Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nat Commun ; 14(1): 7712, 2023 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38001088

ABSTRACT

Follicular helper T (Tfh) cells are essential for the formation of high affinity antibodies after vaccination or infection. Although the signals responsible for initiating Tfh differentiation from naïve T cells have been studied, the signals controlling sequential developmental stages culminating in optimal effector function are not well understood. Here we use fate mapping strategies for the cytokine IL-21 to uncover sequential developmental stages of Tfh differentiation including a progenitor-like stage, a fully developed effector stage and a post-effector Tfh stage that maintains transcriptional and epigenetic features without IL-21 production. We find that progression through these stages are controlled intrinsically by the transcription factor FoxP1 and extrinsically by follicular regulatory T cells. Through selective deletion of Tfh stages, we show that these cells control antibody dynamics during distinct stages of the germinal center reaction in response to a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Together, these studies demonstrate the sequential phases of Tfh development and how they promote humoral immunity.


Subject(s)
T Follicular Helper Cells , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , Immunity, Humoral , Germinal Center , Cell Differentiation , Transcription Factors
2.
Cell Rep ; 38(8): 110399, 2022 02 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35139367

ABSTRACT

Follicular helper T (Tfh) cells promote, whereas follicular regulatory T (Tfr) cells restrain, germinal center (GC) reactions. However, the precise roles of these cells in the complex GC reaction remain poorly understood. Here, we perturb Tfh or Tfr cells after SARS-CoV-2 spike protein vaccination in mice. We find that Tfh cells promote the frequency and somatic hypermutation (SHM) of Spike-specific GC B cells and regulate clonal diversity. Tfr cells similarly control SHM and clonal diversity in the GC but do so by limiting clonal competition. In addition, deletion of Tfh or Tfr cells during primary vaccination results in changes in SHM after vaccine boosting. Aged mice, which have altered Tfh and Tfr cells, have lower GC responses, presenting a bimodal distribution of SHM. Together, these data demonstrate that GC responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein vaccines require a fine balance of positive and negative follicular T cell help to optimize humoral immunity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Germinal Center/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/administration & dosage , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Aging , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/metabolism , COVID-19/virology , Germinal Center/cytology , Germinal Center/metabolism , Immunity, Humoral , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/cytology , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/cytology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/metabolism , Vaccination , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology
3.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2380: 175-185, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34802131

ABSTRACT

T Follicular helper (Tfh) cells stimulate, whereas T follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells inhibit, effector B cell responses. Although new tools have been developed to assess the functional roles of Tfh and Tfr cells in vivo, methods to assess mechanisms have been limited. One such limitation has been the ability of in vitro functional assays to recapitulate robust germinal center-like responses. Although previous in vitro Tfh-mediated and Tfr-suppressed assays to assess antibody regulation have been developed, these classically have relied on polyclonal stimulation. To understand Tfh and Tfr cell functionality, more robust assays that utilize specific antigen are needed. Here we describe an in vitro approach for sensitively and quantitatively assessing the capacity of Tfh and Tfr cells to regulate B cell responses in an antigen-driven system. These assays allow the study of Tfh and Tfr cells in specific disease contexts, such as IgG production after vaccination or IgE responses during allergic airway disease.


Subject(s)
T Follicular Helper Cells , Antigens , Germinal Center , Immunoglobulin E , Immunoglobulin G , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory
4.
Am J Transplant ; 21(5): 1893-1901, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33421294

ABSTRACT

Following solid organ transplantation, a substantial proportion of chronic allograft loss is attributed to the formation of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR). The frequency and phenotype of T follicular helper (Tfh) and T follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells is altered in the setting of kidney transplantation, particularly in patients who develop AbMR. However, the roles of Tfh and Tfr cells in AbMR after solid organ transplantation is unclear. We developed mouse models to inducibly and potently perturb Tfh and Tfr cells to assess the roles of these cells in the development of DSA and AbMR. We found that Tfh cells are required for both de novo DSA responses as well as augmentation of DSA following presensitization. Using orthotopic allogeneic kidney transplantation models, we found that deletion of Tfh cells at the time of transplantation resulted in less severe transplant rejection. Furthermore, using inducible Tfr cell deletion strategies we found that Tfr cells inhibit de novo DSA formation but only have a minor role in controlling kidney transplant rejection. These studies demonstrate that Tfh cells promote, whereas Tfr cells inhibit, DSA to control rejection after kidney transplantation. Therefore, targeting these cells represent a new therapeutic strategy to prevent and treat AbMR.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Organ Transplantation , Animals , Antibodies , Graft Rejection/etiology , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Mice , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Tissue Donors
6.
Immunity ; 53(6): 1202-1214.e6, 2020 12 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33086036

ABSTRACT

The mechanisms by which regulatory T (Treg) cells differentially control allergic and autoimmune responses remain unclear. We show that Treg cells in food allergy (FA) had decreased expression of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-ß1) because of interleukin-4 (IL-4)- and signal transducer and activator of transciription-6 (STAT6)-dependent inhibition of Tgfb1 transcription. These changes were modeled by Treg cell-specific Tgfb1 monoallelic inactivation, which induced allergic dysregulation by impairing microbiota-dependent retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor gamma t (ROR-γt)+ Treg cell differentiation. This dysregulation was rescued by treatment with Clostridiales species, which upregulated Tgfb1 expression in Treg cells. Biallelic deficiency precipitated fatal autoimmunity with intense autoantibody production and dysregulated T follicular helper and B cell responses. These results identify a privileged role of Treg cell-derived TGF-ß1 in regulating allergy and autoimmunity at distinct checkpoints in a Tgfb1 gene dose- and microbiota-dependent manner.


Subject(s)
Autoimmunity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Transforming Growth Factor beta1/immunology , Adolescent , Animals , Autoimmunity/genetics , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Cell Differentiation , Child , Child, Preschool , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Gene Dosage , Humans , Hypersensitivity/genetics , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Infant , Mast Cells/immunology , Mice , Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 1, Group F, Member 3/metabolism , T Follicular Helper Cells/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic , Transforming Growth Factor beta1/genetics , Young Adult
7.
Nat Immunol ; 20(10): 1360-1371, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31477921

ABSTRACT

Follicular regulatory T (TFR) cells have specialized roles in modulating follicular helper T (TFH) cell activation of B cells. However, the precise role of TFR cells in controlling antibody responses to foreign antigens and autoantigens in vivo is still unclear due to a lack of specific tools. A TFR cell-deleter mouse was developed that selectively deletes TFR cells, facilitating temporal studies. TFR cells were found to regulate early, but not late, germinal center (GC) responses to control antigen-specific antibody and B cell memory. Deletion of TFR cells also resulted in increased self-reactive immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgE. The increased IgE levels led us to interrogate the role of TFR cells in house dust mite models. TFR cells were found to control TFH13 cell-induced IgE. In vivo, loss of TFR cells increased house-dust-mite-specific IgE and lung inflammation. Thus, TFR cells control IgG and IgE responses to vaccines, allergens and autoantigens, and exert critical immunoregulatory functions before GC formation.


Subject(s)
B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Germinal Center/immunology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Pneumonia/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Animals , Antigens, Dermatophagoides/immunology , Autoantigens/immunology , Clonal Deletion/genetics , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Immune Tolerance , Immunity, Humoral , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Immunoglobulin G/metabolism , Immunologic Memory , Interleukin-13/metabolism , Lymphocyte Activation , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Transgenic , Pyroglyphidae/immunology
8.
J Exp Med ; 216(3): 605-620, 2019 03 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30705058

ABSTRACT

Follicular regulatory T (Tfr) cells are a regulatory T cell subset that controls antibody production by inhibiting T follicular helper (Tfh)-mediated help to B cells. Tfh and Tfr cells possess opposing functions suggesting unique programming. Here we elucidated the transcriptional program controlling Tfr suppressive function. We found that Tfr cells have a program for suppressive function fine-tuned by tissue microenvironment. The transcription factor FoxP3 and chromatin-modifying enzyme EZH2 are essential for this transcriptional program but regulate the program in distinct ways. FoxP3 modifies the Tfh program to induce a Tfr-like functional state, demonstrating that Tfr cells coopt the Tfh program for suppression. Importantly, we identified a Tfr cell population that loses the Tfr program to become "ex-Tfr" cells with altered functionality. These dysfunctional ex-Tfr cells may have roles in modulating pathogenic antibody responses. Taken together, our studies reveal mechanisms controlling the Tfr transcriptional program and how failure of these mechanisms leads to dysfunctional Tfr cells.


Subject(s)
Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Protein/metabolism , Forkhead Transcription Factors/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Animals , Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Protein/genetics , Female , Forkhead Transcription Factors/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , Male , Mice, Transgenic , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...