A large-volume low-pressure nasal irrigation delivers drug into the nasal cavity? An in vivo study.

The nasal administration route emerged as an interesting route in systemic and brain drug delivery, and different modalities of nasal delivery are available. The nasal irrigation is one of them, but there is a lack of studies investigating the distribution of a large-volume irrigation. The main aim of this study was to assess the deposition of radiolabeled saline in the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses following nasal irrigation by imaging. Five healthy males volunteered to perform large-volume low-pressure nasal irrigation, with a douching device containing 50 mL of radiolabeled isotonic saline. Participants underwent a scintigraphy immediately after. Both the nasal cavities and maxillary sinuses were systematically reached by the solution during nasal irrigation. The sinuses set in a lower position during nasal irrigation showed a tendency to be more irrigated than the sinuses set in a higher position (7.67% vs 22.72%; p = 0.086). Moreover, substantial inter- and intraindividual heterogeneity regarding solution deposition was observed. Large-volume low-pressure nasal irrigation is a good modality to reach the maxillary sinuses as well as the nasal cavities. In order to ensure adequate reaching of both nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses, nasal irrigation should be performed bilaterally.

Consensus on Nasal Irrigation in Infants: A Delphi Study.

INTRODUCTION: Nasal irrigation is regularly used in infants to relieve upper airway symptoms. However, because there is no consensus on good practice, nasal irrigation in infants is described and applied heterogeneously among clinicians and between clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish consensus regarding the use of nasal irrigation in infants. METHODS: A panel of Belgian physiotherapists and physicians experienced in performing nasal irrigation in infants were surveyed using the Delphi technique. Three survey rounds were used. Participants rated their level of (dis)agreement to each statement in each round using a 6-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined for statements which collected at least 75% of responses in agreement or disagreement. The questionnaire of Round 1 was built on nasal irrigation practice habits previously collected from parents, childcare workers, and healthcare professionals. Questionnaires from rounds 2 and 3 were amended based on experts written feedback. RESULTS: Thirty experts (12 physicians and 18 physiotherapists) completed all 3 questionnaires. Consensus was achieved for 47 of 75 statements (63%) distributed over the following domains: "contraindications," "indications and frequency of use," "irrigation means," "solution preparation," "solution volume," "realization of the technique," and "assessment of the efficacy of nasal irrigation." CONCLUSION: This study provides the first well-constructed consensus on good practice on nasal irrigation in infants. Consensus on several statements across different domains were established but require validation in future trials. This study also proposes direction for future research focusing on statements that did not reach consensus.