Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 23(13): 3416-3427, 2017 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28069723

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To generate and characterize a murine GITR ligand fusion protein (mGITRL-FP) designed to maximize valency and the potential to agonize the GITR receptor for cancer immunotherapy.Experimental Design: The EC50 value of the mGITRL-FP was compared with an anti-GITR antibody in an in vitro agonistic cell-based reporter assay. We assessed the impact of dose, schedule, and Fc isotype on antitumor activity and T-cell modulation in the CT26 tumor model. The activity of the mGITRL-FP was compared with an agonistic murine OX40L-FP targeting OX40, in CT26 and B16F10-Luc2 tumor models. Combination of the mGITRL-FP with antibodies targeting PD-L1, PD-1, or CTLA-4 was analyzed in mice bearing CT26 tumors.Results: The mGITRL-FP had an almost 50-fold higher EC50 value compared with an anti-murine GITR antibody. Treatment of CT26 tumor-bearing mice with mGITRL-FP-mediated significant antitumor activity that was dependent on isotype, dose, and duration of exposure. The antitumor activity could be correlated with the increased proliferation of peripheral CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and a significant decrease in the frequency of intratumoral Tregs. The combination of mGITRL-FP with mOX40L-FP or checkpoint inhibitor antagonists enhanced antitumor immunity above that of monotherapy treatment.Conclusions: These results suggest that therapeutically targeting GITR represents a unique approach to cancer immunotherapy and suggests that a multimeric fusion protein may provide increased agonistic potential versus an antibody. In addition, these data provide, for the first time, early proof of concept for the potential combination of GITR targeting agents with OX40 agonists and PD-L1 antagonists. Clin Cancer Res; 23(13); 3416-27. ©2017 AACR.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoid-Induced TNFR-Related Protein/immunology , Melanoma, Experimental/immunology , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/administration & dosage , Tumor Necrosis Factors/immunology , Animals , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , CTLA-4 Antigen/immunology , Disease Models, Animal , Glucocorticoid-Induced TNFR-Related Protein/administration & dosage , Humans , Melanoma, Experimental/genetics , Melanoma, Experimental/therapy , Membrane Glycoproteins/agonists , Membrane Glycoproteins/immunology , Mice , OX40 Ligand , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/immunology , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology , Tumor Necrosis Factors/agonists , Tumor Necrosis Factors/genetics
2.
Cancer Immunol Res ; 5(1): 29-41, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27923825

ABSTRACT

Murine syngeneic tumor models are critical to novel immuno-based therapy development, but the molecular and immunologic features of these models are still not clearly defined. The translational relevance of differences between the models is not fully understood, impeding appropriate preclinical model selection for target validation, and ultimately hindering drug development. Across a panel of commonly used murine syngeneic tumor models, we showed variable responsiveness to immunotherapies. We used array comparative genomic hybridization, whole-exome sequencing, exon microarray analysis, and flow cytometry to extensively characterize these models, which revealed striking differences that may underlie these contrasting response profiles. We identified strong differential gene expression in immune-related pathways and changes in immune cell-specific genes that suggested differences in tumor immune infiltrates between models. Further investigation using flow cytometry showed differences in both the composition and magnitude of the tumor immune infiltrates, identifying models that harbor "inflamed" and "non-inflamed" tumor immune infiltrate phenotypes. We also found that immunosuppressive cell types predominated in syngeneic mouse tumor models that did not respond to immune-checkpoint blockade, whereas cytotoxic effector immune cells were enriched in responsive models. A cytotoxic cell-rich tumor immune infiltrate has been correlated with increased efficacy of immunotherapies in the clinic, and these differences could underlie the varying response profiles to immunotherapy between the syngeneic models. This characterization highlighted the importance of extensive profiling and will enable investigators to select appropriate models to interrogate the activity of immunotherapies as well as combinations with targeted therapies in vivo Cancer Immunol Res; 5(1); 29-41. ©2016 AACR.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacology , Drug Discovery , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Animals , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Comparative Genomic Hybridization , DNA Copy Number Variations , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Synergism , Exome , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Genomics/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Immunomodulation/drug effects , Immunomodulation/genetics , Mice , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Mutation , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Transcriptome , Tumor Microenvironment/drug effects , Tumor Microenvironment/genetics , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology
3.
Oncotarget ; 7(14): 18508-20, 2016 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26918344

ABSTRACT

Despite the availability of recently developed chemotherapy regimens, survival times for pancreatic cancer patients remain poor. These patients also respond poorly to immune checkpoint blockade therapies (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-1), which suggests the presence of additional immunosuppressive mechanisms in the pancreatic tumour microenvironment (TME). CD40 agonist antibodies (αCD40) promote antigen presenting cell (APC) maturation and enhance macrophage tumouricidal activity, and may therefore alter the pancreatic TME to increase sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade. Here, we test whether αCD40 transforms the TME in a mouse syngeneic orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer, to increase sensitivity to PD-L1 blockade. We found that whilst mice bearing orthotopic Pan02 tumours responded poorly to PD-L1 blockade, αCD40 improved overall survival. αCD40 transformed the TME, upregulating Th1 chemokines, increasing cytotoxic T cell infiltration and promoting formation of an immune cell-rich capsule separating the tumour from the normal pancreas. Furthermore, αCD40 drove systemic APC maturation, memory T cell expansion, and upregulated tumour and systemic PD-L1 expression. Combining αCD40 with PD-L1 blockade enhanced anti-tumour immunity and improved overall survival versus either monotherapy. These data provide further support for the potential of combining αCD40 with immune checkpoint blockade to promote anti-tumour immunity in pancreatic cancer.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , CD40 Antigens/agonists , Pancreatic Neoplasms/immunology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , CD40 Antigens/immunology , CTLA-4 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , CTLA-4 Antigen/immunology , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Random Allocation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...