Phase II, dose ranging study of the safety and immunogenicity of single dose West Nile vaccine in healthy adults ≥ 50 years of age.

INTRODUCTION: ChimeriVax-WN02 is a live, attenuated chimeric vaccine for protection against West Nile virus (WNV) produced by insertion of the genes encoding the pre-membrane (prM) and envelope (E) proteins of WNV (strain NY99) into the yellow fever 7D vaccine virus. This Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study in the US assessed the immunogenicity, viremia, and safety of the ChimeriVax-WN02 vaccine. METHODS: The study included adults in general good health. Subjects aged ≥ 50 years were randomized to one of four treatment groups: ChimeriVax-WN02 4 × 10(3) plaque-forming units (pfu) (n=122), 4 × 10(4)pfu (n=124), 4 × 10(5)pfu (n=113), or placebo (n=120). A subset of subjects was randomized to assess viremia after vaccination at three different dose levels. Subjects were followed for safety up to 6 months after vaccination. RESULTS: A total of 121 subjects for WN024 × 10(3), 122 for WN02 4 × 10(4), 110 for WN02 4 × 10(5), and 120 for the placebo group completed the study up to the 6-month safety follow-up. Seroconversion, as measured by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), was achieved at Day 28 by 92.1%, 93.2%, and 95.4% of subjects in the WN02 4 × 10(3), the WN02 4 × 10(4), and the WN02 4 × 10(5) groups, respectively. Viremia was transient, detected between Days 2 and 14 but not at Day 28, and in most cases did not reach the quantification threshold. The percentage of subjects reporting at least one event of reactogenicity was similar in the placebo and active vaccine groups and showed no dose relationship. CONCLUSIONS: The ChimeriVax-WN02 vaccine was highly immunogenic and well tolerated among subjects ≥ 50 years old at all dose levels.

Impact of a peer-delivered telephone intervention for women experiencing a breast cancer recurrence.

PURPOSE: A first breast cancer recurrence creates considerable distress, yet few psychosocial interventions directed at this population have been reported. The Southwest Oncology Group conducted a phase III randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief telephone intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred five women experiencing a first recurrence of breast cancer were randomly assigned to standard care or intervention. The intervention consisted of four to eight telephone calls delivered over a 1-month period. The calls were conducted by trained peer counselors at a breast cancer advocacy organization, the Y-ME National Breast Cancer Organization, and followed a standard curriculum. Psychosocial distress (Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form [CARES-SF]) and depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [CES-D]) outcomes were assessed at baseline and 3 and 6 months. The 3-month assessment was the primary end point and is the focus of this article. RESULTS: Analysis revealed no differences in distress or depressive symptoms at 3 months between the intervention and control groups; at 3 months, 70% of control patients and 66% of intervention patients reported psychosocial distress, and 40% of control patients and 47% of intervention patients exhibited depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Telephone peer counseling did not lead to better psychosocial outcomes. The persistent distress in these women supports the urgent need for the development and testing of more intensive or different supportive interventions for this group of patients.

A pilot study of switch to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy from nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based therapy.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of switching HIV-infected patients with stable viral suppression on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor/nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI/NRTI) therapy to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy. METHOD: Eligible patients discontinued NNRTI and started LPV/r. Two weeks later NRTIs were stopped and LPV/r monotherapy was continued. Patients were seen every 4 weeks throughout the 48-week study. RESULTS: Twelve of 18 (66%) participants met the primary endpoint with HIV RNA <75 copies/mL at week 48. Thirteen (72%) participants completed 48 weeks of LPV/r monotherapy, and 12 of 13 (92%) participants on treatment at week 48 had HIV RNA <75 copies/mL. Ten (55%) of 18 patients maintained HIV RNA <75 copies/mL at all time points. Two patients were withdrawn with virologic failure but demonstrated no evidence of virologic resistance. Three (17%) patients withdrew due to diarrhea, 2 with hyperglycemia at baseline developed diabetes mellitus, 7 (54%) required addition of or increase in lipid-lowering agents, but none had grade 3 or 4 hyperlipidemia. CONCLUSION: Results from this pilot study suggest that LPV/r monotherapy may be an option for management of HIV infection. Larger, randomized trials are warranted to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and patient population who might benefit from LPV/r monotherapy.