Simultaneous cortical, subcortical, and brainstem mapping of sensory activation.

Nonpainful tactile sensory stimuli are processed in the cortex, subcortex, and brainstem. Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have highlighted the value of whole-brain, systems-level investigation for examining sensory processing. However, whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging studies are uncommon, in part due to challenges with signal to noise when studying the brainstem. Furthermore, differentiation of small sensory brainstem structures such as the cuneate and gracile nuclei necessitates high-resolution imaging. To address this gap in systems-level sensory investigation, we employed a whole-brain, multi-echo functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisition at 3T with multi-echo independent component analysis denoising and brainstem-specific modeling to enable detection of activation across the entire sensory system. In healthy participants, we examined patterns of activity in response to nonpainful brushing of the right hand, left hand, and right foot (n = 10 per location), and found the expected lateralization, with distinct cortical and subcortical responses for upper and lower limb stimulation. At the brainstem level, we differentiated the adjacent cuneate and gracile nuclei, corresponding to hand and foot stimulation respectively. Our findings demonstrate that simultaneous cortical, subcortical, and brainstem mapping at 3T could be a key tool to understand the sensory system in both healthy individuals and clinical cohorts with sensory deficits.

Simultaneous cortical, subcortical, and brainstem mapping of sensory activation.

Non-painful tactile sensory stimuli are processed in the cortex, subcortex, and brainstem. Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have highlighted the value of whole-brain, systems-level investigation for examining pain processing. However, whole-brain fMRI studies are uncommon, in part due to challenges with signal to noise when studying the brainstem. Furthermore, the differentiation of small sensory brainstem structures such as the cuneate and gracile nuclei necessitates high resolution imaging. To address this gap in systems-level sensory investigation, we employed a whole-brain, multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 3T with multi-echo independent component analysis (ME-ICA) denoising and brainstem-specific modeling to enable detection of activation across the entire sensory system. In healthy participants, we examined patterns of activity in response to non-painful brushing of the right hand, left hand, and right foot, and found the expected lateralization, with distinct cortical and subcortical responses for upper and lower limb stimulation. At the brainstem level, we were able to differentiate the small, adjacent cuneate and gracile nuclei, corresponding to hand and foot stimulation respectively. Our findings demonstrate that simultaneous cortical, subcortical, and brainstem mapping at 3T could be a key tool to understand the sensory system in both healthy individuals and clinical cohorts with sensory deficits.

Acute effects of high-intensity exercise on brain mechanical properties and cognitive function.

Previous studies have shown that engagement in even a single session of exercise can improve cognitive performance in the short term. However, the underlying physiological mechanisms contributing to this effect are still being studied. Recently, with improvements to advanced quantitative neuroimaging techniques, brain tissue mechanical properties can be sensitively and noninvasively measured with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and regional brain mechanical properties have been shown to reflect individual cognitive performance. Here we assess brain mechanical properties before and immediately after engagement in a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) regimen, as well as one-hour post-exercise. We find that immediately after exercise, subjects in the HIIT group had an average global brain stiffness decrease of 4.2% (p < 0.001), and an average brain damping ratio increase of 3.1% (p = 0.002). In contrast, control participants who did not engage in exercise showed no significant change over time in either stiffness or damping ratio. Changes in brain mechanical properties with exercise appeared to be regionally dependent, with the hippocampus decreasing in stiffness by 10.4%. We also found that one-hour after exercise, brain mechanical properties returned to initial baseline values. The magnitude of changes to brain mechanical properties also correlated with improvements in reaction time on executive control tasks (Eriksen Flanker and Stroop) with exercise. Understanding the neural changes that arise in response to exercise may inform potential mechanisms behind improvements to cognitive performance with acute exercise.

Mechanical Property Based Brain Age Prediction using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Brain age is a quantitative estimate to explain an individual's structural and functional brain measurements relative to the overall population and is particularly valuable in describing differences related to developmental or neurodegenerative pathology. Accurately inferring brain age from brain imaging data requires sophisticated models that capture the underlying age-related brain changes. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a phase contrast MRI technology that uses external palpations to measure brain mechanical properties. Mechanical property measures of viscoelastic shear stiffness and damping ratio have been found to change across the entire life span and to reflect brain health due to neurodegenerative diseases and even individual differences in cognitive function. Here we develop and train a multi-modal 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) to model the relationship between age and whole brain mechanical properties. After training, the network maps the measurements and other inputs to a brain age prediction. We found high performance using the 3D maps of various mechanical properties to predict brain age. Stiffness maps alone were able to predict ages of the test group subjects with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.76 years, which is comparable to single inputs of damping ratio (MAE: 3.82) and outperforms single input of volume (MAE: 4.60). Combining stiffness and volume in a multimodal approach performed the best, with an MAE of 3.60 years, whereas including damping ratio worsened model performance. Our results reflect previous MRE literature that had demonstrated that stiffness is more strongly related to chronological age than damping ratio. This machine learning model provides the first prediction of brain age from brain biomechanical data-an advancement towards sensitively describing brain integrity differences in individuals with neuropathology.

Viscoelasticity of reward and control systems in adolescent risk taking.

Heightened risk-taking tendencies during adolescence have been hypothesized to be attributable to physiological differences of maturation in key brain regions. The socioemotional system (e.g., nucleus accumbens), which is instrumental in reward response, shows a relatively earlier development trajectory than the cognitive control system (e.g., medial prefrontal cortex), which regulates impulse response. This developmental imbalance between heightened reward seeking and immature cognitive control potentially makes adolescents more susceptible to engaging in risky activities. Here, we assess brain structure in the socioemotional and cognitive control systems through viscoelastic stiffness measured with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and volumetry, as well as risk-taking tendencies measured using two experimental tasks in 40 adolescents (mean age â€‹= â€‹13.4 years old). MRE measures of regional brain stiffness reflect brain health and development via myelin content and glial matrix makeup, and have been shown to be highly sensitive to cognitive processes as compared to measures of regional brain volume and diffusion weighted imaging metrics. We find here that the viscoelastic and volumetric differences between the nucleus accumbens and the prefrontal cortex are correlated with increased risk-taking behavior in adolescents. These differences in development between the two brain systems can be used as an indicator of those adolescents who are more prone to real world risky activities and a useful measure for characterizing response to intervention.