Real World Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Ozanimod in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: 1-Year Follow-Up from a Tertiary Center.

BACKGROUND: Ozanimod is a first-in-class Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Real world data describing use of ozanimod are limited. AIM: To provide 1-year follow-up results of our UC patient cohort treated with ozanimod. METHODS: This prospective, observational cohort study includes consecutive patients who initiated ozanimod at the University of Chicago IBD Center between 5/2021 and 12/2022. We collected demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. Clinical disease activity was prospectively assessed using the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with UC initiated ozanimod therapy and were included in the effectiveness analysis. The median age was 35 years (interquartile range (IQR) 28-52), median disease duration of 6 years (IQR 3-13), 26 (58%) were male, 23 (51%) had extensive colitis, 34 (76%) had previous advanced therapy exposure. Thirty-four patients had clinically active UC at the time of ozanimod initiation; week 10 clinical response and remission rates were 58% and 53%, respectively. By week 52, the rates were 25% for both clinical response and remission. In the 12 (39%) patients with a > 75% reduction in absolute lymphocyte count, numerically greater induction clinical response and remission rates were observed (80% vs 54%, p = 0.4 and 75% vs 53%, p = 0.4, respectively). There were no episodes of symptomatic bradycardia and no other new safety signals. CONCLUSION: Ozanimod effectively induced clinical response and remission patients with largely treatment refractory UC, however, had modest long-term effectiveness. The safety profile was favorable with no new signals.

Risankizumab Effectiveness and Safety in Crohn's Disease: Real-world Data From a Large Tertiary Center.

L23 is a recognized cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs).1 The first IL23-targeting agent that became available for clinical use in IBD was Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets p40, a shared subunit of both IL23 and IL12.2,3 Risankizumab (Skyrizi; Abbvie) is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody which binds to the p19 subunit and therefore selectively inhibits IL23.4 In June 2022, it was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). Here, we describe the effectiveness and safety of risankizumab throughout the induction period in a real-world setting of a large tertiary center.

A plain language summary describing how two different concentrations of GP2017, a biosimilar adalimumab medicine, are associated with similar drug levels within the body.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This plain language summary explains, in simple terms, the results of a study from 2022 discussing a biosimilar medicine called GP2017 (called SDZ-ADL in this summary, sold as Hyrimoz®). This medicine is used to treat people with inflammatory conditions. This study investigated a new, high-concentration formulation of GP2017 (SDZ-ADL-HCF) in order to show that the high concentration option acts the same way in the body as SDZ-ADL. SDZ-ADL-HCF has been submitted for regulatory approval to health authorities on the basis of this study and was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for people with the inflammatory conditions that SDZ-ADL is used to treat. This newly developed formulation provides the option for receiving injections less often with reduced volumes which can have a positive impact on the injection experience and increase patient convenience. WHAT WAS THE AIM OF THE CURRENT STUDY?: This study looked at the pharmacokinetics of SDZ-ADL and SDZ-ADL-HCF, meaning it compared how the active medicine behaved in the body at different times after the injection of each of the formulations. The study also looked at how each formulation was recognized by the body's immune system (known as immunogenicity), and the side effects associated with each formulation. This study was randomly assigned and double-blinded, meaning that neither the participants nor the researchers knew which formulation each participant received. This reduces the risk of bias in the results. WHAT WERE THE FINDINGS FROM THE CURRENT STUDY?: The study found that an injection of SDZ-ADL-HCF resulted in similar amounts of the medicine being present within the blood as an injection of SDZ-ADL. This information was needed for the approval of SDZ-ADL-HCF. Participants also experienced similar immune reactions and the number of participants with side effects was similar between both concentrations of medicine. The results confirmed that SDZ-ADL-HCF behaves in the same way in the body and is expected to have the same treatment effects as SDZ-ADL, while at the same time offering an improved formulation with a more positive injection experience and increased patient convenience.

Inflammation in the proximal colon is a risk factor for the development of colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Background: Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of developing colorectal neoplasia (CRN) in the proximal colon. Objectives: To evaluate whether duration and severity of inflammation are linked to the development of CRN in this population. Design: Retrospective, case-control chart review of patients with PSC and IBD at a tertiary care center. Methods: Disease activity was scored per colonic segment at each colonoscopy prior to the first instance of observed CRN using a modified Mayo endoscopic sub-score and histologic assessment. Patients in the CRN-positive group were compared to controls that did not. Results: In all, 72 PSC-IBD patients with no history of CRN were identified, 13 of whom developed CRN after at least one colonoscopy at our institution. Patients in the CRN-positive group had significantly more endoscopic (p < 0.01) and histologic (p < 0.01) inflammation in the right compared to the control group prior to the development of dysplasia. There was significantly greater endoscopic inflammation in the segment of the colon with a dysplastic lesion than other segments of the colon (p = 0.018). Patients with moderate/severe lifetime endoscopic (p = 0.02) or histologic inflammation (p = 0.04) score had a lower probability of remaining free of dysplasia during follow-up. Nearly half of the patients with dysplasia had invisible lesions found on random biopsy. Conclusions: Endoscopic and histologic inflammation in the proximal colon are risk factors for CRN in patients with PSC-IBD. PSC-IBD patients frequently have subclinical inflammation, and these findings support the practice of regular assessment of disease activity and random biopsy of inflamed and uninflamed areas in patients with PSC with the goal of reducing inflammation to prevent the development of CRN.

Patients with PSC and IBD have not been examined as a cohort to assess for risk factors for CRN. We found that severe inflammation in the proximal colon is the main risk factor for CRN in these patients.

Antigen-driven colonic inflammation is associated with development of dysplasia in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is an immune-mediated disease of the bile ducts that co-occurs with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in almost 90% of cases. Colorectal cancer is a major complication of patients with PSC and IBD, and these patients are at a much greater risk compared to patients with IBD without concomitant PSC. Combining flow cytometry, bulk and single-cell transcriptomics, and T and B cell receptor repertoire analysis of right colon tissue from 65 patients with PSC, 108 patients with IBD and 48 healthy individuals we identified a unique adaptive inflammatory transcriptional signature associated with greater risk and shorter time to dysplasia in patients with PSC. This inflammatory signature is characterized by antigen-driven interleukin-17A (IL-17A)+ forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)+ CD4 T cells that express a pathogenic IL-17 signature, as well as an expansion of IgG-secreting plasma cells. These results suggest that the mechanisms that drive the emergence of dysplasia in PSC and IBD are distinct and provide molecular insights that could guide prevention of colorectal cancer in individuals with PSC.

Upadacitinib Is Effective and Safe in Both Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: Prospective Real-World Experience.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Upadacitinib is a novel selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that has shown efficacy in the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), and has received Food and Drug Administration approval for UC. We report a large real-world experience with upadacitinib in UC and CD. METHODS: We performed a prospective analysis of clinical outcomes on upadacitinib in patients with UC and CD using predetermined intervals at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 as part of a formalized treatment protocol at our institution. We used the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index and the Harvey-Bradshaw index, as well as C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin to assess efficacy, and also recorded treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were followed up for 8 weeks on upadacitinib, 84 of whom (44 UC patients, 40 CD patients) were initiated because of active luminal or perianal disease and included in the analysis. One hundred percent previously received anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, and 89.3% had received 2 or more advanced therapies. At 4 and 8 weeks of treatment for UC, 19 of 25 (76.0%) and 23 of 27 (85.2%) achieved clinical response and 18 of 26 (69.2%) and 22 of 27 (81.5%) achieved clinical remission, respectively. Of those who previously were tofacitinib-exposed, 7 of 9 (77.8%) achieved clinical remission by 8 weeks. In CD, 13 of 17 (76.5.%) achieved clinical response and 12 of 17 (70.6%) achieved clinical remission by 8 weeks. Of those with increased fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein levels, 62% and 64% normalized by week 8, respectively. Results were seen as early as week 2 in both UC and CD, with clinical remission rates of 36% and 56.3.%, respectively. Acne was the most commonly reported adverse event, occurring in 24 of 105 patients (22.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world experience in medically resistant patients with UC or CD, we report that upadacitinib is rapidly effective and safe, including in those who had prior tofacitinib exposure. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Chicago (IRB20-1979).

Delays in Therapy Associated With Current Prior Authorization Process for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Despite a high approval rate, there were unnecessary delays in therapy due to prior authorizations. This study identified the impact of type of IBD, FDA-labeled indication, and dose escalations on approvals.

Endo-histologic Normalization Is Achievable with Tofacitinib and Is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Recent real-world effectiveness studies investigating tofacitinib have been encouraging. Questions remain regarding the long-term effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib, effect on endoscopic remission rates, histologic changes, and alterations in fecal calprotectin levels. METHODS: This retrospective study includes consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who initiated tofacitinib therapy. We reviewed electronic medical records for demographic and clinical data, as well as all adverse events and hospitalizations. All patients receiving tofacitinib were included in the safety analysis and only patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) were included in the effectiveness analysis. RESULTS: 119 patients with IBD (97 UC, 12 CD, and 10 pouchitis) seen at our center between 2014 and 2020 were included in this study. Median follow-up was 32 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 3-252). Clinical response and remission were observed in 70% and 21%, 59% and 33%, and 49%, and 37% at weeks 8, 24, and 52, respectively. Endo-histologic healing was achieved by 11%, 25%, and 37.5% of patients at weeks 8, 24, and 52, respectively. Histologic normalization occurred as early as 24 weeks in this cohort and was achieved by 26% of patients in endoscopic remission. Overall, there were 27 (25%) adverse events with 6 (5%) resulting in treatment discontinuation. There were 11 (10%) infections, none required treatment discontinuation. Ten (10.3%) patients underwent colectomy during the follow-up period. There were no cardiovascular adverse events in the cohort during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the effectiveness and long-term safety of tofacitinib in patients with UC. Importantly, we show that the endpoint of endo-histologic healing is achievable with tofacitinib and can occur as early as week 8 of therapy.

Serum Cytomegalovirus Polymerase Chain Reaction Test Is a Valuable Negative Predictor of Infection in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis in the setting of severe ulcerative colitis (UC) remains a clinical challenge. This study aimed to determine the utility of serum CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as a non-invasive test for the diagnosis of CMV superinfection in patients hospitalized with UC. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive admitted patients with UC who had serum testing for CMV completed as part of standard hospital procedure and CMV colitis diagnosed by expert pathologists. RESULTS: Two hundred and six patients with UC were included; 13 patients (6%) had histologically confirmed CMV colitis. Eleven of 13 patients with CMV colitis (84%) and 3 of 193 (1.5%) patients without CMV colitis had a positive serum PCR test (p < 0.0001). ROC analysis showed that a CMV PCR level of 259 IU/mL had a sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 99%, respectively, for diagnosis of CMV colitis with an AUC of 0.9 (p < 0.0001). Serum CMV PCR level significantly correlated to the number of inclusion bodies on biopsy specimens with data available (n = 8) (r = 0.8, p = 0.02). CMV positivity did not predict the need for salvage therapy, admission or 1-year colectomy rates. CONCLUSION: Serum CMV PCR has an excellent negative predictive value and demonstrates a strong correlation with CMV positivity on histology. This work supports a rationale for serum CMV PCR testing on admission to assess the risk of CMV colitis in patients with severe UC.

Ozanimod in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: Initial Real-World Data From a Large Tertiary Center.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the colon and rectum. Long-term therapy is generally required to achieve and maintain disease control.1 In May 2021 the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of ozanimod in patients with moderate to severe UC. We describe the first report of the use of ozanimod in real-world clinical practice.

Evaluating cost per remission and cost of serious adverse events of advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Determining the relative cost-effectiveness between advanced therapeutic options for ulcerative colitis (UC) may optimize resource utilization. We evaluated total cost per response, cost per remission, and cost of safety events for patients with moderately-to-severely active UC after 52 weeks of treatment with advanced therapies at standard dosing. METHODS: An analytic model was developed to estimate costs from the US healthcare system perspective associated with achieving efficacy outcomes and managing safety outcomes for advanced therapies approved for the treatment of UC. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) for response and remission, and numbers needed to harm (NNH) for serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs) were derived from a network meta-analysis of pivotal trials. NNT for induction and maintenance were combined with drug regimen costs to calculate cost per clinical remission. Cost of managing AEs was calculated using NNH for safety outcomes and published costs of treating respective AEs. RESULTS: Costs per remission were $205,240, $249,417, $267,463, $365,050, $579,622, $750,200, and $787,998 for tofacitinib 10 mg, tofacitinib 5 mg, infliximab, vedolizumab, golimumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab, respectively. Incremental costs of SAEs and SIs collectively were $136,390, $90,333, $31,888, $31,061, $20,049, $12,059, and $0 for tofacitinib 5 mg, golimumab, adalimumab, tofacitinib 10 mg, infliximab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab (reference), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib was associated with the lowest cost per response and cost per remission, while vedolizumab had the lowest costs related to SAEs and SIs. Balancing efficacy versus safety is important when evaluating the costs associated with treatment of moderate-to-severe UC.

Prospective Cohort Study to Investigate the Safety of Preoperative Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Exposure in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Undergoing Intra-abdominal Surgery.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Whether preoperative treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) increases the risk of postoperative infectious complications remains controversial. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative exposure to TNFis is an independent risk factor for postoperative infectious complications within 30 days of surgery. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study of patients with IBD undergoing intra-abdominal surgery across 17 sites from the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Clinical Research Alliance. Infectious complications were categorized as surgical site infections (SSIs) or non-SSIs. Current TNFi exposure was defined as use within 12 weeks of surgery, and serum was collected for drug-level analyses. Multivariable models for occurrence of the primary outcome, any infection, or SSI were adjusted by predefined covariates (age, sex, preoperative steroid use, and disease type), baseline variables significantly associated (P < .05) with any infection or SSI separately, and TNFi exposure status. Exploratory models used TNFi exposure based on serum drug concentration. RESULTS: A total of 947 patients were enrolled from September 2014 through June 2017. Current TNFi exposure was reported by 382 patients. Any infection (18.1% vs 20.2%, P = .469) and SSI (12.0% vs 12.6%, P = .889) rates were similar in patients currently exposed to TNFis and those unexposed. In multivariable analysis, current TNFi exposure was not associated with any infection (odds ratio, 1.050; 95% confidence interval, 0.716-1.535) or SSI (odds ratio, 1.249; 95% confidence interval, 0.793-1.960). Detectable TNFi drug concentration was not associated with any infection or SSI. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative TNFi exposure was not associated with postoperative infectious complications in a large prospective multicenter cohort.

Histopathology of Colectomy Specimens Predicts Endoscopic Pouch Phenotype in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic appearance in patients with "pouchitis" after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) can be quite heterogenous. Patients with an endoscopic phenotype resembling Crohn's disease (CD) are at high risk of pouch loss. AIMS: We aimed to assess how the histopathology of colectomy specimens predicts endoscopic pouch phenotypes in UC. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed pouchoscopies from patients with UC who underwent IPAA and classified pouch findings into 7 main phenotypes: (1) normal, (2) afferent limb involvement, (3) inlet involvement, (4) diffuse, (5) focal inflammation of the pouch body, (6) cuffitis, and (7) pouch with fistulas noted ≥ 6 months from ileostomy takedown. We assessed the clinical and pathological data including deep, focal inflammation, granulomas, and terminal ileal involvement in the colectomy specimens. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify contributing factors to each phenotype. RESULTS: This study included 1,203 pouchoscopies from 382 patients with UC. On multivariable analysis, deep inflammation was significantly associated with pouch fistulas (Odds ratio 3.27; 95% confidence interval 1.65-6.47; P = 0.0007). Of the 75 patients with deep inflammation, only two patients (2.7%) were diagnosed with CD based on pathology review. Terminal ileal involvement significantly increased the risk of afferent limb involvement (Odds ratio 2.96; 95% confidence interval 1.04-8.47; P = 0.04). There were no significant associations between other microscopic features and phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: We identify histologic features of colectomy specimens in UC that predict subsequent pouch phenotypes. Particularly, deep inflammation in the resected colon was significantly associated with pouch fistulas, a pouch phenotype with poor prognosis.

Vedolizumab for perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Perianal fistulas are a debilitating manifestation of Crohn's disease (CD). Despite the advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy, the medical management of fistulizing CD continues to be challenged by unmet needs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of vedolizumab for the management of perianal fistulizing CD. METHODS: A search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library was performed from inception to June 2020 for studies reporting rates of perianal fistula healing in CD patients treated with vedolizumab. The primary outcome of interest was complete healing of perianal fistulas and the secondary outcome was partial healing. The pooled fistula healing rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated utilizing a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies were initially identified, 4 of which met the inclusion criteria. A total of 198 patients with active perianal fistulas were included, 87% of whom had failed previous anti-TNF therapy. The pooled complete healing rate was 27.6% (95% CI, 18.9%-37.3%) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=49.4%) and the pooled partial healing rate was 34.9% (95% CI, 23.2%-47.7%) with high heterogeneity (I2=67.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of 4 studies that included 198 patients with perianal fistulizing CD, the majority of whom had failed previous anti-TNF therapy, vedolizumab treatment led to healing of perianal fistulas in nearly one-third of the patients. The lack of high-quality data and significant study heterogeneity underscores the need for future prospective studies of fistula healing in patients receiving anti-integrin therapy.

Outcomes of Ileoanal Pouch Anastomosis in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Are Worse in the Modern Era: A Time Trend Analysis Outcomes Following Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Despite significant differences in surgical outcomes between pediatric and adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) undergoing colectomy, counseling on pediatric outcomes has largely been guided by data from adults. We compared differences in pouch survival between pediatric and adult patients who underwent total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study of patients with UC treated with IPAA who subsequently underwent pouchoscopy between 1980 and 2019. Data were collected via electronic medical records. We stratified the study population based on age at IPAA. Differences between groups were assessed using t tests and chi-square tests. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare survival probabilities. Differences between groups were assessed using a log-rank test. RESULTS: We identified 53 patients with UC who underwent IPAA before 19 years of age and 329 patients with UC who underwent IPAA at or after 19 years of age. Subjects who underwent IPAA as children were more likely to require anti-tumor nerosis factor (TNF) postcolectomy compared with adults (41.5% vs 25.8%; P < .05). Kaplan-Meier estimates revealed that pediatric patients who underwent IPAA in the last 10 years had a 5-year pouch survival probability that was 28% lower than that of those who underwent surgery in the 1990s or 2000s (72% vs 100%; P < .001). Further, children who underwent IPAA and received anti-TNF therapies precolectomy had the most rapid progression to pouch failure when compared with anti-TNF-naive children and with adults who were either exposed or naive precolectomy (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: There are lower rates of pouch survival for children with UC who underwent IPAA following the uptake of anti-TNF therapy compared with both historical pediatric control subjects and contemporary adults.

Ileal pouch­anal anastomosis is the most common surgical approach for patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing total proctocolectomy. Outcomes are informed by heterogeneous adult data cohorts often predating anti-tumor necrosis factor uptake. We find that for children in the modern era pouch loss occurs at higher rates.

Factors associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor effectiveness to prevent postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We assessed the effectiveness of anti-TNF agents and its associated factors to prevent endoscopic and clinical postoperative recurrence (POR) in Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: From a prospectively-maintained database, we retrieved 316 CD patients who underwent intestinal resection (2011-2017). Endoscopic (Rutgeerts index ≥ i2 at 6 months) and clinical (recurrence of symptoms leading to hospitalization or therapeutic escalation) POR were assessed. RESULTS: In 117 anti-TNF-naïve patients, anti-TNF therapy was more effective than immunosuppressive agents (odds ratio [OR], 8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-43.9; P= 0.008) and no medication/5-aminosalicylates (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.0-27.9; P= 0.05) to prevent endoscopic POR. In 199 patients exposed to anti-TNF prior to the surgery, combination with anti-TNF and immunosuppressive agents was more effective than anti-TNF monotherapy (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.02-5.31; P= 0.046) to prevent endoscopic POR. Primary failure to anti-TNF agent prior to surgery was predictive of anti-TNF failure to prevent endoscopic POR (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.10-5.32; P= 0.03). When endoscopic POR despite anti-TNF prophylactic medication (n = 55), optimizing anti-TNF and adding an immunosuppressive drug was the most effective option to prevent clinical POR (hazard ratio, 7.38; 95% CI, 1.54-35.30; P= 0.012). Anti-TNF therapy was the best option to prevent clinical POR (hazard ratio, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.09-8.83; P= 0.034) in patients with endoscopic POR who did not receive any biologic to prevent endoscopic POR (n = 55). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF was the most effective medication to prevent endoscopic and clinical POR. Combination with anti-TNF and immunosuppressive agents should be considered in patients previously exposed to anti-TNF.