Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(8): e0065524, 2024 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980020

ABSTRACT

Emerging tick-borne illnesses, such as anaplasmosis, babesiosis, or ehrlichiosis, are caused by obligate intracellular pathogens that have clinically comparable presentations. Diagnostics used in laboratories today are serologic assays and blood smear analyses, which have known diagnostic limits. This study evaluated the performance of a sample-to-answer direct real-time PCR laboratory-developed test for the multiplex qualitative detection of Anaplasma, Babesia, and Ehrlichia DNA in whole-blood specimens. Compared to two standard-of-care (SOC) methods, the DiaSorin tick-borne laboratory-developed test for Anaplasma detection demonstrated a positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) of 100% (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.0) and 89% (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.97), respectively with a discordant rate of 9.3% against microscopy. After discordant resolution, the NPA increased to 100%. For Babesia, the test demonstrated a PPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0) and NPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0). Compared to a SOC PCR method Anaplasma samples showed a PPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.0) and NPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0). Ehrlichia results showed a PPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.0) and NPA of 100% (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0). The total percent agreement was 98% (95% CI, 0.95 to 0.99) with a κ statistic of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90 to 0.99) or almost perfect agreement compared to SOC methods. This laboratory-developed test for detecting Anaplasma, Babesia, and Ehrlichia DNA provides rapid and reliable detection of tick-borne infections without nucleic acid extraction. IMPORTANCE: This work demonstrates that detection of tick-borne illnesses, such as anaplasmosis, babesiosis, or ehrlichiosis, can be performed directly from whole blood with no extraction. The assay described here has a high positive and negative percent agreement with existing methods and is used as the standard of care. An increasing incidence of tick-borne illness combined with shortage of well-trained technologists to perform traditional manual testing, testing options that can be adapted to various lab settings, are of the utmost importance.


Subject(s)
Anaplasma phagocytophilum , Anaplasmosis , Babesia , Babesiosis , Ehrlichia , Ehrlichiosis , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Humans , Ehrlichia/isolation & purification , Ehrlichia/genetics , Anaplasma phagocytophilum/isolation & purification , Anaplasma phagocytophilum/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Ehrlichiosis/diagnosis , Ehrlichiosis/microbiology , Babesiosis/diagnosis , Babesiosis/parasitology , Babesiosis/blood , Babesia/isolation & purification , Babesia/genetics , Anaplasmosis/diagnosis , Anaplasmosis/microbiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tick-Borne Diseases/diagnosis , Tick-Borne Diseases/microbiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/parasitology , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/blood
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 78(4): 338-42, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24439447

ABSTRACT

The performance of a diagnostic method for detection and identification of Enterococcus spp. directly from positive blood culture was evaluated in a clinical study. The method, Enterococcus QuickFISH BC, is a second-generation peptide nucleic acid (PNA) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test, which uses a simplified, faster assay procedure. The test uses fluorescently labeled PNA probes targeting 16S rRNA to differentiate Enterococcus faecalis from other Enterococcus spp. by the color of the cellular fluorescence. Three hundred fifty-six routine blood culture samples were tested; only 2 discordant results were recorded. The sensitivities for detection of Enterococcus faecalis and non-faecalis Enterococcus were 100% (106/106) and 97.0% (65/67), respectively, and the combined specificity of the assay was 100%. The combined positive and negative predictive values of the assay were 100% (171/171) and 98.9% (185/187), respectively.


Subject(s)
Blood/microbiology , Enterococcus/classification , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Sepsis/diagnosis , Enterococcus/genetics , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sepsis/microbiology
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(6): 1994-8, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22493336

ABSTRACT

A novel rapid peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method, Staphylococcus QuickFISH, for the direct detection of Staphylococcus species from positive blood culture bottles was evaluated in a multicenter clinical study. The method utilizes a microscope slide with predeposited positive- and negative-control organisms and a self-reporting 15-min hybridization step, which eliminates the need for a wash step. Five clinical laboratories tested 722 positive blood culture bottles containing gram-positive cocci in clusters. The sensitivities for detection of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were 99.5% (217/218) and 98.8% (487/493), respectively, and the combined specificity of the assay was 89.5% (17/19). The combined positive and negative predictive values of the assay were 99.7% (696/698) and 70.8% (17/24), respectively. Studies were also performed on spiked cultures to establish the specificity and performance sensitivity of the method. Staphylococcus QuickFISH has a turnaround time (TAT) of <30 min and a hands-on time (HOT) of <5 min. The ease and speed of the method have the potential to improve the accuracy of therapeutic intervention by providing S. aureus/CoNS identification simultaneously with Gram stain results.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Blood/microbiology , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Bacteremia/microbiology , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL