A single method to analyse residues from five different classes of prohibited pharmacologically active substances in milk.

In the European Union, the use of veterinary drugs belonging to the A6 group is prohibited in food-producing animals according to Commission Regulation (EU) No. 2010/37. The aim of this study was to improve the analytical control strategy by developing a single method to analyse residues of prohibited pharmacologically active substances in milk. For this, a single method was developed to analyse 16 prohibited pharmacologically active substances belonging to five different substance classes at required or recommended levels: nitroimidazoles at 3 µg kg-1, nitrofurans at 0.5 µg kg-1, chloramphenicol at 0.1 µg kg-1, dapsone at 5 µg kg-1 and chlorpromazine at 1 µg kg-1. Milk sample preparation started with an acid hydrolysis combined with a derivatisation. These steps were followed by a clean-up consisting of a dispersive solid-phase extraction and a liquid-liquid extraction. Finally, the sample extracts were analysed by liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry, operating alternately in the positive and negative mode. The method was fully validated according to Commission Decision 2002/657/EC for bovine milk and additionally validated for caprine milk. The validation proved that the method is highly effective to detect and confirm all 16 substances in bovine and caprine milk and, additionally to quantify 15 of these substances in bovine milk and 13 of these substances in caprine milk. This study resulted in a new multi-class method to detect, quantify and confirm the identity of 16 prohibited pharmacologically active substances belonging to five different substance classes in two types of milk.

The pattern of restenosis and vascular remodelling after cold-end radioactive stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: Edge restenosis is a major problem after radioactive stenting. The cold-end stent has a radioactive mid-segment (15.9 mm) and non-radioactive proximal and distal 5.7 mm segments. Conceptually this may negate the impact of negative vascular remodelling at the edge of the radiation. METHOD AND RESULTS: ECG-gated intravascular ultrasound with three-dimensional reconstruction was performed post-stent implantation and at the 6-month follow-up to assess restenosis within the margins of the stent and at the stent edges in 16 patients. Angiographic restenosis was witnessed in four patients, all in the proximal in-stent position. By intravascular ultrasound in-stent neointimal hyperplasia, with a >50% stented cross-sectional area, was seen in eight patients. This was witnessed proximally (n=2), distally (n=2) and in both segments (n=4). Echolucent tissue, dubbed the 'black hole' was seen as a significant component of neointimal hyperplasia in six out of the eight cases of restenosis. Neointimal hyperplasia was inhibited in the area of radiation: Delta neointimal hyperplasia=3.72 mm3 (8.6%); in-stent at the edges of radiation proximally and distally Delta neointimal hyperplasia was 7.9 mm3 (19.0%) and 11.4 mm3 (25.6%), respectively (P=0.017). At the stent edges there was no significant change in lumen volume. CONCLUSIONS: Cold-end stenting results in increased neointimal hyperplasia in in-stent non-radioactive segments.

Positive geometric vascular remodeling is seen after catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation but not after radioactive stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports demonstrate that intracoronary radiation affects not only neointimal formation but also vascular remodeling. Radioactive stents and catheter-based techniques deliver radiation in different ways, suggesting that different patterns of remodeling after each technique may be expected. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed remodeling in 18 patients after conventional stent implantation, 16 patients after low-activity radioactive stent implantation, 16 patients after higher activity radioactive stent implantation, and, finally, 17 patients who underwent catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation. Intravascular ultrasound with 3D reconstruction was used after stent implantation and at the 6-month follow-up to assess remodeling within the stent margins and at its edges. Preprocedural characteristics were similar between groups. In-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) was inhibited by high-activity radioactive stent implantation (NIH 9.0 mm(3)) and by catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation (NIH 6.9 mm(3)) compared with low-activity radioactive stent implantation (NIH 21.2 mm(3)) and conventional stent implantation (NIH 20.8 mm(3)) (P:=0.008). No difference in plaque or total vessel volume was seen behind the stent in the conventional, low-activity, or high-activity stent implantation groups. However, significant increases in plaque behind the stent (15%) and in total vessel volume (8%) were seen in the group that underwent catheter-based radiation followed by conventional stent implantation. All 4 groups demonstrated significant late lumen loss at the stent edges; however, edge restenosis was seen only in the group subjected to high-activity stent implantation and appeared to be due to an increase in plaque and, to a lesser degree, to negative remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct differences in the patterns of remodeling exist between conventional, radioactive, and catheter-based radiotherapy with stenting.