Emergency care for transgender and gender-diverse children and adolescents.

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) youth may present to the emergency department with a range of medical problems and health concerns. Some of these may be directly related to their gender identity, but the vast majority are not. While gender diversity is not considered a mental illness, TGD youth are at increased risk for suicide, anxiety, depression, and other psychological conditions, as well as family rejection, homelessness, food insecurity, and poverty. Lack of knowledge and cultural competency among emergency clinicians can create a barrier to effective care. This issue will review relevant terminology, epidemiology, and clinical best practices. It will help emergency clinicians understand common gender-affirming practices and recognize possible complications.

A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of a Double Check on the Detection of Medication Errors.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The use of a double check by 2 nurses has been advocated as a key error-prevention strategy. This study aims to determine how often a double check is used for high-alert medications and whether it increases error detection. METHODS: Emergency department and ICU nurses worked in pairs to care for a simulated patient. Nurses were randomized into single- and double-check groups. Errors intentionally introduced into the simulation included weight-based dosage errors and wrong medication vial errors. The evaluator recorded whether a double check was used, whether errors were detected, and observational data about nurse behavior during the simulation. RESULTS: Forty-three pairs of nurses consented to enroll in the study. All nurses randomized to the double-check group used a double check. In the single-check group, 9% of nurses detected the weight-based dosage error compared with 33% of nurses in the double-check group (odds ratio 5.0; 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 27.74). Fifty-four percent of nurses in the single-check group detected the wrong vial error compared with 100% of nurses in the double-check group (odds ratio 19.9; 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 408.5). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that nurses use double checks before administering high-alert medications. Use of a double check increases certain error detection rates in some circumstances, but not others. Both techniques missed many errors. In some cases, the second nurse actually dissuaded the first nurse from acting on the error.

The Effect of Emergency Department Boarding on Order Completion.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We identify differences in the process of care for admitted patients who board in the emergency department (ED) compared with admitted patients who are transferred to an inpatient care area. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a random sample of adult patients admitted through the ED at one urban teaching hospital. Patients who boarded in the ED for at least 6 hours after the decision to admit were matched to similar control patients. Data were collected by 2 trained medical students using a standardized data abstraction tool. All physician orders placed in the first 24 hours after admission orders were signed were identified. The medical record was searched for documentation of order completion. Each order was classified as being executed on time, delayed, or missed. RESULTS: Of 848 patients screened for inclusion in the study, a total of 145 matched case-control pairs were included, making a total of 290 patients. A total of 9,260 distinct orders were identified. Use of a generalized estimating equation that controlled for correlation within subjects showed that orders were less likely to be completed on time for boarders than for controls (odds ratio [OR] 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38 to 0.55). Among boarders, orders were more likely to be either delayed (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.46 to 2.30) or missed entirely (OR 2.58; 95% CI 1.94 to 3.42). Boarders missed a median of 11 orders during their first 24 hours of admission compared with 6 orders for control patients. CONCLUSION: This study detected an important process difference between boarded patients compared with control patients, which could explain previously suggested outcome differences between these 2 groups. This provides additional support for efforts to move patients to inpatient care areas in a timely fashion rather than board in the ED.

Volume of fluids administered during resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock and the development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between the volume of intravenous (IV) fluids administered in the resuscitative phase of severe sepsis and septic shock and the development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock at a large academic public hospital. The relationship between the volume of IV fluids administered and the development of ARDS was examined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 296 patients hospitalized for severe sepsis and septic shock, 75 (25.3%) developed ARDS. After controlling for confounding variables, there was no significant association between the volume of IV fluids administered in the first 24 hours of hospitalization and the development of ARDS (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.18). Serum albumin (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.87) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.13) on admission were the most informative covariates for the development of ARDS in the regression model. CONCLUSIONS: For patients hospitalized for severe sepsis and septic shock, fluid administration to improve end-organ perfusion should remain the top priority in early resuscitation despite the potential risk of inducing ARDS.

The effect of financial incentives on adherence with outpatient human immunodeficiency virus testing referrals from the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Undiagnosed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is not uncommon among patients who seek care in urban inner-city emergency departments (EDs). The optimal method for providing appropriate HIV counseling, testing, and referral in this setting is unclear. A previous evaluation of an outpatient referral system for HIV testing among patients seen in the ED demonstrated that only 11% returned to be tested; of those tested, 7% were seropositive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a financial incentive on the proportion of referred ED patients who completed outpatient HIV counseling and testing. METHODS: This was a quasi-experiment performed at an urban county teaching hospital. ED patients identified using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines as being at risk for HIV infection were referred for outpatient HIV counseling and testing at our institution within one week. This study was divided into three study periods. During the first and third periods, no financial incentive was offered for completing HIV counseling and testing. During the second period, a 25 dollars incentive was offered for completing HIV counseling and testing. RESULTS: During the study, 372 patients were referred for HIV counseling and testing. During the control periods, 20 (8%) of 252 patients completed HIV counseling and testing; during the intervention period, 27 (23%) of 120 patients completed HIV counseling and testing (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.8 to 6.3). Of the 47 patients who completed HIV counseling and testing, none (0%; 95% confidence interval = 0% to 8%) tested positive for HIV infection. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a modest financial incentive increased the proportion of patients who completed HIV counseling and testing after being referred from the ED. It is unclear whether the use of a financial incentive increases the identification of HIV-infected patients unaware of their status or if it is cost-effective.

Evaluation of an emergency department referral system for outpatient HIV testing.

BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed HIV infection is prevalent among patients who present to urban emergency departments (EDs). Providing appropriate counseling, testing, and follow-up in the ED is difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a referral-based outpatient HIV testing system for patients referred from the ED. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study performed at an urban teaching hospital. Consecutive patients referred from the emergency department (ED) for outpatient HIV testing were enrolled. Data were collected from each patient's ED record and HIV clinic record, if applicable. RESULTS: Of the 586 referrals made from our ED, 494 (84%) met inclusion criteria. Only 56 patients (11%, 95% CI: 9-15%) arrived at the HIV clinic and completed pretest counseling. Of these, 51 (91%, 95% CI: 80-97%) tested negative for HIV, 4 (7%, 95% CI: 2-17%) tested positive for HIV, and 1 (2%, 95% CI: 0-10%) refused the test. CONCLUSIONS: This referral system was ineffective at identifying unrecognized HIV infection due to poor adherence. Changes in the structure of the referral system or the use of point-of-care testing in the ED may improve the ability to detect HIV infection in this setting.