ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To analyze patients, injury patterns, and treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young patients with FNFs associated with shaft fractures (assocFNFs) to improve clinical outcomes. The secondary goal was to compare this injury pattern to that of young patients with isolated FNFs (isolFNFs). DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort series. SETTING: Twenty-six North American level-1 trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Skeletally mature patients, <50 years old, treated with operative fixation of an FNF with or without an associated femoral shaft fracture. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The main outcome measurement was treatment failure defined as nonunion, malunion, avascular necrosis, or subsequent major revision surgery. Odds ratios for these modes of treatment were also calculated. RESULTS: Eighty assocFNFs and 412 isolFNFs evaluated in this study were different in terms of patients, injury patterns, and treatment strategy. Patients with assocFNFs were younger (33.3 ± 8.6 vs. 37.5 ± 8.7 years old, P < 0.001), greater in mean body mass index [BMI] (29.7 vs. 26.6, P < 0.001), and more frequently displaced (95% vs. 73%, P < 0.001), "vertically oriented" Pauwels type 3, P < 0.001 (84% vs. 43%) than for isolFNFs, with all P values < 0.001. AssocFNFs were more commonly repaired with an open reduction (74% vs. 46%, P < 0.001) and fixed-angle implants (59% vs. 39%) (P < 0.001). Importantly, treatment failures were less common for assocFNFs compared with isolFNFs (20% vs. 49%, P < 0.001) with lower rates of failed fixation/nonunion and malunion (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Odds of treatment failure [odds ratio (OR) = 0.270, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.48, P < 0.001], nonunion (OR = 0.240, 95% CI, 0.10-0.57, P < 0.001), and malunion (OR = 0.920, 95% CI, 0.01-0.68, P = 0.002) were also lower for assocFNFs. Excellent or good reduction was achieved in 84.2% of assocFNFs reductions and 77.1% in isolFNFs (P = 0.052). AssocFNFs treated with fixed-angle devices performed very well, with only 13.0% failing treatment compared with 51.9% in isolFNFs treated with fixed-angle constructs (P = <0.001) and 33.3% in assocFNFs treated with multiple cannulated screws (P = 0.034). This study also identified the so-called "shelf sign," a transverse ≥6-mm medial-caudal segment of the neck fracture (forming an acute angle with the vertical fracture line) in 54% of assocFNFs and only 9% of isolFNFs (P < 0.001). AssocFNFs with a shelf sign failed in only 5 of 41 (12%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: AssocFNFs in young patients are characterized by different patient factors, injury patterns, and treatments, than for isolFNFs, and have a relatively better prognosis despite the need for confounding treatment for the associated femoral shaft injury. Treatment failures among assocFNFs repaired with a fixed-angle device occurred at a lower rate compared with isolFNFs treated with any construct type and assocFNFs treated with multiple cannulated screws. The radiographic "shelf sign" was found as a positive prognostic sign in more than half of assocFNFs and predicted a high rate of successful treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)
Femoral Neck Fractures , Humans , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Fractures, Multiple/surgery , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the difference in failure rates of surgical repair for displaced femoral neck fractures in patients younger than 60 years of age according to fixation strategy. DESIGN: This is a retrospective, comparative cohort study. SETTING: Twenty-six Level 1 North American trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients younger than 60 years of age with a displaced femoral neck fracture (OTA 31-B2, B3) undergoing surgical repair from 2005 to 2017. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Patient demographics, injury characteristics, repair methods used, and treatment failure (nonunion/failed fixation, avascular necrosis, and need for secondary surgery) were compared according to fixation strategy. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-five patients met inclusion criteria and were studied. The mean age was 42 years, 36% were female, and the average Pauwels' angle of fractures was 55 degrees. There were 305 patients treated with multiple cannulated screws (MCS) and 260 treated with a fixed-angle (FA) construct. Treatment failures were 46% overall, but was more likely to occur in MCS constructs versus FA devices (55% vs. 36%, P < 0.001). When FA constructs were substratified, the use of a sliding hip screw with addition of a medial femoral neck buttress plate (FNBP) and "antirotation" (AR) screw demonstrated better results than either FNBP or AR screw alone or neither with the lowest overall construct failure rate of 11% (P < 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Historically used fixation constructs for femoral neck fractures (eg, multiple cannulated screws and sliding hip screw) in young and middle-aged adults performed poorly compared with more recently proposed constructs, including those using a medial femoral neck buttress plate and an antirotation screw. Fixed-angle constructs outperformed multiple cannulated screws overall, and augmentation of fixed-angle constructs with a medial femoral neck buttress plate and antirotation screw improved the likelihood of successful treatment. Surgeons should prioritize fixation decisions when repairing displaced femoral neck fractures in patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)
Femoral Neck Fractures , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Trauma Centers , Humans , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Adolescent , Young Adult , Bone Screws , Cohort Studies , Treatment Failure , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To study the results of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in adults less than 60 years of age by comparing patients, injury, treatment, and the characteristics of treatment failure specifically according to patients' age at injury, that is, by their "decade of life" [ie, "under 30" (29 years and younger), "the 30s" (30-39 years), "the 40s" (40-49 years), and "the 50s" (50-59 years)]. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective comparative cohort series. SETTING: Twenty-six North American Level 1 Trauma Centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Skeletally mature patients aged 18-59 years with operative repair of displaced FNFs. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Main outcome measures were treatment failures (fixation failure and/or nonunion, osteonecrosis, malunion, and the need for subsequent major reconstructive surgery (arthroplasty or proximal femoral osteotomy). These were compared across decades of adult life through middle age (<30 years, 30-39 years, 40-49 years, and 50-59 years). RESULTS: Overall, treatment failure was observed in 264 of 565 (47%) of all hips. The mean age was 42.2 years, 35.8% of patients were women, and the mean Pauwels angle was 53.8 degrees. Complications and the need for major secondary surgeries increased with each increasing decade of life assessed: 36% of failure occurred in patients <30 years of age, 40% in their 30s, 48% in their 40s, and 57% in their 50s (P < 0.001). Rates of osteonecrosis increased with decades of life (under 30s and 30s vs. 40s vs. 50s developed osteonecrosis in 10%, 10%, 20%, and 27% of hips, P < 0.001), while fixation failure and/or nonunion only increased by decade of life to a level of trend (P = 0.06). Reparative methods varied widely between decade-long age groups, including reduction type (open vs. closed, P < 0.001), reduction quality (P = 0.030), and construct type (cannulated screws vs. fixed angle devices, P = 0.024), while some variables evaluated did not change with age group. CONCLUSIONS: Displaced FNFs in young and middle-aged adults are a challenging clinical problem with a high rate of treatment failure. Major complications and the need for complex reconstructive surgery increased greatly by decade of life with the patients in their sixth decade experiencing osteonecrosis at the highest rate seen among patients in the decades studied. Interestingly, treatments provided to patients in their 50s were notably different than those provided to younger patient groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)
Femoral Neck Fractures , Treatment Failure , Humans , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Male , Young Adult , Retrospective Studies , Adolescent , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Age FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of technical errors (TEs) on the outcomes after repair of femoral neck fractures in young adults. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective clinical study. SETTING: 26 North American Level 1 Trauma Centers. PATIENTS: Skeletally mature patients younger than 50 years of age with 492 femoral neck fractures treated between 2005 and 2017. INTERVENTION: Operative repair of femoral neck fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The association between TE (malreduction and deviation from optimal technique) and treatment failure (fixation failure, nonunion, malunion, osteonecrosis, malunion, and revision surgery) were examined using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, a TE was observed in 50% (n = 245/492) of operatively managed femoral neck fractures in young patients. Two or more TEs were observed in 10% of displaced fractures. Treatment failure in displaced fractures occurred in 27% of cases without a TE, 56% of cases with 1 TE, and 86% of cases with 2 or more TEs. TEs were encountered less frequently in treatment of nondisplaced fractures compared with displaced fractures (39% vs. 53%, P < 0.001). Although TE(s) in nondisplaced fractures increased the risk of treatment failure and/or major reconstructive surgery (22% vs. 9%, P < 0.001), they were less frequently associated with treatment failure when compared with displaced fractures with a TE (22% vs. 69% P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TEs were found in half of all femoral neck fractures in young adults undergoing operative repair. Both the occurrence and number of TEs were associated with an increased risk for failure of treatment. Preoperative planning for thoughtful and well-executed reduction and fixation techniques should lead to improved outcomes for young patients with femoral neck fractures. This study should also highlight the need for educational forums to address this subject. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)
Femoral Neck Fractures , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Young Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Treatment Failure , Reoperation , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether augmenting traditional fixation with a femoral neck buttress plate (FNBP) improves clinical outcomes in young adults with high-energy displaced femoral neck fractures. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective matched cohort comparative clinical study. SETTING: Twenty-seven North American Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS: Adult patients younger than 55 years who sustained a high-energy (nonpathologic) displaced femoral neck fracture. INTERVENTION: Operative reduction and stabilization of a displaced femoral neck fracture with (group 1) and without (group 2) an FNBP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Complications including failed fixation, nonunion, osteonecrosis, malunion, and need for subsequent major reconstructive surgery (early revision of reduction and/or fixation), proximal femoral osteotomy, or arthroplasty. RESULTS: Of 478 patients younger than 55 years treated operatively for a displaced femoral neck fracture, 11% (n = 51) had the definitive fixation augmented with an FNBP. One or more forms of treatment failure occurred in 29% (n = 15/51) for group 1 and 49% (209/427) for group 2 ( P < 0.01). When FNBP fixation was used, mini-fragment (2.4/2.7 mm) fixation failed significantly more often than small-fragment (3.5 mm) fixation (42% vs. 5%, P < 0.01). Irrespective of plate size, anterior and anteromedial plates failed significantly more often than direct medial plates (75% and 33% vs. 9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a femoral neck buttress plate to augment traditional fixation in displaced femoral neck fractures is associated with improved clinical outcomes, including lower rates of failed fixation, nonunion, osteonecrosis, and need for secondary reconstructive surgery. The benefits of this technique are optimized when a small-fragment (3.5 mm) plate is applied directly to the medial aspect of the femoral neck, avoiding more anterior positioning . LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)
Femoral Neck Fractures , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Young Adult , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Retrospective Studies , Femoral Neck Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Bone Plates , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The 2 main forms of treatment for distal femur fractures are locked lateral plating and retrograde nailing. The goal of this trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty academic trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty patients with distal femur fractures were enrolled. One hundred twenty-six patients were followed 12 months. Patients were randomized to plating in 62 cases and intramedullary nailing in 64 cases. INTERVENTION: Lateral locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional scoring including Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, bother index, EQ Health, and EQ Index. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, walking ability, ability to manage stairs, and number and type of adverse events. RESULTS: Functional testing showed no difference between the groups. Both groups were still significantly affected by their fracture 12 months after injury. There was more coronal plane valgus in the plating group, which approached statistical significance. Range of motion, walking ability, and ability to manage stairs were similar between the groups. Rate and type of adverse events were not statistically different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both lateral locked plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing are reasonable surgical options for these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year after injury but remain impaired 1 year postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures, Distal , Femoral Fractures , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Fractures, Bone , Humans , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects , Bone Plates , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Fracture HealingABSTRACT
SUMMARY: Displaced acetabular fractures with medial and cranial displacement of the femoral head commonly require an anterior approach for reduction and stabilization. Restoration of the femoral head to its native position under the reduced acetabular dome is a primary goal of surgery. We present a surgical technique for applying traction to the proximal femur using the Bookwalter retractor system during the repair of acetabular fractures when using an anterior approach. By placing traction in line with the femoral neck, the femoral head is moved to a more anatomical position allowing acetabular fracture fragments to be reduced unimpeded and the femoral head may be used as a reconstructive template. We review a case series of 116 patients treated using this technique and report the short- and long-term radiographic and clinical results of treatment.
Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Hip Fractures , Spinal Fractures , Humans , Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging , Acetabulum/surgery , Acetabulum/injuries , Traction , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Femur , Treatment Outcome , Fractures, Bone/surgeryABSTRACT
Posterior pelvic ring injuries (i.e., sacro-iliac joint dislocations, fracture-dislocations, sacral fractures, pelvic non-unions/malunions) are challenging injury patterns which require a significant level of surgical training and technical expertise. The modality of surgical management depends on the specific injury patterns, including the specific bony fracture pattern, ilio-sacral joint involvement, and the soft tissue injury pattern. The workhorse for posterior pelvic ring stabilization has been cannulated iliosacral screws, however, trans-sacral screws may impart increased fixation strength. Depending on injury pattern and sacral anatomy, trans-sacral screws can potentially be more beneficial than iliosacral screws. In this article, the authors will briefly review pelvic mechanics and discuss their rationale for ilio-sacral and/or trans-sacral screw fixation.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess the operative results of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young adults in a large multicenter series, specifically focusing on risk factors for treatment failure. DESIGN: Large multicenter retrospective cohort series. SETTING: Twenty-six North American Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS: Skeletally mature patients younger than 50 years with displaced and nondisplaced FNFs treated between 2005 and 2017. INTERVENTION: Operative repair of FNF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome measure is treatment failure: nonunion and/or failed fixation, osteonecrosis, malunion, and need for subsequent major reconstructive surgery (arthroplasty or proximal femoral osteotomy). Logistic regression models were conducted to examine factors associated with treatment failure. RESULTS: Of 492 patients with FNFs studied, a major complication and/or subsequent major reconstructive surgery occurred in 45% (52% of 377 displaced fractures and 21% of 115 nondisplaced fractures). Overall, 23% of patients had nonunion/failure of fixation, 12% osteonecrosis type 2b or worse, 15% malunion (>10 mm), and 32% required major reconstructive surgery. Odds of failure were increased with fair-to-poor reduction [odds ratio (OR) = 5.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.41-13.31], chronic alcohol misuse (OR = 3.08, 95% CI = 1.59-6.38), comminution (OR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.69-4.13), multiple screw constructs (vs. fixed-angle devices, OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.30-2.95), metabolic bone disease (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.17-2.67), and increasing age (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01-1.06). Women (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37-0.88), Pauwels angle ≤50 degrees (type 1 or 2; OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.41-0.98), or associated femoral shaft fracture (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.10-0.33) had lower odds of failure. CONCLUSIONS: FNFs in adults <50 years old remain a difficult clinical and surgical problem, with 45% of patients experiencing major complications and 32% undergoing subsequent major reconstructive surgery. Risk factors for complications after treatment of displaced FNFs were numerous. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)
Femoral Neck Fractures , Osteonecrosis , Female , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Humans , Middle Aged , North America , Osteonecrosis/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Collection of bone graft with the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) system has become common practice across the field of orthopaedic surgery. While RIA bone graft is typically obtained from native long bones, grafting material can likewise be harvested from long bones that have previously undergone the placement and removal of an intramedullary nail, a process termed re-reamed RIA (RRR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the total protein and growth factor concentrations present in native-RIA (NR) compared with RRR samples. METHODS: NR and RRR bone grafts were collected intraoperatively with the RIA system and processed to evaluate both the aqueous and the hard tissue components. Total protein concentration and specific growth factors were analyzed using standard bicinchoninic acid and multiplex assays, respectively. Analyte levels were then normalized to the total amount of protein detected. RESULTS: Total protein levels were comparable between NR and RRR samples for both the aqueous filtrate and the hard tissue samples. When normalized, while levels of bone morphogenic protein-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor were comparable in the hard tissue component, the aqueous filtrate from the RRR sample was found to have elevated levels of growth factors, with bone morphogenic protein-2 reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ample protein is found within both NR and RRR samples, with comparable or elevated levels of osteogenic growth factors found within RRR samples. Future, larger, prospective studies will be required to evaluate the osteogenic potential and clinical efficacy of NR and RRR cancellous bone grafts to validate their equivalency.
Subject(s)
Cancellous Bone , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , Bone Transplantation , Humans , Prospective Studies , Therapeutic Irrigation , Tissue and Organ Harvesting , Transplantation, AutologousABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To better describe the pathoanatomy of young patients' femoral neck fractures with the goal of improving surgeons' decisions for treatment including reduction and fixation. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study of patient records, plain radiographs, and the modern computed tomography scans to study the pathoanatomy of Pauwels II and III femoral neck fractures (coronal angle >30 degrees) in young adults. SETTING: One American College of Surgeons Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: All patients 18-49 years of age with a surgically repaired Pauwels' II and III (>30 degrees) femoral neck fracture between 2013 and 2017. METHODS: Fifty-six adult patients younger than 50 years were identified with a femoral neck fracture in the study period, of whom 30 met study criteria. We evaluated plain radiography and computed tomography data including fracture orientation, characteristics of fracture morphology including size, shape, and dimensions, comminution, displacement, and deformity. RESULTS: Fracture morphology typically included a wide-based caudal head-neck segment (80%) that ends at a variable location along the medial calcar, sometimes as caudal as the lesser trochanter. Comminution was present in 90% of cases mostly located in the inferior quadrant, but anterior or posterior to the void left by the head-neck's caudal segment. The fractures orientations and deformities were reported by means and ranges. CONCLUSIONS: We investigated and reported on the pathoanatomy of high-energy femoral neck fractures in young adults with the goal of increasing understanding of the injury and improving surgeons' ability to provide for improved treatment decisions and quality fracture repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)
Femoral Neck Fractures , Fractures, Comminuted , Femoral Neck Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine if prevalent approaches in acetabular fracture surgery provide enhanced anterior and cranial exposure in a cadaveric model. METHODS: A Kocher-Langenbeck (K-L) approach (followed by a Gibson approach on the contralateral hip) was performed in the lateral position on 8 cadavers. A Steinmann pin was used to create holes outlining the bony surfaces available for instrumentation before and after a trochanteric osteotomy. All soft tissue was then removed from the pelvis, and a calibrated digital picture was taken. The surface area of the pelvis visualized through each approach was calculated and compared with the contralateral side to assess for a difference in exposure between the Gibson approach and the K-L approach. An increase in exposure of greater than 10% was considered significant. The extent of anterior exposure (with and without a trochanteric osteotomy) was then measured from the greater sciatic notch. RESULTS: In 2 of 8 cadavers (25%), the Gibson approach yielded an increase in exposure when compared with a K-L approach. The addition of a trochanteric osteotomy yielded on average 1.6 cm (range, 0.7-2.6 cm) of increased anterior exposure in the K-L approaches and 1.5 cm (range 0.9-3.1 cm) in the Gibson approaches. CONCLUSION: The Gibson approach did not reliably provide increased anterior exposure compared with a K-L approach in a cadaver model. A trochanteric osteotomy can be expected to add 1-2 cm of increased anterior exposure in both approaches.
Subject(s)
Acetabulum , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Cadaver , Femur/surgery , Humans , OsteotomyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Tibia fractures are common injuries that can often be effectively treated with intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation. The ideal starting point for IMN reaming and nail placement is well described and regarded as a crucial aspect in the technique. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy and precision with which the starting point is established and if this is maintained after nail insertion during fracture fixation. METHODS: Fifty consecutive tibia fractures treated by IMN fixation sized 9 to 13 mm through an infrapatellar or medial parapatellar approach and 50 treated with a suprapatellar approach were evaluated. The starting point for reaming and IMN placement was measured using intraoperative fluoroscopy. Postoperative radiographs were used to determine the center of the IMN after placement. The distance between the measured points and the ideal starting point was measured. RESULTS: Deviation from the ideal entry point on intraoperative fluoroscopy averaged 4.6 ± 4.0 mm medially, 2.9 ± 3.7 mm anteriorly, and 2.7 ± 3.3 mm distally. In 30% of cases, the final IMN position varied from the entry point by greater than one SD in the coronal or sagittal plane. No difference between approaches was appreciated. DISCUSSION: Although the ideal starting point for tibial IMN fixation is known, this is frequently not the starting point accepted in practice. Final position of the IMN is independent of IMN size or approach and is not markedly different than the obtained starting point. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III.
Subject(s)
Bone Nails , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Tibia/injuries , Tibial Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Humans , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the presentation and outcomes of calcaneal avulsion fractures. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Two ACS Level I trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Forty-seven calcaneal avulsion fractures isolated from a cohort of 1365 calcaneus fractures treated over a 17-year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: We collected instances of soft-tissue compromise at presentation, evidence of implant failure or fracture displacement after fixation, and reoperation. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were treated operatively, and 6 were treated without surgery. Twenty-one patients (44.7%) had either soft-tissue compromise or an open fracture necessitating urgent treatment at the time of presentation. Of those patients treated operatively with 3-month follow-up (n = 39), 28.2% of patients (11/39) had evidence of implant failure or fracture displacement. Age was the only predictor of catastrophic fixation failure (P = 0.01). The use of washer(s), suture anchor(s), or addition of soft-tissue procedures (eg, Strayer) did not have a significant effect on failure rate. Neither the number of screws used nor size of screw impacted the failure rate. Fourteen patients (35.9%) underwent a secondary operation. DISCUSSION: Avulsion fractures of the calcaneus commonly present with soft-tissue compromise and have a significant rate of treatment failure and reoperation. This injury should be identified early and approached thoughtfully, acknowledging that risks are high. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Subject(s)
Calcaneus/injuries , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fractures, Avulsion/surgery , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Soft Tissue Injuries/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Calcaneus/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fractures, Avulsion/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Open/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Open/surgery , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Risk Assessment , Secondary Prevention , Trauma Centers , Treatment Failure , Young AdultABSTRACT
This chapter discusses principles and controversies surrounding the treatment of periprosthetic fractures around a hip replacement, specifically the Vancouver B1 injury. Evaluation and treatment decisions, as well as surgical tips and tricks, are discussed.
Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Fracture Healing , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To define the pathoanatomy of the posterior malleolus fracture associated with a spiral distal tibia fracture to guide clamp and implant placement when treating these common injuries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-two spiral infraisthmal tibia fractures identified from a cohort of 922 tibia fractures undergoing intramedullary nailing over a 7-year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: We collected instances of intra-articular extension seen on preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative imaging. For patients with a posterior malleolus fracture and computed tomography imaging, we used an axial image 2-3 mm above the articular surface to create a fracture map. RESULTS: Intra-articular extension was present in 84 patients (68.9%), with posterior malleolus fractures occurring most commonly (n = 59, 48.4%). Other fractures included plafond fractures (n = 8), medial malleolus fractures (n = 7), anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament avulsions (n = 5), and other anterior fractures (n = 5). Forty-one of 44 (93%) posterior malleolus fractures with cross-sectional imaging were Haraguchi type I (posterolateral-oblique type) with an average angle of 24 degrees off the bimalleolar axis. The remaining 3 were type II (transverse-medial extension type) fractures. Posterior malleolus fractures were visible 61% of the time on preoperative radiographs. DISCUSSION: Posterior malleolus fractures occur in approximately half of spiral distal tibia fractures and are consistently posterolateral in their morphology. This study can be used to enhance evaluation of the posterior malleolus intraoperatively (eg, â¼25 degrees external rotation view), and if the typical variant of posterior malleolus is identified, clamps and lag screws might be applied accordingly.
Subject(s)
Ankle Fractures/pathology , Ankle Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Fractures, Multiple/pathology , Tibial Fractures/pathology , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Ankle Fractures/complications , Cohort Studies , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Tibial Fractures/complicationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe the inferior retinacular artery (IRA) as encountered from an anterior approach, to define its intraarticular position, and to define a safe zone for buttress plate fixation of femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Thirty hips (15 fresh cadavers) were dissected through an anterior (Modified Smith-Petersen) approach after common femoral artery injection (India ink, blue latex). The origin of the IRA from the medial femoral circumflex artery and the course to its terminus were dissected. The IRA position relative to the femoral neck was described using a clock-face system: 12:00 cephalad, 3:00 anterior, 6:00 caudad, and 9:00 posterior. RESULTS: The IRA originated from the medial femoral circumflex artery and traveled within the Weitbrecht ligament in all hips. The IRA positions were 7:00 (n = 13), 7:30 (n = 15), and 8:00 (n = 2). The IRA was 0:30 anterior to (n = 24) or at the same clock-face position (n = 6) as the lesser trochanter. The mean intraarticular length was 20.4 mm (range 11-65, SD 9.1), and the mean extraarticular length was 20.5 mm (range 12-31, SD 5.1). CONCLUSIONS: The intraarticular course of the IRA lies within the Weitbrecht ligament between the femoral neck clock-face positions of 7:00 and 8:00. A medial buttress plate positioned at 6:00 along the femoral neck is anterior to the location of the IRA and does not endanger the blood supply of the femoral head. The improved understanding of the IRA course will facilitate preservation during intraarticular approaches to the femoral neck and head.
Subject(s)
Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Femur Head/blood supply , Femur Neck/blood supply , Femur Neck/surgery , Vascular System Injuries/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Plates , Cadaver , Female , Femoral Artery/injuries , Femoral Neck Fractures/complications , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Vascular System Injuries/etiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Unfamiliarity with the location of the femoral artery in the medial thigh has tempered surgeons' enthusiasm for medial approaches to the distal femur. The purpose of this study was to define the relationship of the femoral artery to the mid- and distal femur to assist in safely approaching the femur for fracture care. METHODS: Fifteen patients undergoing CT with angiography (CTA) of the lower extremity (CTA) were evaluated. From three-dimensional CTA images, the distance of the artery at the anterior border, midsagittal line, and posterior border of the femur from the distal femur at both the adductor tubercle and medial femoral condyle was measured. RESULTS: The average distances of the adductor tubercle to the femoral artery were 23.2 cm (±3.3), 18.8 cm (±3.4), and 14.3 cm (±4.1) at the level of the anterior border, midsagittal line, and posterior border of the femur, respectively. The descending genicular artery (DGA) originated 10.8 cm (±1.3) proximal to the adductor tubercle. DISCUSSION: A wide safe zone exists in the medial distal femur. The artery crosses the midsagittal axis of the medial femur an average of 18.8 cm proximal to the adductor tubercle.
Subject(s)
Computed Tomography Angiography , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Femur/blood supply , Thigh/blood supply , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Femoral Artery/anatomy & histology , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Femur/anatomy & histology , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Examination under anesthesia (EUA) has been used to identify pelvic instability. Surgeons may utilize percutaneous methods for posterior and anterior pelvic ring stabilization. We developed an intraoperative strategy whereby posterior fixation is performed, with reassessment using sequential EUA to determine the need for anterior fixation. Our aim in the current study was to evaluate whether this strategy reliably results in union with minimal displacement. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study involving adult patients with closed lateral compression (LC) pelvic ring injuries treated during the period of 2013 to 2016. Included were patients who underwent percutaneous pelvic fixation based on sequential EUA. Data points included patient demographics, injury and fixation details, and displacement as observed on follow-up radiographs. RESULTS: Complete documentation was available for 74 patients (mean age, 41 years). The mean duration of follow was 11 months. Fifty-three of the patients had LC-1 injuries, 19 had LC-2 injuries, and 2 had LC-3 injuries. Twenty-five (47.2%) of the 53 patients with LC-1 and 11 (57.9%) of the 19 patients with LC-2 injuries did not undergo anterior fixation on the basis of the algorithm. The 36 LC-1 or LC-2 patients who underwent combined anterior and posterior fixation had no measurable displacement at union. Of the 36 LC-1 or LC-2 patients with no anterior fixation, 27 with unilateral rami fractures had no measurable displacement at union. The remaining 9 LC-1 or LC-2 cases with no anterior fixation had bilateral superior and inferior rami fractures; each of these patients demonstrated displacement (mean, 7.5 mm; range, 5 to 12 mm) within 6 weeks of fixation that remained until union. All patients had protected weight-bearing for 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: A fixation strategy based on sequential intraoperative EUA reliably results in union with minimal displacement for unstable LC pelvic ring injuries. Injuries requiring combined anterior and posterior fixation healed with no displacement. Those without anterior fixation and a unilateral ramus fracture healed with no displacement. In the presence of bilateral rami fractures, even with a negative finding on sequential EUA, the pelvis healed with 7.5 mm average displacement. Surgeons may consider anterior fixation to prevent this displacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.