Combined analysis of VEGF and EGFR predicts complete tumour response in rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy.

The ability to predict complete pathologic response or sensitivity to radiation before treatment would have a significant impact on the selection of patients for preoperative radiotherapy or chemo-radiation therapy schedules. The aim of this study was to determine the value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), p53, Bcl-2 and apoptosis protease-activating factor-1 (APAF-1) as predictors of complete pathologic tumour regression in patients undergoing preoperative radiotherapy for advanced rectal cancer. Pretreatment tumour biopsies from predominantly cT3 patients undergoing a preoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy protocol were immunostained for EGFR, VEGF, p53, Bcl-2 and APAF-1. Immunoreactivity was evaluated by three pathologists. Cut-off scores for tumour marker positivity were obtained by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The association of marker expression with complete pathologic response was analysed in univariate and multivariable analysis. Multi-marker phenotypes of the independent protein markers were evaluated. In multivariable analysis, loss of VEGF (P-value=0.009; odds ratio (OR) (95% CI)=0.24 (0.08-0.69)) and positive EGFR (P-value=0.01; OR (95% CI)=3.82 (1.37-10.6)) both demonstrated independent predictive value for complete pathologic response. The odds of complete response were 12.8 for the multi-marker combination of VEGF-negative and EGFR-positive tumours. Of the 34 EGFR-negative- and VEGF-positive cases, 32 (94.1%) had no complete pathologic response. The combined analysis of VEGF and EGFR is predictive of complete pathologic response in patients undergoing preoperative radiotherapy. In addition, the findings of this study have identified a subgroup of simultaneous EGFR-negative and VEGF-positive patients who are highly resistant to radiotherapy and should perhaps be considered candidates for innovative neoadjuvant combined modalities.

Diagnosis of specialized intestinal metaplasia by optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an imaging technique that produces high-resolution cross-sectional images in vivo. The aim of this study was to establish the sensitivity and specificity of OCT for diagnosing specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM). METHODS: OCT was used to image the stomach and esophagus of 121 patients. A total of 288 biopsy-correlated OCT images were acquired. OCT criteria for SIM were formulated by analyzing 75 images of SIM. The SIM image criteria were retrospectively tested by applying them to images of gastric, squamous, SIM, and cardiac epithelium. The criteria were then tested prospectively to determine the sensitivity and specificity of OCT for diagnosing SIM. RESULTS: OCT images of SIM are characterized by (1) absence of the layered structure of normal squamous epithelium and the vertical "pit and crypt" morphology of gastric mucosa, (2) disorganized architecture with inhomogeneous tissue contrast and an irregular mucosal surface, and (3) presence of submucosal glands. These criteria were 100% sensitive and 93% specific for SIM when applied retrospectively and 97% sensitive and 92% specific when tested prospectively. CONCLUSIONS: OCT is highly sensitive and specific for SIM and may aid in the diagnosis and surveillance of this preneoplastic lesion.

Optical coherence tomography in the gastrointestinal tract.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a high-resolution, cross-sectional optical imaging technique that allows in situ imaging of tissue by measuring back-reflected light. OCT provides images in real time with a resolution approaching that of conventional histopathology, but without the need for tissue removal. OCT imaging can be performed endoscopically to visualize gastrointestinal tissue using a fiberoptic catheter passed through the instrument channel of a conventional endoscope. The resolution of OCT allows visualization of the different layers of gastrointestinal epithelium and the differentiation of Barrett's epithelium from normal gastric and squamous mucosa. OCT has also been used to image esophageal adenocarcinoma and colonic polyps. Recent developments include Doppler OCT, spectroscopic OCT, and ultrahigh-resolution OCT, which can visualize nuclei within single cells. Although still in its infancy as a clinical tool, OCT currently provides high-resolution images over the same imaging depth as conventional mucosal biopsy, and may prove to be a useful and minimally invasive technique for evaluating gastrointestinal tissue, particularly for early neoplastic changes.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor versus intra-abdominal fibromatosis of the bowel wall: a clinically important differential diagnosis.

Intra-abdominal fibromatosis (IAF) is an uncommon benign neoplasm that usually occurs in the mesentery or retroperitoneum and may, on occasion, mimic a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Differentiating between these two entities is important clinically because IAF is a benign tumor whereas GISTs frequently have malignant potential. In this study, the authors identified 13 cases of IAF with prominent involvement of the bowel wall as well as 35 GISTs of the small intestine, colon, or mesentery and analyzed their clinical, gross, histologic, immunophenotypic, and ultrastructural characteristics to identify important distinguishing features. Patients with IAF were younger (mean, 34 yrs) than patients with GIST (mean, 54 yrs). Both types of tumors tended to be large, but GISTs were soft and lobulated with hemorrhage, necrosis, or cystification whereas IAFs were firm, tan, and homogeneous. Histologic features characteristic of GIST included the presence of spindle or epithelioid cells with variable architecture, mitotic activity (range, <1-95 mitoses/50 high-power fields [hpf]; mean, 15 mitoses/50 hpf), nuclear atypia, and myxoid or hyalinized stroma. Necrosis and hemorrhage were seen in 16 and 25 tumors, respectively. In contrast, IAFs were composed of broad, sweeping fascicles of monotonous spindle cells with mitotic activity (range, <3-11 mitoses/50 hpf; mean, 4 mitoses/50 hpf), bland nuclear features, and finely collagenous stroma. Necrosis, hemorrhage, and myxoid degeneration were not seen. Immunohistochemical studies performed on a limited number of GISTs and IAFs demonstrated that cells expressed vimentin (100% GIST and IAF), CD117 (88% GIST and 75% IAF), CD34 (42% GIST and 0% IAF), smooth muscle actin (63% GIST and 75% IAF), muscle actin (75% GIST and 75% IAF), desmin (8% GIST and 50% IAF), and S-100 protein (16% GIST and 0% IAF). Ultrastructural analysis of 21 GISTs revealed incomplete smooth muscle differentiation in some tumors whereas IAFs were shown to have complete myofibroblastic/fibroblastic differentiation. Information regarding clinical outcome was available on 29 patients and revealed that three patients with histologically benign GISTs were alive with no evidence of disease at 5 months to 6 years (mean, 3.5 yrs) and one patient with a histologically benign tumor died of disease after 7 years. Of patients with histologically malignant GIST, one died of surgical complications, 10 were alive without disease at I to 13 years (mean, 5.4 yrs), four were alive with disease at 4 months to 15 years (mean, 3.8 yrs), three had disseminated disease at operation, and seven were dead of disease at 10 months to 3 years (mean, 2.2 yrs). Follow up of eight patients with IAF demonstrated that five were alive without disease at 4 months to 15 years (mean, 5.3 yrs) and three had recurrences at 1 (two patients) and 2 years (one patient). In summary, IAFs can have many features (large size, infiltration of adjacent structures, mitotic activity) that can cause diagnostic confusion with GISTs and, importantly, the degree of mitotic activity present in IAFs may overlap that seen in malignant GISTs. These entities can be distinguished primarily by their light microscopic and ultrastructural features but there is a notable overlap in their immunohistochemical profiles. The distinction between these neoplasms is important because there are important clinical implications for the patient.

College of American Pathologists Conference XXXV: solid tumor prognostic factors-which, how and so what? Summary document and recommendations for implementation. Cancer Committee and Conference Participants.

The College of American Pathologists convened a prognostic factor conference in June 1999 to consider prognostic and predictive factors in breast, colon, and prostate cancer, and to stratify these factors into categories reflecting the strength of published evidence. Because so little progress in prognostic factor clinical utility has been made in the last 5 years, the conference participants focused their attention on decreasing variation in methods, interpretation, and reporting of these factors so that greater clarity of value could be achieved. The conference was organized to promote discussion, broad input, and future planning. An initial plenary session provided an overview of the status of tumor marker research, the impact of variation in medicine and pathology, and statistical issues related to prognostic factor research. In working group sessions for each cancer type, participants interactively evaluated and refined the documents created by the expert panels. A second plenary session dealt with issues common to all 3 groups, including the problem of micrometastases in lymph nodes in these sites; statistical issues that arose during the breakout discussions; and issues of variation in methods, interpretation, and reporting of immunohistochemical assays. A faculty session brainstormed strategies that could be used to implement the changes recommended. This session included invited representatives of the Food and Drug Administration, Health Care Financing Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute, American Joint Committee on Cancer, and International Union Against Cancer. Cancer site and general recommendations were presented and discussed during a final session to achieve consensus of the conference participants and to address feasibility of implementation of these recommendations. A final discussion focused on future initiatives that might lead to implementation of the changes proposed in the conference by the various organizations represented. This report summarizes the general conference recommendations, cancer working group recommendations, and plans for implementation of the recommendations.

Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

BACKGROUND: Under the auspices of the College of American Pathologists, the current state of knowledge regarding pathologic prognostic factors (factors linked to outcome) and predictive factors (factors predicting response to therapy) in colorectal carcinoma was evaluated. A multidisciplinary group of clinical (including the disciplines of medical oncology, surgical oncology, and radiation oncology), pathologic, and statistical experts in colorectal cancer reviewed all relevant medical literature and stratified the reported prognostic factors into categories that reflected the strength of the published evidence demonstrating their prognostic value. Accordingly, the following categories of prognostic factors were defined. Category I includes factors definitively proven to be of prognostic import based on evidence from multiple statistically robust published trials and generally used in patient management. Category IIA includes factors extensively studied biologically and/or clinically and repeatedly shown to have prognostic value for outcome and/or predictive value for therapy that is of sufficient import to be included in the pathology report but that remains to be validated in statistically robust studies. Category IIB includes factors shown to be promising in multiple studies but lacking sufficient data for inclusion in category I or IIA. Category III includes factors not yet sufficiently studied to determine their prognostic value. Category IV includes factors well studied and shown to have no prognostic significance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical literature was critically reviewed, and the analysis revealed specific points of variability in approach that prevented direct comparisons among published studies and compromised the quality of the collective data. Categories of variability recognized included the following: (1) methods of analysis, (2) interpretation of findings, (3) reporting of data, and (4) statistical evaluation. Additional points of variability within these categories were defined from the collective experience of the group. Reasons for the assignment of an individual prognostic factor to category I, II, III, or IV (categories defined by the level of scientific validation) were outlined with reference to the specific types of variability associated with the supportive data. For each factor and category of variability related to that factor, detailed recommendations for improvement were made. The recommendations were based on the following aims: (1) to increase the uniformity and completeness of pathologic evaluation of tumor specimens, (2) to enhance the quality of the data needed for definitive evaluation of the prognostic value of individual prognostic factors, and (3) ultimately, to improve patient care. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Factors that were determined to merit inclusion in category I were as follows: the local extent of tumor assessed pathologically (the pT category of the TNM staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer [AJCC/UICC]); regional lymph node metastasis (the pN category of the TNM staging system); blood or lymphatic vessel invasion; residual tumor following surgery with curative intent (the R classification of the AJCC/UICC staging system), especially as it relates to positive surgical margins; and preoperative elevation of carcinoembryonic antigen elevation (a factor established by laboratory medicine methods rather than anatomic pathology). Factors in category IIA included the following: tumor grade, radial margin status (for resection specimens with nonperitonealized surfaces), and residual tumor in the resection specimen following neoadjuvant therapy (the ypTNM category of the TNM staging system of the AJCC/UICC). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Treatment of intrahepatic malignancy with radiofrequency ablation: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF)-induced tissue coagulation represents a new approach for the thermal destruction of tumors within the liver. The purpose of the current study was to 1) assess technique safety; 2) determine the extent and evolution of induced cellular damage; and 3) correlate the observed pathologic effects with radiologic studies. METHODS: Twenty-three tumors measuring 3 days after ablation showed definite, contiguous coagulative necrosis without intervening areas of viable tumor. CT and MRI scans demonstrated circumscribed hypodense, nonenhancing regions surrounding the electrode tract as early as 15 minutes after ablation. These corresponded within 2 mm to measurements of coagulation at pathology. CONCLUSIONS: RF ablation is a minimally invasive and safe approach to the treatment of tumors in the liver. Tumors treated with RF energy do not immediately demonstrate coagulative necrosis, but do show evidence of irreversible cellular damage. The extent of tumor necrosis correlates closely with findings at contrast-enhanced imaging.

Effect of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition on pancreatic cancer invasion and metastasis: an additive strategy for cancer control.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor, BB-94, on the viability, invasion, and metastases of pancreatic cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Inhibitors of MMPs, enzymes that degrade extracellular matrix, have been tested as single chemotherapeutic agents for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Capan1 and AsPC1 cell lines were studied. BB-94 cytotoxicity was evaluated by cell proliferation assays. Production of MMP2 and MMP9 in conditioned media was demonstrated by gelatin zymography. The in vitro effect of BB-94 on cell invasion was assayed using invasion chambers. Hepatic metastases from pancreatic cancer were induced by intrasplenic injections of Capan1 or AsPC1 cells in nude mice. The in vivo effect of BB-94 on liver metastases was evaluated by comparing animals receiving BB-94 treatment with controls receiving vehicle alone. Variables measured included death rate and tumor burden (liver-to-body weight ratio). RESULTS: BB-94 was not cytotoxic between 3 and 3,000 ng/mL. Zymography demonstrated production of MMP2 and MMP9 by both cell lines, with complete inhibition of these enzymes by BB-94 at 48 ng/mL. Invasion chamber assays showed that BB-94 (48-400 ng/mL) impeded cell invasion in vitro compared with untreated controls. In vivo, BB-94 prevented death or reduced the death rate from hepatic metastases in animals injected with Capan1 or AsPC1 cells. BB-94 treatment resulted in significant reductions in hepatic tumor burden compared with untreated controls. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of MMP reduces both growth of pancreatic cancer metastases and the death rate. These actions do not reflect cytotoxicity but rather result from impaired cancer cell attachment, migration, and organ invasion. MMP inhibitors may provide an additive effect to cytotoxic agents in multidimensional treatment regimens for pancreatic cancer.

High-resolution imaging of the human esophagus and stomach in vivo using optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography is a new, high spatial-resolution, cross-sectional imaging technique. We investigated the ability of optical coherence tomography to provide detailed images of subsurface structures in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography was performed during routine upper GI endoscopy on 32 patients including 20 patients with Barrett's esophagus. An endoscopic mucosal biopsy was obtained immediately after imaging and was used for histopathologic correlation. RESULTS: Optical coherence tomography provided clear delineation of layers of the normal human esophagus extending from the epithelium to the longitudinal muscularis propria. Gastric mucosa was differentiated from esophageal mucosa, Barrett's esophagus was differentiated from normal esophageal mucosa, and esophageal adenocarcinoma was distinguished from normal esophagus and Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Optical coherence tomography allows visualization of the subsurface architectural morphology of the upper GI tract. The diagnostic information provided by this new imaging modality suggests that it may be a useful adjunct to endoscopy.

Carcinoma of the anal canal.

Despite the rarity of carcinoma of the anal canal, remarkable progress has been achieved during the past 30 years in understanding its pathogenesis and improving treatment. Largely because of the rigorous collection of data and the treatment of patients in clinical trials, it is now widely accepted that the majority of cases are caused by human papillomavirus and can be cured by combination therapy. Concomitant treatment with external-beam radiation therapy and chemotherapy with fluorouracil and mitomycin represents the standard approach to combination treatment. Appropriate cytologic screening of high risk populations and the integration of platinum compounds into treatment regimens will most likely reduce mortality from this disorder even further.

Serous cystic tumors of the pancreas.

Serous cystic tumors of the pancreas are unique among pancreatic cystic neoplasms in that they are almost always cytologically monomorphous and biologically benign. The diagnostic challenge for the surgical pathologist is to recognize the spectrum of architectural variation that may lead to misdiagnosis, either preoperatively or postoperatively, and the additional lesions and conditions with which serous tumors may be associated.

Protocols for the examination of tumors of diverse sites: introduction. Cancer committee of the College of American Pathologists.

This issue of the Archives includes previously unpublished protocols for the examination of specimens removed from patients with cancer of diverse sites. We provide a historical context for the development of these protocols and describe the process of development and approval. General information about the structure and content of the protocols is also provided. Cancer protocol development is an important step in the process of standardized cancer reporting. The value of such standardized reporting is discussed.