Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Pain ; 164(10): 2343-2351, 2023 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278657

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Pain with bladder filling remains an unexplained clinical presentation with limited treatment options. Here, we aim to establish the clinical significance of bladder filling pain using a standardized test and the associated neural signature. We studied individuals diagnosed with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) recruited as part of the multidisciplinary approach to the study of chronic pelvic pain (MAPP) study. Patients with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (N = 429) and pain-free controls (N = 72) underwent a test in which they consumed 350 mL of water and then reported pain across an hour-long period at baseline and 6 months. We used latent class trajectory models of these pain ratings to define UCPPS subtypes at both baseline and 6 months. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain postconsumption was used to examine neurobiologic differences between the subtypes. Healthcare utilization and symptom flare-ups were assessed over the following 18 months. Two distinct UCPPS subtypes were identified, one showing substantial pain related to bladder filling and another with little to no pain throughout the test. These distinct subtypes were seen at both baseline and 6 month timepoints. The UCPPS subtype with bladder-filling pain (BFP+) had altered morphology and increased functional activity in brain areas involved in sensory and pain processing. Bladder-filling pain positive status predicted increased symptom flare-ups and healthcare utilization over the subsequent 18 months when controlling for symptom severity and a self-reported history of bladder-filling pain. These results both highlight the importance of assessing bladder filling pain in heterogeneous populations and demonstrate that persistent bladder-filling pain profoundly affects the brain.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Urinary Bladder , Humans , Urinary Bladder/diagnostic imaging , Neurobiology , Symptom Flare Up , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis
2.
Urology ; 161: 31-35, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35021046

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine how often urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) patients progressed from Pelvic Pain Only at baseline to Widespread Pain, or vice versa, during 1-year longitudinal follow-up. METHODS: Men and women with UCPPS enrolled in the MAPP-I Epidemiology and Phenotyping Study completed a self-report body map to indicate their locations of pain every 2 months over 12 months. Patients were categorized at each assessment into one of three pain phenotypes: (1) Pelvic Pain Only, (2) an Intermediate group, (3) Widespread Pain. Only patients who completed 3 or more follow-ups were included in this longitudinal analysis. The primary outcome measure was pain classification at the majority (≥60%) of follow-up assessments. Longitudinal trends of somatic symptom burden were also assessed. RESULTS: Among the 93 UCPPS participants with Pelvic Pain Only at baseline, only 2% (n = 2) showed a Widespread Pain phenotype for the majority of assessments over 12 months. Among the 121 participants who had Widespread Pain at baseline, 6% (n = 7) demonstrated Pelvic Pain Only for the majority of assessments over 12 months. Over half of participants (≥53%) stayed in their baseline phenotypic group. Somatic symptom burden remained stable over 12 months for each of the groups with high intra-class correlation coefficient (0.67 to 0.82). CONCLUSION: It was uncommon for UCPPS patients to progress from Pelvic Pain Only to Widespread Pain, or vice versa, over 12 months. These data suggest that Pelvic Pain Only and Widespread Pain are distinct UCPPS phenotypes that are relatively stable over 12 months of follow up.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Genital Diseases, Female , Medically Unexplained Symptoms , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Phenotype , Syndrome
3.
World J Urol ; 36(10): 1545-1553, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29845320

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Neurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury has significant consequences for patients' health and quality of life. Regular surveillance is required to assess the status of the upper and lower urinary lower urinary tracts and prevent their deterioration. In this review, we examine surveillance techniques in neurogenic bladder, describe common complications of this disease, and address strategies for their management. METHODS: This work represents the efforts of SIU-ICUD joint consultation on Urologic Management of the Spinal Cord injury. For this specific topic, a workgroup was formed and comprehensive literature search of English language manuscripts regarding neurogenic bladder management was performed using key words of neurogenic bladder. Articles were compiled, and recommendations in the chapter are based on group discussion and follow the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine system for Levels of Evidence (LOEs) and Grades of Recommendation (GORs). RESULTS: At a minimum, patients should undergo an annual history and physical examination, renal functional testing (e.g., serum creatinine), and upper tract imaging (e.g., renal ultrasonography). The existing evidence does not support the use of other modalities, such as cystoscopy or urodynamics, for routine surveillance. Urologic complications in neurogenic bladder patients are common and often more complex than in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: There is a shortage of high-quality evidence to support any particular neurogenic bladder surveillance protocol. However, there is consensus regarding certain aspects of regular genitourinary system evaluation in these patients. Proper surveillance allows the clinician to avoid or address common urological complications, and to guide, alter, or maintain appropriate therapeutic regimens for individual patients.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/complications , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Quality of Life , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/diagnosis , Urodynamics , Urology
4.
J Pain ; 19(7): 717-726, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29412183

ABSTRACT

Chronic pain conditions occurring in the lower abdomen and pelvis are common, often challenging to manage, and can negatively affect health-related quality of life. Methodological challenges in designing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for these conditions likely contributes to the limited number of available treatments. The goal of this systematic review of RCTs of pharmacologic treatments for irritable bowel syndrome and 3 common chronic pelvic pain conditions are to: 1) summarize the primary end points and entry criteria, and 2) evaluate the clarity of reporting of important methodological details. In total, 127 RCTs were included in the analysis. The most common inclusion criteria were a minimum pain duration (81%), fulfilling an established diagnostic criteria (61%), and reporting a minimum pain intensity (42%). Primary end points were identified for only 57% of trials. These end points, summarized in this article, were highly variable. The results of this systematic review can be used to inform future research to optimize the entry criteria and outcome measures for pain conditions occurring in the lower abdomen and pelvis, to increase transparency in reporting to allow for proper interpretation of RCT results for clinical and policy applications, and to facilitate the aggregation of data in meta-analyses. PERSPECTIVE: This article summarizes entry criteria and outcome measures and the clarity of reporting of these important design features in RCTs of irritable bowel syndrome and 3 common chronic pelvic pain conditions. These results can be used to improve design of future trials of these largely unaddressed pain conditions.


Subject(s)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome/drug therapy , Pelvic Pain/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Research Design/standards , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...