Exercise-induced GH secretion is related to puberty.

PURPOSE: Exercise represents a physiological stimulus that initiates the coordinated responses of hypothalamic-pituitary axis and sympathetic nervous system. Aims of the study were: 1) to analyze the response of GH, cortisol and prolactin to acute exercise in healthy children with normal GH response to stimulation tests 2) to evaluate the reliability of physical exercise as a screening test for GH secretion. METHODS: Forty-four children (mean age 9.35 ± 2.69 years, range 4-13.7) underwent standardized Bruce's test on treadmill. Twenty-nine children were pre-pubertal (nine females and 20 males) and 15 children were pubertal (ten females and five males). RESULTS: Exercise elicited a peak secretion of all the analyzed hormones. GH showed the highest mean percentage increase (558%), followed by prolactin (178%) and cortisol (23%). In 19/44 children (43.2%), GH peak did not reach the cut-off level of 8 ng/ml, considered as the normal GH response to stimulation tests. Despite a wide inter-individual variability, both GH peak and GH increase from baseline were higher in pubertal children than in pre-pubertal ones (GH peak: 13.49 ± 10.28 ng/ml versus 6.6 ± 4.09 ng/ml-p < 0.001; GH increase: 12.02 ± 10.30 ng/ml versus 5.28 ± 3.97 ng/ml-p < 0.001). The impact of puberty on both GH peak and GH increase was independent of sex, age, BMI SDS and VO2max. No differences related to sex or pubertal status were found in cortisol and prolactin responses. CONCLUSION: Exercise-induced GH secretion should not be considered a valuable screening tool in the diagnostic work-up of GH deficiency, due to the wide inter-individual variability in GH response. As described for standard GH stimulation tests, puberty represents the key factor that enhances GH secretion in healthy children.

Growth hormone response to physical exercise in growing patients with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

Glucocorticoid over-treatment in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) may suppress GH secretion and growth. Aims of our study were: 1) to evaluate post-exercise GH response in patients affected by CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency, in comparison with a group of healthy subjects; 2) to investigate the relationship between the hormonal markers of adequate steroid therapy and GH secretion. We evaluated GH secretion every 6 months in 20 young CAH patients (8 girls, 12 boys). Mean follow-up was 4.6+/-0.9 yr (107 tests performed, 5.35+/-2.05 repeated tests for each patient). Forty-four healthy subjects (25 boys, 19 girls) were selected as a control group. The range of post-exercise GH peak was very wide, but medians were not statistically different in cases and controls (p=0.570). Multivariate analysis showed that post-exercise GH peak was not related to age (p=0.743), gender (p=0.296) or pubertal status (p=0.440) in both groups. GH increase from baseline showed the same behavior (p=0.265, 0.639 and 0.105, respectively). In CAH patients, GH peak and GH increase were both directly related to 17-OH-progesterone levels [GH peak: p=0.032--95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01-0.34--beta=0.18; GH increase: p=0.008--95% CI: 0.06-0.35--beta=0.20]. The negative effect of glucocorticoid therapy on GH secretion seems to be dominant in CAH. The most effective approach to adjust treatment remains monitoring growth. Relying on hormonal markers to adequate steroid therapy may result in over-treatment, GH suppression, and finally poor linear growth.

Young elite athletes of different sport disciplines present with an increase in pulsatile secretion of growth hormone compared with non-elite athletes and sedentary subjects.

Acute exercise is a well-known stimulus for GH secretion but the effect of chronic training on GH secretion still remains equivocal. The aim of our study was to analyse spontaneous pulsatile GH secretion (during a period of 2 hours in the morning) in a group of young elite athletes (EA) compared with non-elite athletes (NEA), and sedentary subjects (SS). Mean and peak GH levels proved significantly higher in EA than in NEA and SS (p=0.0004 and p<0.0001, respectively). The same differences in mean and peak GH levels were also demonstrated in males and females when considered separately (males: p=0.0062 and p=0.0025; females: p=0.0056 and p=0.0032). In addition, GH levels (mean and peak) were higher in females than in males in SS while no differences were demonstrated between the 2 sexes in the EA and NEA groups. IGF-I levels were within the normal range for age in all the subjects with no difference between the 3 groups. Body mass index (BMI) exhibited no difference between groups, while EA showed higher lean mass (p=0.0063) and lower fat mass (p=0.0139) than NEA and SS measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. A strong positive correlation between GH levels (mean and peak) and hours of training a week was demonstrated (p=0.0101; r2=0.1184; p=0.0022; r2=0.1640, respectively). In conclusion, GH levels were higher in EA than NEA and SS without any modification of IGF-I levels; a strong positive correlation was present between GH levels and intensity of training. An increase in the knowledge of the effect of chronic training on GH secretion could improve the training programme to elicit the greatest exercise- induced GH response.