ABSTRACT
In Senegal, the burden of dengue is increasing and expanding. As case management and traditional diagnostic techniques can be difficult to implement, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) deployed at point of care are ideal for investigating active outbreaks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Dengue NS1 and Dengue IgM/IgG RDTs on the serum/plasma samples in a laboratory setting and in the field. During laboratory evaluation, performance of the NS1 RDT was assessed using NS1 ELISA as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were 88% [75-95%] and 100% [97-100%], respectively. Performance of the IgM/IG RDT was assessed using the IgM Antibody Capture (MAC) ELISA, indirect IgG, and PRNT as gold standards. The IgM and IgG test lines respectively displayed sensitivities of 94% [83-99%] and 70% [59-79%] and specificities of 91% [84-95%] and 91% [79-98%]. In the field, the Dengue NS1 RDT sensitivity and specificity was 82% [60-95%] and 75% [53-90%], respectively. The IgM and IgG test lines displayed sensitivities of 86% [42-100%] and 78% [64-88%], specificities of 85% [76-92%] and 55% [36-73%], respectively. These results demonstrate that RDTs are ideal for use in a context of high prevalence or outbreak setting and can be implemented in the absence of a confirmatory test for acute and convalescent patients.
Subject(s)
Dengue Virus , Dengue , Humans , Dengue/diagnosis , Dengue/epidemiology , Rapid Diagnostic Tests , Senegal/epidemiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Immunoglobulin M , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Immunoglobulin G , Antibodies, Viral , Viral Nonstructural ProteinsABSTRACT
We investigated the dynamics of seroconversion in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. During March 29-May 22, 2020, we collected serum samples and associated clinical data from 177 persons in London, UK, who had SARS-CoV-2 infection. We measured IgG against SARS-CoV-2 and compared antibody levels with patient outcomes, demographic information, and laboratory characteristics. We found that 2.0%-8.5% of persons did not seroconvert 3-6 weeks after infection. Persons who seroconverted were older, were more likely to have concurrent conditions, and had higher levels of inflammatory markers. Non-White persons had higher antibody concentrations than those who identified as White; these concentrations did not decline during follow-up. Serologic assay results correlated with disease outcome, race, and other risk factors for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Serologic assays can be used in surveillance to clarify the duration and protective nature of humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
