Barriers to accessing pain management services among veterans with bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers veterans with bipolar disorder face to accessing chronic pain management services within a Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: Veterans (n = 15) with chronic pain and bipolar disorder and providers (n = 15) working within a mid-Atlantic VA health care system. Data were collected from August 2017-June 2018. STUDY DESIGN: Veteran interviews focused on their chronic pain experiences and treatment, including barriers that arose when trying to access pain management services. Provider interviews focused on whether they address chronic pain with veteran patients and, if so, what considerations arise when addressing pain in veterans with bipolar disorder and other serious mental illnesses. DATA COLLECTION: Veterans were at least 18 years old, had a confirmed bipolar disorder and chronic pain diagnosis, and engaged in outpatient care within the VA health care system. Clinicians provided direct care services to veterans within the same VA. Interviews lasted approximately 60 min and were transcribed and analyzed using a rapid analysis protocol. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Four major themes emerged from veteran and provider interviews: siloed care (unintegrated and uncoordinated mental and physical health care), mental health primacy (prioritization of mental health symptoms at expense of physical health symptoms), lagging expectations (unfamiliarity with comprehensive evidence-based pain management options), and provider-patient communication concerns (inefficient communication about pain concerns and treatment options). CONCLUSIONS: Veterans with co-occurring pain and bipolar disorder face unique barriers that compromise equitable access to evidence-based pain treatment. Our findings suggest that educating providers about bipolar disorder and other serious mental illnesses and the benefit of effective non-pharmacological pain interventions for this group may improve care coordination and care quality and reduce access disparities.

Social functioning mediates the relationship between psychiatric symptoms and recovery among veteran and community service users with serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has established the impact of psychiatric symptoms on social functioning, while there is a paucity of research examining how social functioning relates to personal recovery, an individual's self-assessment of their mental health recovery. This study examined the mediating effect of social engagement, interpersonal communication, and satisfaction with support in the relationship between distinct psychiatric symptom clusters and perceived mental health recovery. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, both patient self-report and provider assessment data were collected for 250 patients with serious mental illness (SMI) across four mental health service sites. Parallel mediation analytic models were used. RESULTS: Interpersonal communication partially mediated the relationship between positive and negative symptom clusters and personal recovery. Satisfaction with social supports partially mediated the relationship between excited symptoms and personal recovery. Both interpersonal communication and satisfaction with social supports partially mediated the relationship between general psychological distress and depressive symptoms and personal recovery. Collectively, social functioning mediators explained nearly half of the relationship between general psychological distress and excited symptoms and personal recovery and nearly all of the relationship between positive symptoms and personal recovery. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Clinical providers working with persons with SMI should regularly assess social functioning in addition to assessing psychiatric symptoms and personal recovery factors and should incorporate social skills education into SMI group and individual treatments. Social functioning as a target of treatment may be especially beneficial for patients who are dissatisfied with other interventions or feel they have experienced the maximum benefit from treatment and are seeking additional methods to support personal recovery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).