Industrial Acoustics Company) using a computerized, laptop-based, system. FLFT repeatability was calculated as the root mean square difference from the first test session. FLFT accuracy was calculated as the difference from the highest audible frequency determined from fixed-frequency audiometry interpolated to 80 dB SPL level. RESULTS: The FLFT average RMSD for intersession variability was 0.05 ± 0.05 octaves. The test showed no learning effect [F(3,78) = 0.7; p = 0.6]. The overall intersession variability for SRO fixed-frequency audiometry thresholds at all frequencies was within clinically acceptable test-retest variability (10 dB) at 5.8 dB (range 2.7 to 9.9 dB). The SRO fixed-frequency audiometry therefore served as a repeatable basis of comparison for accuracy of the FLFT test. The mean absolute difference between the fixed-frequency audiometry and FLFT-determined highest audible frequency was 0.03 octaves. The FLFT and the highest audible frequency via fixed-frequency audiometry at 80 dB SPL were not different statistically (p = 0.12). The FLFT took approximately 30 seconds to complete, compared with approximately 4.5 min for fixed-frequency audiometry SRO and 20 to 25 min for a traditional ototoxic audiometric assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The Békésy-style FLFT was repeatable within 1/12 octave (1 step size in the testing procedure). The FLFT agreed well with the highest audible frequency determined via fixed-frequency audiometry at 80 dB SPL. The FLFT test is amenable to automatic and self-administration and may enable quick, accurate, noise-tolerant ototoxicity, and high-frequency hearing monitoring.
Subject(s)
Audiometry, Pure-Tone/methods , Auditory Threshold , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Adult , Audiometry/methods , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Hearing Loss/chemically induced , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Reproducibility of Results , Young AdultABSTRACT
Speech communication often takes place in noisy environments; this is an urgent issue for military personnel who must communicate in high-noise environments. The effects of noise on speech recognition vary significantly according to the sources of noise, the number and types of talkers, and the listener's hearing ability. In this review, speech communication is first described as it relates to current standards of hearing assessment for military and civilian populations. The next section categorizes types of noise (also called maskers) according to their temporal characteristics (steady or fluctuating) and perceptive effects (energetic or informational masking). Next, speech recognition difficulties experienced by listeners with hearing loss and by older listeners are summarized, and questions on the possible causes of speech-in-noise difficulty are discussed, including recent suggestions of "hidden hearing loss". The final section describes tests used by military and civilian researchers, audiologists, and hearing technicians to assess performance of an individual in recognizing speech in background noise, as well as metrics that predict performance based on a listener and background noise profile. This article provides readers with an overview of the challenges associated with speech communication in noisy backgrounds, as well as its assessment and potential impact on functional performance, and provides guidance for important new research directions relevant not only to military personnel, but also to employees who work in high noise environments.
Subject(s)
Military Personnel/psychology , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Perceptual Masking , Recognition, Psychology , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Perception , Speech , Audiometry, Speech , Ear Protective Devices , Environmental Monitoring , Hearing , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/psychology , Humans , Noise, Occupational/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the test-retest variability of hearing thresholds obtained with an innovative, mobile wireless automated hearing-test system (WAHTS) with enhanced sound attenuation to test industrial workers at a worksite as compared to standardised automated hearing thresholds obtained in a mobile trailer sound booth. DESIGN: A within-subject repeated-measures design was used to compare air-conducted threshold tests (500-8000 Hz) measured with the WAHTS in six workplace locations, and a third test using computer-controlled audiometry obtained in a mobile trailer sound booth. Ambient noise levels were measured in all test environments. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty workers served as listeners and 20 workers served as operators. RESULTS: On average, the WAHTS resulted in equivalent thresholds as the mobile trailer audiometry at 1000, 2000, 3000 and 8000 Hz and thresholds were within ±5 dB at 500, 4000 and 6000 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable performance may be obtained with the WAHTS in occupational audiometry and valid thresholds may be obtained in diverse test locations without the use of sound-attenuating enclosures.
Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/instrumentation , Acoustics/instrumentation , Audiometry/instrumentation , Auditory Threshold , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/diagnosis , Hearing , Manufacturing Industry , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Wireless Technology/instrumentation , Adult , Automation , Equipment Design , Female , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/etiology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/physiopathology , Occupational Diseases/psychology , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of ResultsSubject(s)
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/etiology , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Tinnitus/etiology , Acoustics , Auditory Pathways/physiopathology , Auditory Perception , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Hearing , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/psychology , Humans , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/physiopathology , Occupational Diseases/psychology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Tinnitus/diagnosis , Tinnitus/physiopathology , Tinnitus/psychologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In methamphetamine (MA) users, drug-induced neurocognitive deficits may help to determine treatment, monitor adherence, and predict relapse. To measure these relationships, we developed an iPhone app (Neurophone) to compare lab and field performance of N-Back, Stop Signal, and Stroop tasks that are sensitive to MA-induced deficits. METHODS: Twenty healthy controls and 16 MA-dependent participants performed the tasks in-lab using a validated computerized platform and the Neurophone before taking the latter home and performing the tasks twice daily for two weeks. RESULTS: N-Back task: there were no clear differences in performance between computer-based vs. phone-based in-lab tests and phone-based in-lab vs. phone-based in-field tests. Stop-Signal task: difference in parameters prevented comparison of computer-based and phone-based versions. There was significant difference in phone performance between field and lab. Stroop task: response time measured by the speech recognition engine lacked precision to yield quantifiable results. There was no learning effect over time. On an average, each participant completed 84.3% of the in-field NBack tasks and 90.4% of the in-field Stop Signal tasks (MA-dependent participants: 74.8% and 84.3%; healthy controls: 91.4% and 95.0%, respectively). Participants rated Neurophone easy to use. CONCLUSION: Cognitive tasks performed in-field using Neurophone have the potential to yield results comparable to those obtained in a laboratory setting. Tasks need to be modified for use as the app's voice recognition system is not yet adequate for timed tests.